What do the London bombings, 9-11, the anthrax attacks, Oklahoma bombing, and Hurricane Katrina all have in common? Simply put, they are all inside jobs. Each of these operations were orchestrated by the U.S. intelligence services in order to grant the U.S. government pretext for ratcheting up the war on terrorism, and/or invoking increasing war measures at home, i.e. the Patriot Act and Homeland Security. The CIA‘s Frankenstein creation, al-Qaeda, was the entity to be implicated and framed in most of these scenarios. The CIA operative Tim Osmond posing as fanatical Islamic terrorist Osama bin Laden has loomed large in the American psyche, reared on fireside stories of the bogeyman, and the CIA has milked their monster for all he is worth. However, with Michael Moore and other researchers exposing the business ties between the bin Laden‘s and the Bush‘s in addition to exposes on the CIA creation al-Qaeda, the U.S. mafiocracy had to find a new scapegoat. The new perpetrator would leave no paper trail. It would be the perfect crime, granting the U.S. government plausible deniability. Who did they frame? Who did they set up in their most recent assault on the American people? Mother Nature. Hurricane Katrina was blamed for FEMA‘s controlled demolition of the Lake Portchartrain levee. The conspiracy researchers would be stopped cold. No one would believe their claims that FEMA had pulled off another World Trade Center-style controlled demolition. Everyone would blame Mother Nature. She would take the rap this time. No one would believe the government did it. Until now that is. This chapter will present the case for government conspiracy to commit mass murder so succinctly that conspiracy theory skeptics will be silenced once and for all.
None of the official stories involving any of the scenarios named above stand up under rigorous examination. To show that this is the case, let us examine the lead role each of these events has played in Hollywood CIA, Inc. productions by going through the list retroactively. Let us begin with the July 7 London bombings. By showing the striking parallels between the London bombings and the
9-11 attacks, we can begin to see how the official story falls apart as the toilet paper the script was written on begins to unravel.
The first parallel to be drawn is the fact that the same M.O. was followed on both sides of the Atlantic in both operations. In keeping with the National Planning Scenarios drawn up by the governments of both countries, which we will examine later in this chapter, anti- terrorist war game exercises were actually being conducted on the very days the terrorist attacks were happening in real-time. In the case of the London bombings, for instance, a government-appointed consultancy firm was conducting anti-terrorist bombing exercises in London on July 7, the very day of the bombings. The firm is Visor Consultants, which promotes itself as a crisis management consultancy agency. Peter Power, the Managing Director, is a former Scotland Yard official, working at one time with the Anti Terrorist Branch. In a BBC Radio 5 interview, Mr. Power informed the host of this show that at the time anti-terrorist bombing exercises were taking place in London bombs were being planted simultaneously at precisely the same locations – all seven locations where bombs later exploded. Amazingly, according to Power, his firm was running a
1,000-man strong exercise involving the London Underground being bombed at the exact same locations and times actual bombing events were taking place. Powell‘s words as recorded on the BBC 5 program could not be more chilling, the incident clearly leaving him as shaken as any bystander on the scene:
At half past nine this morning, we were actually running an exercise for a company of over a thousand people in London based on simultaneous bombs going off precisely at the railway stations where it happened this morning, so I still have the hairs on the back of my neck standing up right now.
(London Underground Bombing ‗Exercises‘ Took
Place at Same Time as Real Attack, July 13, 2005
Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones, Prison Planet)
Skeptics might argue that this is an incredible risk to take, having terrorists planting bombs right under the noses of an antiterrorist bombing unit, but it actually grants the terrorists plausible deniability and cover. Should they be caught planting a bomb, they can say that they are merely involved in a mock terrorist bombing drill. In fact, they would never even be under suspicion because the drill participants would naturally make this deduction on their own. It not only grants the small compartmentalized government-sponsored terrorists the cover they need to carry out the operation, but the immunity required should they get caught during the attack or afterwards with the incriminating evidence. In addition, the London terror alert level was lowered in advance of the bombings, giving the perpetrators extra cover to plan and execute the attacks unimpeded by stringent security hurdles.
Precisely the same modus operandi was employed on the morning of September 11, 2001, when the CIA was conducting drills involving the flying of hijacked planes into the WTC and Pentagon at
8:30 in the morning. At least six National Planning Scenario-type drills were held in the days preceding the 9-11 attacks. NORAD had been briefed in advance that the CIA would be conducting these drills. This explains NORAD‘s failure to respond when a total of 22 hijacked airliners showed up on their radar screens. The normal reactive procedure and protocols were ignored and the response consequently forestalled and delayed. (London Underground Bombing ‗Exercises‘ Took Place at Same Time as Real Attack, July
The next objection to be raised will of course be motive. Skeptics will argue that no government would be mad or maniacal enough to stage attacks on its own people for the sake of any agenda or policy pursuit. History tells us that this is just not so. The United States, the UK and other powers have been implicated in either staging or planning such events in the past, so why not now? Northwoods, a now often cited declassified document, was presented by the Joint Chiefs of Staff on behalf of the CIA to the president in
1963, and called for the shooting down of mock passenger airliners
that were assets of the CIA and blaming it on Cuba to justify a military invasion of Cuba by the United States. The plan even called for fake passengers lists and mock funerals for the bereaved families of the non-existent dead. The plan was shelved, but seems to have found a new lease on life some 40 years after it was first proposed. Granted it has undergone a facelift and cosmetic surgery, but the basic M.O. remains intact. When similar scenarios have actually gone from boardroom to planning and implementation stage, why not 9-11 and the London bombings? Many researchers have studied Roosevelt‘s failure to respond when advanced warning of an imminent attack on Pearl Harbor came to his attention. It is now well documented that the intelligence apparatus of the United States had broken the Japanese coded transmissions to their diplomatic missions abroad, which were issued through false weather reports and the American government was forewarned of an imminent attack days in advance. When the advanced warning on Pearl Harbor was ignored to grant the US government pretext and justification for entering an unpopular war, why would the same consideration not be in effect on 9-11 when a terrorist attack blamed on the Middle East opened up whole vistas of oil rich sand dunes falling into the oil barons of the American government who could convince an angry public that the invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq was both righteous and justified?
Lack of motive is clearly not a convincing objection. There is plenty of motive and plenty to be gained by state-sponsored terrorists in the UK and USA. Prior to the London bombings, BBC polls showed that 80 percent were opposed to the ID cards. Support for the EU and increased globalization is sure to get the public nod again in the wake of the retreating terrorist tide. In addition, Blair and Bush were both facing indictments in a Federal Grand Jury trial being held in Chicago at the time of the bombings.
(Tony Blair’s MI-6 Agents Caught Trying To Blow Up Chicago Subway: To Derail US Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald’s Grand Jury Investigations of Bush-Blair White House Leaks, by Tom Heneghan
& Stew Webb Tom Heneghan & Stew Webb, www.stewwebb.com)
It appears that French Intelligence in collaboration with the
U.S. Marshall Service caught four of Tony Blair’s British MI-6
Agents trying to bomb the Chicago Subway system on the night of Monday July 18, 2005. The four were charged in Federal Court with explosives possession. Chicago US Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald served Tony Blair a subpoena in the CIA Valerie Plame case on July 13,
2005 to answer questions regarding his role in the leaks connected to George W. Bush, Richard Cheney, Condeleeza Rice, Andrew Card, Scooter Libby and Karl Rove. Neither Tony Blair nor George W.
Bush has yet responded to their subpoenas. Tony Blair had previously supplied George W. Bush with a false British Intelligence directive stating that Iraq leader Saddam Hussein had obtained ―dirty bomb‖ nuclear materials from Niger. This false intelligence report provided Bush with pretext and justification to go to war in Iraq. The report has since been proven to be bogus, rendering the entire war a crime
against humanity and its perpetrators war criminals and treasonous thugs guilty of misleading and betraying their own citizens. Valerie Plame’s husband, Ambassador Joseph Wilson, submitted his report prior to the Bush-Blair lies that Niger never sold nuclear materials to Iraq. Wilson later alleged Bush lied in his State of the Union address to the nation. Valerie Plame’s CIA Network was further investigating Bush and Cheney for planning the 9-11 attacks. New York Police Bernard Kerik it is claimed, who ran a FEMA operation out of pier 29 known as Code Angel also known as Tripod II, planted bombs in the
7 World Trade Center Building that was demolished on September 11,
This operation wasa US Justice Department operation involving Gary Best of the Defense Intelligence Agency, a George H. W. Bush shadow government operative. Arrested in French New Guinea for spying, Best has confessed to 9-11 involvement. Bush and Blair were obviously attempting to derail the Federal Grand Jury investigations of their violations of National Security Laws and their illegal invasion of Iraq through the issuance of intentionally falsified reports. Their further treason attacks on America involve rogue CIA, DIA, British MI-6, Russian and MOSSAD agents who were also involved in the 9-11-2001 World Trade Center and Pentagon attacks.
(Tony Blair’s MI-6 Agents Caught Trying To Blow Up Chicago Subway: To Derail US Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald’s Grand Jury Investigations of Bush-Blair White House Leaks, by Tom Heneghan
& Stew Webb Tom Heneghan & Stew Webb, www.stewwebb.com)
However, despite having being exposed for racketeering, war crimes, and other treasonous offenses, Blair and Bush will continue to hold office for quite some time. Meanwhile, a frightened public fearful of bombing attacks by international terrorists will now rally behind their unpopular, largely discredited, and vilified leaders, who will declare open season on terrorists again, giving the fledgling war on terrorism the required booster shot it needs.
Another parallel between the July 7 London bombings and 9-
11 is the fact that, just as the Bush administration had received advanced warnings of imminent terrorist attacks involving hijacked airliners from German and Russian intelligence agencies and from operatives within its own intelligence apparatuses, so Tony Blair had been repeatedly warned by Israeli of an imminent terrorist threat from July 4 but chose to ignore the warning. Reports by the Associated Press and the intelligence specialists Stratfor were the two main sources for this leak. The AP reports were then quickly withdrawn from public view, but have been salvaged and can be seen at www.nomorefakenews.com and numerous other websites. Another
major oversight of Blair‘s intelligence minions is the fact that the MI5
made a number of glaring errors in their presentation of the ―al- Qaeda‖ website, even revealing a DNS trace to a server within the United States. What this proves beyond doubt is that ―al-Qaeda‖ was being framed by MI5 for the London attacks. And since ―al-Qaeda‖ were being framed by the British intelligence, this implies that the perpetrators were framing another organization for their own crime, proving inside complicity beyond doubt. Whether al-Qaeda, the CIA or MI5 were actually involved in the London bombings is really irrelevant since they are all in cahoots with one another. Haroon Rashid Aswat, the man identified by British Police as being the mastermind of the London bombings, was working for MI6, it has been revealed by leading U.S. and French intelligence assets, which
is an illustrative enough example of the duplicity, double-dealing, roguery, and deception of the ―double agent‖. (―Haroon Aswat…FBI agent threatens former USDA federal agent, now staff reporter for The New Criminologist,‖ Berry-dee, Christopher, Sept. 25, 2005)
John Loftus, a terrorism expert and a former prosecutor for the US Justice Department, has revealed that the so-called mastermind of the July 7th bombings, Haroon Rashid Aswat, is actually a British intelligence asset. Loftus revealed that the so-called Al- Muhajiroun group, based in London had formed during the Kosovo crisis, when fundamentalist Muslim leaders were recruited by MI6 to fight in Kosovo, as he explains, ―Believe it or not, British intelligence actually hired some Al-Qaeda guys to help the Muslim rights in Albania and in Kosovo. That‘s when Al-Muhajiroun got started.‖ Loftus then launches into a blistering attack on MI6 and the US Department of Justice, which he claims protected this asset:
Back in 1999 he came to America. The Justice Department wanted to indict him in Seattle because him and his buddy were trying to set up a terrorist training school in Oregon…we‘ve just learned that the headquarters of the US Justice Department ordered the Seattle prosecutors not to touch Aswat…apparently Aswat was working for British intelligence.
(Christopher Berry-Dee, ―London Bombing ringleader, Haroon Rashid Aswat – double agent for MI6,‖ New Criminologist, August 23. 2005)
The story when previously aired was given a spin, making it appear like a slight ‗difference of opinion‘ between the FBI and MI6, with the British Home Office portrayed as being reluctant to hand Aswat over to US authorities because of his British citizenship. US intelligence officials, on the other hand, are said to be furious because every time they have got close to getting their man, he has slipped through the
In a vitriolic attack, Loftus claims the al-Qaeda exists as an
organized unit only where the intelligence agencies have created, funded and backed its operations. Loftus argues that several weeks before the London Bombings, Aswat was again located by a South African intelligence agency, but allowed to slip through the net again, this time to London:
He was a British intelligence plant. So all of a sudden he disappears. He‘s in South Africa. We think he‘s dead; we don‘t know he‘s down there. Last month the South African Secret Service come across the guy. He‘s alive…the Brits know that the CIA wants to get a hold of Haroon. So what happens? He takes off again, goes right to London. He isn‘t arrested when he lands. He isn‘t arrested when he leaves…He‘s on the watch list. The only reason he could get away with that was if he was working for British intelligence. He was a wanted man. (Ibid)
This game is typical of the Illuminati-Freemason fronts known as the world‘s intelligence agencies. Keep in mind that the intelligence agencies of Europe were founded by Freemasons and Rosicrucians Francis and Roger Bacon back in Elizabethan times. The Masons have always funded and supported both sides in any kind of regional or international war. It is their modus operandi and was practiced by the elite Templar family the House of Guise and Lorraine, whose family coat of arms was the ―double cross,‖ more Freemason jargon that has entered the English language, signifying betrayal, something this crime society is highly skilled in.
Aswat has been protected by British intelligence because he is a typical double agent. Double agents are part of the whole scheme of ―double crossing‖. They work for both sides because the intelligence services that employ them work for both sides. They are playing dialectics – thesis-antithesis-synthesis – as part of their game plan. By manipulating both sides, they can direct their agenda toward a high, overarching goal based on the founding of a New World Order.
Loftus sums up the game plan nicely:
This is the guy (Aswat), and what‘s really embarrassing is that the entire British police are out chasing him, and one wing of the british government, MI6 or the British Secret Service, has been hiding him. And this has been a real source of contention between the CIA, the Justice Department, and Britain…he is a double agent. (Ibid)
This is very reminiscent of the operation involving the OSS to train Bronstein, codename Trotsky, and his cohorts in the United States to foment the Bolshevik Revolution back in Russia. Trotsky was detained in Halifax, Nova Scotia by Canadian immigration police, but in a move similar to the one we are now witnessing with Aswat, British intelligence intervened, pulled rank on the Canadian immigration authorities and told the to let Trotsky (Bronstein) go. (Maclean, ―How Canada Lost Its Chance to Shorten the War: Why Did Canada let Trotsky Go?‖)
Noam Chomsky and other researchers of the more diligent stripe have already exposed the fact that the CIA, MI5 and MI6 had financed al-Qaeda as a terrorist cell that would pose a serious security threat to the Soviets in the Cold War era. It was at this time that Osama bin Laden was and probably still is on the CIA payroll operating under the code name ―Tim Osmon‖. (―Tony Blair Ordered the London Bombings‖, Commentary by Michael James, www.rense.com) Bin Laden was, though, a product of a monumental
miscalculation by western security agencies. Throughout the 80s he
was armed by the CIA and funded by the Saudis to wage jihad against the Russian occupation of Afghanistan. Al-Qaida, literally “the database”, was originally the computer file of the thousands of mujahideen who were recruited and trained with help from the CIA to defeat the Russians. (Former Blair Minister Points Out Al-Qaeda CIA Ties, Robin Cook, London Guardian, July 09, 2005)
Soon after the July 7 London bombings, Blair notified the press that the bombings bore the profile of an al-Qaeda attack. This is true of course and he would be the first to know. The patsy al-Qaeda terrorist network is the changeling bastard child of the British intelligence services and CIA, along with the Freemason-controlled terrorist school known as the Muslim Brotherhood. The attacks were ordered and managed by the British intelligence network probably under the direct supervision of Tony Blair, who most likely ordered the attacks, or at least gave the order under a chain of command at the level of national leader. (Tony Blair Ordered the London Bombings, Commentary by Michael James, www.rense.com)
In order to give the reader some background here, it is necessary to give some history on the Muslim Brotherhood. It emerged out of Egypt in 1928 and evolved into ―the largest and most influential Sunni revivalist organization in the 20th century.‖ Founded by Hasan al-Banna, founder of an organization called Society for Moral Behavior, it was cultivated in an atmosphere of reverent
fundamentalism. He later spawned another group called Society for Impeding the forbidden. At age 16, he enrolled in an Islamic school in Cairo in order to train to become a teacher. He was steeped in Sufi literature and organized a Sufi society called the Hasafiyya Society for Welfare. The other major influence in Hasan al-Banna‘s life was Freemasonry. He became a member of the Masonic Brotherhood at a young age, an absolutely normal route for someone in high Egyptian society to take.
The Muslim Brotherhood received a lot of backing and support from British intelligence and British Freemasonry, which amounts to the same thing since British intelligence emerged out of Freemasonry under Sir Francis and Roger Bacon in Elizabethan England. It was sponsored by the great names in British Middle East intelligence. It had links to British intelligence through dame Freya Stark prior to World War II and the Shah of Iran‘s regime even considered it to be a tool of British Freemasonry, rightfully so. The explosion of violence throughout the Middle East in the late 70‘s and
80‘s, referred to by Zbigniew Brzezinski as the ―Arc of Crisis‖, was
not a chance event, but the result of meticulous planning by Global strategists such as Dr. Alexander King, Henry Kissinger, Zbigniew Brzezinski, and British Operative and Oxford man, Bernard Lewis. The author of this book was not even aware of Lewis‘s intelligence credentials when he consulted several of Lewis‘s books in writing another chapter due to his reputation as an expert in Middle East
The Muslim Brotherhood was focused specifically on Islam. It was Freemasonry for Muslim initiates only. While Freemasonry was liberal and allowed members of all faiths to join, the Muslim Brotherhood was exclusively Islamic. Like masonry, the Muslim Brotherhood invoked great secrecy and was run according to a pyramidal command structure. The infantry at the bottom had no idea of the plans being orchestrated by the generals at the top.
Above all, the Muslim Brother is loaded controlling tens of millions of readily available liquid assets, while controlling billions more in daily business deals involving everything from oil transactions and banking to drug-trafficking, illegal arms merchandising to gold and diamond smuggling. The Anglo-American Freemason-controlled intelligence apparatus has heavy investments in a mercenary terrorists-for-hire racket. They are partners in a powerful worldwide financial empire whose vast wealth is hidden in numbers Swiss bank accounts and offshore tax havens in Dubai, Kuwait, and Hang Kong.
And this is where Osama bin Laden comes in. It was in the
1970‘s that Osama would have his first exposure to the Muslim Brotherhood. Prior to this in the 1960‘s, Mohammed Qutb, brother of Sayed Qutb, the Muslim Brotherhood‘s chief ideologue, emigrated to Saudi Arabia as a result of Nassar‘s crackdown on the organization. In the 60‘s, he was given several positions in Saudi universities to promulgate the mission of the Muslim Brotherhood and gain recruits. While in Saudi Arabia, he conceived of an organization called the World Assembly of Muslim Youth, which became a reality in 1972 thanks to generous donations from the bin Laden family. Osama‘s brother Omar was a director at one time and his brother Abdullah also served as a director. Abdullah and WAMY were actually being
investigated by the FBI in the lead up to 9-11 till their investigation was abruptly halted by the Bush administration at the beginning of
(―TheBritish, Muslim Terrorism and September 11, Part Two: The Muslim Brotherhood: The Globalist‘s Secret Weapon,‖ http://www.redmoonrising.com/Ikhwan/MB.htm)
The terrorist attacks are state-sponsored. They are staged events, nothing more. Osama bin Laden is an insider, a CIA operative with a carefully cultivated ―deep cover‖ pedigree. He is the most convenient scapegoat in the traditional Freemason game of playing both sides. Hegelian dialectics is what it is called and no one plays the game better than the Masons and the Intelligence organizations and terrorist rackets they control. The London bombings and 9-11 were staged events. It‘s not by accident that the planes going into the twin towers looked like a scene from Die Hard II. It was staged. And it is entirely likely that the CIA‘s own Hollywood insiders were consulted to give the operation the right ‗look‘. It was what top officials and globalist planners call a National Planning Scenario staged to take place in real time and Osama and al-Qaeda were implicated to take the blame for it in advance and by design.
The fact is that war game drills similar to those staged on 7-
7 and 9-11, known to insiders as National Planning Scenarios, are regularly staged in the USA, Canada, and the UK code-named Operation Top-off. As reported in the media, a mock terrorist drill was taking place at the same time the terrorist attacks were actually happening in real-time. National Planning Scenarios of this kind are now being held in several major cities around the world. (Planning the Next Pandemic, ―Staging the Operation‖, la.indymedia.org) The author actually witnessed one of these operations in Seoul at Seoul Railway Station on September 6, 2005, and became alarmed when it dawned on him that an actual attack could be on the way in Seoul in light of recent events.
Investigators have revealed that an Operation Top Off-style war game exercise was being conducted Stateside during the week leading up to and on the actual day of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. This presupposes an inside job on both sides of the Atlantic because two war game exercises were being conducted on both sides of the
Atlantic on precisely the same day that an actual terrorist attack was being launched, a timeframe parallel to striking to be dismissed as coincidence. Of course someone might pose the objection that the terrorists might have staged the event on the day a National Planning Scenario was being planned as part of a decoy operation to insulate themselves from detection. But this begs the question, ‗How would they know?‘ The date of these operations is classified information. Prior knowledge presupposes inside knowledge, which presupposes a state-sponsored inside job and culpability. A terrorist event staged on the same day a mock terrorist drill is taking place by government- appointed teams points to a government-led conspiracy to commit mass murder. The fact that such striking coincidences should have occurred on both sides of the Atlantic in countries known to have such close ties that they have seen each other through war after war does rather implicate the highest ranking government officials of both nations in high treason. Indeed, when all is said and done, it is not just the twin towers of the WTC that will have come tumbling down, but the heads that will role in Westminster and Capitol Hill when the full extent of their treasonous activities is brought to light.
(―Former Bush Team Member Says WTC Collapse Likely A Controlled Demolition And ‘Inside Job’‖
By Greg Szymanski
June 12, 2005
Is there any evidence the official story is coming apart at the seams? Morgan Reynolds, a highly recognized former chief economist in the Labor Department, has come forward to express doubts about the official 9/11 story. He cites evidence of cover up and other suspicious circumstances that call the official story into question. He calls the official story about the collapse of the WTC ‘bogus,’ arguing that it is more likely that a controlled demolition destroyed the Twin Towers and adjacent Building No. 7. “If demolition destroyed three steel skyscrapers at the World Trade Center on 9/11, then the case for an ‘inside job’ and a government attack on America would be compelling,” Morgan Reynolds, Ph.D. is quoted as saying.
