We Fell for Sandy Hook, Line and Stinker

Active Search Results

Active Search Results
2
0



translation services

We Fell for Sandy Hook, Line and Stinker

By Timothy Spearman

How kindergarten killer stole his mother’s guns and shot her dead before murdering twenty children and six staff at her school until he finally turned the gun on himself,”reads the story byline of an article co-written by Rachel Quigley, Thomas Durante, and Hayley Paterson titled “High School Loner to Cold-blooded Executioner: How ‘Genius’ Honor Student Adam Lanza Became Masked Killer.” Interesting that the claim is made that Adam was masked. Is this so the alleged killer could not be properly identified? Is this because the actor playing the part of Adam was not meant to be identified?
So let’s get this straight, we are being asked to believe that a severely autistic patient could race through a school and go on a shooting rampage, in which with accuracy and with athletic skill, he guns done twenty children and six adults. What’s wrong with this picture, people? Are you so brain damaged by the thimerosol in the vaccines and the fluoridated water not to see through this farce?
Now let’s look at the media spin contained in all the bullet points from the Daily Mirror article found below:
The shooter, Adam Lanza, 20, is confirmed dead and body still inside the school
Brother Ryan, 24, is in custody and being questioned
One teacher said masked gunman started firing out shots from principal’s office and then his mom Nancy’s kindergarten classroom shortly after 9.30am
Mom was killed at home in Newtown, which was once voted one of America’s safest places to live
One student said there were bullets whizzing by him in the hallway
Female principal and school psychologist believed to have been targeted
Moved to tears, President Obama says ‘our hearts are broken today’
No positive IDs but parents who have not been reunited with their children are assuming the worst
Flags around America being flown at half staff
Bullet point one says that, “The shooter, Adam Lanza, 20, is confirmed dead and body still inside the school.” This is not considered hearsay evidence because the statement has supposedly come from official sources, namely police investigators who were purportedly stating what they found at the scene. But are these police sources truly reliable and can the authorities referred to be trusted to tell the truth about the Sandy Hook school shooting? The public take too much for granted and take vouchsafed statements given by authorities as rote or fact. In other words, the public is too naïve and unquestioning of the word of authorities.
Another bullet point states, “One teacher said masked gunman started firing out shots from principal’s office and then his mom Nancy’s kindergarten classroom shortly after 9.30am.” Again in clearly states that the alleged killer was masked. How then can anyone definitely state and be absolutely sure that the killer was Adam Lanza, when the alleged shooter was masked? In the security course I teach for the Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services of the Province of Ontario, I once had a student who was a retired police officer from Grenada. He was in court testifying as a prosecution witness against a suspect arrested in a crime. The defense brought in the suspect’s identical twin brother to show there was no definitive way the arresting officer could identify the suspect as the perpetrator, when his identical twin brother could have done it. He was asked to tell the two men apart and he couldn’t. The prosecution then summoned the twin brother of the police officer to court to show that not all twins look identical. The courtroom comedy was similar to Shakespeare’s “A Comedy of Errors” where to sets of twins confuse the audience by constantly being mistaken for the other.
Like the case with the identical twin, there is no absolute foolproof litmus test to establish that the masked man spotted at the scene was the same person supposedly identified by authorities as the killer Adam Lanza. We take too much for granted and do not ask enough questions. The reader might ask, but why would the authorities lie? One might just as easily ask, why wouldn’t or couldn’t they? They lie all the time. Politicians are noted for it. Police chiefs and police commissions are known for it. Governments practically make it their policy to lie to the people. Like the matriarchs or patriarchs of the family, they are the custodian of the national family’s secret and they keep these secrets from the younger generation by raising them on a diet of fairy tales in kindergarten and elementary school. We are still taught fairy tales in high school like George Washington’s apple tree and Ben Franklin’s homemade kite and lightning rod, but the fairy tales seem real and possible enough to be believed. Then there are the fairy tales of Lee Harvey Oswald, Timothy McVeigh and Osama bin Laden and other so-called villains of our history who perpretrated crimes, which the record shows couldn’t have been pulled off by one lone madman, but the government , the media and the academia continue to support the lie. And as Goebbels said, “Repeat a lie often enough and people will believe it.” And they do.
No look at the media spin on this bullet point: “Mom was killed at home in Newtown, which was once voted one of America’s safest places to live.” No the tranquility of this peaceful Connecticut town has been shattered. What’s the effect of the scaremongery of the peace and tranquility of a peaceful rural town being shattered by alleged gun violence? In the public mind or the public psyche, no place can now be considered safe. Alleged gun violence is now so far reaching that it has even infiltrated the serene rural heartland of the nation. Now Diane Feinstein has the perfect excuse to introduce draconian gun laws upon America. Dianne Goldman Berman Feinstein, born Dianne Emiel Goldman is the senior United States Senator from California. I would just bet she has Ashkenazi roots and is actually Khazarian by racial extraction and that her ancestors were Baal-worshipping Satanists. She and her supporters will naturally scoff at that accusation and make their usual round of denials and may even hurl the usual accusation of anti-semitism when I am not saying anything about or against ‘Jews’. I specifically said she is not one and is Khazarian by extraction. How therefore is that anti-semitic when the Khazars are originally from the Caususes and are not Semites?
Now look at the media spin on this bullet point: “Moved to tears, President Obama says ‘our hearts are broken today’”. Those were corocodile tears folks. The president is following a script. Like T.S. Eliot wrote in his poem “The Hollow Men”, “We are the stuffed men, we are the hollow men.” There is nothing they do that is not scripted. The same goes for the media spokespeople and commentators. And as will later be shown, the six-year-old daughter of Robbie Parker, who was supposedly gunned down by the ruthless homicidal maniac, was later photographed sitting on the president’s knee one day after the shooting. How many people noticved that? How many people care? The youth know and share details they find on youtube back and forth on social media sites like Facebook, but most of the older generation are too busy or too preoccupied to look and have been acculturated into a social environment based on denial, and since they are anxious to keep their jobs and social circles and not have a falling out with their friends, these insecure, quivering wrecks who have never grown up and continue to try to win the same popularity contest they won at the prom, they keep mum and not only don’t speak out, but won’t even listen to their teenage ‘conspircy theorist’. Instead they pass it off as some harmless and quaint teenage pastime that their rebellious teenager will grow out of. And they’re right, they will grow out of it if they know what’s good for them. Because the only way to have a good income and a top job is by being an intellectual sellout and prostitute and most of these smart alecks of the spoiled rich will grow up to be just like their spoiled parents, opportunists who know the truth but make witty disparaging comments about “truthers” and “conspiracy nuts” because they prefer to sellout their integrity for the Ivy League education, the BMW, the golf club membership, and the commoradorie of palling around with their fellow hypocrites.
Miss Quigley introduces are lone nutter killer with the following information, “A troubled 20-year-old loner with a history of autistic behavior is the monster behind a horrific shooting at a Connecticut elementary school that left 26 people, including 20 children, dead.” If it were true that he was a victim of severe autism, then calling him a monster wouldn’t be right, since it would be the mental illness or the side effects of the medications he was on that would drive him to commit such an odious crime, but all we have is attempts by the media to depict this so-called autistic patient as being responsible for actions so unconscionably heinous as to beggar belief.
Miss Quigley would then have us believe that a severely autistic patient would have the hand-eye coordination – while being severely autistic – to go on a shooting spree to gun down everyone and sundry at a school facility. “Adam Lanza shot his mother Nancy, a kindergarten teacher, at the upscale suburban home they shared together and then took three of her guns and drove the Dandy Hook Elementary School about 9.30am,” writes Quigley. We’re being asked to believe that a severely autistic patient could wield three guns with skill and dexterity and gun down twenty-six people with precision. As we will discover, “severe autism” would ender the subject so challenged in terms of motor skills and motor response that they’d be lucky to walk as straight a line as a drunkard, and yet this is the young man the press would have us believe went on a shooting rampage while running down school hallways like an Olympic athlete.

Quigley prattles on with more nonsense that no sensible person could possibly believe, alleging that, “He used two semi-automatic pistols, a Glock and Sig Sauer, and reportedly wiped out an entire classroom of young children and shot several in a second class before taking his own life.” Right, so a severely autistic individual could weild a Glock and Sig Sauer with the dexterity of a hired killer and slaughter an entire classroom full of students. This the orchestration of a young man whose motor skills would have challenged him to even walk properly, let alone aim a gun.
“Witnesses saw he Lanza going from room-to-room shooting people after first killing the principal Dawn Hochsprung and psychologist execution-style after they confronted him in the hallway,” Miss Quigley claims. Would you care to identify these witnesses, Miss Quigley? Names please. Who are they and can they give direct evidence to the effect in court? You haven’t identified the witnesses, and I submit that at this point it is the most useless form of hearsay evidence.

“Parents who have not been united with their children are assuming the worst,” Quigley continues. “One witness told WCBS: ‘Police just told us everyone presumed missing is in the school and they are dead.’” Is that a fact? Police would never tell distraught parents such a thing. The police department could be sued for making such statements. On top of that there is the bold insensitivity of the remark, in which we are asked to believe that police would callously state that if you’re child is missing, then he must be at ths school and presumed dead. Are you kidding me? No police spokesperson would ever make so irresponsible a comment. And once again, the police are not being quoted by Quigley directly, but based on the hearsay of an unnamed witness ostensibly making the statement in a WCBS interview.

sandy 1

 

Ryan Lanza is seen being led away from his Hoboken home in New Jersey to be questioned by police

sandy 2

Traumatized students were seen being led out of the school crying and holding hands. Traumatized? You could fool me. They look like they’re participating in a drill. The expressions on their faces display no sign of trauma.

sandy 3

The families of victims grieve near Sandy Hook Elementary School, where teacher Nancy Lanza’s son Adam, 20, opened fire and killed 20 children and six adults. Crisis actors? The men don military crewcuts. Which government alphabet soup agency are they working for? The one crisis actor looks up to see if God’s watching over them. Please.

sandy 4

President Obama openly wept today as he spoke of the mindless shooting of 29 people, including 22 children, at Sandy Hook Elementary school this morningsaying, ‘Our hearts are broken today’. Good job Mr. Pres. Where’s the onion? Did you tuck it in your breast pocket?

 

sandy 5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

sandy 6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Heavily armed Connecticut State troopers and FBI agents swarmed to the scene

at Sandy Hook High School. Of course, because there was a pre-planned and coordinated practice emergency drill exercise being held at the location the morning of the alleged shooting,so they would naturally be there, all suited up.

sandy 7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

People arrive for a prayer vigil at the Newtown United Methodist Church following a shooting at the Sandy Hook Elementary School. Right and when was this picture taken? Several weeks beforehand? Is it even a church in Newtown?

sandy 8

 

The design of this so-called school alleged to Sandy Hook Elementary School strikingly resembles the design ot the Temple of Solomon, which actually represented a man kneeling in prayer, with the Holy of Holies representing the head, while the twin pillars at the other end of the Temple represented the praying individual kneeling in prayer. There are no pillars in the school complex design, but there is definitely a building resembling a head built into the complex, while the parking lot design resembles a kneeling man.
A TROUBLED LONER
“Ryan Lanza’s high school classmates always knew something was different about him,” Rachel Quigley’s article goes on. This is hearsay evidence and worthless. This is yellow journalism at its best. Adam may have the worst reputation in the world for temper tantrums. It does not prove he was capable of gunning down twenty children and six adults in a shooting spree. According to Wikipedia, “An estimated 60%–80% of autistic people have motor signs that include poor muscle tone, poor motor planning, and toe walking; deficits in motor coordination are pervasive across ASD and are greater in autism proper.” (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autism) Since article after article appearing in the mainstream press have alleged that Adam Lanza was serverely autistic, it must be concluded that he would fall into the sixty to eighty percent ratio of autistic patients with poor motor skills and motor responses. And yet we’re being asked to believe that with athletic prowess he was able to dash down the hallways of the school carrying multiple guns on his person, and engage in a Rambo-style killing spree all within record time. The stench of bullshit is so rife I might as well be standing in a pile of steaming manure on a pig farm.
“He almost never spoke in class, but made good grades and was an honors student. And he always seemed profoundly uncomfortable in social situations,” Miss Quigley prattles on. More worthless hearsay and journalism yellow enough to take the piss, sorry miss. It is like the public is being programmed to by the lie. Miss Quigley’s efforts to persuade us seem disningenuous at best and downright cynically misguided by the media spin she has been assigned to perform at worst, and for my money, I favour the latter possibility as the most probable.

“It was widely understood that he had mental disabilities – either Asperger syndrome or more severe autism,” Miss Quigley aledges. Miss Quigley clearly doesn’t know which. Again, these are allegations she is taking on board without doing the least bit of investigative journalism to find out which illness he had “Asperger syndrome” or “severe autism”. This is not journalism. This is being given a bunch of wire stories and taking the information as given without subjecting any of it to the least scrutiny.

“A former babysitter told the Washington Post he was ‘rambunctious’ as a teenager and prone to temper tantrums,” writes Miss Quigley. More useless hearsay I’m afraid, dear. What child isn’t rambunctious when being babysat and when told to go to bed doesn’t throw a temper fit, especially when there are no parents around to discipline them and the can get away with it?

“He had to be medicated to control his moods,” Miss Quigley claims without the facts, but only hearsay allegations. Would you care to tell us then what type of medication he was on? Perhaps if we knew that, we might understand how it could be possible that such a “severely autistic” person might have developed a homicidal alter ego capable of pulling off a tragedy of this scale. If anyone would care to see an example of a homicidal alter ego experiencing adverse side effects of an experimental drug, check out the film Bipolar, based on the true story of Harry, who became alter ego serial killer Edward.

“Olivia DeVivo, a student at the University of Connecticut who went to high school with Lanza, said that when it emerged that he was suspected of gunning down twenty small children – none of her classmates were surprised,” Miss Quigley writes, giving us one more useless shred of useless hearsay information. “They said he always seemed like he was someone who was capable of that because he just didn’t really connect with our high school, and didn’t really connect with our town,’ she told the New York Times,” Miss DeVivo is quoted as saying. He may have had the worst reputation in the world, but this is worthless hearsay, that does nothing to implicate him in the crime. Who saw him commit” El flagrant delicto or “finds committing” is the most rudimentary aspect of common law, for the direct evidence provided by a witness who sees someone do something is the only really reliable evidence one can turn to in a criminal case of this kind.

But it gets better. Miss Quigley then informs us how: “Students described being ushered from their classrooms hand-in-hand, with their eyes closed, to the safety of a nearby fire station as police converged on the school.” Interesting that the pupils, not students, were marched in a human chain with their eyes closed ostensibly to protect them from witnessing something traumitizing. Right, so it wouldn’t be traumatizing to be forced to close your eyes when you’re terrified of some armed boogieman being in the vicinity, who could spring out at you at any moment, while you have your eyes closed.
“Adam’s brother Ryan, 24, who was originally thought to have been the shooter, is being questioned by police after he was arrested at his home in Hoboken, New Jersey,” Miss Quigley informs us. Right, so now we are back to our example of the identical twin brother in the courtroom. If you’ll recall, the defense was able to show that there was no way the police officer could definitively identify the suspect in the crime, because he looked identical to his twin brother. Well, if Adam Lanza, the alleged killer, was masked, how could anyone be sure it was him who did the killing? And if he shot himself at the scene of the school shooting, his body would have been recovered inside the school. So how, pray tell, could the police have mistaken his brother as the shooter if the suspect had been properly identified at the scene and found inside the school? Is it just me or are there a series of logical fallacies in the official story that don’t pass the smell test and smack of bullshit instead?

“He was on a bus on his way home from work when he was being named as the gunman and posted on Facebook that it wasn’t him,” according to Miss Quigley. “He told a friend he believed his mentally disabled brother did it. Adam is believed to be autistic.” Would you care to identify the alleged friend that brother Ryan purportedly said this to please, Miss Quigley? I’m afraid all I am seeing is a number of purported cases of he said and she said hearsay allegations without any documented support, any official source named or any witness names provided. What amazes me is that this article is written be a supposedly respected journalist who actually collects a paycheck for journalism so yellow it compels me to take the piss.

Another relative told ABC Adam had been ‘obviously not well’ and Beth Israel, tonight tweeted that her daughter went to school with him and he was ‘troubled for a long time’. Beth Israel eh? Hmmm, since when are there so many people of Jewish extraction living in Newtown, Connecticut? And is she a Zionist agent or Israeli Mossad? Then Miss Quigley informs us that “Alex Israel spoke to CNN about how she went to school with Adam and she described him as fidgety, and a quiet loner who kept to himself.” I see. And so is this alleged child of Beth Israel making these suggestions about Adam because it is scripted by the Zionist press that he should say these things, because his Zionist agent mother has coached him to? Then Miss Quigley sguotes Alex: “She also said he was a highly intelligent student, ‘above the rest of us’.” Well, I won’t argue with you there, honey. None of you frauds have your lightbulbs turned on brightly enough to pull of the con you have attempted to pull on the American people so that Zionist agent Feinstein could do a fine job of setting America up for martial law by imposing gun control legislation on Americans. And now Feinstein is doing a fine job of getting America ready for the staged Ebola pandemic right on cue. She’s following her precoordinated script to the letter. She’s so obviously an agent of Israel and its planned conspiracy to take down and destroy the United States to implement the next stage in the Zionist New World Order agenda that you would have to be braindead not to see it. And sadly due to vaccine poisoning and fluoridated water many Americans clearly are. God bless America indeed.

The gunman’s father Peter Lanza, who is divorced from his wife, lives in Stamford, Connecticut, and declined to comment after police performed a welfare check on him, Miss Quigley informs us. Neighbors claimed he recently remarried. Mr. Lanza is supposed to have learned of the tragic and senseless massacre by reporters who flocked to his home, according to Miss Quigley, but is that really true? Peter Lanza was actually connected to the Libor case, as we will learn later in the book thanks to the sleuthing work of George Freund, a former Peel Region police officer here in Ontario, Canada and my former radio show co-host.
According to Quigley, Peter Lanza arrived shortly after police left and asked what the problem was. Asked what the problem was? Are you trying to convince us that he had not caught any wind of the situation before arriving? Quigley reports that according to the Stamford Connecticut, his expression shifted from patient to surprise to horror. Why are the media emphasizing the father’s surprise at hearing the news so much? Are they trying to cover up the fact that he already knew because he was part of the planning committee for the entire operation, because he too is a Zionist agent? Methinhks they doth protest too much. And once again, Miss Quigley repeats the same mantra about Newtown’s previous state of tranquility, “Newtown was once named one of the safest places to live in America and before this morning, there had been one murder in a decade.” Why the constant emphasis on the town’s former peacefulness if not to make middle America feel insecure that their security is being threatened? This constantly beaten media drum is meant to drum into the average American’s head the need for gun control legislation. If brainwashed to believe that their children are no longer safe, they will willingly give up their Second Amendment gun rights and hand over their guns to the authorities. But as the Boston Marathon Bombing showed, how will this reduce gun violence when police and military personnel came door to door in Boston, demanding at gunpoint that people vacate their own homes so they could do a house to house search? And this is reducing gun violence? Apparently the government’s motto is “Do as we say, not as we do.”

Miss Quigley continues the media spin under the instructions of her spin doctors at New World Order Zionist minion Rupert Murdock’s rag with, “The President addressed a stunned nation five hours after the shooting and openly wept as he spoke of the mindless shooting saying: ‘Our hearts are broken today.’ Seldom has a head of state expressed greater public emotion in modern times.” Violins please. Play a nice somber tune like the one played on the Titanic, would you?

Quigley, then informs us, “Obama struggled for words, pausing several times as he wiped away tears saying, ‘This evening, Michelle and I will…hug our children a little tighter, and we’ll tell them that we love them.’” Such shameless pandering to emotion could only be possible in America, where the median education level is grade seven. The population is so patently ignorant that it is childplay to dupe a population that views All Star Wrestling as worth pablum.
Now check out these tweets by a probable Zionist Mossad agent and her well trained daughter. Daughter Alex’s second tweet is so obviously prompted and scripted as to be laughable: “If anyone knows Mr. Stephen Delguidice, he’s doing a great job on CBS right now. Very well spoken. Glad his daughter is safe.” Right, a elementary school pupil is going to comment on how articulate an adult is. Please. I have heard of precocious but not even the brats on American sitcoms are portrayed as that precocious.

sandy beth

Beth Israel tweeted that shooter Adam Lanza was troubled for a long time. Troubled? What does she mean by that precisely? Autistic people are not known for violence. The word ‘troubled’ simply suggests a bias or prejudice towards a person with a mental condition. There is no established scientific link between being a ‘troubled’ autism patient and violent homicidal tendencies. Why is this pathetic hearsay gossip being shared with the public like this? It is astounding that msalltown gossip passes as news and information in this dumbed down, intellectually challenged population of Americans. She also claims that her family lived six houses away from Adam. Not so. That’s a lie. Whose lie is it? Nancy’s or CIA Operation Mockingbird style CIA spin doctors? Let’s face it the Daily Mirror is getting its information from the spin doctors in the States and just recycling it.

sandy 11

 

Jacob Wycoff also tweeted that Adam was autistic. Here’s another probable Israeli Mossad agent. Let’s put it this way, people who use Old Testament names as their given names are not commonly Christians. “Jacob” is an Old Testament Biblical name as anyone with the most basic religious education can tell you. “Wycoff” is a commonly used surname of crypto-Ashkenazis or should I say crypto-Khazarians, who are actually Satanists – formerly known as Baal-worshippers – pretending to be Jews.
Accordint to Quigley’s article, Adam is described as, “…carrying three weapons including two handguns and a rifle and was wearing a bullet-proof vest, a mask and black military gear.” Where pray tell would an autistic patient acquire military gear and why? Additionally, why would he wear a mask? Since he committed suicide, we can only deduce that he planned the suicide along with the homicides. Why would he then need to disguise himself? The only reason for donning a disguise would be to conceal your identity in the hope of escaping accountability and not being caught. If the official story has even a grain or kernel of truth, then he clearly did not intend to come out of the school alive and is reported to have shot himself following his killing spree. Why therefore would a disguise be necessary? The deployment of a disguise suggests that the identity of the alleged gunman had to be concealed because it was not Adam Lanza, but the public obviously was not to know that fact.

 

sandy 12

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Alex Israel, pictured, told Piers Morgan that Adam Lanza was a loner who kept to himself. Of course, what else would she say, being the daughter of a government agent and probably being one herself? Piers Morgan was so obviously a government shill imported from Britain to serve the gun-confiscation lobby, which was nothing short of shamefully transparent.
From Miss Quigley’s article, we learn that, “Three guns were found at the scene – a Glock and a Sig Sauer, both pistols – and a .223-caliber rifle.” Yet she goes on to suggest, “The rifle was recovered from the back of a car at the school. The two pistols were recovered from inside the school.” How interesting. Why would the shooter bring along three guns to the scene of the crime only to leave one in lockup in the car? He is reported to have taken his own life inside the school, so there is no possibility that he came out to put one of the guns away in the car trunk at any stage of the operation. We are also led to believe that all the guns “were legally registered to Nancy Lanza,” the shooter’s mother.
Miss Quigley goes on to report, “A number of children were found hiding in closets in the school five hours after the shooting.” Five hours after the shooting? Are we to believe that rambunctious children could be kept as quiet as church mice for five hours so that investigators, police and other emergency management personnel were not even aware of their presence in the building? Are we to believe that a group of children could be made to stay quiet for that length of time while remaining hidden in the dark for five hours? Miss Quigley goes on to report that, “One mother told CBS that her child said there were bullets ‘whizzing by’ him in the hallway and that a teacher pulled him into a classroom. It was said to have been like a ‘war zone’.” But all the student killings were supposed to have taken place inside two classrooms. Why therefore were shots being fired in the hallway when the victims were all said to be within a classroom. It doesn’t make sense that the shooter would simply shoot randomly without any targets, emptying his magazines forcing him to reload. This makes no sense as with most of the patent lies invented in this report.

And low and behold, what do we find but that Mayor Bloomberg, another Ashkenazi with Baal-worshipping Khazarian roots makes a plea for gun control legislation, so Americans can be rendered defenceless before the Zionist-led martial law executive order is passed by the presidential puppet of the New World Order. Quigley writes, “Mayor Bloomberg said…that immediate action must be taken over gun laws in the U.S. He said: ‘We heard after Columbine that it was too soon to talk about gun laws. We heard it after Virginia Tech. After Tucson and Aurora and Oak Creek. And now we are hearing it again.’” Why are we hearing from a New York Mayor about something happening in another state? The answer to that is that it suits the agenda. His scripted comments fit right into the Zionist New World Order plot to take down America in a final takedown where the country is meant to go down for the count. Ayor Bloomberg then added, “For every day we wait, 34 more people are murdered with guns. Today, many of them were five-year olds. President Obama rightly sent his heartfelt condolences to the families in Newtown. But the country needs him to send a bill to Congress to fix this problem. Calling for ‘meaningful action’ is not enough. We need immediate action.” The ‘country’ needs to send a message to Congress to fix the problem? Where does he get off speaking for the ‘country’? He is speaking for himself and the Zionist lobby and putting a spin on the language to make it seem that it the American people that are making this “call to action”. This is nothing but cynical opportunism disguised as concern for one’s fellow citizens. The New York Mayor doesn’t consider Americans his fellow citizens. That is because he is an agent of a foreign power. It doesn’t really matter which nation, but it is well known that a certain nation has managed to control America’s foreign and domestic policy. We know well which nation that is. Is it racist and ani-semitic to name that country? To the Zionist-controlled press it will be of course. To the Anti-defamation League it will be of course. To Binai Brith it will be of course. But to thinking people living in a so-called democracy that guarantees freedom of speech by virtue of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, it is our God-given right to speak out. Is it hate speech to speak out against genocide and hate? In the end, these criminals will turn on the Jewish people they pretend to be, but are not because they are Satanists. Like the so-called killer at Sandy Hook, they are wearing a mask that says they are Jewish when they are not, and they are doing a disservice to the God-fearing Jewish people by pretending to be among their flock.

sandy 13

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ryan Lanza, brother of Sandy Hook Elementary mass shooting suspect Adam Lanza, is seen being led away by cops, left, and in photos pulled from his Facebook page. Another Zionist Mossad agent like Dad playing his part in the Sandy Hook false flag terror operation.

sandy 14

A U.S. flag flies at half staff in front of the Reed Intermediate School in Newtown, Connecticut. Why not go all the way with the false flag terror operation by lowering the American flag to half mast, in a further effort to dupe the American people into believing that Sandy Hook really happened and that real people actually died that day.

sandy 15

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A couple comfort each other after the mass shooting. Principal Dawn Hochsprung is said to have been one of the twenty-six who were shot dead at the school. Really? This book is intended to show that that is a lie.

sandy 16

Music teacher Maryrose Kristopik, circled, has been hailed as a hero after taking 15 children and putting them in a closet, undoubtedly saving their lives. She is credited with stowing them in the closet of the music room, where they supposedly stayed for five hours. Later reports indicate Adam was hammering on the door of the closet where they were hiding. Why did he not hammer on the closet door with bullets if he was really there? Are we to believe the sloset doors were impregnable to bullets?

sandy 17

Adam Sanza shot his mother at her home before driving in her car to the elementary school and shooting dead 26 people before turning the gun on himself. The caption above says “Home of the shooters parents.” Adam’s parents were separated. How can it therefore be the home of his ‘parents’, when it is his mother’s home?

sandy 18

Sandy Hook Elementary School is in Newtown, Connecticut, where Nancy Lanza lived. Their son Ryan lives in Hoboken, New Jersey. It seems that father Peter wasn’t keen on having the disabled son with him, but apparently preferred son Ryan to be with him instead.

sandy 19

A woman waits to hear about her sister, a teacher, following the tragic shooting this morning which has shocked the quiet suburban community.

sandy 20

Chaotic scenes at the school as police work to secure the area and bodies are carried out of the school. Bodies are carried out of the school? Really? Would you care to point out the bodies? One stretcher is completely empty and the other three are full of equipment like emergency first aid kits and there are no bodies to be seen anywhere.

sandy 21

Young children wait outside Sandy Hook Elementary School after a shooting in Newtown, Connecticut. Wait outside the school in the woods? Is this to be believed? A homicidal lunatic was supposedly on the loose just a few minutes before and these children are left hiding in a wooded area near the school but yet a photo journalist was conveniently able to find them and photograph them. How convenient. Sandy Hook has all the hallkarks of a false flag terror event.

sandy 22

Parents leave a staging area after being reunited with their children following a shooting at the Sandy Hook Elementary School. Note that is says ‘parents’ in reference to the photo shown above. And yet we see only one parent walking with his child. Are these two of the crisis actors participating in the drill exercise held that morning?

sandy 23

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

People gather outside the White House to participate in a candle light vigil to remember the victims at the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting in Newtown, Connecticut. Right on cue, participants all calling for gun control lesgislation. I thought they were just there to hold a candle light vigil to mourn the dead, but the media can’t skip a beat in politicizing the so-called vigil by having the signs displaying the call to action. One sign reads, “Today is the day”, while the other is addressed to the president “Mr. President, We are praying for your action.” Both messages are carefully scripted to not seem too opportunistic in the call for gun control legislation.
‘IT’S TIME FOR IMMEDIATE ACTION’ SAYS MAYOR BLOOMBERG
Miss Quigley’s article then repeats the call to action of Mayor Bloomberg. Why do we need to hear the call again? This article absolutely reeks of propaganda and media spin. In fact, it is so shmaless in its effort to indoctrinate that it puts North Korea to shame.
‘We heard after Columbine that it was too soon to talk about gun laws. We heard it after Virginia Tech. After Tucson and Aurora and Oak Creek. And now we are hearing it again.