Reynolds, now a professor emeritus at Texas A&M University, also calls it ‘next to impossible’ that 19 Arab Terrorists could have led the mighty U.S. military a cat and mouse game. A scientific report on the WTC collapse might bring down the edifice of lies as hastily as a controlled demolition may have done the twin towers themselves, and Reynolds is calling for just such an investigation. “It is hard to exaggerate the importance of a scientific debate over the cause(s) of the collapse of the twin towers and building 7,” Reynolds argues. (Former Bush Team Member Says WTC Collapse Likely A Controlled Demolition And ‘Inside Job’ By Greg Szymanski) If anything, it was not the twin towers that stood on shaky ground nor were they in the least vulnerable to attack by commercial airliners and burning jet fuel. It is the government‘s edifice of lies that appears to be vulnerable and with a steady army of researchers slowly demolishing the official 9-11 story, it is unlikely the edifice of lies will stand for long. The investigative media are going to bring the government-orchestrated tower of lies down in the same spirit as the controlled demolition they themselves orchestrated. And was there ever a more poetic justice in the history of the world? Indeed, the Divine Architect could not have planned a scheme for retribution and setting things to rights better. Reynolds sums up the flimsy nature of the government‘s tower of lies effectively by stating:
If the official wisdom on the collapses is wrong, as I believe it is, then policy based on such erroneous engineering analysis is not likely to be correct either. The government’s collapse theory is highly vulnerable on its own terms. Only professional demolition appears to account for the full range of facts associated with the collapse of the three buildings.
He then adds even more ominously and strikingly:
More importantly, momentous political and social consequences would follow if impartial observers concluded that professionals imploded the WTC. Meanwhile, the job of scientists, engineers and impartial researchers everywhere is to get the scientific and engineering analysis of 9/11 right.
(Former Bush Team Member Says WTC Collapse Likely A Controlled Demolition And ‘Inside Job’
By Greg Szymanski)
Reynolds acknowledges, however, that the job of ―getting it right in today’s security state‖ is formidable given that government- orchestrated obstruction of justice is at play, in which explosives and structural experts have been intimidated in their analyses of the collapses of the World Trade Center Twin Towers. While the government line on the collapse of the towers is that burning jet fuel brought them down, many independent investigators have expressed strong disagreement. They have been hard pressed to come up with hard evidence to disprove the government line, however, since FEMA had already removed most of the hard evidence prior to independent investigation. (Former Bush Team Member Says WTC Collapse Likely A Controlled Demolition And ‘Inside Job’ By Greg Szymanski)
It is interesting to note that the company in charge of FEMA‘s hard evidence removal operation was a firm aptly named Controlled Demolition. If there was ever an example of irony in a dramatic plot that exposed the true perpetrators it is this. Indeed, the WTC was brought down by a ―controlled demolition‖, and the government agents involved in the clean-up operation were probably the very agents who had planted the incendiary devices that brought down the towers in the first place. Controlled Demolition has certainly been given a clean bill of health by the U.S. government, which has
awarded it with federal contracts worth billions. But, why in God‘s name is the company so highly trusted when its track record shows it to be a corrupt entity? Could it be because there is honor among thieves? Who else would a criminal government involved in racketeering, fraud and mass murder hire but another mafia family to cart away the evidence? Who else could you trust but a family – the Loizeaux family headed by Mark Loizeaux of Baltimore – whose own backs are against the wall for having faced a Federal Grand Jury for falsely reporting campaign contributions for Elijah E. Cummings, a Democrat Representative for the state of Maryland? The Baltimore Sun reported that the illegal contributions allegedly occurred between
1996 and 1998, but the Loizeaux‘s and Controlled Demolition were acquitted in 2000. (David Icke, Alice in Wonderland and the World Trade Center Disaster, p.152) Should the company fail to carry out the government-ordered cover-up of 9-11 evidence to the letter, the case would be reopened with Mercurial speed and they would duly face indictment. Having been on hand to carry away the hard evidence in the state-sponsored terror on the Alfred P. Murrah Building of Oklahoma, the same family was on site once again to clean up the dirty mess left behind by another government- orchestrated terror event known as 9-11. They would then cart the hard evidence away to a facility safely under the guard of CIA subcontractor George Wackenhut, a man placed in charge of many important operations too delicate for the CIA. (David Icke, Alice and the WTC, p. 152-153)
Junkyard dog George Wackenhut would take charge of the wreckage. Why would the government allow Wackenhut to dispose of the hard evidence in the case? This is the man whose company has on its board former CIA, FBI and Pentagon Officials. Wackenut was also in charge of the operation to ensure that Saddam Hussein got the biochemical weapons material he needed. Wackenhut Corporation , a publicly traded company with strong CIA affiliations and federal contracts worth $200 million a year made sure Saddam received his materials intact. Wackenhut is in tighter than a steel vice with the government. When it comes to security matters, Wackenhut virtually
is the government. In 1991, a third of the company‘s $600 million revenues came from the government, while another substantial part was met by companies that are also under subcontract hire by the government like Westinghouse. Wackenhut is the largest single company providing security to U.S. embassies overseas. Many of the embassies in question have been in important hotbeds of espionage activity, such as Chile, Greece and El Salvador. It also guards most of the strategic government facilities in the U.S., including the Alaskan oil pipeline, the Hanford nuclear waste facility, the Savannah River plutonium plant, and the Strategic Petroleum reserve.
Wackenut has close ties with the U.S. government in other ways. Early board of directors included Captain Eddie Rickenbacker, Gen. Mark Clark, and Ralph E. Davis (a John Birch Society leader). Current and recent board members have included much of the country‘s recent national security directorate, including, former FBI director Clarence Kelley; former Defense Secretary and former CIA deputy Frank Carlucci; former Defense Intelligence Agent director General Joseph Carroll; former U.S. Secret Service director James J. Rowley; former Marine commandant P.X. Kelley; and acting chair of President Bush‘s foreign intelligence advisory board and former CIA deputy director Admiral Bobby Ray Inman; and before being appointed as Reagan‘s CIA director, William Casey was Wackenhut‘s outside legal counsel. The company is a mini army with some 30,000 armed personnel on its payroll. (―Inside the Shadow CIA‖ by John Connoly, Spy Magazine, Sept 1992 Vol 6)
Critics claim the Bush administration has engaged in overt obstruction of justice, an undeniable charge given their tampering with the investigations of the bin Laden family and WAMY (World Army of Muslim Youth) by the FBI prior to 9-11. As with the so- called independent Warren Commission investigating the JFK assassination headed by Freemason, CIA and military insiders all the way, the recent 9/11 Commission has failed to address the major evidence contradicting the official version of 9/11, a whitewash and cover up by the same breed of government-appointed insiders. Some
deliberately overlooked flaws in the government jet fuel theory include:
Photosshowing people walking around in the hole in the North Tower where 10,000 gallons of jet fuel was supposed to have been burning.
Mostof the North Tower’s fire had already died before the South Tower was hit, burning for only 16 minutes, making it relatively easy to contain and control without a total collapse.
The fire didnot grow over time as was alleged and which would have been necessary for the government line to be credible, probably because it quickly ran out of fuel and was dying, indicating that without the edition explosive devices, the fires could have been easily controlled.
FDNYfire fighters still remain under a tight government gag order not to discuss the explosions they heard, experienced, and witnessed. A similar 9/11 gag order has been imposed on FAA personnel. This state-sponsored obstruction of justice makes it criminal for witnesses to make statements or give evidence in contradiction to the official story. Obstruction of justice in itself points to criminal conspiracy. Who is the government protecting, itself?
Even thewhitewash known as the 9/11 Commission Report acknowledges that “none of the [fire] chiefs present believed that a total collapse of either tower was possible.”
History showsthat fire has never before caused steel-frame buildings to collapse except for the three WTC buildings, nor has fire been responsible for the collapse of any steel high rise since 9/11.
The fires, especially in the South Tower and WTC-7, were relatively small, and not the towering infernos reported by the government and mainstream media. WTC-7 was unharmed by any airplane and had only minor fires on the seventh and twelfth floors, yet it collapsed in less than 10 seconds.
WTC-5and WTC-6 had raging fires but did not collapse despite much thinner steel beams.
It’sdifficult if not impossible for hydrocarbon fires like those fed by jet fuel (kerosene) to raise the temperature of steel – especially high-tempered steel – close to melting point.
(Former Bush Team Member Says WTC Collapse Likely A Controlled Demolition And ‘Inside Job’ By Greg Szymanski)
Mainstream experts, speaking for the administration, pose the theory that an airplane impact weakened the structures, while intense fires resulted in thermally weakening, causing buckling failures, which allowed the upper floors to pancake onto the floors below. Thomas Eager, professor of materials engineering and engineering systems at MIT, supports the government line. He argues that the collapse occurred as a result of the extreme heat from the fires, causing the loss of loading-bearing capacity on the structural frame. Eagar points out the steel in the towers could have collapsed only if heated to the point where it “lost 80 percent of its strength,” or around
1,300 degrees Fahrenheit. Critics claim his theory is flawed since the fires did not appear to be intense and widespread enough to reach such high temperatures. Intellectual prostitutes can be found under every rock. Historical precedent alone should discount this theory, since no fire, however intense, has ever resulted in the collapse of structural support for any high-rise building. Other proponents of the government position claim the impact of the airplanes, not the heat, weakened the entire structural support system of the towers, but critics contend the beams on floors 94-98 did not appear to have suffered any structural weakness, much less the entire building structure.
(Former Bush Team Member Says WTC Collapse Likely A Controlled Demolition And ‘Inside Job’ By Greg Szymanski)
It is virtually impossible to prove or disprove either theory at this point due to the absence of hard evidence. Hard evidence to
substantiate either theory is lacking due to FEMA’s quick removal of the structural steel before it could be analyzed. Even though the criminal code requires that crime scene evidence remain unmolested for the sake of forensic analysis, FEMA had it destroyed or shipped overseas before a serious investigation could take place. This in itself proves beyond doubt that a government agency broke the law, a law forbidding the tampering or destruction of evidence in a criminal investigation. Given the magnitude of the crime of mass murder and a crime against humanity, the fact that FEMA tampered with and destroyed evidence implicates the government agency in tampering with evidence and a Grand Jury indictment of FEMA and Controlled Demolition should have commenced immediately, along with those in the government who ordered the removal and destruction of hard evidence before a proper investigation of the crime scene could be orchestrated. Besides FEMA’s quick removal of the debris, authorities considered the steel quite valuable as New York City officials had every debris truck tracked on GPS and even fired one truck driver who took an unauthorized lunch break. And even more doubt is cast over why FEMA acted so swiftly since coincidentally officials had arrived the day before the 9/11 attacks at New York’s Pier 29 to conduct a war game exercise, named “Tripod II.” (Former Bush Team Member Says WTC Collapse Likely A Controlled Demolition And
‘Inside Job’ by Greg Szymanski) This National Planning Scenario- style war game exercise would have granted the planters of any incendiary devices the cover they needed to get away with their crime. The fact that a bomb squad was seen on the scene of the Alfred F. Murrah building the morning of the Oklahoma bombing incident shows that a similar cover operation was going on six years earlier.
Glenn and Kathy Wilburn lost two children in the Oklahoma bombing. They conducted and documented more than 300 hours of interviews. The level of corroboration achieved in these interviews substantiates beyond a reasonable doubt the fact that a heavily armed bomb squad had been in downtown Oklahoma near the Murrah Building the morning of the bombing. Among those who have
testified to having seen them are Oklahoma lawyer Daniel J. Adomitis, who stated:
There was this fairly large truck with a trailer behind it. It had a shield on the side of the door that said ‗bomb disposal‘ or
‗bomb squad‘ below it. And I really found that interesting. You know, I‘d never seen anything like that in person. (David Icke, Alice and the WTC Disaster , p.154)
Some parents saw people in bomb squad gear as they dropped their children off at the day care center at the Murrah Building. Eventually, the Sheriff‘s Department had to cave into pressure and acknowledge that the bomb squad had been there. In the end, other families became convinced that the authorities had prior knowledge of an imminent attack and failed to act as in 9-11. The Wilburns and other families filed suit against the US government alleging prior knowledge and failure to respond, and also cited the fact that ATF (Bureau of Alcohol, Firearms and Tobacco) agents had been ―alerted not to go to work on April 19th, 1995.‖ (David Icke, p.154)
In a M.O. that is becoming all too familiar, it appears likely that a fire drill or bomb scare exercise was staged only days before the bombing of the Murrah Building on April 12, 1995, when approximately 300 people were evacuated from the building for unknown reasons. Mr. Wilburn related the contents of a conversation between a gentleman who was frantically searching for his wife and an ATF (Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms) official following the explosion that is most revealing:
And the first thing the gentleman did, the husband of the woman who was in the building, the first person he ran into was an
agent of the ATF down on the street. And he asked him…what was happening, and the quote from the agent was ‗It was either a natural gas explosion or it was a bomb. We had a bomb threat yesterday, and some of us were called and were told that we didn‘t have to come in if we didn‘t want to.‘
(Jim Keith, OKBomb: Conspiracy and
This suggests far more than prior knowledge. It suggests that bomb scare exercises were conducted in advance of the bombing to waylay and prevent federal employees from showing up that day. It also suggests probable practice exercises to get the state-sponsored terrorists operating within the front of the ATF out of the building after planting the incendiary devices the day of the bombing. This last theory is a radical one calling for support. Fortunately, there is evidence that these drills were preparatory for a real-day event.
Two witnesses came forward claiming to have seen a black helicopter hovering above the Murrah Building, ―…for some time prior to the explosions, only to fly away before the explosions took place, and not return.‖ NORAD would neither confirm nor deny the allegations of these witnesses. One member of a Red Cross team named Frank, who made statements on a call-in radio program, claimed to have witnessed more than one black helicopter at the scene, contending, ―…we had two black helicopters flying about the building, fifteen minutes before the explosion, loading people up to take them out of the building.‖ Frank‘s gave further information pointing to an inside government operation on the same radio program:
We had two secretaries who work down there who had noticed that, and these ladies survived it, and they was told that all the top-level officers, and the FBI, ATF, and all the DEA was
transferred prior to the explosion, so we knew that the ATF was not, anyone in the building when this happened, and the FBI was told to get out of the building. (Ibid. p.166, 167)
The implications of this statement are obvious. Not only did the government have advanced warning and prior knowledge, but it appears that federal agencies housed within the Murrah Building and federal agents on location the day of the attacks may have had something to do with the bombing.
According to Oklahoma investigator J.D. Cash, there was a bomb scare at 10:30 a.m. the morning of the bombing. The bomb scare was caused by the discovery of a two by two foot box clearly marked
―high explosives‖. At best the ATF, which had offices in the building, is guilty of gross criminal negligence causing death or several of their agents are guilty of premeditation and intent in this crime against humanity. Cash claims to have on video four witnesses who claim to have seen the ATF clearing out their arsenal room two weeks after the explosion. Among the articles removed were an array of firearms, hundreds of thousands of rounds of ammunition, explosives, boxes marked explosives, TOW missiles, grenades, etc. That‘s quite an arsenal. That‘s a veritable Molotov cocktail of explosive materials conveniently planted and ready to be set off by the 3.500 pounds of pressure per square inch resulting from the impact pressure of the truck bomb. Investigator Cash pulls no punches in pointing to ATF culpability. Though his accusations fall short of accusing the ATF of premeditation and intent, his testimony is damning enough:
If you know this is a cantilevered building, it‘s a perfect structure for a truck bomb to do the maximum amount of damage to, and if it did and the explosion, if it did bring down that facia area and rupture the ATF arsenal room – and since the ATF was keeping the repellant caps or percussion caps for C-4, it
is reasonable to assume that they also were keeping C-4 there – if a case of C-4 fell out of that room during the initial blast, then demolition people…and you can check with anybody who is familiar with C-4, they will tell you that C-4 is extremely safe to handle, but you can set it off with 3,500 pounds of pressure per square inch. And so, if a case of C-4 came out of that room, or if C-4 was stored in another area of that building, in the southeast area, and if that facia came down from the explosion outside, which I think we all agree it did, then it builds up on top of…3,500 pounds is nothing when you look at the facia of the building…then that would explain that huge amount of destruction on the southeast side. So what we may have had is the government‘s ineptitude, the ATF overlooking and not following procedure. They may have killed most of the people in that building that day, and certainly they‘re not going to be the first ones to admit it. (Ibid, p.109)
Given the pattern of federal agencies staging war game exercises in all of these disasters, it does indeed appear likely that ATF armed explosives were deliberately left in their offices granting the state- sponsored terrorists operating within their ranks plausible deniability and non-accountability. Even if ATF officials were found to have left explosive devices that had failed to be properly disarmed on the building premises, standard whitewash procedure of any organization facing disciplinary and legal responsibility for culpability, would call for concealment and denial, in effect, a cover-up. And that is undeniably what is in effect with the Oklahoma bombing. It is a classic case of government agency cover-up at every level.
In a detailed analysis just released supporting the controlled demolition theory, Reynolds presents a compelling case. ―First, no steel-framed skyscraper, even engulfed in flames hour after hour, had ever collapsed before. Suddenly, three stunning collapses occur within a few city blocks on the same day, two allegedly hit by aircraft, the third not,” said Reynolds. “These extraordinary collapses after short-duration minor fires made it all the more important to preserve the evidence, mostly steel girders, to study what had happened.‖
After considering both sides of the 9/11 debate and after thoroughly sifting through all the available material, Reynolds concludes the government story regarding all four plane crashes on
9/11 remains highly suspect. “In fact, the government has failed to produce significant wreckage from any of the four alleged airliners that fateful day. The familiar photo of the Flight 93 crash site in Pennsylvania shows no fuselage, engine or anything recognizable as a plane, just a smoking hole in the ground,” said Reynolds. “Photographers reportedly were not allowed near the hole. Neither the FBI nor the National Transportation Safety Board have investigated or produced any report on the alleged airliner crashes.”
(“Two More WTC Workers Claim Explosion In Lower Levels Of North Tower,‖ Greg Szymanski, www.arcticbeacon.com, posted at 7/13/2005 11:50:00 AM)
Despite the gag order imposed on firefighters and FAA officials in the wake of the 9-11 attacks, several witnesses have come forward to give their eyewitness accounts to foreign media enterprises
immune to gag orders and media muzzling. Two credible sources, one of whom is William Rodriguez, recently declared a national hero for his rescue attempts on 9-11, have come forward with eyewitness testimony that a huge explosion ripped apart the lower levels of the north tower immediately prior to the alleged jetliner slamming into
the upper floors. The two WTC workers reported hearing an underground blast, from which they suffered injuries, including severe burns to the face, arms, hands, and numerous abrasions after being trapped in a stalled basement elevator. Burn victim, Felipe
David, employed by Aramark Co. and Salvatore Giambanco, a WTC office painter trapped in a basement elevator at the time, later testified to a Colombian television station in 2002 on the first anniversary of
9/11. Their comments were eventually aired in Colombia in Spanish on the Red Continental De Noticias (RNC) as part of an in depth 9/11 documentary after the foreign station spent a month in New York in
2002 shooting the project. Despite the great exposure received, their testimony still fails to stand up in court back home, either in the 9-11
Commission, which should be dubbed the 9-11 Omission, or in the mainstream media.
A copy of the original interview tapes with RCN reporter Claudia Gurisatti questioning the WTC workers was made available by WTC maintenance worker William Rodriguez in 2005, just before going public about the north tower basement explosions. Recently, Rodriguez said he heard a massive basement explosion seconds
before the jetliner struck the upper floors when he, along with 14 other co-workers, were huddled in a sub-level 1 office. Besides the testimony of these workers, there are the taped statements of Jose Sanchez, another WTC maintenance worker, who said he heard an underground explosion at the same time the others reported having heard something, while working in a small sub-level 4 workshop.
While all of these men are frustrated by the media blackout on all testimony and evidence contradicting the government line, no one is more annoyed or put out than Rodriguez, who can see no justification for it beyond a high-level government cover up. ―What really upsets me is that we have all these people coming forward with credible testimony about explosions and we have been completely ignored by the 9/11 Commission and the major media,‖ said Rodriguez about what he calls an obvious media and government blackout on any information contrary to the official story that only jet fuel brought down the towers, the theory predictably embraced by the
9/11 Commission. ―They concluded jet fuel brought down the towers without even considering the testimony of WTC eyewitness workers like David, Giambanco and Sanchez. Why would they do that unless they are covering up something?‖ Once perplexed by the media
blackout, Rodriguez is now convinced the 9-11 Commission, more aptly named the 9-11 Omission, along with the glaring mass media omissions and other important pieces of evidence and testimony, points to a government orchestrated whitewash and cover up. His outrage is palpable and unequivocal:
And, concerning the American press, they have locked their doors on all of us, never allowing our stories to surface or even trying to investigate why the 9/11 Commission didn‘t bother to include out statements in the final report. Here we have a Colombian station in 2002 doing their work and three years later our story only has appeared in South America in Spanish. What does that tell you?
(―Two More WTC Workers Claim Explosion In Lower Levels Of North Tower,” posted on: 7/13/2005 11:50:00 AM – by Greg Szymansky)
After his testimony was stricken from the 9-11 Commission record, Rodriguez decided to take justice into his own hands. ―Unless there is a cover-up, why didn‘t they use my comments or even mention my name?‖ he asks. Rodriguez claims that, when the government pressured him to change his story or keep silent, he refused to play ball. He was subsequently blackballed and forced to live on the street at one point. Living under a bridge and seeing no way out, he planned to tie himself to a cross in the middle of Ground Zero to make his point. Then, through the help of a Methodist support group, he was able to make a fiery comeback. His troubles are far from over though. He recently returned from a 9-11 lecture in Chicago to find his apartment burglarized, the thieves taking his laptop, containing a lot
of stored data, and other household items. Rodriguez has begun speaking out at speaking engagements in Hollywood and Chicago. ―I will speak at every church and university in the country if that is what it takes to get at the truth. The government story is a lie, and I know it
for a fact because I was there that morning,‖ he was quoted as saying.
―Last Man Out of WTC Possibly Slated for Mainstream Film Documentary‖ by Greg Szymanski, Sept. 26, 2005, http://www.arcticbeacon.com)
In the taped interviews of 2002 on Colombian television, David and Giambanco, both trapped in different basement locations, recount heartrending stories of surviving what they thought was a massive underground explosion, not an airplane strike 90 floors above. Standing in front of a freight elevator on sub level 1 near the office where Rodriguez and 14 others were huddled together when the explosion erupted below, David said in the taped interview:
That day I was in the basement in sub-level
1 sometime after 8:30am. Everything happened so fast, everything moved so fast. The building started shaking after I heard
the explosion below, dust was flying everywhere and all of a sudden it got real hot. I threw myself onto the floor, covered my face because I felt like I was burned. I sat there for a couple of seconds on the floor and felt like I was going to die, saying to myself ‗God, please give me strength.
(―Two More WTC Workers Claim Explosion In Lower Levels Of North Tower,” posted on: 7/13/2005 11:50:00 AM – by Greg Szymanski)
Despite severe burns to his face, arms, and hands, and with skin hanging from his body, David picked himself up, running for help to the office were Rodriguez and others were gathered. ―When I went in, I told them it was an explosion,‖ said David. ―When people looked at me with my skin hanging, they started crying but I heard others say
‗OK, good, good, you made it alive.‘‖ (Ibid.)
While David, Rodriguez and others were in shock from the basement explosion, Giambanco was on the opposite side of sub level
1 by another elevator. In the taped interview, Giambanco told Gurisatti, the Colombian reporter:
We heard the explosion and the smoke all of a sudden came from all over. There was an incredible force of wind that also swept everything away. I remember hearing a scream of a woman, but I couldn‘t see her. I had just gotten off the elevator and I was standing by it with another man but didn‘t know his name. The doors of the elevator were still open and, I don‘t know why we did, but we both jumped back in maybe because of the wind whipping everything around in the hallway. ―Then, suddenly,
the elevator doors closed in front of us and we started going down. It all of a sudden stopped and I could see through the cracks we were between B-2 and B-3. We were both screaming and afraid. I remember seeing through the slot of the elevator and seeing other people running and screaming. Then water started gushing in the elevator and I remember saying, ‗God, please help us.‘ At that point, I was resigned to the fact I was going to die. (Ibid)
Divine intervention or human, Giambanco‘s prayers were answered when he heard someone yelling from above, ―How many people are down there?‖ The miracle above turned out to be Rodriguez who had returned after helping David to safety in order to help others after disobeying police orders to remain outside.