For every day we wait, 34 more people are murdered with guns. Today, many of them were five-year-olds.

President Obama rightly sent his heartfelt condolences to the families in Newtown. But the country needs him to send a bill to Congress to fix this problem.

Calling for “meaningful action” is not enough. We need immediate action.’
-Mayor Bloomberg
Miss Quigley jumps on the bandwagon to condemn the apparent crime, making sure to remind her audience of the young age of the victims: “The shooting is the latest in a series of high-profile gun crimes in American schools and colleges, that is especially shocking given the age of the students involved.”
Miss Quigley then describes the arrest of the so-called killer’s brother, “At Ryan Lanza’s home in Hoboken, New Jersey, around 20 armed state police could be seen coming out of the house having apparently searched it at around 3pm.” She then reveals that, “Ryan was then led out in cuffs. He had earlier taken to Facebook to dispel rumors that he was the shooter and told a friend he believed it was his mentally disabled brother.” If he had made this post on Facebook, why would the police then subject him to a wrongful arrest? It makes no sense. The first thing they would do is check out all social media sites connected to a suspect. Having scene the post, they would then take him in for questioning rather than arrest him. And if his brother was found dead at the scene of the shooting, they would surely have been able to identify him at the scene as the killer and would not have to undertake a manhunt for a second suspect. Please someone explain this madness to me, because from where I am sitting, the lunatics have taken over the asylum.
Then Miss Quigley makes the remarkable claim, “A parent told MailOnline Lanza battered on a closet where 15 children and their music teacher were locked inside shouting: ‘Let me in! Let me in!’ These are hardly the words of a gun-wielding homicidal maniac. They are more the words of someone who is afraid for his own life and wishes to hide along with them. If he was the actual perp, and the testimony were bona fide, why would he not simply spray the closet with gunfire and kill everyone hidden inside?

The mother, in her 40s, who declined to give her name, praised the quick-thinking actions of Maryrose Kristopik: ‘I want to thank my child’s music teacher. She saved their lives. The shooter kept banging on the door screaming: “Let me in! Let me in!” but he didn’t get in. Now I have to explain to my nine-year-old son that his friends won’t be coming back. How am I supposed to do that?’ Right, so the shooter, who supposedly gunned down all the kids in one classroom, and half the kids in another classroom, supposedly shouts for people hiding in a closet “Let me in!” when he is supposed to be armed with two assault weapons capable of turning the closet doors into swiss cheese and riddling everyone inside with bullet holes. Can anyone see the inconsistencies here or is it just me? And I’m a conspiracy theorist. Right. No, I’ve got just got an inquiring mind, which most readers of the mainstream press, who never look at the alternative press, seem not to have, otherwise how could they possibly by this nonsensical, logically fallacious bullshit?

sandy 24

 

 

 

 

 

A boy weeps as he is told what happened after being picked up at Reed Intermediate

sandy 25

School following the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting. Wait a second. This kid doesn’t know these kids and doesn’t even attend Sandy Hook, but is a student of Reed Intermediate School, and we’re asked to believe that he’s so moved by what happened to kids he doesn’t know and never even met that he is going to burst into tears worse than those he cried over the death of his pet rabbit? Right, happens everyday. Kids all over the nation are weeping for the poor victims of Snady Hook.

sandy 26th

 

A woman talks to a state police officer for news about the 29 people believed to have been shot dead at the school. 29 people? I thought it was 26. Was the original plan for there to be 29 fake victims of Sandy Hook only to have the actual number change to 26? Interesting that 26 victims were mentioned previously in the article.

sandy 27th

Nancy Lanza’s home in Newtown, Connecticut, was raided after 2pm…and the teacher was found shot dead, allegedly from a gunshot to the face. Poor Nancy. Suuposedly her house was located on a street where there were supposed to be other homes, yet this photo shows a house next to some woods on one side with no sign of neighboring lots on the other side.

 

sandy 28th

 

 

Nancy Lanza was divorced from Peter Lanza who lives in Stamford, Connecticut. Remember the map showing Adam’s parents’ home? But alas the couple are no longer a couple. It is Nancy’s home, not shared with Peter. Peter lives in a different town. The inconsistencies in this article are glaring. Miss Quigley, darling, you need an editor. Oh, I forgot, you have one, woops.

Miss Quigley then recounts the suppsed testimony of other witnesses, “Alberta Bajraliu 41, got a call from a friend who heard a gunshot at the school and told her to check it out. Mrs. Alberta’s nine-year-old daughter Venesa was at the school but her two other children are not. She said: ‘I was one of the first there and they were bringing children out, carrying them out. One girl came out and her face was covered in blood and she had bits of meat from other people in her hair. It was terrible.’ No, you’re not seeing things. A mother of four children is really going to say something so insensitive to the press as “she had bits of meat from other people in her hair.” This is not the words of a mother, but those of a low empathy psychopath working for the intelligence services drafting a fictional script for the media that completely lacks any verisimilitude. No mother would ever say anything remotely like this, especially in reference to child victims in a shooting. Please, stop with the lies and the bullshit already.  Miss Quigley then quotes Miss Bajraliu further, a mother who is nevertheless referred to as Miss in the article. Am I Missing something? Miss Bajraliu purportedly said, ‘Another girl just looked shocked. They brought one girl out and I thought it was my daughter. They asked me: ‘Does she have black trousers?’ and I said no as Venesa had jeans. This begs the question, why would she think it was her daughter, when the girl in question was not wearing jeans as she apparently knew her daughter was? Miss Bajraliu supposedly continued, ‘When I saw her I just felt so relieved. She has not spoken much about what happened. She said she was in an art class and the teacher closed the door and they were waiting until they could get out.’ Interesting that Miss Bajraliu, a wedded mother Miss, has a traumatized daughter who she can’t get to say much about the shooting, but still managed to prize out of her the fact that she was supposedly in an art class at the time and the teacher ‘closed’ the door, not closed and locked, but merely closed the door? And there is supposedly an armed gunman out in the hallway and ‘they were waiting till they get out’. There is no mention of being ordered to hide under their desks, nor is there any reference to the state of trauma and fear, but merely that they were waiting till they could get out. The child’s alleged testimony makes it sound more like the children were being made to participate in a drill exercise as opposed to responding to a real emergency.

A PRESIDENT BREAKS DOWN AS ‘HEARTS ARE BROKEN’: OBAMA’S 

SPEECH IN FULL

sandy 29

 

And now for the coup de grace. What better way to end a cynical piece of propaganda than to quote the president and his call to action on gun confiscation legislation.

Right on cue.

 

“This afternoon, I spoke with Governor Malloy and FBI Director Mueller. I offered Governor Malloy my condolences on behalf of the nation, and made it clear he will have every single resource that he needs to investigate this heinous crime, care for the victims, counsel their families.

We’ve endured too many of these tragedies in the past few years. And each time I learn the news I react not as a President, but as anybody else would — as a parent. And that was especially true today. I know there’s not a parent in America who doesn’t feel the same overwhelming grief that I do.  The majority of those who died today were children — beautiful little kids between the ages of five and ten years old.  They had their entire lives ahead of them — birthdays, graduations, weddings, kids of their own. Among the fallen were also teachers — men and women who devoted their lives to helping our children fulfill their dreams.

So our hearts are broken today — for the parents and grandparents, sisters and brothers of these little children, and for the families of the adults who were lost.  Our hearts are broken for the parents of the survivors as well, for as blessed as they are to have their children home tonight, they know that their children’s innocence has been torn away from them too early, and there are no words that will ease their pain.  As a country, we have been through this too many times. Whether it’s an elementary school in Newtown, or a shopping mall in Oregon, or a temple in Wisconsin, or a movie theater in Aurora, or a street corner in Chicago — these neighborhoods are our neighborhoods, and these children are our children.

 

(Echoes of Martin Luther King Jr.’s speech “I Have a Dream”: “Go back to Mississippi, go back to Alabama, go back to South Carolina, go back to Georgia, go back to Louisiana, go back to the slums and ghettos of our northern cities, knowing that somehow this situation can and will be changed.” Or how about: “And so let freedom ring from the prodigious hilltops of New Hampshire. Let freedom ring from the mighty mountains of New York. Let freedom ring from the heightening Alleghenies of Pennsylvania. Let freedom ring from the snow-capped Rockies of Colorado. Let freedom ring from the curvaceous slopes of California.” Far be it for me to accuse the President of plagiarism. He doesn’t write his own speeches anyway.) And we’re going to have to come together and take meaningful action to prevent more tragedies like this, regardless of the politics.

This evening, Michelle and I will do what I know every parent in America will do, which is hug our children a little tighter and we’ll tell them that we love them, and we’ll remind each other how deeply we love one another.  But there are families in Connecticut who cannot do that tonight. And they need all of us right now. In the hard days to come, that community needs us to be at our best as Americans. And I will do everything in my power as President to help. Because while nothing can fill the space of a lost child or loved one, all of us can extend a hand to those in need — to remind them that we are there for them, that we are praying for them, that the love they felt for those they lost endures not just in their memories but also in ours.

May God bless the memory of the victims and, in the words of Scripture, heal the brokenhearted and bind up their wounds.”

 

Indeed his words are as disingenuous in intent in being spoken by the President actor as they were when they were scripted and written by the speech writer working for the CIA who wrote the propaganda garbage in the first place.

 

sandy 30

Hundreds of officers swarmed the building as students were evacuated after a gunman went from classroom to classroom shooting students and teachers. Hundreds of police officers? Really hundreds? Would you care to point them out to me in any of these media file photos?

 

sandy 31

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

sandy 32

 

 

 

 

A mother runs with her children as police canvass homes in the area following a shooting at the Sandy Hook Elementary School. There walking uphill. The heavy steps result from the uphill climb. A mother running with an infant child held with only one arm, while she reaches with a free hand for the other child’s hand? Not likely. And another comforts her traumatized child, a male child, while the female child is ignored and left standing there? What’s wrong with this picture?

sandy 33

A black Honda believed to belong to the shooter has been cordoned off.

sandy 34

 

There are preliminary reports a students father, who is believed to be 20-years-old and from New Jersey, was the shooter. He was killed at the scene though it is unclear if he shot himself or was brought down by an officer.

sandy 35

Parents pick-up children outside Sandy Hook Elementary School after 18 students and two adults were shot dead this morning. Right and the father and mother are both wearing smirks, when this child is supposed to be a trauma victim. Bullshit. They are smiling because the child is a cry baby whining about something quite trivial, hence the amused expressions on her parents’ faces. My question is was the picture even taken at the scene of Sandy Hook?

sandy 36

 

Hundreds of officers, sniffer dogs, and firefighters patrol the streets outside Sandy Hook Elementary School to secure the area. There is no way the casual deportment of these men is in response to an emergency. This is a drill exercise if anything. And where are the sniffer dogs referred to in the caption and the firefighters I’d like to know?

“Dawn Hochsprung, 47, has been the principal at Sandy Hook Elementary school since July 2010. One teacher is confirmed to have been shot in the foot and is being treated at a local hospital. The mayor said they are not releasing names until next-of-kin have been notified,” writes Miss Quigley. There are no victim names to be released and no next of kin to be informed, because as the death register shown later in this book shows, no children of the six-year-old age group defined were born or died in Newtow, Connecticut within the required time frame for any of the victims to be real.  Two handguns have been recovered at the scene and police have cordoned off a black Honda with New Jersey plates believed to belong to the dead shooter. Hundreds of officers and police dogs had the area surrounded as they worked to secure the scene. Teachers and students were said to be in morning meetings when the shots were fired. The children were locked inside their classrooms until police came and evacuated them to a nearby fire station. One child was seen being carried from the school by a police officer, apparently seriously wounded. A person in one room had ‘numerous gunshot wounds’, police told the The Hartford Courant.

Aerial view of scene of school shooting at Newtown, Conneticut 

sandy 37

 

The picture shown above is not the same property location. That is not Sandy Hook school

or the grounds outside the school.

sandy 38

Paramedics push stretchers toward Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, after the mass shooting. These emergency responders pushing the stretcher sure look like they’re in a hurry. Their deportment indicates they are participating in a drill and by their demeanor do not appear to be taking the whole thing terribly seriously. Can’t say I blame them. Neither do we.

sandy 39

 

Lindsay Merikas, 26, of Alexandria, Virgina, wears a button saying ‘Stop Gun Violence’ as she gathered with other supporters of gun control on Pennsylvania Avenue in front of the White House. Can’t miss a good call to action on gun control now can

we?

sandy 40

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

sandy 41

 

Families grieve. The level of consolation shown above for the grieving is not commensurate with the scale of such a tragedy. And a man carries a child away from the area of a shooting at the elementary school. The child depicted in the photo is no trauma victim, not with that contended expression on his face. And the father hardly looks worse for wear.

Miss Quigley then tells us, “Traumatized students were seen being led out of the school crying and holding hands shortly after the shots rang out. There were also reports that a bomb squad was being called into the school. A helicopter was flying over the scene.” This is consistent with an Emergency Planning Scenario drill exercise. If you’ve never heard of such a thing, Google it. Such drills are also referred to as “Operation Top Off” drills meaning “top officials”, since they are meant to coordinate drill responses from all emergency response teams, including S.W.A.T. teams and the military.

Miss Quigley’s report goes on, “Frantic parents were rushing to the school as they were advised to go to the nearby fire station with ID to pick up their children. A witness told News8 he saw one child with a bloodied face and another with a hand injury.” These are not genuine injuries, but merely mock injuries of crisis actors taking part in a pre-coordinated drill exercise. Miss Quigley informs us, “The school has about 600 students from kindergarten through to fourth grade – aged between five and 11.” If there are so many students, why do we see so few being led away from the school in the photographs?

 

President Obama was first notified of the shooting at a Connecticut elementary school at 10:30am, White House press secretary Jay Carney said. There’s something wrong with the timeline here, folks. According to Wikipedia, the shooting was supposed to have taken place between 9:35 and 9:40 Connecticut time on December 14, 2012. Yet we are asked to believe that it took nearly an hour for news of the shooting to reach the White House? There’s a “Fahrenheit 911” stink to all this.

But no piece of propaganda could be complete without the history of school gun violence being mentioned in the course of the article. Why school gun violence? It is naturally because people are more responsive to a call to action, when it is innocent young lives that have been ended prematurely by gun violence.

A HISTORY OF VIOLENCE: AMERICA’S WORST SCHOOL MASSACRES 

  1. Virginia Tech – 32 dead plus the shooter, April 16, 2007, Blacksburg, Virginia

Student Seung Hui Cho, 23, killed two stuidents in a dorm and then went through building of classrooms armed with two handguns, shooting at random before killing himself.

  1. University of Texas – 16 dead plus shooter, August 1, 1966, Austin, Texas

Former Marine sniper Charles Whitman, 25, armed with an arsenal of weapons shot victims from the observation deck of the campus tower.

  1. Columbine High School – 13 dead plus two shooters, April 20, 1999, Littleton, Colorado

Students Eric Harris, 18, and Dylan Klebold, 17, opened fire outside the school killing students and one teacher before shooting themselves in the library.

  1. Red Lake High School – 9 dead plus shooter, March 21, 2005, Red Lake, Minnesota

Jeffrey Weise, 17, goes on a shooting spree at Red Lake High School killing nine people, including his grandfather, before shooting himself.

  1. University of Iowa – five dead plus shooter, November 1, 1991, University of Iowa

Gang Lu, 27, a graduate student from China killed five with a .38-caliber revolver. He was apparently angry because his doctoral dissertation had not been nominated for an academic award.

  1. Amish schoolhouse massacre – six dead plus shooter, October 2, 2006, Nickel Mines, Pennsylvania

Charles Carl Roberts IV, 32, executes five girls aged 7 to 13 before killing himself in a small Amish schoolhouse

  1. Jonesboro, Arkansas – five dead, March 24, 1998, Jonesboro, Arkansas

Mitchell Johnson, 10, and Andrew Golden, 8, took seven guns to school and pulled the fire alarm and shot students as they headed for the exits. Four died plus a teacher. The pair were sent to a juvenile detention center and released in 2005.

  1. Cleveland Elementary School – five dead plus shooter, January 17, 1989, in Stockton, California

Patrick Edward Purdy entered a schoolyard and opened fire with a semiautomatic rifle at Cleveland Elementary School. Five children died and 30 others were wounded including one teacher. He then shot himself.

  1. University of Arizona – three dead plus shooter, October 28, 2002, University of Arizona

Robert Flores, 40, a nursing student shot an instructor in her office before entering a classroom and killing two more teachers before committing suicide.

  1. Kent State University – four dead, May 4, 1970, Kent State University in Ohio

National Guard troops killed four students who took part in anti-war protests on the campus of Kent State University in Ohio.

‘If we get more information and as we get more information, we’ll certainly provide it to you. The president as a father and I as a father certainly…feel enormous sympathy for families that are affected and to do everything we can to support state and local law enforcement, to support those who are enduring what appears to be a very tragic event,’ White House spokesperson, Jay Carney, went on to say. First Selectman Pat Llodra told Patch that there is no information being released about the victims — only confirming that there was a shooting. ‘I’m horrified, saddened and shocked that this happened in Newtown,’ Llodra said. ‘Our priorities right now are making sure everyone safe and reuniting parents with their children.’ One mother of an eight-year-old girl at the school, Brenda Lebinski, told Patch that her daughter is safe thanks to one teacher’s decision to move all kids into a closet when a gunman had entered the building. Mrs Lebinski said that she had spoken to her daughter’s teacher who was in the school at the time of the shooting, and that a masked gunman had shot adults in the school.  ‘My daughter’s teacher is my hero,’ Lebinski said. ‘She locked all the kids in a closet and that saved their lives.’

sandy 42

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

sandy 43

 

 

“Teachers and students were said to be in morning meetings when the shots were fired. The children were locked inside their classrooms until police came and evacuated them to a nearby fire station.” So if they were locked inside their classrooms, how did Adam Lanza get in and gun them all down? And how did they have the foresight to know that they should be inside locked classrooms? This suggests that they were instructed to stay inside locked classrooms as part of a drill exercise. It would also explain why “teachers and students were said to be in morning meetings”. Those meetings would have been instructional meetings in which the students were being given drill participation instructions.

sandy 44

“As well as police and firefighters, there were reports that a bomb squad was being called into the school. A helicopter was also flying over the scene.” Why the need for a bomb squad when there was supposed to just be a lone gunman shooter? Is it not more likely that all these emergency responses were simply part of a precoordinated Operation Top Off drill, which routinely requires the participation of all Emergency

Mangement response teams?

sandy 45

“There are unconfirmed reports of two shooters, one is believed to be dead and the other still at large.” There goes the lone gunman theory out the window. If there were two shooters, whether mock or real, it suggests a conspiracy either way, because conspiracy by definition is when two or more individuals participate in a plot.

SECURITY MEASURES CAN’T PREVENT ANOTHER U.S. SCHOOL SHOOTING

Miss Quigley goes on and on, “American public schools use a variety of security measures to protect students and staff. Almost 94 per cent of U.S. elementary schools lock their doors during the school day to restrict access to campuses.” Very well, so how did Adam Lanza pull up to the school in his Honda and get in if it was locked?

“Some 84 per cent of high schools, 73 per cent of middle schools, and 51 per cent of elementary schools use security cameras to monitor their schools, according to the U.S. Department of Education.” So I guess Sandy Hook was one of the 49 percent of elementary schools that didn’t have security cameras to monitor what happens on its grounds. How convenient.

Miss Quigley sums up her article with more grim news about gun violence in American schools. “Increasing numbers of security guards are in place at U.S. public schools as a result of gun crime with metal detectors also in use across the country. Yet despite security measures school shootings in America are still commonplace.”

And so Miss Quigley makes her final summation:

“On February 10 2012 a 14-year-old from New Hampshire called Hunter Mack shot himself in the face at Walpole Elementary School cafeteria.

Two weeks later student T.J. Lane, 17, allegedly opened fire at Chardon High School, Ohio, killing two and injuring three.

Seven were killed and 10 injured at a shooting at Oikos University, in Oakland, California on 2 April. One L. Goh, 43, a Korean national surrendered to police.

Police arrested 15-year-old Robert Gladden and charged him as an adult after a student opened fire on the first day of school, at Perry Hall High School, Baltimore, in August. The 15-year-old allegedly opened fire before being rushed by teachers.

Teachers again stopped a shooter on September 7 when a 14-year-old was tackled to the floor after shooting at the ceiling at Normal Community High School, Illinois.

On September 26 eight grader Cade Poulos killed himself at Stillwater Junior High School in Oklahoma.”

Clearly Miss Quigley is a hired hack. She has done a shameless job of arm-twisting to persuade Americans to give up their arms. If I were an American, I’d say not on my watch, honey, and if you and your bosses dare set one foot on my land, you’ll be pulling the buckshot out of your butts.

(Rachel Quigley, “High School Loner to Cold-blooded Executioner: How ‘Genius’ Honor Student Adam Lanza Became Masked Killer,” http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2248197/Adam-Lanza-How-honor-student-goth-killer-massacring-20-children-Sandy-Hook-Elementary.html#ixzz3FA5DlOAi)

Published on Dec 14, 2012, we have full police and fire scanner audio feed from the Newtown, Connecticut Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting on December 14, 2012.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9klblvRFzaI

According to George Freund’s report on the audio feed, en route dispatch advises two men running from the scene past the gym. The first officer on the scene reports that the front window is broken. It is highly unlikely that the patsy Adam Lanza would ever be able to access to the inside of the school. For those who don’t know it, school glass is reinforced with wire mesh so it won’t break. You really have to go to town to break it open. The wire will support the glass even from gunfire. My former radio show co-host, George Freund, would know. He worked for a Toronto school board security for three years. The first officers on the scene at the school report the patsy, Adam Lanza dead. They also report finding a shotgun. How on earth are you supposed to carry a rifle, a shotgun, two pistols, and all sorts of ammo, and lock and load replacing gun cartridges, with two autistic hands to boot and kill so many people? No one could pull off such a feat – if it really happened – alone. http://www.conspiracy-cafe.com/apps/videos/videos/view/17438712-newtown-connecticut-sandy-hook-school-shooting-police-fire-audio-scanner-

 

WAS ONLY A DRILL AT SANDY HOOK SCHOOL

Posted by George Freund on December 14, 2012 at 5:30 PM

sandy 46

 

Here are my former radio show co-host George Freund’s comments about the above Tweet message: “Well it will be no rest for the Conspiracy Cafe host. We recorded a dynamite show last night. I hope to have it available tomorrow. The site survey at my home went well. I can smoke data as necessary. As the men were finishing the work I was listening to Alex Jones on short wave. The mass murder event of the innocents will take center stage. The globalists have blown their bugles and shouted CHARGE! America’s fifth columnists will advance and try to disarm WE THE PEOPLE. The tweet above is from the school principal killed in the attack. Of course there are reports of a second gunman. He was taken into custody. He may never be heard from again. That is a common scenario. In the Norwegian massacre the second gunman was even photographed being taken into custody.”

Now look at the Tweets about a second shooter shown below. It is typical black ops. Create confusion by disseminating so many stories, some of them true, some of them not so true, and some of the boldfaced lies, and you have the citizens so confused they won’t know which way is up. The main objective is to foster paranoia and fear so that they will beg you to take their Second Amendment gun rights away so that their little Jack or Jill won’t be heard when they go up the hill to fetch a pale of water.

 

sandy 47

 

 

sandy 48

 

 

sandy 49

 

 

A further report implied the shooter was the parent of a student, as can be seen by the Tweet message shown below. The mainstream media is doing its black ops best to muddy the waters and foster confusion. The more confused the story is the harder it will be for anyone to discern the truth, the truth being that nothing happened. There was no Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre, folks. The massacre that has been committed is on the public mind as a result of an evil psychological operation to instill fear in the American people, in order to justify the imposition of drachonian gun control legislation, and if need be, the implementation of martial law.

sandy 50

 

 

sandy 51

 

 

sandy 52

 

 

 

sandy 53

 

 

 

sandy 54

 

 

That last tweet shows the fix is on. The tweeter has fulfilled her obligations to her masters. Gun control is the predetermined solution and what will follow is the final solution, the globalist effort to achieve their cull by reducing our numbers to half a billion as America’s Stonehenge, the Georgia Guildestones make abundantly clear in their Ten Commandments. We knew it was coming. The globalists and the treasonous lackies that serve their agenda would try every trick in the book to get Americans to give up their guns. Always be careful of the ‘emergency drill exercise’. Sometimes they go live and many end up dead.

(George Freund, “It Was Only a drill at Sandy Hook School,” http://www.conspiracy-cafe.com/apps/blog/show/20998374-it-was-only-a-drill-at-sandy-hook-school)

Soros Promotes UN Control over Gun

 Ownership

 

sandy 55

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At the time this debate was heating up over gun violence, George Soros was leading

the fight to give the United Nations control over our guns. Through his

 Media Matters organization, Soros was pushing pro-UN gun control propaganda into the mainstream media to coincide with the

United Nations Conference on the Arms Trade Treaty being held in New York July 2–27.

In a blog post published on July 3, Timothy Johnson of Media Matters describes the notion that the United Nations would ever try to take away the right of Americans to keep and bear arms “laughable”. Johnson goes on to promote the passage of the UN’s Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) as a means of “curtailing the illicit arms trade” and thus cracking down on those who use these weapons to deny others their “human rights”. That’s the kind of spin the spin doctors always cook up when they’re trying to dupe the true trusting white collar government employees to rest easy because the government’s going to look after them from the cradle to the grave because it’s got their vote.

The blog post assures citizens concerned about the potential eradication of the rights guaranteed in the Second Amendment to the Constitution that they have nothing to fear from the UN’s gun control treaty. Why the need for the reassurance then if everything’s kosher? Oh it’s kosher alright.

Top officials from the United Nations, the United States, and other high profile supporters have repeatedly and clearly said that the treaty does not aim to restrict anyone’s “freedom to own” a gun. Indeed, the UN General Assembly’s resolution on the treaty makes clear that countries will “exclusively” maintain the right within their borders to “regulate internal transfers of arms and national ownership, including through national constitutional protections on private ownerships.” Golly Sarg. Isn’t that nice of them? I just get all warm inside thinking of the good intentions of these folks looking down on us little old folks. Doesn’t it just give you goosebumps?

Constitutionalists will instantly notice a couple of red flags raised by Media Matters’ word choice. First, there need be no quotation marks around the phrase freedom to own a gun. Americans enjoy the unqualified right to bear arms under the Second Amendment and it is not some antiquated idea that requires special punctuational too highlight it. It’s American citizens’ rights under the constitution. Americans are well aware that an unarmed citizenry is easier to subdue and will rightly resist all efforts to abridge that right. They’re not stupid. The Red Coats tried to pull that one on them once before, which is why the Founding Fathers introduced the Second Amendment in the first place.

They knew the fascists would be back. Freemason Paul Revere of the St. Andrew’s Lodge and his fellow Lodge members stage a false flag Tea Party in Boston Harbor, so that they could have an excuse for penalizing the colonists for dumping the Freemason-owned British East India Co.’s tea into the harbor, so the colonial government could impose drachonian reparation taxes and a curfew on the colonists, but we know how that worked out.

Second, the citizens of the United States do not need the permission of the United Nations to maintain the “exclusive” right to own a gun. This right, as with all others protected by the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, comes from God, not man, and may be neither given nor taken away by any government.

Undaunted, however, Soros will continue to use his mouthpieces to promote the globalist agenda, including the systematic dismantling of the U.S. Constitution and the sovereignty it protects, while Soros’ appointee Obama is the Pied Piper leading the band into the Potomac River with a series of Executive Orders fraudulently implemented by a fraud in an attempt to override the U.S. constitution.

The current draft of the ATT mandates that the governments of member states petition the United Nations for approval of any contract to sell weapons to any nation where there exists a “substantial risk of a serious violation” of human rights.

While the end of reducing the abuse of human rights is laudable, the means to achieve that cannot lawfully include the requirement that the Congress of the United States ask for permission from the UN overlords before it passes a law, including one authorizing the sale of arms to another country. That is a direct assault on American legislative sovereignty, and an indirect attack on the sovereignty of the American people who elect the members of Congress who vote on such measures. It is therefore not only unconstitutional to adopt such measures, but treasonous, and legal measures should be taken by legal minds expert in constitutional law to stop them.