In the basement, Rodriguez managed to find a construction ladder, lowering it into the elevator after entering the darkened shaft
and opening the top hatch on the elevator where Giambanco and the other unidentified man now were standing thigh-deep in water from the activated sprinkler system. ―I don‘t know he did it, but I felt him just pick me up and pull me out,‖ said Giambanco about Rodriguez‘s rescue efforts. ―I didn‘t know who he was then, but I do now and he definitely saved my life. If it wasn‘t for William Rodriguez, I wouldn‘t be here today.‖ After Rodriguez brought him to safety, Giambanco remembers being rushed to a hospital where in his hospital room, he received news reports that both towers had collapsed. (Ibid)
Why has the government invoked so many gag orders in the case of the Oklahoma bombing, the Pentagon and World Trade Center attacks, and Hurricane Katrina? The argument repeatedly invoked that it is in the interests of national security simply doesn‘t wash. How is national security upheld by gag orders that prevent the nation and its people from investigating crimes of national import, which is ultimately for their own protection? In another instance of gag orders being imposed with threats superadded is the case of a 9-11 rescue worker who was warned by FBI agents to ―keep his mouth shut‖
about one of the black boxes a fellow firefighter recovered from the debris of the collapsed towers. Honorary firefighter Mike Bellone
says he was approached by FBI agents shortly after he and his partner, Nicholas DeMasi, found three of the four black boxes in the WTC rubble. Their claim was recorded as early as 2003 in a book called Behind the Scenes: Ground Zero. ―They confronted me and told me
not to say anything,‖ Bellone claimed. Bellone said 9-11 Commission members never contacted him or DeMasi and never subpoenaed them to appear before the body, even though the previously referred to
book was published long before the hearings began. This revelation contradicts the official story that the black boxes were never recovered from the wreckage. National Transportation Safety Board officials have stated on record that the black boxes should have withstood the conditions of the WTC disaster. ―It‘s extremely rare that we don‘t get the recorders back,‖ said NTSB spokesperson Ted Lopatkiewicz. ―I can‘t remember another case (where) we did not
recover the recorders.‖ (―Black Box Cover Up: Rescue workers silences after exposing 9-11 whitewash‖ Greg Szymanski, www.americanfreepress.net/html/black_box.html) The fact that the crime scene had been tampered with by a federal agency with the tower rubble being carted off before a proper investigation could take place would make it rather difficult to recover the black boxes. The fact that the government has been able to get away with breaking the law in this fashion is amazing enough, but then the gag orders imposed on the media under the pretext of safeguarding national security has been a justification for nearly every violation in the book in the wake of 9-11.
The authors of this book are close colleagues of Peter Kawaja, radio show host and producer of Tropic Wave Radio. Before working in radio, Mr. Kawaja was given high tech security installation jobs for the U.S. government and other prestigious contracts. Mr. Kawaja has stated on several of his radio programs that the official story on 9-11 doesn‘t add up. In the case of the flight recorders for American 11 and United 175, the data recorders should have survived impact, but even if they didn‘t, the technology is now available to send the data by signal to a data storage facility offsite, according to Mr. Kawaja. The same goes for the WTC, whose video data recorders would not have
to be recovered since the data would be sent offsite anyway by fiber optic feed lines that would see the data reached a data storage facility offsite.
The case for controlled demolition bringing down the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center is gathering momentum. Theologian and author David Ray Griffin recently spoke before packed houses in New York on October 15th and 16th about how recently revealed evidence makes it an open and shut case for controlled demolition of the Twin Towers and WTC-7. ―It is already possible to know, beyond a reasonable doubt, one very important thing: the destruction of the World trade Center was an inside job, orchestrated by terrorists within our own government.‖ No statement by any public official could be more powerful than that. His unbridled confidence in making such an allegation suggests that the evidence is
now readily available to support his claim. It is also clear that a man
of his reputation and public standing would hardly be likely to risk his good fortune on dubious claims and meager evidence.
Author of two books on 9-11, the theologian gave a presentation titled, ―The Destruction of the Trade Towers: A Christian Theologian Speaks Out.‖ Dr. Griffin included in his presentation excerpts from the firemen‘s tapes, which were only recently released under pressure from the victim‘s families who were represented in a protracted court battle by attorney Normal Siegal as reported in the New York Times.
These witnesses gave lengthy testimony of explosions going off in the buildings. A 12-minute film was shown to the audience, who saw the irrefutable evidence for controlled demolition for themselves.
Dr. Griffin gave ten reasons for why the buildings did not fall due to being struck by planes of the resulting fires associated with the impact of those planes. He argued that the buildings fell suddenly straight into their own foundation at freefall speed, meeting no resistance as they fell, a phenomenon which can only be explained by the removal of core support by means of explosive detonations within the towers. He reminded the audience that the towers were built to withstand the impact of a Boeing 707 and 160 mile an hour winds. The plane crash and ensuing fires were nothing the towers weren‘t
built to withstand. In addition, the massive core columns were severed into almost perfectly uniform 30-foot sections, just the right size for the Controlled Demolition company‘s 30-foot trucks to cart away before a crime scene investigation could be launched.
Even more telling is the fact that there was a volcanic-like dust cloud which formed as a result of the concrete being pulverized, and no explanation besides that of controlled explosives demolition can account for the buildings‘ concrete being reduced to fine dust. The debris was ejected horizontally hundreds of feet in fan-shaped plumes in all directions, with ―squibs‖ following the path of the explosives downward. These are the facts have been shunned by mainstream news media, yet these characteristics of controlled demolition were being discussed by firefighters and news people the morning of 9-11.
How is it that such important testimony could have been withheld from the American people and the citizens of the world by the mainstream news media for so long? The answer is that gag order need not even be imposed. There is no need; the corporate news media will muzzle its own. Not only are the corporate news media in bed with the power brokers in Washington, they rely on advertising revenue that requires that they feed from the same cattle trough, whose fodder is provided by the political machine in Washington. The multiple witness accounts of controlled demolition were kept
sealed for four years by the city of New York until a lawsuit launched the victim‘s families pried open the jaws of concealment and obstruction of justice.
In the wake of the September 11 attacks, President Bush urged people not to tolerate the ―outrageous conspiracy theories, but as Dr. Griffin points out there was no conspiracy theory more outrageous than the U.S. government‘s, ―because it is violently contradicted by numerous facts, including some basic laws of physics.‖ The government‘s line that the impact of the planes coupled with the jet fuel burning at such high temperatures heated and weakened the steal support columns initiating the towers‘ collapse. This is a conspiracy theory in its own right and not a terribly convincing one, and one that would never stand up to the scrutiny of a proper scientific review, a review that was never permitted because the hard evidence was removed from the crime scene. (Kevin Barrett, ―Case For WTC Tower Demolition Sealed By Griffin: Theologian Says Controlled Demolition is Now a Fact, Not a Theory,‖ Jeff Rense, http://www.rense.com/general68/caseforWTCtower.htm)
Recently, Rene Welch, a scientist involved with the government‘s brain development program went public in May
2005with allegations that the U.S. government was not only actively involved in the planning of 9-11, but had carefully laid plans for initiating World War III and global population reduction. She claimed she had uncovered this clandestine initiative called ―Global Cleanse
2000‖ when working on the brain development program back in 1987. During this period, she claims she had two encounters with Saudi
royals, including two bin Laden brothers, who maintained the U.S. government was actively participating in pre-arranging a 9-11-type scenario. The meetings exceeded eight hours in length and took place in Sedona and Pleasant Valley, Arizona. The plans revealed how the U.S. government was planning an attack on the World Trade Center that would kick off a war in the Middle East. Her story has been corroborated by Ronald Logsdon, a scientist who was working on a NASA program with Welch along with Naomi Miles, both of whom were present at the meetings.
Welch claims that when she was working for NASA as a scientist on brain development research in Phoenix, she obtained a secret computer code that granted her access to a secret government- funded study titled ―Global Cleanse 2000‖ outlining global war and population reduction strategies. When all of this began nearly 20 years ago, FBI and CIA operatives promised that they would leave her alone if she ―Shut up and lay low‖. She has now made public a
200-page document detailing the staging of 9-11, Global Cleanse
2000 and innumerable FBI and CIA civil rights violations. ―I‘m naming names and want justice,‖ Welch is quoted as saying. Skeptics will wonder why it has taken Welch so long to come forward. In reply and defense, it is clear she has suffered repeated harassment, beatings and even drugging campaigns by intelligence operatives. In addition, her past attempts to alert the government, sending copies to the
Clinton White House, including Hilary Clinton, and Taos New Mexico former district attorney John Paternoster, who Welch approached in 1995 about government death threats. NASA scientist Logsdon even elaborates at some length about the meeting that took place way back in 1987:
Two of the bin Laden brothers came some
90 miles from Phoenix, Arizona, and stopped at our doorstep unannounced. Their bodyguards set up a surveillance parameter around our property and others came into our house, taped up the windows and set up a film projector. The people in this
motorcade seemed very scared, and presented this as a matter of life and death.
These men told us to be very cautious and to assume that we were under surveillance by our government. For several hours they showed us films of meetings of key Arabs and U.S. government officials discussing the oil issues. The bottom line was that if the Arabs did not do it their way, the U.S. would simply take their oil by force. They also explained that they have been manipulated into setting up bank accounts where oil profits were siphoned off and were no
longer under their control.
They then explained why the World Trade Centers were the ideal target for this purpose. The two bin Ladens showed us this film because they made it very clear they did not want to be involved with any U.S. plot to manipulate the Arab governments or start a war.
(―Bin Laden Brothers Tip-Off Two NASA Research Scientists in
1987 about U.S. Government Plans to Cause 9/11; Now Third person Comes forward to Verify Scientists‘ incredible Story‖ by Greg Szymanski, July 27, 2005, www.rense.com)
However, the war game exercises were not confined to the World Trade Center. That would be impossible. The war game exercises would have to be universal and broad enough in scope that they would create confusion and thwart all efforts normal emergency response protocols in the state-sponsored, government-insiders free- for-all. The war game drill was not confined to the World Trade Center twin towers. There is no way they could have been. The Tripod II war game exercise only granted cover to FEMA agents
planting the incendiary devices. This would by no means be sufficient to pull off the operation, precisely because further plausible
deniability was required for the state sponsored terrorists behind the controlled demolition of the twin towers to get off scot-free. The impression had to be created that airliners hijacked by Middle Eastern terrorists were the true cause of the World Trade Center collapse, not the explosives that had been planted all the way up and down the towers in advance. However, the perpetrators needed to guarantee that the passenger airliners were there on time and on target. Nothing
could be left to chance. A war game drill had to be carried out on the ground and in the air simultaneously, ensuring that the entire event would be coordinated perfectly with all operatives comfortably in position, prepared and ready, without the least cause for panic, uncertainty, unpreparedness, or a need to race against the clock. The hijacked airlines employed as tactical missiles would be there and the controlled demolition of the twin towers would be perfectly timed with the impact of the two birds into the Twin Towers, granting the
perpetrators of the controlled demolition plausible deniability, an alibi and an out.
On 9-11, war game exercises were being held on the ground and in the air simultaneously. The war game exercise in the air would involve at least four large-scale agencies, including NORAD, the FAA, the Canadian Air Force, and the National Reconnaissance Office. Some of the drills involved hijackings of airliners. The denials of prior knowledge by members of the Bush administration and top generals of the U.S. military like Gen. Richard B. Myers are clear perjury and blatant lies because they would have had to know about these war game drills nicknamed operation ―Top Off‖ because they involve top officials in the country. ―Top off‖ means ‗top officials‘, in this case, the top officials in the United States and Canada, since it
was a joint exercise. In some cases, the hijackings were real and in some cases, according to Michael C. Ruppert, not real, but staged, with blips deliberately programmed to appear on FAA and military radar screens, which were present during the first attacks and succeeded in pulling significant fighter resources away from the
northeast U.S. on September 11. Some of these exercises involved
―live-fly‖ drills, where actual aircraft were simulating the behavior of hijacked airliners simultaneously with the real-time events. (Michael C. Ruppert, Crossing the Rubicon, 336) With a war game drill occurring at the same time as the actual event, it is easy to imagine why air traffic controllers, the FAA, and NORAD command, not to speak of Air Force generals and top military brass might become confused. The words of Sr. Airman Stacia Rountree could not be more chilling in this context: ―We had three aircraft down and the possibility of others hijacked. We had to think outside the box…Before the day ended, 21 aircraft across the US had been handled as ‗tracks of interest‘.‖ (Crossing the Rubicon, 348)
The name of the war game exercise involving NORAD, the FAA, the Canadian Air Force, and the National Reconnaissance Office was called Vigilant Guardian. Details of the Vigilant Guardian war game exercise were classified and unavailable. These exercises were said to be based on cold war-era type threats and were said to be held once a year. However, post-9-11 statements by NORAD indicated that the Vigilant Guardian exercise held on September 11 was not of
traditional kind. This was not a war game exercise aimed at a Russian threat, and why would it be with no perceived threat coming from that arena since the end of the cold war? Operation Vigilant Guardian had
a direct impact on the Northeast Air Defense Sector, where all four hijackings occurred. Aviation Week even reported that, ―Senior officials involved in Vigilant Guardian were manning NORAD command centers throughout the US and Canada, available to make immediate decisions.‖ This war game exercise was supposed to facilitate a quick response in the event of a terrorist or otherwise aggressive attack. (Ibid. 337) What the war game exercise actually did was not only slowdown the proper tactical response to the terrorist attack on September 11, but cripple it altogether. The naïve will call this ironic and the arrogant fools in academia might even twitter with laughter over it. But this is not some tragic accident, a case of bad timing, an inconvenient coincidence or anything of the kind. This is premeditated calculated evil of the most malevolent kind. The war
game exercise was deliberately timed not only to sabotage a real-time military response, but to grant the perpetrators plausible deniability by coordinating a war game exercise at the same time as an actual attack. The war game exercise was conducted ostensibly for the good of the nation, but was actually a treasonous disruption and the most
insidious kind of decoy operation.
NORAD has also admitted that it ran two mock drills on September 11, involving various radar and command centers in the US and Canada that included air force bases in New York, Florida, Washington, and Alaska. Investigators in the 9-11 commission were at one time looking into whether NORAD‘s attention was unduly misdirected toward the North Pole by the drill, when the hijackings came from an entirely different quarter. (Ibid. 338)
Another Operation Top Off-type exercise was being held up in Canada, on September 11 called Operation Northern Vigilance. It involved the deployment of fighter jets north to Alaska and northern Canada in preparation for a Russian event. The Toronto Star even reported that the operation had to be immediately called off during the September 11 attacks, while ―injects‖ were purged from the screens. (Ibid. 339) The fact that so-called ―injects‖ or false radar blips were deliberately programmed to appear on radar screens as part of the war game exercise is diabolically convenient for the state-sponsored terrorists. Whose screens did these blips appear on? How much did they throw normal Air Force response into chaos on both sides of the border?
While all these war game exercises are being staged on 9-11, another exercise involving the National Reconnaissance Office is being played out. The National Reconnaissance Office is a joint CIA and a division of the U.S. Air Force operating US spy satellites. NRO was also running a war game exercise on 9-11. This operation involved a scenario in which a plane would crash into the
headquarters of the NRO in the Washington D.C. suburb of Chantilly, Virginia, just outside Dulles International airport, where flight 77 first spread its wings. On the occasion of 9-11, the CIA was in charge of
the NRO drill. (Ibid. 340-341) Presumably, the decoy war game drill would have had attention diverted to a war game scenario so that the satellite hawks would not be tending to the real-time situation over America‘s skies.
According to 9/11 Commission staff report Flight 77 began deviating from its flight path at 8:54 and then completely disappeared at 8:56. The staff report describes the activity surrounding Flight 77 in some detail:
Shortly after 9:00, Indianapolis Center started notifying other agencies that American 77 was missing and had possibly crashed…At 9:09, they reported the loss of contact to the FAA regional center, which passed this information to FAA headquarters at 9:24…Radar reconstructions performed after 9/11 reveal
that FAA radar equipment tracked the flight from the moment its transponder was turned off at 8:56 a.m. But for 8 minutes and 13 seconds, between 8:56 a.m. and 9:05 a.m., this primary radar information on American 77
was not displayed to controllers at
Indianapolis Center. The reasons are technical, arising from the way the software processed radar information, as well as from poor
primary radar coverage where American 77 was flying.
In sum, Indianapolis Center never saw flight
77 turn around…American 77 traveled undetected for 36 minutes on a course heading due east for Washington, D.C.
(9/11 Commission staff report quoted in
―Crossing the Rubicon,‖ p.400)
This is what Benedict Sliney, the FAA‘s National Operations Manager on 9/11 had to say about the radar and transponder issues of Flight 77:
―There are radars that would have seen the target regardless. Would they have known what to be looking for? I do not know.‖ (Ibid, p.401)
According to the 9/11 Commission staff report, orders were given from the Mission Crew Commander at NEADS (North East Air Defense System) at 9:23. ―Okay…scramble Langley. Head them towards the Washington area.‖ The scramble order was given to fighter hawks at Langley Air Force base – a CIA-run Air Force base – in Virginia. Instead of heading north toward the pentagon, however, the fighter pilots headed east in conformity with a ‗generic‖ scramble order. This sent them out over the ocean, because the lead pilot and
local FAA controller assumed that the flight plan instruction to go east was the newer guidance that superseded the original scramble order. It is claimed that the Langley pilots were never briefed about why they were being scrambled. This is presumably because the pilots had been briefed on the cold war-style war game exercise involving a mock attack from the Russians. The lead pilot gave his own telling account on the confusion, ―I reverted to the Russian threat…I‘m thinking
cruise missile threat from the sea. You know, you look down and see the Pentagon burning and I though the bastards snuck one by us.‖ The Langley pilots responded according to a Russian threat presumed to have come from somewhere in the Atlantic. Because the pilots were never briefed or made aware that the threat was coming from hijacked airliners, they failed to respond to an internal attack. They obviously perceived the attack to be a cold war-style Russian attack coming from outside. This explains General Myers comment alluded to in a
previous chapter, ―We‘re pretty good when the threat‘s coming from outside. We‘re not so good if the threat is coming from inside.‖ Unbelievably, the fighter jocks appear not to have been told that the attack involving hijacked passenger airliners was coming from inside, this despite two World Trade Towers and the Pentagon in flames. (Ibid, p.401)
Scramble orders were given for fighter jets from Otis Air Force base in response to the hijacking of Flight 11 at 8:46. Because the plane‘s
transponder signal had disappeared, NEADS spent the next few minutes searching their radar for the target. The Otis jets were not airborne until 8:53, well after Flight 11 hit the World Trade Center. Astonishingly, NEADS claims it did not know where to send the jetfighters, so they were sent out off the coast Long Island. This allowed Flight 175 to crash into the second World Trade Tower. As with the Langley fighter pilots, the Otis Air Force base pilots were flying blind. They had no idea where they were going or what they were supposed to intercept. (Ibid, 401)
The testimony of the Langley lead pilot confirms that the Pentagon had already been attacked as he flew overhead. How could he not be informed about the nature of the attack? There can only be two explanations, incompetence and gross criminal negligence or
premeditated high treason and war crimes. It has to be one or the other. The fact that General Myers should be promoted three days later to the second highest military command position in the country as head of
the Joint Chiefs speaks volumes. The general is obviously not being promoted as a reward for competence and a job well done where the
9/11 emergency response is concerned, which suggests that he is receiving his reward for an operation of another kind involving the successful orchestration of a Air Force stand down non-response on
9/11 with premeditated and criminal intent.
As might be expected, the details of the war game drills were classified. Details of Operation Top Off-type drills like Vigilant Guardian, involving top officials, were only available to top officials, the very individuals who would be coordinating and carrying out those drills. Who these officials were would remain as classified as the operations themselves, and for very good reason. If not the actual perpetrators of the state-sponsored terrorist attacks, the top officials would have a direct hotline to those who were. As in any special ops intelligence operation, the chain of command would delegate operations in such a manner that those in charge of the operation at the top would remain anonymous, and would remain utterly immune to scrutiny, investigation, and accountability. They would remain behind a screen like any crime boss and would not show their face,
sign a paper, or speak to anyone directly involved in the operation. How do we know the pre-9/11 war game drills are top secret? Because NORAD tells us so:
The planning, execution and lessons learned aspects of NORAD exercises were classified. In fact, during the planning stages only so- called trusted agents, those directly involved in the planning and execution, knew details
of exercises. For operational security reasons, therefore, NORAD cannot discuss details or results of its pre 9/11 hijack exercises…
(E-mail from NORAD spokesperson Major Nancy Quon to Michael
Ruppert dated April20, 2004, Crossing the Rubicon)
The classification of the war game exercises meant that only a few would be in on the planning and implementation. In addition, no one involved in the top secret drills would be allowed to speak about any details related to the operations. Top officials at the FAA and the Air Force would be under a strict protocol of secrecy. This would insulate the perpetrators at the top and prevent any compromising leaks from coming out that might either jeopardize the status of the drill, or lead to future investigations or possible indictments.
The 9/11 Commission was a whitewash by almost anyone‘s standards. It was a commission of omission, concealment, evasion, diversion, and fraudulence. When asked who was responsible for conducting the war game exercises on September 11, for instance, Gen. Ralph E. Eberhart, the man in charge of NORAD on the morning in question, replied, ―No comment,‖ as he was wont to do. The man in charge held a very high office in the country indeed. We will come to who that man was later. Later, 9/11 commissioner, Roemer, asked Eberhart a very pointed and direct question that cut to the heart of the matter:
Roemer: My question is, you were postured for an exercise against
the former Soviet Union. Did that help or hurt? Did that help in terms of were more people prepared? Did you have more people ready? Were more fighters fueled with more fuel? Or did this hurt in terms of people thinking, ―There‘s no possibility that this is real world; we‘re engaged in an exercise,‖ and delay things?
Eberhart: Sir, my belief is that it helped because of the manning, because of the focus, because the crews – they have to be airborne in
15 minutes, and that morning, because of the exercise, they were airborne in 6 or 8 minutes. And so I believed that focus helped. (Quoted in ―Over the Rubicon,‖ p.395)
While the absurdity of this answer could not possibly be overlooked by anyone in the room, it was overlooked from the standpoint of Roemer‘s line of questioning. A good commissioner – able, competent, and honest – would have gone for the jugular at this point, would have gone in for the kill. The most poignant and meaningful line of questioning that could have been pursued by an honest investigator at this stage would have been to ask the general why the military was not therefore prepared. Why was there no Air Force response? Why was their no effort to stop these events? How could there have been so protracted a delay between the report of hijackings and the attack on the Pentagon building with no intercept jets able to successfully track, intercept and stop any of these targeted airliners? Even more indicative of a cover-up is the fact that the general maintained that tactical preparedness was enhanced by the war game exercises, but then refused to comment on who was in charge of the war games. This is self-refuting, self-contradictory and inherently paradoxical and circular in reasoning. If the war games had enhanced preparedness and readiness then obviously 9/11 would not have been allowed to happen. The fact that the war games did no such thing, and left everyone in so utter a state of confusion that they were unable to distinguish between the war game exercise and the real-time events means that, far from enhancing readiness, it functioned as nothing
more than a disastrous decoy operation that allowed 9/11 to take place. Furthermore, if the war game drill had been such a patented success
in terms of getting the military into an enhanced state of readiness and alertness, why not then acknowledge and comment on who was heading up the operation? The fact that the general is unwilling to name the individual who would prefer to remain the wizard behind
the curtain means that that individual would only be compromised and disgraced by being named in association with an operation that was not only an abject failure but the direct cause of what was at best gross criminal negligence causing mass death. The fact that the war game drill was actually a decoy operation deliberately masterminded by the wizard behind the curtain, who would prefer to remain nameless, to subvert and undermine the customary response of the FAA, NORAD and the US Air Force to the hijacking of passenger airliners means that that individual is guilty of high treason, and for that reason should and must remain nameless in the face of potential prosecution for war crimes, crimes against humanity and conspiracy to commit treason and mass murder against the citizens of the United States.
So who was that top official involved in the ―Operation Top Off‖ drill that day? War game drills involving NORAD, the CIA, the Air Force, etc. was one thing, but the Tripod II exercise being conducted
at pier 93 in New York involved civilian federal agencies. This disqualified anyone in the military from heading up the operation. No one in the military would have the overarching authority to straddle both civilian and military jurisdictions in this operation. It had to be someone in the political arena. In addition, it had to be someone very high up the ladder, very probably within the White House itself. The individual in question is none other than Vice President Cheney. Not only was he in charge of all war game exercises the day of the attacks, he had assumed that management role prior to 9/11 and continued to occupy that management role afterwards. The proof for this is contained in a White House press release issued in 2001.
For Immediate Release Office of the Press Secretary May 8, 2001
Statement by the President
Domestic Preparedness Against Weapons of Mass Destruction
Protecting America’s homeland and citizens from the threat of weapons of mass destruction is one of our Nation’s important national security challenges. Today, more nations possess chemical, biological, or nuclear weapons than ever before. Still others seek to join them. Most troubling of all, the list of these countries includes some of the world’s least-responsible states — states for whom terror and blackmail are a way of life. Some non-state terrorist groups have also demonstrated an interest in acquiring weapons of mass destruction.
Against this backdrop, it is clear that the threat of chemical, biological, or nuclear weapons being used against the United States — while not immediate — is very real. That is why our Nation actively seeks to deny chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons to those seeking to acquire them. That is why, together with our allies, we seek to deter anyone who would contemplate their use. And that is
also why we must ensure that our Nation is prepared to defend against the harm they can inflict.
Should our efforts to reduce the threat to our country from weapons of mass destruction be less than fully successful, prudence dictates that the United States be fully prepared to deal effectively with the consequences of such a weapon being used here on our soil.
Today, numerous Federal departments and agencies have programs to deal with the consequences of a potential use of a chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear weapon in the United States. Many of these Federal programs offer training, planning, and assistance to state and local governments. But to maximize their effectiveness, these efforts need to be seamlessly integrated, harmonious, and comprehensive.
Therefore, I have asked Vice President Cheney to oversee the development of a coordinated national effort so that we may do the
very best possible job of protecting our people from catastrophic harm. I have also asked Joe Allbaugh, the Director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, to create an Office of National Preparedness. This Office will be responsible for implementing the results of those parts of the national effort overseen by Vice President Cheney that deal with consequence management. Specifically it will coordinate all Federal programs dealing with weapons of mass destruction consequence management within the Departments of Defense, Health and Human Services, Justice, and Energy, the Environmental Protection Agency, and other federal agencies. The Office of National Preparedness will work closely with state and local governments to ensure their planning, training, and equipment needs are addressed. FEMA will also work closely with the Department of Justice, in its lead role for crisis management, to ensure that all facets of our response to the threat from weapons of mass destruction are coordinated and cohesive. I will periodically chair a meeting of the National Security Council to review these efforts.
No governmental responsibility is more fundamental than protecting the physical safety of our Nation and its citizens. In
today’s world, this obligation includes protection against the use of weapons of mass destruction. I look forward to working closely with Congress so that together we can meet this challenge.
(Quoted in Over the Rubicon, from www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/05/20010508.html)
It should be remembered that Tripod II was a war game specifically a drill involving weapons of mass destruction, in this case a biological attack. Dick Cheney was in charge of this and other war game operations prior to and on the day of the 9/11 attacks. He was in charge of the NORAD/Joint Chiefs war games of 9/11 involving Vigilant Guardian, Vigilant Warrior, Northern Vigilance, etc. This places Cheney at the highest level of command in the treasonous war game activities of September 11. In fact, FEMA was in New York setting up for a biowarfare exercise the day before the attacks called Tripod II. FEMA even issued a press release to that effect. It is hard
to imagine that Dick Cheney would be out of the loop based on the previous press release by the president of the United States, according to which the then head of FEMA, Joe Allbaugh, was obligated to report to Cheney directly. Let us post here the FEMA press release acknowledging the war game exercises the day of the attack quoted in Over the Rubicon. Note also that the FEMA press release in question was removed from the FEMA website by July of 2004.
FEMA Fully Activated in Response to Apparent Terrorist Events
Washington, DC September 11, 2001—In response to the apparent terrorist events, FEMA‘s Washington-based Emergency Response Team (EST) has 9been) fully activated and on 24-hour operations. All
10 of the FEMA regions – headquartered in Boston, New York City, Philadelphia, Atlanta, Chicago, TX, Denver, San Francisco and Bothell, Wash. – are also fully activated.
FEMA has activated the Federal Response Plan, which brings together 28 federal agencies and the American Red Cross to assist local and state governments in response to national emergencies and disasters. Already, FEMA has deployed eight Urban Search & Rescue teams (US&R) to New York City to search for victims in the affected buildings. US&R teams are specially trained teams that include engineers and other technical experts as well as specially trained search dogs. Another four teams have been deployed to the pentagon, for search and rescue efforts there…
FEMA support is working closely with the White House to ensure coordination and management of the consequence of the events…
(Quoted in Over the Rubicon, p. 417, http://www.fema.gov/nwz01/nwz01_92.htm, website address removed as of July 2004)
One cannot overlook the fact that certain resources had been put into place by the Tripod II drill, while a Secret Service agent had been put into place in New York‘s Office of Emergency Management
(OEM) on September 11. The Secret Services also had offices in the building 7 of the World Trade Center just to ensure that all the planning way up there at the top could go smoothly. Does all this sound like a mere coincidence? A statistician should be employed at this juncture just to calculate the mathematical probability of all the coincidences listen in this chapter being merely coincidental. Remember also that Vigilant Warrior was a live-fly drill involving the Joint Chiefs of Staff. (Over the Rubicon, 433) Remember also that General Richard B. Myers would be promoted on September 14, 2001 to the Joint Chiefs of Staff directly after displaying gross
incompetence on September 11th, which suggests that he was not
being rewarded for his incompetence but for his competent execution of duties in a criminal conspiracy orchestrated at the highest levels of the U.S. government.
The Air Force National Security Emergency Preparedness
Agency (AFNSEP) plans and coordinates Air Force activity in
national security preparedness drills related to military support to civil authorities for natural and manmade disasters. It also works with the DoD‘s Joint Chiefs of Staff, FEMA and other federal agencies to help coordinate the national response plan related to incident management. And this is where we have checkmate. AFNSEP is also the primary Air Force office responsible for the continuity of government operations in the event of a national emergency, which places it directly under FEMA‘s management and control. As it happens, FEMA was placed under Dick Cheney‘s control since May of 2001 when the president issued his press release, ―Domestic Preparedness Against Weapons of Mass Destruction.‖ (Over the Rubicon, p.433) There is no way that the man in charge of the war game drills and on top of them at every stage could not know what was happening in
9/11. He would have been in the loop before the first hijacked airliner struck the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center, precisely because the war game drills presuppose an on-hand readiness and
preparedness that would have put Cheney and very likely General Myers, the Joint Chiefs and others very high up in the civilian and military command structure on alert. They would have been as aware
of the real-time hijackings as they were of the pretended ones. Their position in the planning and implementation of these drills would have put them right on the ball. And they were, indisputably, unequivocally and undeniably. They were on red alert.
It is now beyond the pale that 9/11 was an AWACS (Airborne Warning and Control System) operation. Former German Intelligence Minister Von Bulow initially spilled the beans about 9/11 in an interview in the German daily newspaper, Tagesspiegel and now the story‘s out. According to Von Bulow, the remote controlled Boeing
727 passenger airliner that flew into the South Tower was steered into position as part of an AWACS operation staged from the air by means of a black ops reconnaissance jet and military helicopter. It headed for its South Tower position just after the airliner crash set off charges to ignite barrels of crude oil in the World Trade Center Tower to create a smoke plume that would cover the detonations of the explosives concealed in the towers. The USS George Washington was located
50-75 miles from Manhattan Island at the time. The helicopter would have had a flight of approximately one hour ‘s duration to get to the South Tower to carry out its mission of remote controlling the incoming Boeing 737 airliner into the South Tower. Photographs from www.rense.com of the helicopter flying into position at the time of the attacks can be seen below. NBC News is sitting on millions of dollars worth of videos that its News helicopter took of the South Tower AWACS helicopter flying in and out of position. This is understandable given that NBC is owned by General Electric Co., one of the greatest beneficiaries of the 9/11 wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.
In this photo, the military helicopter can be seen leaving the crime scene after completing its mission. It is very probable that the success of the AWACS operation is wholly attributable to the remote steering of the Boeing 727 airliner by the military craft present at the scene and leaving immediately thereafter.
The 35 foot long White Jet, whose vapor trail can be seen in the photo below probably used the Aircraft Carrier George Washington as its base. George Washington‘s 4 1/2 acre deck would be more than capable of accommodating it. The White Jet also exited the rear stage left using the smoke plume to hide its flight to the South Tower. The White Jet’s role was probably intended to remote control a Boeing
737 airliner to Manhattan Island for a military relay handoff operation to the waiting military helicopter, which guided the Boeing to the finish line. In this photo, the vapor trail of the White Jet is clearly visible.
In the above photo, the White Jet is caught using the smoke plume to conceal its presence on the stage, setting off under camouflage the demolition charges that would bring down the North Tower.
On 9/12 USA Today reported that Aircraft Carrier USS George Washington was anchored off Long Island. While the aircraft carrier USS George Washington was standing watch off Long Island at the same time that the USS John F. Kennedy was being refueled further
off the east coast, the Navy was moving several cruisers and destroyers out of port in Norfolk, Va., headquarters for the Atlantic Fleet. (Jon Carlson, ―Von Bulow Solves 911,‖ www.rense.com. 11-5-
The parallels to Pearl Harbor are striking. On the day that will live in infamy, the first U.S. fleet was out of port. The Hawaiian Islands were left utterly defenseless, but due to the advanced
warnings the U.S. government had received from decoded Japanese mock weather reports, the U.S. Navy was safe. On 9/11, the Navy was quite conveniently headed out of port. America actually had an aircraft carrier full of jet airplanes stand down just off Manhattan Island. The Atlantic Ocean, Sept. 13, 2001 – The aircraft carrier USS John F. Kennedy (CV 67) was taking on fuel through an underway replenishment at sea (RAS) with the Military Sealift Command ship USNS John Lenthall (T-AO 189). Coming alongside Lenthall is the cruiser USS Hue City (CG 66). The USS Kennedy and elements of her battle group got underway shortly after the September 11th terrorist attack on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. (Jon Carlson, ―Von Bulow Solves 911‖ Jon Carlson, www.rense.com, 11-
5-5) The refueling at sea was as conveniently timed as the war game exercises conducted that day. The sheer number of coincidences alone points either to a conspiracy either in the heavens or the earth. This level of coincidences cannot be easily dismissed.
It so happens that a war game exercise was conducted at the Pentagon on October 24, 2000. This exercise was preparatory for a defense of the Pentagon against an attack from the air. There is no way Secretary of Defense, Donald Rumsfeld, could not know about this war game exercise. There is no way he could legitimately claim to be ignorant of any such military scenario. There is furthermore no truth to the claim that a 9/11-type aerial attack by hijacked passenger airliners had never before been considered and was the furthest thing from his mind. 9-11 Commissioner Richard Ben Veniste did question Rumsfeld on the well-known threat of aircrafts being used as weapons. There was a long list of precedents for believing in the possibility of hijacked airliners being used as weapons, but Ben Veniste conveniently left out the Oct 24, 2000 drill directly involving the Pentagon because of the dramatic implications such a line of questioning would raise. It should be noted that Ben Veniste was Bill
& Hillary Clinton‘s Senate appointed lawyer during Whitewater as well as the attorney for Barry Seal who flew cocaine from Honduras up to the Mena Arkansas airstrip while Bill Clinton was governor. Given such a resume, it is hardly likely that Ben Veniste would be on
the Commission to prize certain truths from the lips of government officials. It should be clear from his track record, in which he is most famed for the Whitewater whitewash, that he is more skilled in the arts of whitewash, cover-up, and putting dirty laundry through the wash and rinse cycle.
What was most telling was Commissioner Gorelick’s (CIA) question to Rumsfeld, where she recalled being in a room with Mr. Wolfowitz planning for the possibility of a hijacked airliner being used as a guided missile for a terrorist attack at the Olympics. She found it hard to comprehend could not have crossed Rumsfeld‘s mind in advance of the WTC and Pentagon attacks. Strangely, Commissioner Gorelick omitted any reference to the October 24,
2000 war game exercise staged at the Pentagon. In light of her direct involvement in the other war game planning session involving Wolfowitz, how could she overlook such a telling example in the context of her line of questioning? Rather that pursuing this issue to its logical conclusion, she deviated to another line of questioning, skirting over the matter entirely. She asked Rumsfeld when the order was given authorizing fighter pilots to shoot down aircraft on the September 11. Rumsfeld explained that military protocols concerning rules of engagement had been modified just prior to 9/11. The change in the rules of engagement meant that previous protocols on giving orders and following a particular chain of command had been altered and no longer applied. This granted the government plausible deniability in claiming that standard operating procedure had not been violated on 9/11, arguing that the rules of engagement had ostensibly changed. General Myers would then answer the question by providing no timeline, offering only the sufficiently vague information that the shoot-down order was given shortly after the president issued it, which fails utterly to fix a time or answer the question.
GORELICK: May I ask one more question, Mr. Chairman?
We can’t go into the content of the
PDDs and the SEIBs here. And I can’t
even characterize them in order to ask you the next question that I would ask. So let me ask you this: Was it your understanding that the NORAD pilots who were circling over Washington D.C. that morning had indeed received a shoot-down order?
RUMSFELD: When I arrived in the command center, one of the first things I heard, and I was with you, was that the order had been given and that the pilots — correction, not the pilots necessarily, but the command had been given the instructions that their pilots could, in fact, use their weapons to shoot down commercial airliners filled with our people in the event that the aircraft appeared to be behaving in a threatening way and an unresponsive way.
GORELICK: Now, you make a distinction there between the command and the pilots. Was it your understanding that the pilots had received that order?
RUMSFELD: I’m trying to get in time because…
MYERS: Well, I think — my understanding, I’ve talked to General Eberhart, commander now of NORAD, and I think he’s briefed the staff. And I think what he told the staff, what he
told me, as I recall, was that the pilots
did – at the appropriate point when the authority to engage civilian airliners was given, that the pilots knew that fairly quickly. I mean, it went down through the chain of command.
RUMSFELD: It was on a threat conference call that it was given, and everybody heard it simultaneously. The question then would be – the reason I am hesitant is because we went through two or three iterations of the rules of engagement. And in the end, we ended up delegating that authority to, at the lowest level, I believe, to two stars.
RUMSFELD: And the pilot would then describe the situation to that level. To the extent that level had time, they would come up to General Eberhart. To the extent Eberhart had time, he would come up to me. And to the extent I had time, I might talk to the president,
which in fact, I did do on several occasions during the remainder of the day with respect to international flights heading to this country that were squawking “hijack.”
GORELICK: I’m just trying to understand whether it is your understanding that the NORAD pilots themselves, who were circling over Washington, as you referred to in your statement, whether they knew that they
had authority to shoot down a plane. And if you don’t know, it’s fine to say that. You mentioned them in your statement, and I would like to know if you know the answer.
RUMSFELD: I do not know what they thought. In fact, I haven’t talked to any of the pilots that were up there. I certainly was immediately concerned that we did know what they thought they could do.
RUMSFELD: And we began the process quite quickly of making changes to the standing rules of engagement, Dick Myers and I did, and then issuing that. And we then went back and revisited that question several times in the remaining week or two while we were still at various stages of alert. And we have since done that in connection with several other events such as the Prague summit.
GORELICK: As you know, we were not intending to address the issues of the day of in this hearing. And it is the subject of a full additional hearing, and we may be back to you with these questions with a more precise time line for you to look at.
Thank you very much. KEAN: Thank you.
Officials at NORAD have stated when the hijackings first occurred they initially thought it was part of the Vigilant Guardian drills running that morning. This confusion grants the government plausible deniability in claiming that there were justifiable reasons for the lack of Air Force response. The claim has been made that war games held simultaneously with the terrorist attacks threw the government and military command structure into confusion. This coupled with the fact that the rules of engagement had been changed only weeks before
9/11 would offer plausible reasons for the poor military showing that
It is true that there is no proof that the war games were deliberately staged decoy operations to distract the military command structure to conveniently prevent it from stopping a newly staged Pearl Harbor event. It is entirely possible that al-Qaeda may have received intelligence of the war game exercises taking place that day and may have chosen to stage the terrorist event to coincide with the drills to throw the American military command structure into confusion. This notwithstanding, it is highly improbable that war game drills could be held simultaneously with real-time events in Oklahoma, London, New York, the Pentagon, and New Orleans be sheer coincidence and not by inside planning and design. The fact that war game exercises have been staged to coincide with other acts of terror on both sides of the Atlantic points to a common M.O. The statistical odds of so many war games coinciding with real-time terrorist events is staggering and completely refutes the oft repeated government mantra, ―There‘s no way we could have known.‖ Despite the initial confusion resulting from the simultaneously held war game exercises, once Flight 11 struck the World Trade Center at 8:45 a.m., everyone should have known it was not a test. What is likely based on the testimony given by NORAD and FAA officials is that the difficulty in distinguishing mock and real radar-identified objects from one another may have heightened the level of Air Force- response insecurity, justifying the inexcusably long delay in ordering Air Force intercepts.
There is no excuse for Air Force intercept orders not to have been given at a very early stage in the events of 9/11. Air Force intercept orders have nothing to do with shooting down aircraft. All that is required is for fighter jets to intercept aircraft that have strayed off course, to investigate and if found necessary to provide a military escort. Such fighter jet scramble procedures had been followed as many as 67 times in the year prior to 9-11. The thought that this standard operating procedure could fail to be implemented from 8:28 a.m., when Flight 11 made an unplanned 100-degree turn to the south until 9:38 a.m. when the Pentagon was struck, is simply inconceivable and inexplicable by any ordinary course of logic. What is abundantly clear is that war game exercises taking place on 9/11 coupled with recently implemented changes in the rules of engagement played a decisive role in confusing standard operating protocols that day.
What was the Secretary of Defense doing on the morning of 9-
11? How could he have been so out of the loop that he neither expected nor responded to the emergency in the manner required of a Secretary of Defense? Rumsfeld claims that he was giving a lecture to members of Congress, in the Pentagon, on the morning of 9-11, warning them to expect the unexpected from future terrorist attacks. The dramatic irony here is palpable and has to be examined. How could he be holding a lecture admonishing military officials to be on their guard, while no one in the room, especially the Secretary of Defense himself, displayed any of the preparedness, readiness, concern, response or decisive action required in such a national
emergency. Shortly after instructing his staff to expect the unexpected, news of the unexpected arrived as he learned that the North Tower
had been struck, shortly after which he learned that the second tower had been hit. He then claims he continues with this lecture until the Pentagon was struck at 9:38. This defies all logic. If the Secretary of Defense was lecturing to Congressmen about surprise terrorist attacks when he is told two planes have hit both World Trade Towers, it is beyond belief that he would continue this presentation without reacting to the very unexpected scenario he was lecturing about. To
highlight the hypocrisy and negligence of his actions by alluding to the oft-cited cliché ―Do as I say and not as I do‖ is most apropos.
Is there any evidence that a Pearl Harbor-style event was in the works prior to 9/11? As it happens, there is striking evidence for such planning at the top. The Project for the New American Century (PNAC), a non-profit organization founded in 1997 by prominent Republican leaders called for a transformation of America that would likely take a long time ―…absent some catastrophic catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor‖. The policies that PNAC hoped to
implement have been rapidly stepped up since 9-11. Paul Wolfowitz was a signatory of the PNAC document, which put a ―new Pearl Harbor‖ in a favorable light in September of 2000. Donald Rumsfeld was a contributor and signatory to previous PNAC documents. This is highly suggestive to say the least and points to government complicity, planning and implementation of a staged Pearl Harbor –type event by government insiders.
Who can believe that so many war game drills, conveniently functioning as decoy operations, could conveniently fall on the same calendar date as the most serious national security breach and most violent terrorist attack in U.S. history? The statistical ratio for chance and probability for all of these war game drills occurring that week, where they just happened to coincide with the most massive terrorist strike in US history would rule out chance on their own, but the fact that the same M.O. has been followed in the London bombings, and Hurricane Katrina, as we shall see, makes the case for treason beyond circumstantial. When the same M.O. is repeated in a number of homicide events, we call it a pattern. That pattern grants significant weight to the circumstantial evidence, such that when the perpetrators are caught using the same M.O., an arrest based on suspicion can be made. In this case the M.O. of a war game decoy drill operation
taking place at the same time as an actual terrorist attack has been repeated so many times that the statistical odds alone discount coincidence. And if coincidence can be ruled out, then a criminal
conspiracy involving inside racketeering by top officials in Canada and the US can simply not be ignored. In this case, the pattern points to premeditated mass murder, which in this context would not only be treasonous, but would constitute war crimes and crimes against humanity.
There is a common denominator linking the Oklahoma bombing, the London bombings, and the September 11 attacks. The common denominator is that bombing squads were in position in all three operations prior to the actual event because war game exercises were being conducted at the same time that real-time terrorist events were occurring, offording the perpetrators cover and a degree of plausible deniability. The same M.O. has been used in each case. Later, we will discover that the same M.O. was used in the Hurricane Katrina flooding in New Orleans, resulting not from the hurricane surge reaching landfall, but from controlled demolition of the levees around Lake Pontchartrain. In the case of the Tower number 7 of the World Trade Center and the Lake Pontchartrain levees, FEMA was in position planting the explosives that would result in a controlled demolition. However, this time FEMA would be granted the cover of the hurricane, offering them sufficient plausible deniability to blame it on Mother Nature. The wrath of Mother Nature could never be
equated with state-sponsored terrorists acting under the cover of Allah‘s holy warriors. After all, Mother Nature is impartial and blows hot and cold in accord with the winds of chance. No one in their right mind would ever suppose that federal agents had anything to do with the wrath unleashed by the hurricane, even if it was shown that the Lake Pontchartrain levee was breached one day after the hurricane reached landfall.