In the text of the ATT, the United Nations specifically calls for the passage of a legally binding instrument that will impose international standards for the ownership, trade, and transfer of weapons. In another section the ATT includes “controls on a comprehensive list of weaponry, including small arms and light weapons”. Predictably, all these controls are couched comfortably in talk of “human rights” and ending senseless killings by rogue regimes. That’s why Operation Fast and Furious was orchestrated by the ATF in the first place. It provided pretext and justification for the wording of the ATT, so that the good citizens of the United States would buy into the sugar-coated language of the UN arms treaty Trojan Horse.

In order to avoid being labeled a “human rights abuser,” the United States (along with all member states) is ordered by the UN to comply with the ATT. To coersively achieve such compliance, the ATT empowers the UN to force Congress to:

  • Enact internationally agreed licensing requirements for Americans
  • Confiscate and destroy unauthorized firearms of Americans while allowing the U.S. government to keep theirs
  • Ban the trade, sale, and private ownership of semi-automatic guns
  • Create and mandate an international registry to organize an encompassing gun confiscation in America

On this point, in 2011, the UN’s General Assembly declared “that disarmament, arms control and non-proliferation are essential.” In other words, if world peace, the protection of human rights, and the disarming of violent regimes could be achieved through the confiscation of personal firearms, then so be it.

Soros and his fellow globalist cowards don’t plan to march UN soldiers into the homes of Americans with orders to seize their guns and ammunition just yet. Instead, through a series of binding international treaties and UN resolutions, they will force the national governments of the world to do the dirty work for them. Sadly, officials of our own federal government, including President Obama, are pushing Congress to sign off on this treaty. That’s why he was appointed to office in the first place. Elected? Please. The federal election is a farce. These stuffed puppets are appointees, handpicked by the elites to do their bidding. If this were not the case, how could second cousins George Bush and John Kerry run head to head when they were both Yale graduates and Skull and Bones initiates. The Skull and Bones Society only inducts thirteen new members each year. That’s a pretty exclusive club they have there. No, the apple doesn’t fall far from the tree.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has announced that the Obama administration is working with the UN to lean on Congress to consent to the ATT. Clinton has pushed the treaty as an “opportunity to promote the same high standards for the entire international community that the United States and other responsible arms exporters already have in place to ensure that weaponry is transferred for legitimate purposes.” Right Hillary, legitimate purposes like arming ISIS and Syrian rebels to slaughter and kill Middle Easterners because Muslims won’t submit to the usury based banking system imposed by the Vatican’s banking establishment families known as the Illuminati. They’re Luciferians, Satanists, that’s all. Call a spade a shovel. Have some jam and call them what they are for Christ’s sake and it is for his sake, that’s not blasphemy.

There is little doubt that the scope of those “legitimate purposes” will be determined by Soros, Clinton, Obama, and the rest of the globalist cabal who have much to fear from an armed and educated citizenry.

For now, the resistance to ratification of such a treaty is strong in the United States. In July of 2011, Senator Jerry Moran (R-Kan.) and 44 other senators sent a letter to President Obama and Secretary Clinton encouraging them to stop pushing for passage of UN gun control treaties. In the letter, Moran wrote:

“Our country’s sovereignty and the Second Amendment rights of American citizens must not be infringed upon by the United Nations. Today, the Senate sends a powerful message to the Obama Administration: an Arms Trade Treaty that does not protect ownership of civilian firearms will fail in the Senate. Our firearm freedoms are not negotiable.”

George Soros, through his Media Matters outlet, promises that “U.S. gun owners have nothing to fear” from the ATT or from similar UN agreements to restrict the manufacture, transfer, and possession of firearms. The globalists’ only goal, they maintain, is “the maintenance of international peace and security.” Right and with their typical Orwellian doublespeak “War is peace” and “Peace is war”, which is why we need to supply the terrorists with weapons to go after the other terrorists. That, my friends, is the fallacious reasoning of gangsters, banksters and terrorists. They are after all the lunatics running the asylum.

(Joe Wolverton II, “Soros Promotes UN Control over Gun Ownership” July 6, 2012, http://thenewamerican.com/usnews/constitution/item/11983-soros-promotes-un-control-over-gun-ownership)

This is a classic application of the Hegelian dialectic called problem-reaction-solution. The intelligence services, which are truly run by and affiliated with the Vatican, namely the CIA, NSA, etc., create and foster social problems like mental illness and gun violence, labelling perfectly healthy but rebellious children mentally ill so that they can be given the eugenics prescription drugs that are meant to make them not only mentally ill, but violent. Then they turn them loose in anticipation of the sleeper agent ticking timebomb creating the zombie apocalypse and many of them are drugged up zombies make no mistake.

 

(George Freund, “It Was Only a drill at Sandy Hook School,” http://www.conspiracy-cafe.com/apps/blog/show/20998374-it-was-only-a-drill-at-sandy-hook-school)

 

As Jon Rappoport rightly points out, we have to consider the fact that many of these killers were being prescribed SSRI antidepressants like Prozac, Paxil, and Zoloft. The drugs have been well studied. They have been known to push people over the edge by scrambling neurotransmitter systems, resulting in many ‘patients’ committing suicide or even murder or mass murder.

Jon Rappoport’s school-shooting report, written a decade ago, lays out the facts about these drugs, and also about the amphetamine-type drugs prescribed for ADHD, like Ritalin:

http://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2012/02/11/the-school-shooting-white-paper/

The meds cause inexplicably violent behavioural anomalies, including suicide and homicide attempts. The drugs were, in fact, linked with the 1999 Columbine school shooting. Eric Harris, one of the killers, was on Luvox, an SSRI antidepressant, which was taken off the market by its manufacturer several years later. (Jon Rappoport, “The Connecticut school shootings: Operation Chaos,” December 14, 2012,

 www.nomorefakenews.com)

 

 

Psychological operations and mind control also play a significant part in many of these shootings and massacres, as part of the social engineering effort on the part of the New World Order to impose the UN mandated gun banning program so that UN troops can be rallied to come in and take guns out of the hands of private citizen. Feinstein’s recent bill mnandated that anyone deemed mentally ill would not be able to purchase or own an handgun, but later the definition of mentally ill will be broadened to include anyone who is distrustful of their government or elected leaders, conspiracy theorists who will be dubbed dangerous and disaffected paranoids and borderline psychotics.

 

As Jon Rappoport reminds us it did leak out that the James Holmes, the individual implicated in the Aurora theater shootings, was under the care of a so-called psychiatrist. Rappoport makes the further point that many of these killers were operating out of an even darker mind-controlled program, as was apparently the case, for example, with the dupe in the RFK assassination, Sirhan Sirhan, one of the many casualties of the MK-Ultra program and Operation Chaos.

 

(Jon Rappoport, “The Connicicut School Shootings: Operation Chaos,” December 14, 2012, www.nomorefakenews.com)

 

As Jim Stone rightly discerns the Aurora, Colorado Theater Shooting was another false flag terror operation that never really happened. Two of the so-called victims hit the social security death index before the others which is noteworthy in itself, namely, Jessica Redfield/Ghawi and Alexander Teves. In the case of Jessica Redfield, who is doubtless a well paid government agent, she tweeted out a message where she joked about making people believe there was gunfire right from her Twitter account shown below.

sandy 56

 

 

Then there is the other mass shooting Jessica Redfield supposedly witnessed. What are the odds of someone being a victim in two major mass shootings in two different albeit neighboring countries? It is a bit of a stretch, don’t you think? Supposedly Jessica Redfield, a budding media presence, was in Toronto when a mass shooting supposedly took place down at the Eaton Center near Dundas Square. If she really had genuinely witnessed a mass shooting in Toronto only a month before, why would she be joking about making people think a gun was being discharged? Was the Toronto Mall shooting fake as well? Whether real or not, she attended both events, as a ‘victim’ or as a ‘perp’ covert operative in false flag terror operations?

 

Mr. Stone does a little math for us on the mathematical likelihood of such an occurrence. According to him, mass shootings happen about once every five years in Canada and the U.S., comprising approximately 370 million people combined. With mass shootings occurring once every five years in a population of that scale, the odds are well high impossible that Jessica could witness two such events in so short a timeframe. Over an eight year lifespan, you might learn of sixteen mass shootings over eighty years, according to the once every five year incidence ratio. If 150 people witness each mass shooting, that’s 16 multiplied by 150 or 2,400 possible witnesses. A population of 370 million divided by 2,400 would have a 1 in 154,000 chance of witnessing a single mass shooting incident. Imagining the odds of one person witnessing two mass shootings and you are in entirely different ballpark. Take 154,00 and multiply is against itself and you arrive at a ratio of 1 in 23,710,000,000, and that is without factoring in how close the mass shootings were to one another on the timeline.

 

Two things stand against the fraud Redfield, her Tweeter message and those odds. In addition, one of her tweets referred to her moving to a new place with seven swimming pools and a lake two weeks before the second shooting in Colorado. She was an intern. How could an intern pull that off? She’s not that attractive that she would get top billing at the escort agency. But a multimillion dollar payout for her participation in a major government psy-op false flag terror operation would certainly make for a substantial downpayment on a mansion.

sandy 57

 

When doing a search of the names

from Aurora, Colorado Theater

 Shooting, a small search engine

indicated that a week after the shooting all the victims from Aurora had a complete shutdown of the first

 fifty hits on even a small search

engine as proven by the photo Jim Stone posts on his website.

(Jim Stone, “All the evidence behind why I believe no one died at the

theatre,

 http://www.jimstonefreelance.com/aurora.html)

 

 

Courtesy of www.jimstonefreelance.com

sandy 58

 

Let’s look at James Holmes pedigree for a moment. He is the grandson of a U.S. Naval veteran. He is also purported to be a 24-year-old neuroscience student purportedly persuing a Ph.D. in the field, who murdered twelve people and injured dozens of others on July 20, 2012, at a screening of the Batman film The Dark Knight Rises. As we will see later, the Batman film The Dark Knight Rises is an example of predictive programming deliberately shown in the theatre in Aurora the night of the shooting for the purpose. As we’ll discover in a later section of the book, there are frames in the film that make explicit reference to Aurora and Sandy Hook.

 

Whether the shooting was real or theatre staged appropriately at a theatre, the behavior of Holmes, who calmly surrendered himself to police is what is remarkable. This calm echoes the behavior of some other past “lone nut” patsy shooters. Mark David Chapman, who shot John Lennon, comes to mind as a noteworthy example. After killing Lennon, he purportedly sat down and began reading a paperback he’d brought with him, The Catcher in the Rye, written by J.D. Salinger, who served in U.S. Army Counterintelligence during World War II and whose commanding officer was Henry Kissinger of all people. No wonder the author went into seclusion. He probably wanted to escape the world of intrigue and espionage that had turned him into all but a fully fledged paranoid schizophrenic. This was the same unit that recruited Nazi Klaus Barbie and aided in his escape to South America following World War II. Chapman purportedly remained reading at the scene despite supposedly being instructed to leave by the doorman, Jose Perdomo, who coincidentally turned out to be an anti-Castro Cuban involved in Operation 40 after the Bay of Pigs. Jose was probably his handler, probably encouraging him to stay rather than telling him to leave, so he could be arrested at the scene as the patsy frontman he was meant to be. It was a CIA hit and Jose fits the profile of the other Cubans involved in the JFK assassination, the Bay of Pigs, and Watergate like Virgilio Gonzalez and Eugenio Martinez.

 

The University of Colorado, Denver is mentioned as one of the institutions involved in the MK-ULTRA project of the CIA, which focused on controlling the minds of ordinary citizens so they could be induced to carry out assassinations. One experiment dating back to 1954 showed that it was possible to get individuals to fire a gun and then forget about it. Incidentally, this is precisely the pattern shown in the RFK assassination by Sirhan Sirhan, who after firing his gun at Robert Kennedy could not recall anything about the event afterwards. The New York Times reported on the MK-ULTRA mind control program in 1978, following the wake of the Church Committee Hearings. Many universities and hospitals were involved in the program and took money to perform the experimentation. The doctors involved in hypnoprogramming American citizens were at the top of their fields, and included such figures infamous figures as Ewen Cameron and Jolyon West. Cameron participated in mind control experiments with Joseph Mengele at Memorial College, McGill University, which involved the use of shock treatment using electric chairs on the victims, many of whom are purportedly buried in a mass grave near the college.

 

There is an interesting book on the subject written by Emile Franchel of hypnosis and mass brainwashing called 254 Questions and Answers on Practical Hypnotism written in 1957. In the book, he is posed the question, “Has hypnotism ever been used on masses of people, far larger than any auditorium can hold?” His answer:

“From what I can see at this time, hypnotism is being practiced on millions of people at this moment, both inside and outside this country. The hypnotic techniques being employed at present make the hypnotic technicians of the ex-Nazi regime look like well-meaning psychiatrists…One of the great dangers of hypnotism is its simplicity of operation and how easily it can be disguised.”

 

(Joseph Green, “The Aurora, Colorado Shooting: Echoes of MK-ULTRA?” http://www.examiner.com/article/the-aurora-colorado-shooting-echoes-of-mk-ultra)

As part of the attack, Holmes painted his hair red and referred to himself as “The Joker”, one of the arch-enemies in the DC Comics-inspired Batman movie series. According to a New York Times article, Billy Kromka, a pre-med student at the University of Colorado, in Boulder, worked with Mr. Holmes for three months the previous summer as a research assistant in a lab of at the Anschutz Medical Campus. Mr. Kromka said he was surprised to learn Mr. Holmes was the shooting suspect. “It was just shocking, because there was no way I thought he could have the capacity to do commit an atrocity like this,” he said.

 

There is already conjecture that James Holmes may have been involved in mind-altering neuroscience research and ended up becoming involved at a depth he never anticipated. His actions clearly show a strange detachment from reality, indicating he was not in his right mind. That can only typically be accomplished through drugs, hypnosis or trauma (and sometimes all three.

His behavior already reveals stark inconsistencies that question the mainstream explanation of events. For example, he opened fire on innocent people but then calmly surrendered to police without resistance. This seems to suggest a form of programming whereby he becomes submissive and passive in the face of authorities. He then admitted to police that his apartment was booby-trapped with explosives. If you were really a psychopathic Joker trying to maim and kill as many people as possible, why would you warn the police about a booby trap in advance of them searching your living quarters?

“After his arrest, Holmes told police about ‘possible explosives in his residence,” police said. When police searched his apartment, they discovered it was booby-trapped and evacuated surrounding buildings. Aurora Police Chief Dan Oates said bomb technicians are determining how to disarm flammable or explosive material in the third-floor apartment. He said police could be there for some time.

He said pictures from inside the apartment are fairly disturbing and the devices look to be sophisticated, adding the booby-traps were ‘something I’ve never seen’. At the scene were found one rifle, two handguns, a knife, a bullet proof vest, a ballistic helmet, a gas device, a gas mask, military SWAT clothing and unidentified explosives were also found in Holmes’ car, a law enforcement source told CBS News. Oates said Holmes purportedly wore a gas mask, a ballistic helmet and vest as well as leg, groin and throat protectors at the scene of the shooting. In other words, this guy was equipped with exotic gear by someone with connections to military equipment. SWAT clothing, explosives, complex booby-traps. Common, there is no way this is a “lone gunman” hermit operating on his own without friends on the inside. This is somebody who was selected for a mission, provided with military gear to carry it out, then somehow brainwashed into playing his role as the Joker, fittingly because the joke’s on us and there was no theatre shooting, but only another staged false falg terror event. Aurora Police Chief Dan Oates said Holmes’ apartment is booby-trapped with a sophisticated maze of flammable devices that would take hours or days for authorities to disarm, according to a report from Yahoo News.

This is not a lone madmen working alone. How in his mental state would he work out the logistics and the planning to pull off something like this? It was a carefully planned, heavily funded and technically advanced attack. Who might be behind all this? The FBI, CIA, FEMA and ATF have all been linked to terror plots before. The FBI which has a long history of setting up and staging similar attacks, then stopping them right before they happen could have been involved in this one as well. See four documented stories on these facts. The FBI has admitted to setting up terror plots, providing the weapons and gear, staging the location of the bombings and even driving the vehicles to pull it off. This is not a conspiracy theory. The FBI have admitted to it right out in the open.

(Twana Blevins “Colorado Batman shooting shows obvious signs of being staged,” July 21, 2012, http://patriotsforamerica.ning.com/forum/topic/show?id=2734278%3ATopic%3A386089&xgs=1&xg_source=msg_share_topic)

Consider the case of Oregon college student Mohamed Osman Mohamud. He thought about using a car bomb to attack a well-attended, festive Christmas tree-lighting ceremony in Portland. The FBI gave him a van packed with inert explosives consisting of some real, but inactive, detonators and six 55-gallon drums, along with a gallon of diesel fuel. An FBI agent even drove the van. When Mohamud called the cell phone number that was supposed to trigger the explosion, nothing explosive happened, except that he got arrested.

Mohamud’s case is not unique. In fact, such counterterrorism operations are not only legal but they are a common tactic employed by the agency in the post-9/11 world. Terror defendants most often try to claim entrapment, but they also most often lose because the law says as long as they showed at least some intent to commit a terrorist act, even if tempted by the ‘Devil’ posing as undercover agents, they are still considered guilty. That is exactly what happened to the so-called Toronto 18, who were portrayed as 9/11 affiliated when they were just niave dupes set up by Canada’s CSIS and the Metropolitan Toronto Police.

http://www.naturalnews.com/035849_domestic_terror_plots_FBI.html#ixzz3FGg87hlh

Then take Dave Williams who along with three other men were arrested in May 2009 on charges of plottng to blow up Jewish synagogues and purchase anti-aircraft missiles to shoot down military planes.Yet amazingly, the weapons for the operation were provided by the F.B.I. who, through a paid informant, set up a so-called “terror” plot they themselves were then able to take dismantle while takeing credit for busting the terror ring. Lawyers for Williams and his three “co-conspirators” agree that, were it not for the F.B.I. inventing this so-called plot out, none of the men would be in jail and, in fact, there would have been no plot at all, since they are not the ones who hatched, given that the FBI can take full credit for devising the plot from start to finish. It seems like to be a classic case of entrapment, and some of the legal experts who have examined the facts of the case shake their heads in disgust. “The target, the motive, the ideology and the plot were all led by the FBI,” Karen Greenberg, a law professor at Fordham University in New York, who specializes in studying the new FBI tactics, told the London Guardian newspaper.

http://www.naturalnews.com/034325_FBI_entrapment_terror_plots.html#ixzz3FGkqgGan

“I don’t want anyone to get hurt,” one of the former drug dealer defendants, Mr. Cromitie said, and then explained that he meant women and children. “I don’t care if it’s a whole synagogue of men.” It took eleven months of meandering discussion and a promise of $250,000 to lead him, with three co-conspirators he recruited, to plant fake bombs at two Riverdale synagogues.

“Only the government could have made a ‘terrorist’ out of Mr. Cromitie, whose buffoonery is positively Shakespearean in its scope,” said Judge Colleen McMahon, sentencing him to 25 years. She branded it a “fantasy terror operation” but called his attempt “beyond despicable” and rejected his claim of entrapment.

The judge’s statement was unusual, but Mr. Cromitie’s characteristics were not. His incompetence and ambivalence could be found among other aspiring terrorists whose grandiose plans were nurtured by law enforcement. They included men who wanted to attack fuel lines at Kennedy International Airport; destroy the Sears Tower (now Willis Tower) in Chicago; carry out a suicide bombing near Tampa Bay, Fla., and bomb subways in New York and Washington. Of the twenty-two most frightening plans for attacks since 9/11 on American soil, fourteen were developed in sting operations.

David K. Shipler, “Terrorist Plots Hatched by the FBI,” April 28, 2012, http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/29/opinion/sunday/terrorist-plots-helped-along-by-the-fbi.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0)

Instead of responding to, or attempting to thwart, actual terrorist plots, the F.B.I. seems to be manufacturing cases. The agency is busy sending informants into Muslim communities to talk of radical Islam and to see who bites on the bait. Even the judge in this case, Colleen McMahon, said when the men were finally sentenced that “there would never have been any case of the government had not made one up.” A similar circumstance involves five men accused of plotting to attack U.S. soldiers outside Fort Dix, N.J. “That case too involved dubious use of paid informants, an apparent over-reach of evidence and a plot that seemed suggested by the government,” said the Guardian.

http://www.naturalnews.com/034325_FBI_entrapment_terror_plots.html#ixzz3FGkqgGan

According to an AFP report, FBI special agent Richard DesLauriers claimed the sting operation proved “a committed individual, even one with no ties to or formal training from, an international terrorist organisation, can pose a serious danger to the community.” Yet, FBI agent DesLauriers fails to explain how Ferdaus could have acquired C4 explosives for his alleged plot without being supplied by a federal agency like the FBI. Additionally, DesLauriers fails to explain how Ferdaus can be considered acting as an “individual” with no “direct connections” to an international terrorist organization, when FBI itself was assuming that role, supplying him with motivation, supplies, explosives, logistics, and weapons. This begs the question is the FBI now operating as an international terrorist organization, arming and equipping terrorists in a hypocritical war on terror in which they are playing both sides of the fence?

If convicted, Ferdaus faces fifteen years in prison for supporting a foreign terrorist organization and an additional forty years on other terror related charges. In order to support a foreign terrorist organization, Ferdaus would have to have to be in contact with one, again undermining FBI special agent DesLauriers’ statement. Ironically, Ferdaus is being arrested, held, and awaiting trial that could see him locked up for most of his life, while the US State Department, Department of Defense, and the White House itself are verifiably supporting foreign terrorist organizations, including the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG), listed as #26 on the State Department’s own list, as well as Mujahedin-e Khalq (MEK) in Iran, listed as #28 by the US State Department, and more recently ISIS.

In fact, the biggest supporter of foreign terror organizations is the US government itself, while doing all this under the cover of a hypocritical war on terror. Indeed the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG) literally led the NATO-backed rebellion in Libya, and verifiably committed horrific war crimes, atrocities, and indisputable acts of genocide against the Libyan people. In one city, Tawarga, its 10,000 residents were either massacred, exiled, or imprisoned by rebel forces under NATO cover and their property seized, according to the London Telegraph. LIFG’s leader, Abdul Belhaj, unlike the FBI’s patsy Rezwan Ferdaus, has really killed American soldiers in Afghanistan while members of his LIFG terror organization have likewise killed US troops in Iraq. He is now the “council leader” in Tripoli, installed in headquarters right next to the newly re-opened US Embassy.

The FBI has a long string of similar operations where entrapped individuals are literally brought up to the moment of pulling the trigger before being foiled. In 1993, such an operation “accidentally” went live, when FBI agents supplied would-be World Trade Center bombers with real explosives and a fully functioning bomb. The detonation resulted in six deaths and over one thousand injured, and was only deemed an “accident” when FBI informant, former Egyptian army officer Emad Salem, revealed recordings he made of his conversations with the FBI agents. He became suspicious of their motives and feared for his own safety upon realizing real explosives were being used. The recordings were published by the New York Times.

A similar operation was covered in depth in November 2010, in Portland, Oregon, where the city refused to join the FBI’s Joint Terrorist Task Force (JTTF). The FBI then went behind the city mayor’s back to conduct a “sting operation” that resulted in their target-suspect delivering a van containing a device the FBI constructed for him to a crowded public square, after which he attempted to detonate the device remotely before being arrested. The news came as a shock, designed by the FBI to embarrass and extort the mayor into to rectifying his decision to remain out of the JTTF. In essence, the FBI and other federal agencies are running a glabal protection racket, no different than that run by criminal mafia organizations. Unfortunately, Portland caved in to the FBI’s pressure and eventually joined the JTTF in April, 2011. In other words, the FBI literally terrorized the people of Portland to accept their federally endorsed protection racket.

(Tony Cartalucci,

 “Boston: FBI Thwarts Own R/C Bomb,” Sept. 29, 2011,

 http://www.prisonplanet.com/boston-fbi-thwarts-own-rc-bomb.html)

The idea that Holmes was acting alone is absurd. Just like in the previously examined cases, he was being set up by one of the federal alphabet soup agencies, most likely the FBI in this case. How can an unemployed medical student afford all the complex weapons gear, bomb-making gear, flammable booby trap devices, ammunition, multiple magazines, bullet-proof vest, groin protection, ballistic helmet, SWAT uniform and the incindieries he had planted all over his home? And furthermore where could he possibly gain access to all of this if not from an international terrorist organization like the ones run by the U.S. government in its notoriously hypicrical War on Terror? A decent AR-15 rifle alone costs at least $1,000. The shotgun and handgun might cost about $800 total. Spare mags, sights, slings, and so on will run you at least another $1,000 for three firearms. The bullet-proof vest is easily another $800, and the cost of the bomb-making gear would be another substantial cost. With all the specialty body gear, ammunition, booby-trap devices and more, Holmes would be looking at a sunbstantial series of purchases amounting to at least $20,000 in weapons and tactical gear, much of which is very difficult for civilians to get access to. And how is it that he could be so off the radar with all these purchases with Homeland Security watching everyone like a hawk? And how is it that he was an unkown who the authorities had never heard of before? Such predator wolves as he is described as being don’t just pop up out of nowhere without a series of priors and other red flags. They usually have a background and a past. The mere manufacture of an explosive booby-trap device is a serious felony on its own. And remember that Aurora Police Chief Dan Oates said Holmes’ apartment was booby-trapped with a sophisticated maze of flammable devices.

While some have suggested that Holmes could have acquired this gear more cheaply than the estimated sum of $20,000, say $10,000 or so, that tally doesn’t really add up, not when you consider all the extras needed to effectively run these guns, in addition to training courses, spare magazines, etc. Just a decent AR-15 battle sight (a holographic red dot sight) can run $1,000 – $2,000. A search of “ACOG” makes it clear that this kind of gear is pricey. It is also reported that Holmes is purportedly said to have bought 6,000 rounds of ammo, which is extremely costly as well. Where would an unemployed student get that kind of money?

This false flag appropriately staged at a theater is looking like a deliberately orchestrated plot by the government reminiscent of Operation Fast and Furious undertaken by the other alphabet soup government agency, the ATF, which helped smuggle tens of thousands of guns into Mexico for the purpose of precipitating “gun violence” in the U.S., and then turning around and blaming the Second Amendment. All this looks like James Holmes completed a “mission” and then calmly ended it by surrendering to police and admitting to everything. The mission, as we are now learning, was to cause as much terror and mayhem as possible, then to have that multiplied by the national media at exactly the right time, leading up to the UN vote imminent at the time of the shooting, calling for a global small arms treaty that could result in gun confiscation across the country. Even Forbes.com wrote about this quite extensively, warning readers about the coming gun confiscation effort related to the UN treaty. The story was authored by Larry Bell, who argued that the UN treaty could “override our national sovereignty, and in the process, provide license for the federal government to assert preemptive powers over state regulatory powers guaranteed by the Tenth Amendment in addition to our Second Amendment rights.” In other words, this has all the signs of the appropriately named Fast & Furious ATF covert operation. No totalitarian government has yet devised a more effective way of disarming a nation and assuming total control over a population than to stage a horrific act of gun violence, blame it on firearms, then call for leaders to “do something”. It is classic problem-reaction-solution dialectics and it is so old and so tired that the more enlightened masses of today tend to see through it. In the past, such calls for gun control inevitably led to gun confiscation legislation, usually followed by government-sponsored genocide as history has shown in the case of Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot, Mao and other dictators and fascist regimes.

Here’s a short list of government mass murder carried out throughout history, almost always immediately following the disarmament of the public, and usually preceded by staged false flag events to justify the disarmament: 50+ million dead: Mao Ze-Dong (China, 1958-61 and 1966-69, Tibet 1949-50) 12+ million dead: Adolf Hitler (Germany, 1939-1945) – concentration camps, civilian deaths and dead Russian POWs 8+ million dead: Leopold II of Belgium (Congo, 1886-1908) 6+ million dead: Jozef Stalin (USSR, 1932-39) 5+ million dead: Hideki Tojo (Japan, 1941-44) 2+ million dead: Ismail Enver (Turkey, 1915-22) 1.7 million dead: Pol Pot (Cambodia, 1975-79) 1.6 million dead: Kim Il Sung (North Korea, 1948-94) 1.5 million dead: Menghistu (Ethiopia, 1975-78) 1 million dead: Yakubu Gowon (Biafra, 1967-1970) 900,000 dead: Leonid Brezhnev (Afghanistan, 1979-1982) 800,000 dead: Jean Kambanda (Rwanda, 1994)

Despite the tragedies associated with localized gun violence, the fact remains that the greatest danger of all is not a crazy person with a rifle, but a government that exerts a “monopoly of force” over the entire population. And that’s exactly what the UN’s stated goal for the world is: stripping all power from individuals and nations so that the World Government can impose its will on a defenceless population with its world army composed of NATO and UN troop deployments.