In the case of Hurricane Katrina, it was revealed on the Hal Turner show that it was explosives that caused the levee breach in New Orleans and not the storm as previously reported. The story goes that a team of divers inspecting the ruptured levee walls spotted something unusual during one of their dives. Burn marks were detected on underwater debris found beneath the broken levee wall. A diver attached to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, who had some
experience with explosives, knew exactly what he was dealing with. When he came to the surface evidence in hand to show his superior, the on-site Coordinator for FEMA stepped in and immediately imposed the gag order: ―You are not here to conduct an investigation,‖ he was told unequivocally, ―as to why this rupture occurred, but only to determine how best to close it.‖ Amazingly, the FEMA official purportedly threw the evidence back into the water and said, ―You will tell no one about this.‖ (Hal Turner, Explosive
Residue Found on Failed Levee Debris: Ruptured New Orleans Levee
Had Help Failing, Sept. 9, 2005)
The gag order did not prevent the diver from going down to take another look. No doubt the gag order itself raised the red flag for the diver. It may have even prompted him to take a closer look. On the second dive, Hal Turner alleges that the diver secretly pocketed a sample of debris inside his wet suit. Turner claims the diver then had
it sent to friends in the U.S. Army Forensic Laboratory at Fort Gillem. According to unnamed sources, a military forensic specialist
subjected the fragments to analysis and determined that the burn marks were caused by high explosives. The source, speaking on condition of anonymity, is alleged to have said, ―We found traces of boron-enhanced flouronitramino explosives as well as PBXN-111 embedded in the debris. This would indicate at least two separate types of explosive devices.‖ (Ibid)
Hal Turner and many other investigators have confirmed that the levee breach did not occur during the hurricane, but rather a day after the hurricane reached landfall. Residents and Emergency Workers reported hearing loud muffled explosions coming from the direction of the levee, but these were discounted by the authorities as gas explosions from residential areas with leaking gas lines. If these allegations prove correct, it points to state-sponsored terrorism, since only someone with access to weapons-grade explosive material could have planted and detonated the device.
The official story issued by the government and mainstream media is that Mother Nature is to blame for the flooding in New Orleans. A hurricane offers all the plausible deniability in the world
and will certainly take the rap, be framed and go down for the mass murder in New Orleans, but this doesn‘t erase the fact that the official story is as indefensible as the 9-11 claptrap foisted on the American people and the New World Order UN permitting a military response
in the so-called heartlands of al-Qaeda, which just happen to be located in the oil rich territories of the Middle East. To oppose an objection to the government line, it need only be stated that a storm surge occurs as a hurricane approaches land. A tidal wave is created and floods land as the hurricane comes ashore. It is only during the storm surge that flooding occurs, not afterwards and certainly not one day later. As Turner rightly contends, once the rear part of the eye wall comes ashore, the winds blow in the opposite direction, sending water away from the land. Hurricanes rotate counter-clockwise. The top right side of the hurricane is throwing water toward land, while the left side of the eye is turning in the opposite direction. Therefore, to argue that the storm surge was ―delayed‖, in an attempt to account
for the 24-hour difference between the hurricane reaching landfall and the levee failure, is simply preposterous.
The ABC News video that goes with the story posted on the Hal Turner radio program website, shows what‘s become of the steel and concrete in the aftermath of the destruction. The degree of damage inflicted on the steel suggests that Mother Nature is not the
culprit. The concrete appears twisted, ripped, and utterly torn asunder. This is hardly attributable to the effects of water.
And the diver was told not to speak of it, not to breathe a word, not so much as a peep. How like the gag order imposed on William Copper, who, when active duty in the U.S. Navy, saw a UFO rising from the sea and was told unofficially to maintain a gag order
or else. The account is given in some detail in Behold a Pale Horse:
Those of us who had witnessed the UFO were not allowed to go ashore after we had berthed in Pearl. Even those of us who didn‘t have the duty were told we had to stay aboard. After about two hours a Commander from the Office of Navy
Intelligence boarded. He went directly to the Captain‘s stateroom. It wasn‘t long before we were called to wait in the passageway outside the Captain‘s door. Ensign Ball was called first. After about
10 minutes he came out and went into the wardroom. He looked shaken. I was next.
When I entered the stateroom, the Commander was holding my service record in his hands. He wanted to know why I had gone from the Air Force into the Navy. I told him the whole story and he laughed when I said that after putting off the navy
for fear of chronic seasickness, I hadn‘t been seasick yet. Suddenly a mask dropped over his face, and looking me directly in the eyes he asked, ―What did you see out there?‖
―I believe it was a flying saucer, sir,‖ I
The man began to visibly shake and he screamed obscenities at me. He threatened
to put me in the brig for the rest of my life. I thought he wasn‘t going to stop yelling, but as suddenly as he began, he stopped.
I was confused. I had answered his question truthfully; yet I was threatened with prison. I was not afraid, but I was not very confident, either. I figured I had better take another tack. Eighteen years with my father and four years in the Air Force had taught me something. Number one was that officers
just do not lose control like that, ever. Number two was that if my answer had
elicited that explosion, then the next thing out of my mouth had better be something entirely different. Number three was, that his response had been an act of kindness to get me to arrive at exactly that conclusion.
―Let‘s start over again,‖ he said. ―What did you see out there?‖
―Nothing sir,‖ I answered. ―I didn‘t see a damn thing, and I‘d like to get out of here just as soon as possible.‖
A smile spread over his face and the Captain looked relieved. ―Are you sure, Cooper?‖ he asked.
―Yes sir,‖ I replied. ―I‘m sure.‖
―You‘re a good sailor, Copper,‖ he said.
―The Navy needs men like you. You‘ll go
far in the Navy.‖ (Behold a Pale Horse, p.20,
The fact that FEMA has imposed gag orders on the firefighters, Air Force, FAA, and other personnel working in the Twin Towers and on the Pentagon response the day of the attacks as well as on the divers that found evidence of explosive residue in the debris found beneath the Lake Pontchartrain levee suggests they have something to hide. Why conceal evidence and interfere with a criminal investigation if there is nothing to hide? In fact, FEMA is directly culpable and indictable for two counts of tampering with a crime scene, once on 9-
11 at the World Trade Center, when it ordered the tower rubble to be carted away before a forensics team could arrive on the scene as would take place in a proper criminal investigation. What does this suggest? What this suggests is that there must be a very good reason
why a federal government agency would openly flout normal protocol
in a criminal investigation by tampering with the crime scene by hastily removing the hard evidence. What does this action prove? It proves that the government agency had something to hide, which forced it to contravene the legal code that must be followed in all criminal investigations. How did it get away with it? The government can get away with anything because the government is immune to persecution. History will attest to the fact that criminal governments of the kind normally associated with fascist or totalitarian regimes do not have the welfare of the people at heart. In fact, in the case of most
oligarchies – and that is what we now have with the Bush mafiocracy, posturing as a democratically elected body with the mandate of the people – people are viewed as nothing but a herd of cattle to be corralled, marshaled and controlled. And in post-9-11 America, who could legitimately argue that the Patriot Act, Homeland Security and FEMA have not done precisely that? Who else but a rancher and cowboy from Texas would think of corralling people into a sports stadium? Talk about being hogtied.
In the real world, and not the world of virtual reality military operations, this would be called obstruction of justice. Not only is it highly irregular, it violates every tenet of a free society. This is the conduct of a government agency employed by a military junta, not a free and just democratic society. But then, the modern American mafiocracy under George W. Bush, far from being ―the home of the brave and the land of the free‖ has become the domicile of Homeland Security and the Patriot Act, with the brave and free tugging on the skirt of the Statue of Liberty like frightened children.
This is not the first time gag orders have been invoked. Military personnel deployed in the Gulf War, who, as reported in the Riegle Report, told their superior officers that they had heard, scene, witnessed and experienced side effects following an explosive burst that had occurred in the heavens were told by their superior officers not to speak of it under any terms. According to documentary evidence, it was in the early morning hours of January 19, 1991 at Camp 13, some six to seven miles west of the Port of Jubayl, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, that explosive bursts were witnessed by
several U.S. soldiers. Some individuals, who came forward to testify claim to have witnessed the event on the January 20, 1991, though the documentary evidence would suggest the 19th. The discrepancy is interesting, and given the U.S. military‘s long history of
whitewashing its dirty laundry, the discrepancy should be noted and by no means overlooked. The first witness to come forward with testimony implying a government cover-up of the events of January
19, 1991 is Petty Officer Sterling Symms. Symms‘ testimony is
‗telling‘, which is why he is ‗telling‘, coming forward, speaking out, whistle-blowing as it were. Were his testimony not significant, it would not appear in the Riegle Report. What his testimony points to is a deliberate, orchestrated cover-up of the status of the explosion witnessed, seen and heard in the heavens on that day that resulted in many coming down with symptoms of biochemical poisoning soon afterwards. In light of the possible ramifications, Symms‘ eyewitness account is chilling:
Witness 01: Petty Officer Sterling Symms, then assigned to the Naval Reserve Construction Battalion 24, in an area south of the Kuwait border, testified before the Senate Armed Services Committee that between 2:00a.m. and
3:00a.m. on January 20, 1991, there was a “real bad explosion” overhead. The alarms went off and everybody started running towards their bunkers. Petty Officer Symms said there was a sharp odor of ammonia in the air. His eyes burned and his skin stung. His unit donned full chemical gear for nearly two hours until the “all clear” was given.
Later, according to Symms, members of the unit were advised that what they heard was a sonic boom. Petty Officer
Symms said that he did not believe that it
was a sonic boom because there was also a “fireball” associated with the explosion. Members of the unit were ordered not to discuss the incident. Petty Officer
Symms says he has since experienced fatigue, sore joints, running nose, a chronic severe rash, and open sores which have been diagnosed as an “itching problem.” He has also been treated for streptococcus infections. In his testimony, Symms stated that 4 or 5 other members of his unit and two of their wives have been treated for similar infections.
Symms just doesn‘t buy the military line that it was a sonic boom. He says there was a ‗fireball‘ associated with the boom, which suggests it was an explosion. Yet, despite he and the other members of his unit being the direct eyewitnesses of the event, they were told what they had seen and heard by military superiors, as opposed to having their own testimony relied upon for a proper military investigation into the event. In addition, a gag order was imposed, with the members of his unit specifically told to say nothing about what they had witnessed.
Mike Moore was attached to the same unit and has much the same to say about what he thought he saw, heard and experienced that day. He says he was awakened by a double explosion about 3:00 a.m. Moore was also told that it was a sonic boom and to think nothing of it and simply get back to work. While experiencing nothing untoward in the immediate aftermath of the explosions, Moore has, according to the report, come down with an array of symptoms normally associated with the Gulf War Syndrome, as have his family members. The fact is that the so-called Gulf War Syndrome is vaccine induced and should rightfully be called VIDS and is a contagion as well as sexually transmissible. In light of the frightening domino effect the Gulf War Syndrome continues to have on an unsuspecting population, Moore‘s testimony is bone-chilling:
Witness 02: Mike Moore, assigned to the same unit as Symms, also reported that on January 20, 1991, at about
3a.m., he was awakened by a double explosion. As the sound of the explosion faded the alarms went off. The unit intercom announced “Go to MOPP level 4.” Everyone in the tent put on their gas gear and went to the bunker. They stayed at MOPP level 4 until about 7a.m. Later that day or the next, everyone’s chemical suits and masks were collected and replaced. According to Mr. Moore, he was told
the explosion was a sonic boom, to quit worrying about it, and to get back to work. Mr. Moore said that he later
heard that what he heard was an incoming SCUD, but he also heard rumors that a Iraqi MIG was shot down in the area that night.
Mr. Moore said that he did not feel a spray or smell ammonia. He had no stinging or numb lips. Since returning home from the Gulf, he has suffered a severe thyroid problem, a heart attack, memory loss, tired and aching joints, rashes on his feet, nervousness, and muscle cramps, although he reported no bleeding. According to Mr. Moore, he has had about ten blood tests and two sets of x-rays performed at the Tuskeegee, Alabama, Veterans Affairs Medical Center. In past calls to the
Tuskeegee, Alabama, VAMC, however,
he had been told that there is no information in his record.
In February 1992, Mr. Moore’s daughter began developing a thyroid problem and has been suffering from nervousness, headaches, and fatigue. Over the last year, his wife has begun to develop these symptoms as well. There is no history of thyroid problems in the family.
Mr. Moore is on record claiming that, ―he did not feel a spray or smell ammonia. He had no stinging or numb lips.‖ This is interesting. This suggests that in his case, despite the deployment of biochemical weapons in the field to which his unit was exposed, some of whom came down with immediate symptoms, he experienced no such immediate reaction. This suggests that his exposure to poisons of a bioweapon nature did not come from his experiences on the field. Rather, they would have come from the dangerous and reactive smallpox vaccine, he and 2,000,000 other soldiers were given prior to their deployment in the Gulf. Allied troops deployed in WWI were given dangerous and highly reactive flu vaccine shots as inoculations against germ warfare that resulted in the global scourge known as the
1918 flu pandemic, which by the time it had spent its fury, had claimed the lives of 40,000,000 human beings. Same old. Same old. Exactly the same M.O. has been used by those employed in the DoD and the Pentagon‘s bioweapons program. It‘s just that the germ
warfare technology has been ratcheted up to the next level in the state- sponsored global depopulation-eugenics-genocide program.
The third witness to testify to having heard two booms on the day in question is Mr. Kay, an electrician deployed in the Gulf. He claims that the camp intercom announced that there was a ―confirmed mustard gas‖ release and the camp immediately went to MOPP level four.
Witness 03: Mr. William Larry Kay was an electrician assigned to Naval Mobile Construction Battalion 24. He was also assigned to Camp 13. On January 20, 1991, Mr. Kay heard two “booms”, shaking the whole building. Sirens began going off. The camp intercom announced “confirmed mustard gas — go to MOPP level 4.” Mr. Kay was at the Recreation Center when the blasts occurred. He had fallen asleep. He went outside and put his gas mask on. It immediately filled with fumes. He recalls that it smelled like ammonia. Mr. Kay has been a member of a Hazmat (Hazardous Materials) team of the fire department in Columbus, Georgia; he said the strong smell of ammonia is unusual in an open area. There was an ammonia plant nearby, but he had never smelled such a strong odor of ammonia in the area. He reported to his assigned bunker. Each member of the unit had a duty during these attacks — Mr. Kay was assigned to a decontamination team. There were other people assigned to test for chemical contamination. A radio call came
in for these people to check for gas. Then, almost immediately, the intercom announced “all clear.”
Mr. Kay said that after the incident, in response to questions from the unit as to what had occurred, the unit Commanding Officer said “Have you ever heard of a sonic boom?” When members of the unit
continued to question the unit commanders
about what had occurred, they were ordered not to discuss the incident.
Mr. Kay is on record claiming that his gas mask immediately filled with fumes upon deployment, recalling that it smelled like ammonia. Interestingly, the U.S. government, with criminal intent, manufactured an agent known as Prussian Blue at a factory facility in Boca Raton, Florida called Product Ingredient Technology. This agent was
designed to render the gas masks and protective gear inoperable in the Gulf War. Given the testimony of Mr. Kay, it certainly seems likely that the gas mask he deployed in the Gulf was not only rendered inoperative, but was contaminated with a chemical poison known as Prussian Blue, whose ammonia smell he was seemingly able to detect.
Mr. Avery, a utilities worker, deployed to the Gulf, also testifies to having heard a double explosion. He was attached to the same unit and claims he was told the same thing as everyone else, that is was a sonic boom. As a vet of Vietnam, he is well acquainted with what a sonic boom sounds like. He claims the sound he heard was nothing
like a sonic boom, but the military has never had a good reply to this objection, but then dialectics have never been the army‘s forte. The army‘s approach is ―These are the facts, son. Put up or shut up.‖ There is no room for debate when orders are simply given and taken, no questions asked.
Witness 04: Mr. Terry Avery of Salem, Alabama worked on utilities for Naval Mobile Construction Battalion 24, and was also assigned to Camp 13. During the night of January 20, 1991, Mr. Avery said that he heard a double explosion. The alert siren went off. He put on his gas mask and went to the bunker. While in the bunker, his unit received the command to go to MOPP level
4 over the camp loudspeaker. He put on his chemical suit. Mr. Avery said he was almost completely dressed when they announced
“all clear.” He left the bunker and returned to his tent.
Mr. Avery was later told by his Master Chief that the noise he heard was just a sonic boom. A veteran of Vietnam who had heard sonic booms before, Mr. Avery felt that it was not a sonic boom, but he never got a good answer about the explosion. He reported that the rumor going around the
camp was that an enemy plane had been shot down over the desert. (Riegle Report, Chapter 3)
Mr. Avery is not satisfied with the account of events he was given by the U.S. military. A patriot of his stripe has every right to question the government and military. He has served his country faithfully and honorably and was exposed to dangerous biochemical agents while in the field. He was already an experienced war veteran of Vietnam by the time he was sent to the Gulf. He knew the field of battle probably
better than anyone. Yet, his eyewitness testimony could never stand up to the kangaroo court that had already passed its verdict contravening the testimony of several eyewitnesses that what they heard, saw, and experienced was not an explosion, but a sonic boom.
In all the instances described, gag orders were imposed without exception either by the military or by a government agency with a hierarchy, protocol and procedural mandate differing little from the military. The gag orders themselves should raise a red flag among researchers and investigators. An external enemy would naturally call for a thorough investigation to protect those inside. An enemy inside the gate, operating a rogue unit of traitors and accomplices, would endeavor to conceal, cover-up, and hide the evidence at every turn so that a proper investigation could never get off the ground. This is when it looks like, smells like, tastes like, and feels like what it is – high treason. In the case of Oklahoma, 9-11, the London bombings, and the levee explosions in New Orleans, the disturbing truth was that
government plants were on location at the same time a terrorist event was being staged in real-time. Does this suggest treasonous activity? Indeed it does. At best it points to prior knowledge, which could account for why government agents might be snooping around a future crime scene. At worst, it points to a criminal conspiracy to justify the
―war on terrorism,‖ an interminable war whose inevitable outcome can only be WWIII. Actually, it was the war game drill that was ‗staged‘
as it were. The state-sponsored terrorist attacks were for real. To address this reality will require not denial or complacency, but a collective rising up to bring the true perpetrators to justice. When the people are acquainted with the full facts of the Illuminati-controlled deceptions orchestrated by their agents, the upwelling of the riotous mob will be the shot heard around the world.
How is it that the same M.O. could be used in so many events staged in so many different parts of the world? Does it not suggest some overarching plan orchestrated by a transnational organization of supreme mastery and control? How is it that the planning for such war games and anti-terrorist drills should be so well honed and coordinated? Does it not presuppose a number of dress rehearsals? Who conducted these dress rehearsals? Where were they staged? How were they organized? And who organized them? All of these questions can be answered in one simple phrase: National Planning Scenarios. War game drills and exercises are held with the perennial reliability of spring flowers every April 4 and 5 under the code name ―Operation Top Off‖ (‗Top Off‘ stands for ‗Top Officials‘). In New Jersey and Connecticut, for instance, a drill involving police, hospitals, hazardous materials units, emergency teams and news teams will be coordinated to respond to a simulated dirty bomb attack right in their backyard. In part, the drill is designed to assess the public response to such a simulation. In the U.K., this operation goes under the name ―Atlantic Blue,‖ while in Canada its called ―Triple Play‖. This drill involves simulated dirty bomb attacks staged in all three countries. (The Next Pandemic, ―Staging the Operation,‖ www.indymedia.org)
The National Planning scenarios call for a doomsday plan to be followed out based on a mock ―universal adversary‖, with an acting
troop consisting or rescue teams, police units, firefighters, ambulance teams, the army, media, etc, all taking part in the staged production. A script has even been written by members of the country‘s leading anti- bioweapons attack experts, scenarios that call for regular dress rehearsals as indicated by the Department of Homeland Security‘s executive summary of the National Planning Scenario, which can be found by doing a word search under that appellation using any of the popular search engines. A total of 15 scenarios have been elaborated and regular rehearsals are held for each in all three countries named.
The million-dollar question is does life imitate art? Is this mock drill, this fiction, an imitation of an event that could happen in real- time? Quite naturally it is. Why else do it? The question then is are the so-called ―Top Officials‖ practicing drills to guard against an outside terrorist attack or is it more like the Tavistock Institutes‘ surveys conducted to see how effective their mind-control programs are on the world‘s population? In other words, are the ―Top Offs‖ conducting mock drills that are in some way preparatory for a real-time event of their own making? Are the drills merely to coordinate their own future state-sponsored terrorist attacks as part of the eugenics-population control-genocide program known as Global Cleanse 2000? Are the
war games additionally designed to monitor how people react in a terror situation for purposes of corralling and controlling a hysterical population or even leading the cattle to the slaughter more effectively? These are shocking questions, but these are shocking times.
Scientists engaged in the UK ―Top Off‖ program known as
―Atlantic Storm‖ are engaged in a scenario involving the release of spores into the air. In the case of a real-life event, mass vaccinations would be undertaken immediately. War game exercises in which current and former public officials are asked to coordinate a medical, political, and economic assault involving an act of bioterrorism, in which viruses are released into the air in the Warsaw and Rotterdam subways, Los Angeles and Frankfurt airports and the Instanbul Bazaar are cases in point. Mass vaccinations would be initiated immediately.
―Scarlet Shield‖ is an initiative launched by Donald Rumsfeld. 99% of the U.S. Congress voted for Bioshield as it is called. The preparation
of hemorrhagic fever and bird flu viruses in the lab is being used as a pretext for ―Operation Bioshield‖. Biochemical weapon secret labs have been set up all over the United States. The target of these weapons is you and I with American citizens first on the list. (www.indymedia.org)
If this seems far-fetched to some, one need only look as far as New Hampshire to see that Operation Bioshield is already underway. In the wake of Hurricane Katrina, many rumors have been circulating in part as a result of the U.S. government‘s own black operations, that among the Diaspora of refugees fleeing the hurricane, an unfortunate group of individuals, alleged to have been infected with biologicals from one of the bioweapons facilities that went underwater during Hurricane Katrina or from some as yet unidentified source, has descended on the unfortunate people of the state of New Hampshire. Should anyone doubt that much has been made of this story by the government and media, they can refer to the words of Representative McKinney in a speech titled ―The Tremendous Challenges that Face Our Country‖, which she gave to Congress on September 8, 2005. In this speech, she referred specifically to a bioweapons lab facility that went underwater in New Orleans:
I can remember the Tuskagee Study. I remember MK-Ultra as an African American. I remember Paul Robeson. But Tulane University is underwater, and Tulane University houses one of these biodefense labs. We need to know what the heck was in that lab, what was going on in that biodefense lab.
The Tuskagee Study to which she refers was part of the NK-NAOMI operation carried out in concert with MK-ULTRA, in which a sterilization program was launched against African-Americans. These programs were initiated and launched by the CIA with Congressional
Approval and given the green light when Robert MacNamara was the National Security Advisor under President Kennedy, an initiative that also kicked off the now infamous Special Cancer Virus Program, which would oversee the development of HIV as a bioweapon among other things. Now, under the pretext of a biologicals threat to the people of New Hampshire ostensibly emerging from a flooded biodefense lab in New Orleans, the citizens of this state will fall subject to forced vaccinations, which will most certainly give them whatever it is they are afraid of catching. Talk about being up Shit‘s Creek without a paddle. I doubt even if they had a paddle they‘d be able to use it. The current strategy of the government seems to be to render American citizens completely defenseless.
The White House‘s response to its own false red flag is of course to offer special emergency assistance in the form of money and personnel to contain the alleged threat of disease. The Executive Order from the White House specifies that, ―assistance is available to State and eligible local governments for emergency protective measures that are undertaken to save lives and protect public health and safety.‖ The reference to saving live and protecting public health and safety of course refers to the vaccination program that will be implemented to contain the perceived threat posed by the Katrina Hurricane victims. The government for its part will never be suspected of unleashing a bioweapons attack on its own population through a vaccine program,
as it will have granted itself plausible deniability on two counts: Firstly, Mother Nature will be blamed for flooding the biodefense lab and releasing the biologicals. Secondly, people will blame the outbreak not on vaccine-induced infection, but on the Diaspora of infected individuals emerging from the hurricane and disease ravaged south.