See the document “Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF)” policy paper No. 24. As this document reveals, a table entitled, “Governance solutions for reasserting the state monopoly on the use of force” lists the options available to governments to re-establish “monopolies of force” to deploy and wield against their own people: • (Re-)establish state monopoly – Ownership of WMDs – Safety Inspectorates • Prohibit business activity – Justice and Execution – Deadly Force? • Regulate/limit activities – Private defense/security services – Control of financial transfers – Export controls – Transport and infrastructure safety – Environmental impact It is rather uncanny but hardly surprising how perfectly the DCAF’s paper definition of “terrorism” matches the staged Aurora, Colorado movie theater shooting: Terrorists aim to spread panic and fear in societies in order to achieve political goals, be they based on left- or right-wing, social-revolutionary, nationalistic or religious ideologies. They are organized in a clandestine way, most often in small groups and cells… Typical tactical means include kidnapping, hostage-taking, sabotage, murder, suicide attacks, vehicle bombs and improvised explosive devices.

This document lays out the entire blueprint for the globalist agenda to disarm and enslave the population, as page 28 clearly lllustrates: The legitimate monopoly of force should not be limited to the nation-state but should be based on the local, national, regional and the global levels.

Global Security Governance and the Monopoly of Force At the global level no monopoly of violence exists. The UN Security Council already has a monopoly power to authorize the use of force at the global level, although the UN was never given the necessary means to exercise this authority, such as the capacity to implement sanctions, a police force and armed forces… This deficiency in global governance acts as a bottleneck and a barrier to the creation of the democratically legitimized monopoly of violence that is globally required.

The UN is a Trojan Horse Satanic organization, which aims to impose its will on the world population in order to establish the New World Order of the Antichrist. And all those who call foul about conspiracy theories will be wearing the bullet as the UN tanks role into town. Don’t worry, I won’t tell you I told you so. There’ll be no need. You’ll be dead.

(Twana Blevins “Colorado Batman shooting shows obvious signs of being staged,” July 21, 2012, http://patriotsforamerica.ning.com/forum/topic/show?id=2734278%3ATopic%3A386089&xgs=1&xg_source=msg_share_topic)

The whole lone nut shooter conspiracy is predicated on the cultivation of MK-Ultra style sleeper agent assassins. After Nixon resigned over Watergate, President Ford appointed Vice President Nelson Rockefeller to head a commission to report on MK-Ultra. Thus, the fox was appointed to guard the sheep or the sheeple as you prefer. It was a wise choice because his forefather John D. Rockefeller started the modern version of the program way back in 1909 with a $300 million funding from Standard Oil to the Rockefeller Foundation. In fact, Nelson was so diligent in carrying on the legacy that it led to the formation of a Satanic cult called The Process-Church of Final Judgement. It’s most famous product was undoubtedly Charles Manson. One assassin of note was David Berkowitz the ‘Son of Sam’ killer. However, it was the lesser known Lynette ‘Squeaky’ Fromme and Sara Jane Moore who manchurianized to assassinate President Ford. The pattern has been unremitting since the time of The Assassins (derived from the word “hashish”, mashallah, ‘the gift of God’, which was used to brainwash the assassins of this secret society of antiquity). Hypnotized sleeper agents have been the weapons of sultans and kings since time immemorial. How do you think Vice Presidents get to be Presidents? How did Lyndon B. Johnson replace John F. Kennedy?

Take the mass shooting event at Fort Hood, Texas. Everyone knows the alleged shooter Major Nidal Nasan, but do they delve into the fact he was a psychiatrist? One of the victims was a GITMO psychiatrist Major L. Eduardo Caraveo. He falls off the table as the focus is lead to Hasan. After viewing the film The Killing Room, I could see a doctor losing it. However, Major Hasan has connections with the development of the beltway sniper. I view the incident as the two for one special. Both have become liabilities to the machine and were eliminated. The mass public soaks up the story cooked up by the media spin doctors and buy the lies.

sandy 59

 

The circumstances behind staged false flag mass shooting events like the one in Aurora are becoming well understood. The psychopaths running our governments, military and alphabet soup government agencies have not succeeded in diverting down a false trail like gun control to get bush whacked. It’s an ambush and we have seen through it because they have pulled the same bullshit too many times. If guns were really the issue, the murder rate in the United States before 1905 wouldn’t rival Prince Edward Island in Canada around 0.8 to 1.2 per 100,000. You could have any sort of gun then. There was no restriction on what kind of gun you could own or how many you could have. Yet the incidence of gun violence was so low that Quick Draw McGraw could walk the entire country from one end to another without having to be measured for a pine box. The rate rose after the money trust collapse and then went off the scales after 1909 when the Rockefeller Foundation implemented its satanic social engineering programs to twist and pervert the human mind to take us from the paragon of animals to the lowest of the low.

You see the MK Ultra trail leads to something rather pertinent. The CIA study and use of hypnosis experiments conducted by Alden Sears at the University of Minnesota was encouraged to find a change of venue. This is how cons and criminals avoid capture. They set up shop in an unfinished office, pull their con, and move out before law enforcement swoop down on their operation. Where in heaven do you suppose the CIA would move its psychological operations lab to, do you think? You guessed it. To the University of Colorado, Denver, where else? Our shooter was a medical student at University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus in Aurora. That’s the big secret you weren’t supposed to find out about. I’m sure George Freund is sorry for being such a spoiler. The police searched the campus even though our unemployed student wasn’t attending at the time. The campus search was either to make it look good or retrieve evidence of the mind control operations going on there to whitewash the affair on behalf of the CIA.

Could a hypnotist induce a totally separate personality, another window or door of perception in a subject, leading to the creation of a multiple? CIA counterintelligence chief, James Jesus Angleton, a leader of the British intelligence faction in the American intelligence community, established three goals for the hypnosis program: 1) to induce hypnosis very rapidly in unwitting subjects; 2) to create durable amnesia; and 3) to implant durable and operationally useful post-hypnotic suggestion. A test of rapid hypnosis took place in July 1963. The counterintelligence staff in Washington, D.C. asked the CIA station in Mexico City to find a suitable candidate for a rapid induction experiment.

sandy 61sandy 60

 

 

 

 

 

Hypnosis is a primary part of the creation of a Manchurian candidate. Drugs and or electroshocks are used in conjunction. All they require is unwitting subjects like a loner Ph. D. student struggling at school. In the Manchurian Candidate the Queen of Diamonds was the trigger. For the staged theatre shooting at the Batman film, the trigger is the Joker appropriately, since it is all a sick joke. The card, the concept and the fictional killing machine were planted deep into James Holmes’ mind. Without an expert knowledge of deep level mind control programming, psychiatrists could never find the source. I explore this to some extent in my novel Butterfly Dreams.

There is a report there were three military men in the theatre. Two were shot and one is missing. Someone had to open the rear door to allow Holmes to enter. I doubt it was staff. If this was a military operation, it can be taken for granted that the military participated. Since Holmes was wearing a gas mask, can we assume he was the one firing off the weapons? He was in the dark and gas was deployed. He didn’t buy gas and smoke grenades at the sporting goods store. Media will concentrate on the guns. They are police or military issue. It was George Freund who noted that Buckley Air Base at Aurora hosts the 566th Intelligence Squadron.

sandy 62

Police investigated the suspect’s car outside a movie theater after a shooting in Aurora, Colo. This is reminiscent of Sandy Hook and the Santa Barbara shooter, who also had their cars found at the scene. It’s the common M.O. that gives the game away and points to the fact that all of these patsy frontmen have operators behind them. According to CIA hypnosis expert Milton Klein, creating a hypnotized “patsy” is easier than making a totally controlled Manchurian Candidate. The patsy can be induced by hypnosis to do things which later show up as circumstantial evidence implicating him in the crime. Klein claims he can create a patsy in three months; a full-scale Manchurian Candidate, on the other hand, takes six months. I think we can see the big picture now. Dupes likes Holmes are best made into patsies. He could have been waiting in his car outside while the ‘Joker’ shot the place up. The ‘Joker’ could have been a regular military killing machine or a more advanced Manchurian. Why waste an investment like that? Leave the patsy next to the scene. You know the specially selected cops at the scene will frame him anyway if the evidence doesn’t quite fit. Are they real local cops in the first place or just posing as local cops in uniform? For all we know, the boys in blue could all be intel. If necessary, we’ll have a commission to tell us what the script really said happened. The contingency plans are always the same. Why change the program if everyone’s is hooked to the same channel?

(George Freund, “The Dark Prince Was a Manchurian,” http://www.conspiracy-cafe.com/apps/blog/show/17249031-the-dark-prince-was-a-manchurian)

 

 

Adam Lanza’s family: Mom liked parlor games, guns; dad, a tax exec, remarried

sandy 63

By Michael Martinez and David Ariosto, CNN

updated 9:32 AM EST, Sun December 16, 2012

Newtown, Connecticut (CNN) — The mother of the man identified by authorities as the gunman behind an elementary school massacre liked to play parlor games in a ladylike setting with neighbors, discussing their landscaping and backyard gardens in this charming exurb some 60 miles from New York City.

Nancy Lanza was a personable neighbor who lived on a block of spacious houses on a crest overlooking gentle hills, acquaintances said. She and her family moved to the Sandy Hook neighborhood about 1998, raising two sons with husband Peter until the couple separated a few years ago. “It was just a nice, normal family,” neighbor Rhonda Cullen said, recalling a recurring neighborhood ladies night over the Bunco dice game.

 

sandy 64

 

 

 

 

 

 

sandy 66

sandy 65 sandy 67

 

 

 

Connecticut shooter’s family statement

Shooting suspect’s home

Lanza neighbor stunned

Shooter’s classmate: He was ‘different’

“We used to joke with her that she’d do all this landscaping that no one could see because it all was in the back, and because her house was so set back,” added Cullen. Right, so already the media spin on this article is setting us up for the Munsters or the Addam’s Family. But the next paragraph takes the impression of an eccentric dysfunctional family further, duping the naïve public into believing the story of a lone nut stealing the weapons of his gun hobbiest mother so he can go live with his video games at a local school.

“At odds with this image of New England gentility was how the Lanza household possessed a cache of weapons — including an assault-style rifle and two handguns — in a community prized for its stillness.”

“Those weapons were found with Nancy Lanza’s younger son, Adam, 20 — whom three law enforcement officials said was the gunman in Friday’s mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School,” the CNN reporters inform us. Interesting that the CNN reporters write “Adam 20 — whom three law enforcement officials said was the gunman”. This is interesting for two reasons. First, they have to convince us that Adam was the shooter because three law enforcement officials identified him as the shooter. Okay, so would you care to tell us who they were? Names please. And the second point is why do we need convincing when it’s all over the news that Adam was the killer? Instead, we are reminded that three law enforcement officials have vouched for that being the case. I guess it must be true then, if three officers of the law say it is so. There’s only one problem. We don’t know who these officers are, so the claim is worthless hearsay without the officers being properly identified.

Accordin to CNN, “After gunfire at the school killed 20 children and six adults— the second deadliest school shooting in U.S. history — the shooter killed himself, officials said.” You don’t say, officials say, do they? Would you care to tell us which officials? More worthless hearsay at this point.

“Before Friday’s rampage, authorities said, Adam Lanza killed his mother in her home in Newtown’s Sandy Hook community, after which the school takes its name. Adam was living with his mother, two law enforcement sources said. The other son, Ryan, was living in New Jersey,” we learn from CNN.

Now it’s two law enforcement sources claiming that Adam was living with his mother, not three as before. Three in a bed and the little one said, “Move over! Move over!” What happened to the third law enforcement official? And who did you say those two law enforcement officers were again?

Said Cullen, struggling to make sense of the weaponry and the carnage: “Something doesn’t add up.”

I could not agree with you more, honey. We fell for Sandy Hook, Line and Stinker, but something sure does stink. Miss Cullen apparently didn’t know about the weapons. As for the carnage, she finds it incomprehensible that her peaceful neighbours would have a son that uses six year olds for target practice. You’re right, honey. It doesn’t make any sense. That’s because none of the nonsense they’re telling you is true.

“Marsha Lanza, an aunt to Adam Lanza, described him as a “quiet, nice kid,” but he had issues with learning, she said. Her husband is brother to Adam Lanza’s father,” the CNN reporters tell us.

You heard Marsha, a nice, quiet kid who apparently woke up on the wrong side of the bed one morning. How can “a nice, quiet kid” suddenly turn into an angry monster capable of slaughtering children? Why children, for pity’s sake? I mean, you might understand a disaffected youth’s rage being directed against adults who impose their will on him and perhaps make his life stressful, hence the six adults who were supposedly gunned down. But children? What would the motive be? And the argument that he was just crazy doesn’t wash. Everyone has a motive, as twisted and perverse as they sometimes may be, there is always a motive. I can fathom why the twisted and perverted monsters running the government and the intelligence services might want to harm innocent children, but not Adam Lanza the lone nut. The government wants an excuse to go after Americans’ guns so they can slaughter untold numbers of innocents in their genocidal campaign to cull the world’s population. That is the agenda behind UN Agenda 21. If you haven’t read it maybe you should before you dismiss the claim as another conspiracy theory.

“He was definitely the challenge of the family in that house. Every family has one,” she told CNN affiliate WLS. “They have one. I have one. But never in trouble with the law, never in trouble with anything.”

Here you have the assurance of someone who knows the family very well and is a relative. She maintains Adam was a challenge, but as she says, “never in trouble with the law, never in trouble with anything.” No wonder the woman is confused and perplexed. There’s always a warning sign before someone snaps. They don’t just wake up one day and go on a shooting rampage. But what she is maintaining is that he had never shown the slightest sign or proclivity for violence. I’m sort, but that just doesn’t happen.

She said Adam Lanza’s mother “battled” with the school board and ended up having her son home-schooled. “She had issues with school,” said Marsha Lanza, who lives in Crystal Lake, Illinois. “I’m not 100% certain if it was behavior or learning disabilities, but he was a very, very bright boy. He was smart.”

Right, so why would a well nurtured autistic child, home-schooled by his devoted mother have anger issues? And if he was so bright and smart, why would he not look for a solution for any issues he might have instead of going on a shooting rampage? Violence is the preserve of the weak and intellectually deficient, not the smart pro-active, problem-solving intellect.

Nancy Lanza was a giving, quiet, reserved person who grew up on a farm in New Hampshire with three siblings in a self-reliant family, Marsha Lanza said. The Lanza family is from Kingston, New Hampshire, she said. “She didn’t have to work because my brother-in-law left her very well off, very well off. She was always there for her kids,” Marsha Lanza added, referring to Nancy Lanza’s financial situation after she and her husband divorced.

Again, we come back to motive. Adam wants for nothing. He lives in a large, luxurious home. His mother is well off due to Adam’s father leaving her financially well endowed following their divorce. And by relative Martha’s own appraisal, his mother was always there for her kids.