The text of the Executive Order released by the Office of the Press
Secretary on September 19, 2005 appears below:
For Immediate Release Office of the Press Secretary September 19, 2005
Statement on Federal Assistance for New Hampshire
The President today declared an emergency exists in the State of New Hampshire and ordered Federal aid to supplement state and local response efforts to assist evacuees from the area struck by Hurricane Katrina and to provide emergency assistance to those areas beginning on August 29, 2005, and continuing.
The President’s action makes Federal funding available to the State and all 10 counties of the State of New Hampshire.
Specifically, assistance is available to State and eligible local governments for emergency protective measures that are undertaken to save lives and protect public health and safety. Emergency protective measures, including direct Federal assistance, will be provided at 100 percent Federal funding. (http://www.whitehouse.gov/releases/2005/09/20050919-8.html)
Representing FEMA, R. David Paulison, Acting Under Secretary for Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of Homeland Security, named Kenneth L. Horak as the Federal Coordinating Officer for Federal recovery operations in the affected area.
A list of the 15 National Planning Scenarios and how they will be carried out are listed below. Short summaries from the Executive Summary are included. Useful comparisons can be made between the theoretical scenarios outlines in each summary and real- time events that have already happened. This is one reason why the National Planning Scenarios are considered so worrying to the authors of this book. The scenarios themselves so shockingly parallel events that have already occurred that one cannot dismiss the notion that the scenarios themselves may in fact be dress rehearsals for real events. The Sarin gas attack outlined in Scenario 7, for instance, so closely parallels the sarin gas attack on the Tokyo subway as to give any researcher into the Brave New World of bioweapons the jitters. To add to this, Scenario 10, preparatory of a hurricane response, so closely parallels the events involving Hurricane Katrina as to be flabbergasting. The argument has been made from numerous sources that Katrina was raised from a category 2 to a category 5 hurricane
and steered to landfall artificially. We won‘t examine that issue here. We mention it now merely to highlight the close parallel between Scenario 10 and the Katrina event. What this suggests is that there may be cause to view Katrina as something more than a mere weather anomaly. Finally, the anthrax attacks outlined in Scenario 7 and 13 give one cause for pause in light of the fact that several researchers have traced the anthrax attacks that came in the wake of the
September 11, 2001 terror to the bioweapons facility known as Fort Detrick, a known CIA operation. Anthrax is not a Middle Eastern or Asian bioweapon. It was specifically emerged from the American government‘s own bioweapons program. The very fact that scenarios
2 and 13 rehearse a theoretical anthrax attack suggests that the dress rehearsal may be preparatory for opening night. Given that anthrax is a direct by-product of the U.S. bioweapons program, and that scenarios 2 and 13 involving rehearsed anthrax attacks, suggest that the same people in charge of the war game exercises are the very people behind the acts of terror themselves. What scenarios 7 and 13 presuppose, in particular, is U.S. government complicity in acts of terror directed against its own citizens, involving high treason, mass murder, war crimes and crimes against humanity.
Scenario 1: Nuclear Detonation – 10-Kiloton Improvised Nuclear
In this scenario, terrorist members of the Universal Adversary (UA) group assemble a gun-type nuclear device using highly enriched uranium (HEU) – used here to mean weapons-grade uranium – stolen from a nuclear facility located in the former Soviet Union. The nuclear device components are smuggled into the United States. The
10-kiloton nuclear device is assembled near a major metropolitan center. Using a delivery van, terrorists transport the device to the central business district of a large city and detonate it. Most buildings within 1,000 meters (~ 3,200 feet) of the detonation are severely damaged. Injuries from flying debris (missiles) may occur out to 6 kilometers (~ 3.7 miles). An Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP) damages many electronic devices within about 5 kilometers (~ 3 miles). A mushroom cloud rises above the city and begins to drift east-northeast.
Scenario 2: Biological Attack – Aerosol Anthrax
Anthrax spores delivered by aerosol delivery results in inhalation anthrax, which develops when the bacterial organism, Bacillus anthracis, is inhaled into the lungs. A progressive infection follows. This scenario describes a single aerosol anthrax attack in one city delivered by a truck using a concealed improvised spraying device in
a densely populated urban city with a significant commuter workforce. It does not, however, exclude the possibility of multiple attacks in disparate cities or time-phased attacks (i.e., ―reload‖). For federal planning purposes, it will be assumed that the Universal Adversary (UA) will attack five separate metropolitan areas in a sequential manner. Three cities will be attacked initially, followed by two additional cities 2 weeks later.
Scenarios 3: Biological Disease Outbreak – Pandemic Influenza
Influenza pandemics have occurred every 10 to 60 years, with three occurring in the twentieth century (1918, 1957-1958, and 1967-1968). Influenza pandemics occur when there is a notable genetic change (termed genetic shift) in the circulating strain of influenza. Because of this genetic shift, a large portion of the human population is entirely vulnerable to infection from the new pandemic strain.
This scenario hypothetically relates what could happen during the
next influenza pandemic without an effective preplanned response. At least twenty-five cases occur first in a small village in south China. Over the next 2 months, outbreaks begin to appear in Hong Kong, Singapore, South Korea, and Japan. Although cases are reported in all age groups, young adults appear to be the most severely affected, and case-fatality rates approach 5%. Several weeks later, the virus appears in four major U.S. cities. By nature, pandemic influenza moves extremely rapidly, and the outbreaks continue.
Scenario 4: Biological Attack – Plague
Plague is a bacterium that causes high mortality in untreated cases and has epidemic potential. It is best known as the cause of Justinian‘s Plague (in the middle sixth century) and the Black Death
(in the middle fourteenth century), two pandemics that killed millions. In this scenario, members of the Universal Adversary (UA) release pneumonic plague into three main areas of a major metropolitan city
– in the bathrooms of the city‘s major airport, at the city‘s main sports arena, and at the city‘s major train station.
Scenario 5: Chemical Attack – Blister Agent
Agent YELLOW, which is a mixture of the blister agents sulfur Mustard and Lewisite, is a liquid with a garlic-like odor. Individuals who breathe this mixture may experience damage to the respiratory system. Contact with the skin or eye can result in serious burns. Lewisite or Mustard-Lewisite also can cause damage to bone marrow and blood vessels. Exposure to high levels may be fatal.
In this scenario, the Universal Adversary (UA) uses a light aircraft to spray chemical agent YELLOW into a packed college football stadium. The agent directly contaminates the stadium and the immediate surrounding area, and generates a downwind vapor hazard. The attack causes a large number of casualties that require urgent and long-term medical treatment, but few immediate fatalities occur. Of the total stadium attendance, 70% is exposed to the liquid at the time of the attack. The remaining 30% (i.e., those in the covered areas of the stadium), plus 10% of the total population in the vapor hazard
area, are exposed to vapor contamination.
Scenario 6: Chemical Attack – Toxic Industrial Chemicals
In this scenario, terrorists from the Universal Adversary (UA) land in several helicopters at fixed facility petroleum refineries. They quickly launch rocket-propelled grenades (RPGs) and plant improvised explosive devices (IEDs) before re-boarding and departing, resulting in major fires. At the same time, multiple cargo containers at a nearby port explode aboard or near several cargo ships with resulting fires.
Two of the ships contain flammable liquids or solids. The wind is headed in the north-northeast direction, and there is a large, heavy plume of smoke drifting into heavily populated areas and releasing various metals into the air. One of the burning ships in the port contains resins and coatings including isocyanates, nitriles, and epoxy resins. Some IEDs are set for delayed detonation. Casualties occur onsite due to explosive blast and fragmentation, fire, and vapor/liquid exposure to the toxic industrial chemical (TIC). Downwind casualties occur due to vapor exposure.
Scenario 7: Chemical Attack – Nerve Agent
Sarin is a human-made chemical warfare agent classified as a nerve agent. Nerve agents are the most toxic and rapidly acting of the known chemical warfare agents. Sarin is a clear, colorless, and tasteless liquid that has no odor in its pure form. However, Sarin can evaporate into a vapor and spread into the environment. Sarin is also known as GB.
In this scenario, the Universal Adversary (UA) builds six spray dissemination devices and releases Sarin vapor into the ventilation systems of three large commercial office buildings in a metropolitan area. The agent kills 95% of the people in the buildings, and kills or sickens many of the first responders. In addition, some of the agent exits through rooftop ventilation stacks, creating a downwind hazard.
For purposes of estimating federal response requirements, each building is assumed to have an occupancy of 2,000 personnel (i.e., twenty-story buildings with 100 occupants per floor), and the outdoor/subway population density of the surrounding areas is 3,900 people per square mile (one-tenth of the total population density in the vicinity of Times Square, New York).
Scenario 8: Chemical Attack – Chlorine Tank Explosion
Chlorine gas is poisonous and can be pressurized and cooled to
change it into a liquid form so that it can be shipped and stored. When
released, it quickly turns into a gas and stays close to the ground and spreads rapidly. Chlorine gas is yellow-green in color and although not flammable alone, it can react explosively or form explosive compounds with other chemicals such as turpentine or ammonia.
In this scenario, the Universal Adversary (UA) infiltrates an industrial facility and stores a large quantity of chlorine gas (liquefied under pressure). Using a low-order explosive, UA ruptures a storage tank man-way, releasing a large quantity of chlorine gas downwind of the site. Secondary devices are set to impact first responders.
Scenario 9: Natural Disaster – Major Earthquake
Earthquakes occur when the plates that form under the Earth‘s surface
suddenly shift, and most earthquakes occur at the boundaries where the plates meet. A fault is a fracture in the Earth’s crust along which two blocks of the crust have slipped with respect to each other. The magnitude of an earthquake, usually expressed by the Richter Scale, is a measure of the amplitude of the seismic waves. The intensity, as expressed by the Modified Mercalli Scale, is a subjective measure that describes how strong a shock was felt at a particular location.
The Richter Scale is logarithmic so that a recording of 7, for example, indicates a disturbance with ground motion ten times as large as a recording of 6. A quake of magnitude 2 is the smallest quake
normally felt by people. Earthquakes with a Richter value of 6 or more are commonly considered major; great earthquakes have magnitude of 8 or more. The Modified Mercalli (MM) Scale
expresses the intensity of an earthquake‘s effects in a given locality in values ranging from I to XII. The most commonly used adaptation covers the range of intensity from the condition of ―I – Not felt except by a very few under especially favorable conditions,‖ to ―XII – Damage total. Lines of sight and level are distorted. Objects thrown upward into the air.‖
In this scenario, a 7.2-magnitude earthquake occurs along a fault zone in a major metropolitan area (MMA) of a city. MM Scale VIII or
greater intensity ground shaking extends throughout large sections of the metropolitan area, greatly impacting a six-county region with a population of approximately 10 million people. Subsurface faulting occurs along 45 miles of the fault zone, extending along a large portion of highly populated local jurisdictions, creating a large swath of destruction. Soil liquefaction occurs in some areas, creating quicksand-like conditions.
Scenario 10: Natural Disaster – Major Hurricane
Hurricanes are intense tropical weather systems consisting of dangerous winds and torrential rains. Hurricanes often spawn tornadoes and can produce a storm surge of ocean water that can be up to 24 feet at its peak and 50 to 100 miles wide. The most destructive companion of hurricanes is the storm surge.
A typical hurricane is 400 miles in diameter and has an average forward speed of 15 miles per hour (mph) in a range of 0 to 60 mph. The average life span of a hurricane is 9 days in a range of less than 1 day to more than 12 days. Hurricanes‘ highest wind speeds are 20 to
30 miles from the center. Hurricane force winds cover almost 100 miles, and gale-force winds of 40 mph or more may cover 400 miles in diameter. A fully developed hurricane may tower 10 miles into the atmosphere.
A hurricane is categorized by its sustained wind intensity on a Saffir- Simpson Hurricane Scale that is used to estimate the potential for property damage and flooding. ―Major‖ hurricanes are placed in Categories 3, 4, or 5 with sustained wind intensities between 111 mph to greater than 155 mph. The most dangerous potential storm would
be a slow-moving Category 5 hurricane, making landfall in a highly populated area.
In this scenario, a Category 5 hurricane hits a Major Metropolitan Area (MMA). Sustained winds are at 160 mph with a storm surge greater than 20 feet above normal. As the storm moves closer to land, massive evacuations are required. Certain low-lying escape routes are
inundated by water anywhere from 5 hours before the eye of the hurricane reaches land.
Scenario 11: Radiological Attack – Radiological Dispersal Devices
Cesium-137 (137Cs) has a half-life of 33 years. It decays by both beta and gamma radiation. It is one of several known radioactive isotopes that stand out as being highly suitable for radiological terror. This isotope causes skin damage similar to burns, but the injury may be as deep within the body as on the skin. Cesium would be particularly dangerous if accidentally ingested or inhaled, even in small quantities. Cesium mimics potassium in the body. It binds to concrete and other masonry, making decontamination of such buildings extremely
difficult and possibly economically infeasible. Use of 137Cs in an
urban setting would seriously raise the cost of cleanup.
137Cs is mostly used in the form of cesium chloride (CsCl), because
it is easy to precipitate. CsCl is a fairly fine, light powder with typical particle size median at about 300 microns. Fractions below 10
microns are typically less than 1%. In a Radiological Dispersal
Device (RDD), most will fall out within approximately 1 to 2,000 feet (although many variables exist), but a small amount may be carried great distances, even hundreds of miles.
In this scenario, the Universal Adversary (UA) purchases stolen CsCl
to make an RDD or ―dirty bomb.‖ The explosive and the shielded 137
Cs sources are smuggled into the country. Detonator cord is stolen from a mining operation, and all other materials are obtained legally in the United States. Devices are detonated in three separate, but regionally close, moderate-to-large cities. The cities are physically similar with geographic topography that is flat. The results in each city are essentially the same. The contaminated region covers approximately thirty-six blocks in each city and includes the business district (high-rise street canyons), residential row houses, crowded shopping areas, and a high school. Buildings in the affected areas are principally made of concrete and brick; some are stone faced.
The entire scene is contaminated with 137Cs, though not at levels causing immediate concern to first responders. Due to the size of the explosion, the radioactive contamination is blown widely such that
the ground zero area is not as radioactive as might have been expected. The detonation aerosol contains 90% of the original 137Cs source with radioactive particles whose sizes range from 1 micron (or micro-
meter, µm) to 150 microns – the size of most of the particles is approximately 100 microns. Larger particles either penetrate building materials in the blast zone, or drop quickly to the ground as fall-out within about 500 feet.
Variable winds of 3 to 8 miles per hour carry the radioactively contaminated aerosol throughout an area of approximately thirty-six blocks (the primary deposition zone). Complex urban wind patterns carry the contamination in unpredictable directions, leaving highly variable contamination deposition with numerous hot spots created by wind eddies and vortices. Radioactivity concentrations in this zone
are on the order of 5-50 microµi/m 2 , with hot spots measuring 100-
500 microµi/m 2 ; however, traces of the 137Cs plume carry more than
3.5 kilometers (~ 2.2 miles) on prevailing winds. Air intakes contaminate interiors of larger buildings, and negative indoor building pressure draws contaminated aerosol into buildings via cracks around windows and doors. In city one, the subway air intakes contaminate the subway system.
Scenario 12: Explosives Attack – Bombing Using Improvised
In this scenario, agents of the Universal Adversary (UA) use improvised explosive devices (IEDs) to detonate bombs inside a sports arena and create a large vehicle bomb (LVB). They also use suicide bombers in an underground public transportation concourse
and detonate another bomb in a parking facility near the entertainment complex. An additional series of devices is detonated in the lobby of the nearest hospital emergency room (ER).
The event is primarily designed for an urban environment, but could be adapted for more rural area events such as county fairs and other large gatherings. Casualty estimates would be reduced as a function of a reduced target population and less population density at target points.
Scenario 13: Biological Attack – Food Contamination
The U.S. food industry has significantly increased its physical and personnel security since 2001. A successful attack could only occur following the illegal acquisition of sensitive information revealing detailed vulnerabilities of a specific production site. However, in this scenario the Universal Adversary (UA) is able to acquire these restricted documents due to a security lapse. The UA uses these sensitive documents and a high degree of careful planning to avoid apprehension and conduct a serious attack.
The UA delivers liquid anthrax bacteria to pre-selected plant workers. At a beef plant in a west coast state, two batches of ground beef are contaminated with anthrax, with distribution to a city on the west coast, a southwest state, and a state in the northwest. At an orange juice plant in a southwestern state, three batches of orange juice are contaminated with anthrax, with distribution to a west coast city, a southwest city, and a northwest city.
Scenario 14 Biological Attack – Foreign Animal Disease (Foot and
Foot and mouth disease is an acute infectious viral disease that causes blisters, fever, and lameness in cloven-hoofed animals such as cattle and swine. Pregnant animals often abort and dairy cattle may dry up.
It spreads rapidly among such animals and can be fatal in young animals. The disease is not considered a human threat.
In this scenario, members of the Universal Adversary (UA) enter the United States to survey large operations in the livestock industries. The UA targets several locations for a coordinated bioterrorism attack
on the agricultural industry. Approximately two months later, UA teams enter the United States and infect farm animals at specific locations.
The U.S. livestock transportation system is highly efficient and movements are rapid and frequent. Although the initial event will be localized at transportation facilities in several states, as the biological agent matures and the livestock are transported, the geographical area will widen to include surrounding states where the livestock are delivered.
Scenario 15: Cyber Attack
In this scenario, the Universal Adversary conducts cyber attacks that affect several parts of the nation‘s financial infrastructure over the course of several weeks. Specifically, credit-card processing facilities are hacked and numbers are released to the Internet, causing 20 million cards to be cancelled; automated teller machines (ATMs) fail nearly simultaneously across the nation; major companies report payroll checks are not being received by workers; and several large pension and mutual fund companies have computer malfunctions so severe that they are unable to operate for more than a week. Individually, these attacks are not dangerous – but combined, they shatter faith in the stability of the system. Citizens no longer trust any part of the U.S. financial system and foreign speculators make a run on the dollar.
Of the 15 National Planning Scenarios outlined above, there is cause for serious concern. Several of the scenarios described so closely parallel real-world events as to be hair-raising. Let‘s take the sarin gas attack outlined in scenario 7 as a case in point. We know
that a sarin gas attack on a populated center has already been carried out, in this instance on the Tokyo subway system. Links between the Aum cult and Rev. Sun Myung Moon of the Unification Church are well established. The Unification Church is a Korean cult founded and led by Rev. Sun Myung Moon, who has well established links with the Bush family. Co-founder of Aum, Hayakawa Kiyohide, was
sent by the Unification Church. He brought methods of mind control and millions of dollars and at least 12 Unification Church members to Aum. (Aum Shinnikyo – Japanese Terrorist Cult, Japan-
101.com/culture/aum_shinniko_cult.htm) Rev. Sun Myung Moon’s business empire, which includes the conservative Washington Times, paid millions of dollars to North Korea’s communist leaders in the early 1990s when the hard-line government needed foreign currency to finance its weapons programs, according to U.S. Defense
Intelligence Agency documents. There is no doubt that he has acted as a conduit for North Korea‘s weapons development program. The payments included a $3 million “birthday present” to current communist leader Kim Jong-il and offshore payments amounting to “several tens of million dollars” to the previous communist dictator, Kim Il-sung, a partially declassified document indicated. (―Rev.
Moon, North Korea, and the Bushes‖, by Robert Parry, www.consortiumNews.com, Oct. 11, 2000)
Moon Sun-myung enjoys friendly relations with Kim Jong-il and has even visited the reclusive North Korean leader from time to time. Moon’s Japanese Toen Trading company once made a special delivery of 12 Russian Golf missile submarines with launch tubes intact. The North Korean communists developed this technology and adapted it to launch missiles from surface and submarine platforms. North Korea now has nuclear weapon strike capability, largely thanks to Moon, that can reach the continental United States from sea-based mobile launch facilities at distances of 2,500 miles. (http://www.ecosyn.us/adti/Nukes.html) Simultaneously, Moon has enjoyed longstanding financial and political ties to the Bush family. The implications of this are striking given that Bush Sr. is the former Head of the CIA. While channeling funds to North Korea’s
communist leaders, the 80-year-old founder of the South Korean- based Unification Church has funneled large sums of money, possibly millions of dollars as well, to former President George H.W. Bush. One well-placed former leader of Moon’s Unification Church has stated that the total earmarked for former President Bush was $10 million. The father of the current U.S. president has declined to say
how much Moon’s organization actually paid him for speeches and other services in Asia, the United States and South America. (―Rev. Moon, North Korea, and the Bushes‖, by Robert Parry, www.consortiumNews.com, Oct. 11, 2000) In exchange for this campaign funding, Bush Sr., at his prostituted best, has responded in kind by giving his full backing and support to Moon‘s new paper syndication in South America. Bush lavished praise on Moon and his journalistic enterprises: “I want to salute Reverend Moon, who is the founder of The Washington Times and also of Tiempos del Mundo,” Bush declared. “A lot of my friends in South America don’t know about The Washington Times, but it is an independent voice. The editors of The Washington Times tell me that never once has the man with the vision interfered with the running of the paper, a paper that in my view brings sanity to Washington, D.C. I am convinced that Tiempos del Mundo is going to do the same thing” in Latin America. (―Dark Side of Rev. Moon: Hooking George Bush, by Robert Parry, May 25, 2001, http://www.freerepublic.com)
What we see here is another paper trail of business ties between the Bushes and shadowy figures connected with a terrorist cult in Japan and the funding of North Korea‘s weapons program. Given that Moon is a former North Korean, and friendly with Kim Jong-il, the President of North Korea and sworn enemy of the United States, the relationship between Moon and the Bushes is as irregular as the business ties between the Bushes and the bin Laden family. In light of this, the sarin gas attack on the Tokyo subway also has a paper trail leading to Moon and back to the United States. Given that the sarin gas attack is one of the scenarios elaborated in the National Planning Scenarios, and given that it has already been carried out by rogue elements with shadowy connections to Moon, the Bush family and CIA ops, the case for the sarin gas attack being rehearsed and planned in war game drills by the perpetrators is strong. The M.O. of the CIA-connected Bush crime family is to cultivate a bogeyman or monster in whatever locale it is they wish to invade or attack. Supplying North Korea with biochemical weapon-making material and helping them to develop their nuclear and bioweapon arsenal
through the help of agents like Moon, with known KCIA and CIA links, is their standard M.O. It is the same M.O. they used in the case of Saddam, Osama, and Manuel Noriega. We don‘t mean to seem alarmist, but based on our research and contacts, the Illuminati plan is to have WWIII break out on the Korean peninsula. The Bush-CIA- Moon-KCIA-CIA-Kim Jong-il connection should be a clear enough warning for the world governments to raise the red flag.
Next, let‘s examine the Anthrax attacks outlined in scenarios 2 and 13 and its implications. Far from being a bioweapon in the al- Qaeda weapon‘s cache or any of the Middle Eastern governments for that matter, anthrax has a made in the USA label on it and is a by- product of Fort Detrick‘s bioweapons program. Law enforcement officials said the scientific analysis of the anthrax sent in letters that killed five people was consistent with the Ames anthrax strain held by the U.S. military at Fort Detrick and distributed to a number of labs
for research. Timothy Read, an assistant investigator for the Institute for Genomic Research, stated, “The anthrax strain from the Florida case was very similar to an anthrax strain that was derived from one distributed through Fort Detrick.” (―FBI Turns Anthrax Probe Towards Fort Detrick, Maryland‖ by Pierre Thomas, ABCNEWS.com, May 20, 2002, at truthout.com)
Photo exhibits of envelopes and letters have been released by the FBI and can be viewed at www.whatreallyhappened.com. In hindsight, they appear to be a hoax and not the work of Islamic extremists as the mainstream media would have us believe. While purportedly the work of al-Qaeda Islamic extremists, several anomalies emerge both in the writing appearing on the envelope and the letters contained therein. First of all, there is the attempt to convey that an amateur hand is at work in the penmanship of the English lettering on the envelopes. The words slope downwards in a childish manner. This has every appearance of a staged attempt to show someone unfamiliar with English words and lettering. However, considering that calligraphy and skill in letter formation is one of the hallmarks of those educated in the Arabic language, it is patently ridiculous that they would have difficulty forming the comparatively
simpler English letters or to maintain a straight hand while writing. If there is an amateur hand at work here, it would be the rank and file of the American intelligence services, who appear to have a rather narrow and naïvely misguided view of foreign people and cultures.
Another major anomaly involves the dating that appears at the top of the letter shown in photo exhibit C. While it may seem inconsequential at first glance, more rigorous intuition will tell you that the numbers don‘t add up in the dating of the letter. The date shows the month, followed by the day, and then the year. In the Arabic system, this order would be reversed. While some might
object that the Arab terrorists are merely adopting the Western system of dating to cater to a Western audience, the fact is that issues of nationalism and authenticity would be foremost in a Middle Eastern terrorist‘s mind. The devil is in the details and the need to convey authenticity would be considered paramount. In addition, many have pointed out that the language of the letter does not ring true either.
The phrase ―ALLAH IS GREAT‖ would not be used. Instead, the phrase ―GOD IS GREAT‖ or ―ALLAH ACHBAR‖ would be the standard fair. Also, the words seem not to be those of a confident and menacing Islamic adversary, but those of a taunting child. ―YOU CAN NOT STOP US. WE HAVE THE ANTHRAX. YOU DIE NOW. ARE YOU AFRAID?‖ Them‘s fighting words? Surely not. These are the words of a rank amateur trying to place himself in the shoes of an Arab terrorist, but with insufficient sophistication, schooling, worldly awareness, education and knowledge to pull it off. The misspelling of the word penicillin as ‗penacilin‘ is a somewhat more convincing attempt to show illiteracy in the English language, but hardly convincing in the end. People from the Asian world prize education more highly than Americans. Meticulous care is taken with language acquisition in that part of the world. Academic pedantry is the norm and attention to detail the custom. The authors of this book
should know, since each of them has spent a considerable part of their lives living in the east. Misspelling a word is considered shameful and disgraceful. Given the brevity of the letter and message conveyed.
One would expect the Arab terrorists to get the language right and
they most assuredly would, and would show markedly greater skill in terms of penmanship. But don‘t take our word for it. Examine the
letters for yourself. You be the judge.
2001 Press Releases
(―The 9-11 Anthrax Frame-up‖ at http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/frameup.html)
How do operatives infiltrate the ranks of organizations the Illuminati- controlled organizations like the CIA wish to get a foothold in? Take this as a textbook example. It was announced in the wake of September 11, in early 2002 in fact, that on January 21 the director of the CDC, Jeffrey Koplan would be stepping down on March 31. Six days earlier it was announced that Surgeon General David Satcher was resigning. At the same time, the National Institutes of Health was being run by a prince regent. This means that the three most prestigious and important medical positions in the country were all
vacant at the same time. (Ruppert, Crossing the Rubicon, p. 518) This is not just a case of watchdogs looking the wrong way. This is a blatant example of watchdogs not even being on watch.
With watchdogs nowhere in sight, it is easy to imagine how exhaustive investigations would reveal that the anthrax that had killed several Americans since October 5 2001 had been linked to CIA research. The FBI was unequivocal about the fact that only 10 people could have had access, yet there were said to have been astounding security breaches at the Fort Detrick bioweapons facility during this period, such as unauthorized nighttime experiments and lab specimens going missing.
The U.S. government‘s militarized anthrax was developed by William C. Patrick III, who holds five classified patents on the process. He is now a private biowarfare consultant to the U.S. military and CIA. He pioneered the process of concentrating one trillion spores of anthrax into one gram, literally the head of a pin. No other country has been able to come close, 500 billion per gram at best. The anthrax that was sent around town in the eastern U.S. in late 2001 was the one trillion per gram variety, making it the grade-A, world class variety found only at Fort Detrick. This was verified in a January 31,
2002 report by Barbara H. Rosenberg of the Federation of American
Scientists. (Ruppert, Crossing the Rubicon, p.518)
The Bush administration needed to railroad its draconian legislation—particularly the Patriot Act and Homeland Security— through Congress as quickly and expediently as possible. They needed a military phalanx, they needed some kind of threat that would penetrate and divide the ranks, so that the Machiavellian initiatives would receive but tacit opposition from the House. Senate majority Leader Tom Daschle was well placed to wield the passage of the new bills a heavy if not fatal blow unless he was brought on side. While generally supportive of the Bush administration‘s policies, there were signs he was showing some nervous agitation amid the ultra- nationalist foment that had emerged in the wake of the September 11
attacks. By October 10th, he had spearheaded the move by Ross
Feingold of Wisconsin to block passage of the US Patriot Act, which had somehow managed to circumvent proper scrutiny or debate in the
House. The Patriot Act for all intents and purposes amounted to the complete suspension of the Constitution powers of the Republic for an indefinite period, and the White House was demanding its immediate passage. It was clear to the administration that Daschle had to be brought to heel or all was lost. Major pieces of legislation including Homeland Security and a multitude of investigations were all within Daschle‘s jurisdiction. He would be forced into compliance or else. On October 15, it was announced that Daschle‘s office had received a present—weaponized anthrax. While the secret admirer was by no means disclosed, it is now beyond the pale that it was an
intelligence unit loyal to the Bush Camp. By October 18th, it was
announced that 31 senate staff members had tested positive for anthrax spore infection. The Patriot Act that lacerated the Constitution was duly passed sans debate on October 24th, 2001.Feeling besieged and on edge the beleaguered chamber traded their freedoms for what they hoped to be greater safety and security. Congress had been kowtowed without the faintest suspicion it had been had. By January
29, 2002, CNN announced that both the president and vice president had asked Daschle to limit congressional investigations into the attacks ostensibly because it might channel unnecessary resources away from the war on terror. The real reason of course is that the Bush administration did not want to be caught red-handed running a criminal protection racket operation in Congress. Not only did Daschle fall into line, he acted as an accomplice in the obstruction of justice, delaying public investigations until the FBI revelations forced his hand on the issue.
Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Pat Leahy, was also in a position to thwart many of the unconstitutional measures coming out of the White House. He showed his willingness to do so with eloquence and passion in the chamber till the wind was taken out of his sails by another special delivery of weaponized anthrax. He had a history of taking on the Bush administration and had a particular bone to pick with the Attorney-General John Ashcroft, who defiantly refused to appear before his committee to answer questions. On November 16, Senator Leahy received his anthrax delivery from a secret admirer. This present was particularly potent with
concentrations of a trillion spores per gram. With the Judiciary Senate Committee brought to heel, Ashcroft was now ready to appear before the beleaguered committee, who were now sufficiently tamed to ask only the most innocuous and painless questions.
Some months later, the truth about anthrax was revealed, but by then Joe Public had lost interest and had forgotten all about it. Nevertheless, it was revealed that the Ames strain of anthrax identified as the one sent to Congress, was the product of a CIA weapons research program involving the US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID), the Dugway Proving Ground, and the Batelle Memorial Institute. All of the anthrax sent post-911 had a Made in the USA label on it with a manufacturer‘s serial number implicating CIA bioweapons research programs. (Michael C. Ruppert, Crossing the Rubicon, 269-271)
Let us now examine National Planning Scenario number 10 and see how it relates to real-world events. Scenario 10 describes a hurricane reaching landfall in a populated area. A slow-moving category 5 hurricane is considered the most dangerous and of course Hurricane Katrina fits the bill. The last part of the scenario is the most chilling:
Sustained winds are at 160 mph with a storm surge greater than 20 feet above normal. As the storm moves closer to land, massive evacuations are required. Certain low-lying escape routes are inundated by water anywhere from 5 hours before the eye of the hurricane reaches land.
If that national planning scenario isn‘t enough to convince you of the striking similarity to the Katrina disaster, perhaps the Hollywood version might be more convincing. The made for TV film Oil Storm is a national planning scenario served up for Hollywood, whose close working relationship with America‘s intelligence services is well documented. The synopsis of the film is available on the Net, but we will save you the trouble by presenting it here:
Oil Storm examines what happens when a Category 6 hurricane in the Gulf of Mexico slams into Louisiana, crushing the city of New Orleans and crippling the vital pipeline of refined oil that is Port Fourchon. It examines the ripple effect of that event and the ensuing cascade of disasters associated with it, through the eyes of public officials (Operation Top Off anyone?), a family in Texas who own a gas station (What, and not an oil well?), an EMS worker in Boston who has to deal with a brutal winter, and a ranching family in South Dekota who have their subsidy completely taken away and question whether we need oil or food to survive.
As the country reels from the loss of life and energy reserves associated with (the) hurricane‘s fury, the price of crude oil skyrockets and the United States government sets forth to take immediate action. It puts in motion efforts to rebuild the infrastructure of Port Fourchon (8 months minimum) and the sagging and disabled deep sea rigs in the Gulf of Mexico (of equal length). It reroutes activity normally associated with the Port Fourchon shipping lanes to the Port of Houston and compels Houston to work
24/7 in order to get cruse to our refineries and out to the public.
(Oil Storm, scenario, available for download at:
In keeping with the usual M.O., where federal authorities are on location staging a war game or emergency response exercise virtually at the same time that a real event is unfolding in real-time, the same type of national planning scenario-style event took place in New Orleans in the case of Katrina. As reported on NBC News, emergency planners were involved in a hurricane simulation that projected 61,290 dead and 384,257 injured or in need of medical assistance in a catastrophic flood that would leave a large portion of New Orleans uninhabitable for more than a year. The planners were not involved in the Katrina response. They were involved in an emergency response exercise known as ―Hurricane Pam,‖ quite probably by design, given the M.O. we have exposed in this chapter. They were taking part in a yearlong project to prepare federal and state officials for a Category 3 hurricane in New Orleans. (―Katrina makes many of planners‘ fears a reality: Feds ‗Hurricane Pam‘ exercise predicted massive flooding,
61,000 dead,‖ The Associated Press, Sept. 10, 2005, http://msnbc.msn.com/id/9274362/print/1/displaymode/1098/) This is more than eerie. Given the consistent pattern in all of these terrorist bombings and national emergencies there is strong evidence of premeditated murder, which is murder in the first degree and, in the case of Katrina, with genocidal intent. In the 412-page report obtained by AP from a government official working on the Hurricane Pam project, the national emergency planning scenario eerily predicts
The death toll is just one of the many chilling details in a 412-page report obtained by the AP from a government official involved in the Hurricane Pam project. Written in ominous present-tense language, the report with the scenario played out only days before the Katrina event, predicted,
Floodwaters would surge over levees, creating ―a catastrophic mass casualty/mass evacuation‖ and leaving drainage pumps crippled for up to six months. ―It will take over one year to re-enter areas most heavily impacted,‖ the report estimated.
Morethan 600,000 houses and 6,000 businesses would be affected, more than two-thirds of them destroyed. Nearly a quarter-million
children would be out of school. ―All 40 medical facilities in the impacted area (are) isolated and useless,‖ it says.
Localofficials would be quickly overwhelmed with the five-digit death toll, 187,862 people injured and 196,395 falling ill. A half million people would be homeless. (Ibid.)
The report even refers to evacuees as ‗refugees‘ and indicated they could be housed at college campuses, military barracks, hotels, travel trailers, recreational vehicles, private homes, cottages, churches, Boy Scout camps, and cruise ships. Then, the report says, ―Federal support must be provided in a timely manner to save lives, prevent human suffering and mitigate severe damage. This may require mobilization and deploying of assets before they are requested via normal (National Response Plan) protocols.‖ (Ibid)
Under FEMA‘s direction, federal and state officials began working on the $1 million Hurricane Pam project in July 2004, when
270 experts convened in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, for a simulation lasting a total of eight days. The ―tabletop‖ exercise involved a mock hurricane. The drill included computer graphic simulations projected on large screens of a hurricane hitting New Orleans. ―We designed the to be a worst-case plausible storm,‖ said Madhu Beriwal, chief executive of, Innovative Emergency management Inc., a consultancy firm not unlike the one hired in London‘s anti-terrorist bombing drill. They produced an update on how to deal with the dead and injured, which they submitted to FEMA‘s headquarters in Washington on September 3, 2005. By this time, Hurricane Katrina had hit and the government was under fire for its slow response. Hurricane Pam national planning scenario was clairvoyant in a multitude of ways, i.e. predicted flooding would exceed 10 feet and result in a lethal mixture of decomposing corpses, chemicals and human waste. The report noted that Hurricane Pam would be a direct hit, but it is known that Katrina‘s eye hit to the east of New Orleans as admitted in the NBC News report. (Ibid)
Having discovered a common M.O. in the Oklahoma bombings, the July 7 London bombings, the 9-11 attacks, and the Hurricane Katrina Disaster, it is clear that national planning-style
scenarios were in operation in each case, excepting perhaps the Alfred P. Murrah Building attack in Oklahoma. Nevertheless, the same M.O. is at work in the Oklahoma case insofar as a bomb squad was seen by several witnesses at the location on the morning of the bombing attack. Having discovered a common M.O. in operations staged in both the USA and the UK, it would be naïve not to connect all of these incidents to some overarching master puppeteer orchestrating these events from behind a screen. What could that overarching controller be and what could possibly be its agenda? ―The answer, my friends, is blowing in the wind, the answer is blowing in the wind.‖ The Bavarian Illuminati founded by the Jesuit Adam Weishaupt was founded in the same year as the American Republic. The American Republic, as suggested in a previous chapter, is a Freemason experiment. The Masons are an Illuminati organization and have been controlled for centuries, as was their predecessor, the Knights Templar, by the Illuminati bloodline families, otherwise known as the Black Nobility families of Europe. The majority of signatories of the Declaration of Independence were Masons. The hind side of the American dollar bill, first introduced by Franklin D. Roosevelt‘s administration, reveals the Illuminati slogan in Latin Annuit Coeptus Novus Ordo Seclorum, meaning ―Announcing the Birth of a New Order of Ages‖ or a ―New World Order‖. It is also known as ―The Great Work of Ages‖ and is a long-term plan to inaugurate a world government, allowing the Illuminati bloodline families to take control of planet Earth through the centralization of power. The majority of US presidents have been Freemasons, not just Freemasons but Masons of the highest initiated
degree, 33. Bush Sr. and son George W. are both 33rd Freemasons, as
was Bill Clinton, Ronald Reagan, Gerald Ford, Harry Truman, and Franklin D. Roosevelt to name a distinguished few. JFK was a Knight of Malta, but even this is a quasi-Masonic organization. The Bush‘s, along with the grandfather of the current president, Prescott Bush, are all initiated Skull and Bones Society initiates of the Skull and Bones university that they each attended, Yale University. The name Skull and Bones is derived from the initiatory ceremony of the Third Degree of Freemasonry, where the initiate confronts his own death shroud upon which appears a skull with two crossed bones. The Skull and
Bones Society have an agenda to wage war against the ‗goyim‘ and initiates belong to Jewish Illuminati bloodline families belonging to a specific Satanic sect of Judaism that we call the ―Illuminati‖.
The headquarters of the New World Order, The United States, has gained control of the world‘s food supply through a multinational company known as Monsanto, which forces genetically modified seed on farmers all over the world. Monsanto specializes in ―Terminator Technology‖ or ―Suicide Seeds‖ so that farmers are unable to seed their own crops in the spring and are forced to return to the agricultural consortium each year to buy more seed. The United States also controls international finance through the monopoly enjoyed by the U.S. dollar, which oil-producing nations depend on to trade in oil. And of course, the United States and NATO control the majority of the world‘s oil reserves through their imperial advance into Central Asia and the Middle East. The United States also has a large stake in the Earth‘s water and mineral resources. And now, it controls the weather. We will learn about the U.S. controls the weather in more detail in the next chapter.
Hurricane Katrina: Owning the Weather
Skeptics will claim that that there is no proof that weather manipulation is even possible. They will argue that there is no empirical evidence weather control even exists. Perhaps they could explain then why a UN Resolution to that effect known as Resolution
31/72 was introduced as early as 1967. They might also explain why a bill on weather modification was referred to the Congressional Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation in 2005. Section 3, Clause 4 will be of particular interest:
To establish the Weather Modification Operations and Research Board, and for other purposes.
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES March 3, 2005
Mrs. HUTCHISON introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and
To establish the Weather Modification Operations and Research
Board, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the `Weather Modification Research and Technology Transfer Authorization Act of 2005′.
SEC. 2. PURPOSE.
It is the purpose of this Act to develop and implement a comprehensive and coordinated national weather modification policy and a national cooperative Federal and State program of weather modification research and development.
SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS.
In this Act:
(1) BOARD- The term `Board’ means the Weather
Modification Advisory and Research Board.
(2) EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR- The term `Executive
Director’ means the Executive Director of the Weather
Modification Advisory and Research Board.
(3) RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT- The term
`research and development’ means theoretical analysis, exploration, experimentation, and the extension of investigative findings and theories of scientific or technical nature into practical application for experimental and demonstration purposes, including the experimental production and testing of models, devices, equipment, materials, and processes.
(4) WEATHER MODIFICATION- The term `weather modification’ means changing or controlling, or attempting to change or control, by artificial methods the natural development of atmospheric cloud forms or precipitation forms which occur in the troposphere.
SEC. 4. WEATHER MODIFICATION ADVISORY AND RESEARCH BOARD ESTABLISHED.
(a) IN GENERAL- There is established in the Department of Commerce the Weather Modification Advisory and Research Board.
(1) IN GENERAL- The Board shall consist of 11 members appointed by the Secretary of Commerce, of whom–
(A) at least 1 shall be a representative of the
American Meteorological Society;
(B) at least 1 shall be a representative of the
American Society of Civil Engineers;
(C) at least 1 shall be a representative of the
National Academy of Sciences;
(D) at least 1 shall be a representative of the National Center for Atmospheric Research of the National Science Foundation;
(E) at least 2 shall be representatives of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration of the Department of
(F) at least 1 shall be a representative of institutions of higher education or research institutes; and
(G) at least 1 shall be a representative of a State that is currently supporting operational weather modification projects.
(2) TENURE- A member of the Board serves at the pleasure of the Secretary of Commerce.
(3) VACANCIES- Any vacancy on the Board shall be filled in the same manner as the original appointment.
(b) ADVISORY COMMITTEES- The Board may establish advisory committees to advise the Board and to make recommendations to the Board concerning legislation, policies, administration, research, and other matters.
(c) INITIAL MEETING- Not later than 30 days after the date on which all members of the Board have been appointed, the Board shall hold its first meeting.
(d) MEETINGS- The Board shall meet at the call of the Chair. (e) QUORUM- A majority of the members of the Board shall constitute a quorum, but a lesser number of members may hold hearings.
(f) CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR- The Board shall select a
Chair and Vice Chair from among its members.
SEC. 5. DUTIES OF THE BOARD.
(a) PROMOTION OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT- In order to assist in expanding the theoretical and practical knowledge of weather modification, the Board shall promote and fund research and development, studies, and investigations with respect to–
(1) improved forecast and decision-making technologies for weather modification operations, including tailored computer workstations and software and new observation systems with remote sensors; and (2) assessments and evaluations of the efficacy of
weather modification, both purposeful (including cloud-seeding operations) and inadvertent (including downwind effects and anthropogenic effects).
(b) FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE- Unless the use of the money is restricted or subject to any limitations provided by law, the Board shall use amounts in the Weather Modification Research and Development Fund–
(1) to pay its expenses in the administration of this Act, and
(2) to provide for research and development with respect to weather modifications by grants to, or contracts or cooperative arrangements, with public or private agencies.
(c) REPORT- The Board shall submit to the Secretary biennially a report on its findings and research results.
SEC. 6. POWERS OF THE BOARD.
(a) STUDIES, INVESTIGATIONS, AND HEARINGS- The Board may make any studies or investigations, obtain any information, and hold any hearings necessary or proper to administer or enforce this Act or any rules or orders issued under this Act.
(b) PERSONNEL- The Board may employ, as provided for in appropriations Acts, an Executive Director and other support staff necessary to perform duties and functions under this Act. (c) COOPERATION WITH OTHER AGENCIES- The Board may cooperate with public or private agencies to promote the purposes of this Act.
(d) COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS- The Board may enter into cooperative agreements with the head of any department or agency of the United States, an appropriate official of any State or political subdivision of a State, or an appropriate official of any private or public agency or organization for conducting weather modification activities or cloud-seeding operations.
(e) CONDUCT AND CONTRACTS FOR RESEARCH AND
DEVELOPMENT- The Executive Director, with the approval of the Board, may conduct and may contract for research and development activities relating to the purposes of this section.
SEC. 7. COOPERATION WITH THE WEATHER MODIFICATION OPERATIONS AND RESEARCH BOARD.
The heads of the departments and agencies of the United States and the heads of any other public or private agencies and institutions that receive research funds from the United States shall, to the extent possible, give full support and cooperation to the Board and to initiate independent research and development programs that address weather modifications.
SEC. 8. FUNDING.
(a) IN GENERAL- There is established within the Treasury of the United States the Weather Modification Research and Development Fund, which shall consist of amounts appropriated pursuant to subsection (b) or received by the Board under subsection (c).
(b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS- There is authorized to be appropriated to the Board for the purposes of carrying out the provisions of this Act $10,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2005 through 2014. Any sums appropriated under this subsection shall remain available, without fiscal year limitation, until expended.
(c) GIFTS- The Board may accept, use, and dispose of gifts or donations of services or property.
SEC. 9. EFFECTIVE DATE.
This Act shall take effect on October 1, 2005.
All this evidence for weather manipulation is given added weight, when set against the backdrop of Jim McCanney‘s claims on a recent radio broadcast that the U.S. government has used weather
manipulation techniques he himself patented and shared with the U.S. Air Force. McCanney also shared the technology with the Russians and claims the Russians made similar overtures to the U.S. government. McCanney now regrets his decision. He naively believed that his government would use the technology for peaceful purposes, steering severe storms away from population centers, thus preventing wind and flood damage. It is his contention, however, that the government has used the technology for more untoward purposes. For instance, he is quite unequivocal about the fact that the U.S. government used weather manipulation technology to steer Hurricane Katrina into New Orleans, a major population center, in stark contrast with the purpose for which he intended the technology. He begins this rather salient and clear radio lecture by debunking self-proclaimed weather manipulation experts, who don‘t know what they‘re talking about. He denies that there is any validity to the claims that so-called scalar technology was employed in the recent hurricane emergencies.
A lot of standard features are being pointed to as so-called scalar technology results, etc. First of all, I‘ve yet to see anybody define what scalar technology even means. It‘s being bantered around by dozens of people. It‘s being used as a common lingo. And it‘s pure disinformation. There is no way to beam radiation into the side of a hurricane or influence a hurricane from the cloud tops…
McCanney even debunks the debunkers—those who will deny there is any such thing as weather manipulation. He begins by asking a very pertinent rhetorical question, namely, if there is no such thing, why then did the UN pass a resolution forbidding the use of weather manipulation as an instrument of war?
There are even people claiming there is no such thing as weather manipulation. Well gee, why on earth then did the UN in 1976
pass a resolution prohibiting the use of weather manipulation. It was clearly already well under development at that time. People were experimenting. There‘s a patent that goes back to the 1930‘s even dealing with weather manipulation. There‘s a good deal of work that went on with World War II…
Let‘s examine UN Resolution 31/72 for a moment just to consider its contents and ramifications:
UNGA RES. 31/72, TIAS 9614
CONVENTION ON THE PROHIBITION OF MILITARY OR ANY OTHER
HOSTILE USE OF ENVIRONMENTAL MODIFICATION TECHNIQUES
Adopted by Resolution 31/72 of the United Nations General Assembly on 10 December 1976. The Convention was opened for signature at Geneva on 18 May 1977.