The gunman’s mother owned guns for self-defense, the aunt said. “She never felt threatened, or she would have said something,” Marsha Lanza said. This is another anomaly. Adam’s mother was supposed to be a gun hobbiest. Yet Marsha claims Nancy kept the guns for defensive purposes, but later in the article we learn from another source that she was a gun hobbiest. Martha appears to know the family more intimately than anyone else. If she says Nancy kept guns in the house for defensive purposes then it’s probably true. Martha makes no mention of Nancy being a gun hobbiest.

Martha adds that the mother never felt threatened. If you were living with someone with homicidal or suicidal tendencies, they would surely exhibit signs of agitation, temper and disquiet. They wouldn’t just wake up one day and explode like a cannon. Ad had Nancy Lanza seen those warning signs she would have needed to confide in someone and probably more than one person. In fact, she probably would have been asking around for advice on how to handle the problem. But there were no warning signs because ultimately the entire media spin on the crazed autistic killer is complete nonsense.

The aunt also said she couldn’t begin to understand the mass shooting.

We don’t blame you, honey. We can’t make sense of it either. That’s because it doesn’t make sense. None of it. That’s because it’s a poorly thought out script by amateur script writers who don’t understand how to weave a plausible narrative. They should have hired Hollywood script writers and no doubt used to do so in the past, but when AIDS killed off most of the best brains in Hollywood we’re left with bottom of the barrel reality shows. The same problem appears to have hit the intelligence services. They have really bad script writers and editors and there false falg terror operations are badly scripted and transparent as seran wrap.

“Why these kids, why these innocent little kids? That just still baffles me,” she said. “I can’t understand why.”

Neither can we, honey. Neither can we. Marsha is asking the same questions we are. She can’t fathom why Adam would gun down a bunch of six year olds. The simple answer to the question is that he couldn’t, wouldn’t and didn’t. First, because he lacked motive. And second because he was too disabled with sever autism to have the motor skills to be able to undertake such a shooting spree.

She said she doesn’t believe gun laws should be changed. “It’s the person who does the killing, not the gun,” she said. “I thank God every day that my kids have faith and know right from wrong — and I’m not saying her kids didn’t — but you have got to give your kids roots.”

Martha makes more sense than the government or the idiots in the mainstream media calling for gun control. What people in the media are overlooking is the fact that guns can be a defense and deterrent to violence as much as they can be the cause of it.

Adam Lanza’s brother, Ryan, works as a certified public account in New York, the aunt said. “I couldn’t imagine Ryan doing such a thing. He is too well-educated,” she said. “He has it together.”

We see the significance of Martha’s claim about Adam’s brother Ryan in the next paragraph, where we have the testimony of Dan Holmes, who owns a local landscaping business. He claims Nancy is a gun collector and showed a rifle she had recently purchased. Well, I’ve heard of butch before, but a woman totting guns around and showing them off? Martha claimed Ryan was a certified public accountant who worked in New York. Does that sound like the sort of individual who would get his jollies from heading off to the town dump with his hick mom to shoot glass bottles for kicks? Let’s examine Mr. Holmes’ statement below.

The CNN reporters then state, “Dan Holmes, who owns a local landscaping business, said Nancy Lanza was a gun collector, and that she showed off a rifle she had recently purchased. She told me she’d go target shooting with her boys pretty often,” Holmes said.

Sorry, but this claim isn’t even believable. What mother on planet Earth would take her boys for target practice? I’ve heard of ultra-feminists who like to get their hands dirty and wear the pants in the family, but this is ridiculous. Mothers are usually the nurturers who try to steer their children away from violence, not condition them into being pro gun and going out to the town dump to shoot at glass bottles. The other problem with the story is that Mr. Holmes allegedly claims she took both boys out for target practice. We know that the other son, Ryan, doesn’t live with his mother. We have also learned elsewhere that he has a job in New York that keeps him busy. Is it likely that he would have the time or inclination for such a pastime just to amuse his brother and autistic brother? Now look at the next paragraph because it holds the clincher in all this hearsay nonsense.

But ATF Special Assistant Agent Gene Marquez said his agency “has not been able to uncover any evidence that the mother and the son were actively engaged in going to the gun ranges, practicing marksmanship, or anything of that nature.”

What the heck is the Federal Agency ATF doing on the case? Why not the FBI and the local Newtown police department or county sheriff’s department? The ATF has had established links to false flag terror events before like the Oklahoma Bombing, where their agents were forewarned not to come into work that day as Jim Keith stated in his book OK Bomb. Keith also claimed that the ATF actually had live incidieries stored in their office space in the Alfred P. Murrah federal building and that these explosives added to the magnitude of the explosions. Could the ATF have been invoved in the Sandy Hook drill? Could they have had an integral part in the so-called investigation and cover up in an attempt to conceal the fact that this false flag terror event never really happened.

The three weapons found at the scene of the shooting were legally purchased by his mother, a law enforcement official familiar with the investigation told CNN.

Who is this unidentified “law enforcement official familiar with the investigation”? ‘Familiar’ with the investigation? The word ‘familiar’ implies having some acquaintance with something – in this case the investigation, which implies he doesn’t have any direct involvement in the case. This, coupled with the fact that he is not identified by the CNN reporters places his so-called statement in the realm of hearsay. It is completely unreliable as evidence, at least within the context of this article.

Neighbor Gina McDade said Nancy Lanza was a “stay-at-home mom” and not a teacher or part-time employee of Sandy Hook Elementary, as some media reports stated.

So if Nancy Lanza was a stay-at-home mom devoted to caring for her severely autistic child, Adam, what could possibly initiate the kind of rage within him that would prompt his to shoot his mother in the face? That’s right face if reports can be believed. If he’s being nurtured and loved by this woman, it makes no sense that he would be so filled with rage towards her that he would shoot her in the face, which shows the most extreme form of malice and hate. Shooting someone in the face and especially your own mother? Then going on a homicidal rampage at a local school, where you purportedly gun down innocent children? The narrative makes no sense whatsoever. Autistic individuals are not especially known for violence and there are few documented cases of them ever turning on those who care for and nurture them.

Then CNN informs us that:

Nancy Lanza had earlier worked in finance in Boston and Connecticut, said a friend who knew her well but who didn’t want her name published. Nancy Lanza had retired or was on a break from her career, but she was not a teacher, the friend said.

Why would this friend not wish to have their name published? And what value is their testimony when we have no idea who they are. Again it is worthless testimony amounting to no more than hearsay. Nevertheless, if Adam’s mother Nancy was not a teacher at Sandy Hook and had never been employed as a teacher there, what is the link between Adam and Sandy Hook that would cause him to go on a homicidal shooting rampage against school staff and youg pupils? The absurdity of the official story beggars belief. One has to suspend one’s disbelief as one does hearing a fairy tale, but at least with a fairy tale there is a cohesive and logical narrative that makes sense and holds our attention because it almost seems possible or real. The absurd official narrative of Sandy Hook is one of the most implausible of modern times, even more implausible than the official story or official ‘lie’ of 9/11.

The friend said Nancy was devoted to her sons and had been “caring for Adam”, but would not provide further details.

And just how is she devoted to Ryan when he doesn’t even live with her and has a high paying job as a charted accountant in New York? How often would mother Nancy even be able to see him? As for being devoted to “caring for Adam” as a stay-at-home mom, anyone can see that at least this part of the narrative makes some sense.

Nancy Lanza’s relatives say they share the nation’s grief and struggle “to comprehend the tremendous loss that we all share,” according to a statement from James Champion, who is a police officer and brother to Nancy Lanza.

Once again it is reiterated in the article that none of the relatives can fathom how any of this is possible and struggle to comprehend the scale of the tragedy. Who can blame them? The wholse story is so patently ludicrous it is amazing to think that professional liars working for and paid by the military intelligence agencies can justify their paycheck with a narrative this transparently ridiculous. At least one thing is apropos: the staging ground for this false flag terror operation has an elementary school. The planning committee that planned this operation show that their median education level is at about the level of the children attending the school.

Peter Lanza released a statement expressing condolences to the families of victims, according to CNN.

“Our family is grieving along with all those who have been affected by this enormous tragedy. No words can truly express how heartbroken we are. We are in a state of disbelief and trying to find whatever answers we can,” said the statement.

According to the CNN article, the Lanzas’ marriage had ended in 2008. Nancy Jean Lanza sued Peter John Lanza for divorce on November 24, 2008, according to Connecticut court records show. Nancy Lanza checked off “yes” for financial disputes but “no” for parenting disputes. They were divorced in September 2009 after an uncontested hearing, records show.

CNN claims Peter Lanza is tax director and vice president of taxes for GE Energy Financial Services in the New York City area, according to his resume on the social media networking site LinkedIn. He had served as an adjunct faculty member at Northeastern University in Boston since 1995 and also taught a partnership tax class in the master’s in taxation degree program at Fairfield University in Fairfield, Connecticut, according to his LinkedIn page.

On LinkedIn, he wrote summaries about himself, including: “Career dedicated to developing and refining partnership tax planning and transactional skills” and “Work closely with many of the preeminent partnership tax advisors in the United States on a daily basis.”

The fact that Peter Lanza worked for GE in any capacity is a red flag. GE is widely reputed to have unsavoury connections to a lot of international crime syndicates and their operations and always has. It is also accused of being one of the New York based firms behind the building up of Nazi Germany during World War II. I.G. Farben worked in concert before and throughout the war with other cartels like the J.P. Morgan-controlled General Electric, a company with which President Franklin D. Roosevelt was closely allied. In 1939, Senator James A. Reed of Missouri, a one-time Roosevelt supporter, bravely blew the whistle on FDR in the Senate, referring to the President rightfully as a “hired man for the economic royalists” in Wall Street. He added that the Roosevelt family was one of the biggest holders of shares in General Electric.  General Electric was also supported Hitler and his rise to power. There is photographic and documented evidence that, like I.G. Farben, both General Electric companies in Germany, A.E.G. and Osram, directly financed Hitler. I.G. Farben contributed the most, making up 45% of the fund that brought Hitler to power in 1933, but the companies linked to General Electric also made very large donations. As with Standard Oil of New York, whose Germany subsidiary was I.G. Farben, a number of directors of the German General Electric were on the board of I.G. Farben. As with the other major American companies involved, the parent company General Electric based in New York channelled its contributions to Hitler via German subsidiaries and cartel partners. Again only the German directors of the General Electric cartel were charged and tried at Nuremberg, not the Americans. To have done so would have exposed the whole story.

(David Icke, “And the Truth Shall Set You Free”, ch.5, http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/biggestsecret/andtruthfreebook/truthfree05.htm)

Hours after the shooting, according to CNN, a reporter with the Stamford Advocate found Peter Lanza as he pulled his blue Mini Cooper into his driveway in Stamford, Connecticut. Peter Lanza was apparently unaware that his son was behind the school massacre and his ex-wife had been killed, the newspaper reported.

Peter Lanza purportedly told the reporter, “Is there something I can do for you?” and then declined to comment upon being told of his family’s involvement in the shooting, the newspaper reported. The newspaper quoted an unidentified neighbor as saying Peter Lanza and his new wife, who has been living in the neighborhood for at least a decade, were married fairly recently. Peter Lanza was taken in for questioning, but there was no indication he would face any charges, one U.S. law enforcement official told CNN.

Again we are given testimony from two unidentified sources, one a so-called neighbour and the other another unidentified law enforcement official. Why are all these law enforcement officials afraid or unable to identify themselves? Is it because they do not want their names and reputations besmirched by association with this massive fraud known as the Sandy Hook school shooting? Why all the secrecy? Why is it necessary? Why did the state troopers forbid reporters from interviewing the so-called grieving families of the victims? Since when have the First Amendment rights of American reporters ever been denied to them before in any major event in American history? And how was this justified? Supposedly it was to protect the aggrieved relatives from being inflicted with more pain. Nonsense. It’s because the State Troopers were under instructions from above to forbid the reporters from interviewing the families for fear they would discover that they were merely actors taking part in a treasonous plot against their fellow countrymen.

According to CNN, Ryan Lanza was taken into custody for general questioning from a home in Hoboken, New Jersey, according to three law enforcement officials. He was supposedly not considered a suspect. Why did they have to take the father and the brother into custody if they were not considered suspects? Was it so they could be briefed or debriefed on how to behave and how to conduct themselves during the course of this criminal fraud?

“The more complicated story of Adam Lanza was still being assembled by authorities and media in the aftermath of the massacre,” the CNN article states. The wording of that piece of text is most apropos, since they are making the story up as they went along. “The more complicated story of Adam Lanza was still being assembled” is the most apt way of putting it. The narrative was being invented by the spin doctors and they had to spin it just right in an attempt to circumvent the attempts of “truthers” to expose and debunk the media lies.

Accoring to CNN, authorities said they were examining the sequence of events that led Adam Lanza to dress in what a law enforcement source said was “black battle fatigues and a military vest,” enter Sandy Hook Elementary and begin firing. Once again claims are based on an unnamed law enforcement source. Not only are the law enforcement sources not named, but neither is the law enforcement agency. How can anyone trust that any of this information is bona fide and real, when there are no named sources organizationally or individually in any of these reports? The only time we have a law enforcement source named,

He was named by authorities as the invader who shot to death 20 children — ages 6 and 7 — and six adults, then killed himself.

Adam Lanza was found dead in a classroom, and police recovered three weapons from the scene: a semiautomatic .223-caliber rifle made by Bushmaster and two handguns made by Glock and Sig Sauer, a source with knowledge of the investigation said.

Adam Lanza had no known criminal record, a law enforcement official said.

A member of Lanza’s family told investigators that he had a form of autism, according to a law enforcement official who spoke under condition of anonymity due to the sensitive nature of the investigation.

Acquaintances struggled with fathoming the deadly actions being attributed to someone they had known.

Alex Israel was in the same class at Newtown High School with Adam Lanza, who lived a few houses down from her.

“You could definitely tell he was a genius,” Israel told CNN, adding she hadn’t talked with him since middle school. “He was really quiet, he kept to himself.”

His former bus driver, Marsha Moskowitz, told CNN affiliate WABCthat he was “a nice kid, very polite” like his brother.

“It’s a shock to even know (the family),” she said. “You can’t understand what happened.”

A former classmate told CNN affiliate WCBS that Adam Lanza “was just a kid” — not a troublemaker, not antisocial, not suggesting in any way that he could erupt like this.

“I don’t know who would do anything like this,” the classmate said, before walking away distraught. “This is unspeakable.”

(Michael Martinez and David Ariosto, “Adam Lanza’s family: Mom liked parlor games, guns; dad, a tax exec, remarried,” December 16, 2012, http://www.cnn.com/2012/12/15/us/connecticut-lanza-family-profile)

 

 

 

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*