The States Parties to this Convention,
Guided by the interest of consolidating peace, and wishing to contribute to the cause of halting the arms race, and of bringing about general and complete disarmament under strict and effective international control, and of saving mankind from the danger of using new means of warfare,
Determined to continue negotiations with a view to achieving effective progress towards further measures in the field of disarmament,
Recognizing that scientific and technical advances may open new possibilities with respect to modification of the environment,
Recalling the Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the
Human Environment, adopted at Stockholm on 16 June 1972,
Realizing that the use of environmental modification techniques for peaceful purposes could improve the interrelationship of man and nature and contribute to the preservation and improvement of the environment for the benefit of present and future generations,
Recognizing, however, that military or any other hostile use of such techniques could have effects extremely harmful to human welfare,
Desiring to prohibit effectively military or any other hostile use of environmental modification techniques in order to eliminate the dangers to mankind from such use, and affirming their willingness to work towards the achievement of this objective,
Desiring also to contribute to the strengthening of trust among nations and to the further improvement of the international situation in accordance with the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations,
Have agreed as follows:
Each StateParty to this Convention undertakes not to engage in military or any other hostile use of environmental modification techniques having widespread, long-lasting or severe effects as the means of destruction, damage or injury to any other State Party.
Each StateParty to this Convention undertakes not to assist, encourage or induce any State, group of States or international
organization to engage in activities contrary to the provisions of paragraph 1 of this article.
As used in article 1, the term “environmental modification techniques” refers to any technique for changing – through the deliberate manipulation of natural processes–the dynamics, composition or structure of the Earth, including its biota, lithosphere, hydrosphere and atmosphere, or of outer space.
Theprovisions of this Convention shall not hinder the use of environmental modification techniques for peaceful purposes and shall be without prejudice to the generally recognized principles and applicable rules of international law concerning such use.
TheStates Parties to this Convention undertake to facilitate, and have the right to participate in, the fullest possible exchange of scientific and technological information on the use of environmental modification techniques for peaceful purposes. States Parties in a position to do so shall contribute, alone or together with other States
or international organizations, to international economic and scientific co-operation in the preservation, improvement and peaceful
utilization of the environment, with due consideration for the needs of the developing areas of the world.
Each State Party to this Convention undertakes to take any measures it considers necessary in accordance with its constitutional processes to prohibit and prevent any activity in violation of the provisions of the Convention anywhere under its jurisdiction or control.
TheStates Parties to this Convention undertake to consult one another and to co-operate in solving any problems which may arise in relation to the objectives of, or in the application of the provisions of, the Convention. Consultation and co-operation pursuant to this article may also be undertaken through appropriate international procedures within the framework of the United Nations and in accordance with
its Charter. These international procedures may include the services
of appropriate international organizations, as well as of a Consultative
Committee of Experts as provided for in paragraph 2 of this article.
Forthe purposes set forth in paragraph 1 of this article, the Depositary shall within one month of the receipt of a request from any State Party to this Convention, convene a Consultative Committee of Experts. Any State Party may appoint an expert to the Committee whose functions and rules of procedure are set out in the annex which constitutes an integral part of this Convention. The Committee shall transmit to the Depositary a summary of its findings of fact, incorporating all views and information presented to the Committee during its proceedings. The Depositary shall distribute the summary
to all States Parties.
AnyState Party to this Convention which has reason to believe that any other State Party is acting in breach of obligations deriving from the provisions of the Convention may lodge a complaint with the Security Council of the United Nations. Such a complaint should include all relevant information as well as all possible evidence supporting its validity.
Each StateParty to this Convention undertakes to cooperate in carrying out any investigation which the Security Council may initiate, in accordance with the provisions of the Charter of the United Nations, on the basis of the complaint received by the Council. The Security Council shall inform the States Parties of the results of the investigation.
Each StateParty to this Convention undertakes to provide or
support assistance, in accordance with the provisions of the Charter of the United Nations, to any State Party which so requests, if the Security Council decides that such Party has been harmed or is likely to be harmed as a result of violation of the Convention.
AnyState Party to this Convention may propose amendments to the Convention. The text of any proposed amendment shall be submitted to the Depositary, who shall promptly circulate it to all States Parties.
An amendment shall enterinto force for all States Parties to this Convention which have accepted it, upon the deposit with the Depositary of instruments of acceptance by a majority of States Parties. Thereafter it shall enter into force for any remaining State Party on the date of deposit of its instrument of acceptance.
This Convention shall be of unlimited duration.
Fiveyears after the entry into force of this Convention, a conference of the States Parties to the Convention shall be convened by the Depositary at Geneva, Switzerland. The conference shall review the operation of the Convention with a view to ensuring that its purposes and provisions are being realized, and shall in particular examine the effectiveness of the provisions of paragraph 1 of article I in eliminating the dangers of military or any other hostile use of environmental modification techniques.
At intervals of not less than fiveyears thereafter, a majority of the
States Parties to this Convention may obtain, by submitting a proposal
to this effect to the Depositary, the convening of a conference with the same objectives.
If no conference has been convened pursuant to paragraph 2 ofthis article within ten years following the conclusion of a previous conference, the Depositary shall solicit the views of all States Parties to this Convention concerning the convening of such a conference. If one third or ten of the States Parties, whichever number is less, respond affirmatively, the Depositary shall take immediate steps to convene the conference.
This Convention shallbe open to all States for signature. Any State which does not sign the Convention before its entry into force in accordance with paragraph 3 of this article may accede to it at any time.
This Convention shallbe subject to ratification by signatory States. Instruments of ratification or accession shall be deposited with the Secretary-General of the United Nations.
This Convention shallenter into force upon the deposit of instruments of ratification by twenty Governments in accordance with paragraph 2 of this article.
Forthose States whose instruments of ratification or accession are deposited after the entry into force of this Convention, it shall enter into force on the date of the deposit of their instruments of ratification or accession.
TheDepositary shall promptly inform all signatory and acceding States of the date of each signature, the date of deposit of each instrument of ratification or accession and the date of the entry into force of this Convention and of any amendments thereto, as well as of the receipt of other notices.
This Convention shallbe registered by the Depositary in accordance with Article 102 of the Charter of the United Nations.
This Convention, of which the Arabic, Chinese, English, French, Russian and Spanish texts are equally authentic, shall be deposited with the Secretary-General of the United Nations, who shall send duly certified copies thereof to the Governments of the signatory and acceding States.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being duly authorized thereto, have signed this Convention
Done at Geneva, on the 18 day of May 1977. (Here follows signatures)
Annex to the Convention
Consultative Committee of Experts
TheConsultative Committee of Experts shall undertake to make appropriate findings of fact and provide expert views relevant to any problem raised pursuant to paragraph 1 of article V of this Convention by the State Party requesting the convening of the Committee.
Thework of the Consultative Committee of Experts shall be organized in such a way as to permit it to perform the functions set forth in paragraph 1 of this annex. The Committee shall decide procedural questions relative to the organization of its work, where possible by consensus, but otherwise by a majority of those present and voting. There shall be no voting on matters of substance.
TheDepositary or his representative shall serve as the Chairman of the Committee.
Each expert maybe assisted at meetings by one or more advisers.
Each expert shallhave the right, through the Chairman, to request from States, and from international organizations, such information and assistance as the expert considers desirable for the accomplishment of the Committee’s work.
TEXT PUBLISHED IN: United Nations General Assembly Resolution 31/72, Annex; see Official Records of the General Assembly, Thirty-first Session, Supplement No. 39 (A/31/39), pp. 37-
InternationalLegal Materials, Vol. XVI, No. 1, January 1977, pp.
88-94 (Engl.); World Armaments and Disarmament, SIPRI Yearbook
1978, London 1978, pp. 392-397 (Engl.); Shindler & Toman, eds., “The Laws of Armed Conflicts.”
(UN Resolution 31/72, http://fletcher.tufts.edu/multilaterals.html)
If indeed there is no such thing as weather manipulation, why was the UN Resolution proposed back in the 1970‘s? And furthermore, how far has the technology progressed in the 29 years since the resolution was first introduced? And why does it specifically address the issue of weather modification being used as a weapon of war? Later in the program, McCanney even points out that Article 1 of the Resolution only addresses weather manipulation in the context of one country attacking another. In no place does the resolution address the issue of any country using it against its own citizens, which seems to be the case in relation to America and Hurricane Katrina.
McCanney‘s extraordinary revelations do not end there. He even maintains that the anomalous weather conditions are being exploited by the Illuminist-Freemason New World Order camp to implement their designs on the world. There is almost a prophetic tone to his rhetoric, where he suggests that solar system changes are
underway of such import that the Illuminati-steered New World Order is even directing the weather to achieve its ends.
My books describe specifically how this works, how weather works, what drives the weather, and how it is manipulated. So, I‘ll go through a brief description of that tonight, what I call Weather Manipulation 101. The history and science of weather manipulation…There is very clear evidence that the political moves being made in association with the weather activity of recent weeks and months is very much associated with the New World Order. They‘re trying to get their ducks in a row before something major happens in the solar system…Is the political situation driving the weather or is the solar situation driving the political situation? And the answer is probably both because there is clear evidence that the sun is responding to something. Clearly, something is going on in our solar system. The sun is very much out of sorts, and it is being manipulated and used…
McCanney then goes on to give a rather lengthy description of the path of Hurricane Katrina. Analogous to the official flight paths for Flight
77 and Flight 11 given in the newspapers and other publications in September 11, 2001, which are in stark contrast with the actual flight paths, we have an official hurricane path given by the mainstream publications that is grossly at odds with the one actually taken by Hurricane Katrina.
Now, they use weather systems that are already in existence to magnify them, change their directions to direct them into specific areas. Let me just talk briefly
about the true path of Hurricane Katrina and just a couple of details as it moved into New Orleans. And of course, the tropical storm development, early in its history has been totally out of sorts with any kind of meteorological prediction of storms historically. Katrina formed out of the tropical depression, as it came up from the Bahamas, it formed very quickly to become a hurricane that passed across Florida. The standard path for that storm should have been north…along the east coast, much as the tropical storm Ophelia is doing now, passing up to the right and then up to the Carolinas. That would be the normal path for the storm, just as Floyd did. Now, all of a sudden Katrina makes a sharp left turn. All of the prediction paths by computer showed it going north after it passed through Miami. It did nothing of the sort. It made another left turn, headed out south as a very disorganized thunderstorm, and within 30 minutes developed into a category 3 hurricane. And it moved out westerly across the Gulf of Mexico till it hit about midway, and then it made another sharp turn, and started heading north-northwest up towards the Texas border, actually, is where it first started to move to if you drew a line from its path, it would have hit somewhere in east Texas. So it‘s moving northwards and kind of bending, kind of bending toward New Orleans, but even a hundred miles offshore, Katrina was headed west of New Orleans. As it moved
closer, it made a perfect curve, like a perfect strike pitcher‘s curve ball, directly north towards New Orleans. And of course at that point, we all thought New Orleans was toast. At that point, Katrina made landfall. It made a very sharp right-hand turn, almost 90 degrees, and headed east toward Buloxi, Mississippi. And the reason for that was because it went over two of the oil refineries that had been missed by Ivan and the other four storms that had been guided into that area over the past year. Five major tropical storms, including hurricanes moving into the Mobile, Alabama area. But the people guiding the storm knew that the big refineries, the two big ones that needed to be hit were just east and south of New Orleans. This storm Katrina went dead center over that location, but now understand that as Katrina was a category
4 pushing category 5 hurricane, a hundred miles offshore over new Orleans, even the manipulation of the storm couldn‘t keep it driving at that rate. It lost power. It was only a category 2 storm as it actually hit those refineries. And as it hit, the left part of the eye just grazed Lake Pontchartrain, which lies just north of New Orleans.
According to McCanney, a trained meteorologist who tracked the storm, the eye of the hurricane missed landfall in New Orleans, the left part of the eye just grazing Lake Portchartrain with winds falling to less than one hundred miles an hour as the hurricane reached landfall. Rainfall did not exceed that of any heavy thunderstorm— only 7 inches. There was no storm surge in Lake Portchartrain to
speak of. One has to bear in mind that there are plenty of marshlands to act as a buffer. McCanney‘s contention that the pumps were working and the levees were holding just fine seems true. The levee wall was dealt a fatal blow not by a hurricane surge—because there was none to speak of in Lake Pontchartrain—but by explosions that came a full day afterwards.
Now understand that the rain in New Orleans – I‘m going to describe the conditions of New Orleans. There was 7 inches of rain total, which is not a lot for New Orleans. New Orleans has had these kinds of rainstorms, other than just a thunderstorm in the past. With Katrina, the winds in New Orleans were less than a hundred miles and hour, so the city faired quite well. The pumps were working, the levees were holding. There was no surge coming in Lake Pontchartrain. The waves in that kind of activity, of course there was some, but the levees were holding quite nicely until there was a series of explosions a whole day later…
The immediate consequence of the hurricane passing over the oil refineries in the Gulf was that oil prices shot up to $70 a barrel. Now, let‘s look at two facts concerning the Katrina events and consider them. First, the flood affected the poor largely black neighborhoods in the Ninth Ward, but left the rich French Quarter largely unscathed. Isn‘t that amazing? It‘s often said that storms have a cleansing feature, but have you ever known one to perform ethnic cleansing? Is Mother Nature racist? The second issue concerns the fact that the storm dealt oil refineries and the U.S.A.‘s foremost port a hefty blow. Who benefits? The greatest beneficiary is the oil-disposed Bush administration. Given that Mother Nature has no motive and the Bush administration does, and given that both have opportunity and that a
weapon has been found in the possession of each—the hurricane in the case of Mother Nature and high-tech military grade explosives in the case of the government—who would you name as the prime suspect? McCanney, as the chief meteorological investigator, has come down heavily in his judgment on the oil baron administration, attributing probable cause, motive, and opportunity to those most standing to benefit from the oil refinery damage, the controlled demolition, and the flood disaster.
But as for the Hurricane Katrina, at that point, it had done its damage on the two major oil refineries, and then made a sharp left turn to allow it to go north again. Now, if you look at the standard path that is printed on any of the meteorological pages of the newspaper or whatever, it shows a broad swinging path from Florida down into the Gulf, and then going north, going straight up through New Orleans. But they made that jog left after going over these oil refineries to go north, and of course, the oil prices had already the prior night begun to climb. Oil went to over $70 a barrel overnight, and now we‘re being told the fuel and natural gas heating for the United States will be up 70% this winter, and of course, money being poured into the gas pumps…by people had already hit as much as $6.00 a gallon in Atlanta.
After describing the path of the hurricane, McCanney then argues that the storm did not cause the flood damage. He is unequivocal about the fact that the winds were not sufficiently strong and the rains not significantly heavy — winds of less than 100 mph and less than 7 inches of precipitation—to cause the flood damage in New Orleans. He argues that the levees were blown in a very systematic pattern.
Given the fact that the poor, largely black neighborhoods of Ward Nine were affected, while the rich neighborhoods of the French Quarter were spared, there is some cause for questioning the official media‘s version of events, particularly considering that the levees had survived the hurricane surge and had held quite nicely during the night. The pumps were working and for the 200,000 or so souls who had remained behind in New Orleans life had almost returned to normal.
The next day, it was clear that New Orleans had survived quite well. A couple of hundred thousand people remained in New Orleans and were starting to get back to normal. The pumps were working and the levees were holding. About 4:00 a.m., the levees started to blow. And we have reports unconfirmed that people heard those explosions. If you look at the pattern of levees and the later explanation, saying it was the surge – the storm surge had already left Lake Pontchartrain when the levees started to blow…The levees were blown in a very systematic pattern around New Orleans…There‘s a lot of people claiming that‘s conspiracy theory. No, I‘m sorry, it‘s very true. If it is due to the surge, then how come the levees blew on the river and on the canal side? There was no surge in those…
He says, ―And we have reports unconfirmed that people heard those explosions,‖ but reports have now emerged to that effect and witnesses have been interviewed. Actually, we do have a confirmed report from ABC News. For one, we have the transcript of the interview with New Orleans citizen, Joe Edwards, interviewed by David Muir, which we will share with you.
David Muir: This is the actual levee that runs along the canal on the eastern side of the city. And when the hurricane hit, the water came through the canal at such force it was apparently too much. You can see the massive breach here. And when you look around the corner, you can see what the water did to the Lower Ninth Ward. It completely destroyed neighborhoods.
Jeo Edwards, Jr. 9th Ward Resident: I heard something go BOOM! David Muir: Joe Edwards rushed to get himself and as many neighbors
as possible into his truck. They drove to this bridge, where they‘ve
been living ever since.
Joe Edwards: My house broke in half. My mother‘s house just disintegrated. It was a brick house. All the houses down there floated down the street like somebody guided them.
(Now take note of the following editorial remarks by David Muir. He is engaged is taking editorial license with the interview and slanting the story so as to prejudice the jury against the witness, Joe Edwards. He is subtly coloring the story so as to discredit the witnesses who claims to have heard explosions at the time of the levee breach.)
David Muir: Was it solely the water that broke the levee or was it the force of this barge that now sits where the house once did? Joe Edwards says neither. People are so bitter, so disenfranchised in the neighborhood, they actually think the city did it, blowing up the levee to save richer neighborhoods like the French Quarter.
(Muir‘s takes great editorial license with the comment, ―People are so bitter, so disenfranchised in the neighborhood, they actually think the city did it, blowing up the levee to save richer neighborhoods like the French Quarter.‖ He is clearly playing on the consciousness of those Americans, who are either too brainwashed or brain dead to acknowledge that decades of conspiracies have been unfolding around them from the JFK assassination to the Vietnam War, from the
Oklahoma bombing to 9-11, and who still can‘t face the music even with the final notes of the operatic tragedy ringing in their ears. His job is to interview the witnesses and report the news, not put an editorial slant on what sincere citizens are saying about what they saw, heard, and experienced. Have we become so jaded and prejudiced by the manipulations of Hollywood and the mainstream media that we no longer respect the testimony of a sincere black witness, who adamantly claims that he heard explosions and sincerely believes that the authorities blew the levee? Why pray not? The testimony of this witness should be as admissible in a court of law as any other. But with interrogators like David Muir filtering the information for the general public and prejudicing the jury against witnesses like Joe Edwards, no wonder those at the lower echelons of society are seldom heard and even more seldom listened to. Without the pedigree that paves the road to an elite academy and a Ph.D., the opinion of Joe Public holds about as much water as Lake Pontchartrain.)
Muir: So you‘re convinced…
Joe Edwards: I know it happened.
Muir: They broke the levee on purpose? Joe Edwards: They blew it!
(David Muir then inserts the editorial comment, ―New Orleans mayor Ray Nagin said there‘s no credence to this.‖ This is basically the standard procedure by which the establishment inoculates itself. The claims of ordinary citizens are discredited by appeal to so-called experts or figures of authority. The general population is so brainwashed into respecting only figures of rank, position, and authority that they immediately accept the statement of the official, while dismissing the claims of the mere mortal, Joe Public. This is doubly reinforced by the fact that Joe Public is telling the people what they don‘t want to hear, while the public official is telling them what they do. The condition known to clinical psychologists as ‗denial‘ is
reinforced by appeal to higher authority, which gently allows the public mind to escape into the Never Never Land, the comfort zone where bad things don‘t happen, or if they do, Peter Pan is there to set things to rights. Now let‘s examine the words of Mayor Ray Nagin, which were used in the interview to discredit the claims of Joe Edwards.)
New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin: That storm was so powerful and pushed so much water, there‘s no way anyone could have calculated what level of dynamite to have the kind of impact to save the French Quarter.
(Not only are the mayor‘s remarks scientifically unsupportable, they are inherently absurd. Nevertheless, they are sufficient, despite their illogic, to discredit the claims of Joe Edwards, who may as well be Joe Public as he will be perceived by the all-too-gullible public mind. The other thing to note about the brief interview with the mayor is that he is looking down and not into the camera, displaying no conviction for his words. It should be taken for granted that he would be distraught, having lost a good many of his citizens, and with his once noble city now in ruins, but there is something more here. He doesn‘t seem to believe what he is saying, and his words are at best cold comfort for those who have been displaced or lost relatives or families. As a duly elected public servant, it is incumbent upon him to instill a measure of confidence in the people and show that he stands firmly behind his words and convictions. That he does not do so raises suspicions, especially in light of the fact that he initially encouraged people to return to their homes, only to do an about face the day after his briefing with Col. Honore, where he suddenly bids the citizens of New Orleans to evacuate.
David Muir then ends the interview with the final nail in the coffin for Joe Edwards and the establishment‘s inoculation job is now complete. Following Mayor Nagin‘s shoddy attempt at an establishment-spawned inoculation campaign, another expert is called upon, an unnamed LSU (Louisiana State University) professor.)
David Muir: A LSU expert who looked at the video today says, ―While the barge may have caused it, it was likely the sheer force of the water that brought the levee along the lower 9th ward down.‖
(Video: ―Earwitness tells ABC explosives blew Industrial Canal levee,‖ Sept. 11, 2005, http:www.total411.info/2005/09/video- earwitness-tells-abc-explosives.html)
The reference to an unidentified LSU expert holds about as much water as Dan Rather‘s announcement on the 6:00 News on September
14th, 2001 that CBS had learned that Air Force jets had been
dispatched from Langley and Otis Air Force bases on 9-11. Dan Rather did not provide a source for his story. Neither as it happened did David Muir. The convictions of an unidentified Louisiana State University expert are as bankrupt as an empty piggy bank. Besides, it is mere presupposition to assume that either a barge or the sheer force of a volume of water should have anything to do with the disaster without thoroughly inspecting the destruction on site. To presuppose that either a barge or a significant weight of water had anything to do with it based on viewing a video is patently absurd. But given the amount of footwork and archeological labor the average academic establishment clone includes in his research, no wonder gross oversights are made. That said, the establishment is perfectly content with such shallow analysis and will probably reward the good professor with tenure for failing to smell a rat. The good professor, for his part, will happily uphold the whitewash, taking it for granted that the government could never be involved in such a thing, and so long as his family and his neighborhood remain unaffected by the genocidal machinations of this regime, he will go on believing it till his dying day.
Now back to Jim McCanney‘s radio show broadcast. In the next segment, he actually debunks the line that HAARP (High- frequency Active Auroral Research Program) technology was used to steer these weather anomalies into landfall. He claims to have been personally involved with the HAARP program and maintains that it was largely ineffectual, that, at best, it could be used to move clouds around, but was of no use in projects of a Katrina scale. He then
elaborates on the technology that actually was used to manipulate Katrina and how he was directly responsible for creating this technology.
HAARP was a technique to send radiation – radio wave radiation in large volumes into certain areas and concentrate it on a certain area. But it really was not that effective. They could do a little bit of weather manipulation. They could somewhat move cloud systems around, but it was not very effective. Back in the mid-90s, I came up with a technique that I took to the Air Force, and now I regret that terribly…I took this to the Air Force in Noah and I said I will give you this for free. It‘s a technology that will allow us to manipulate storms and drag them away from shorelines that would affect people. And we can diminish the energy in storms using these techniques. Well, what they‘ve done is taken those same techniques, built large laser satellites that are in orbit around the Earth. And these are what are pumping up the energy in these storms. What they basically do is they shine a laser – and these can be in many different frequencies and this is what I measured directly last January, when I went out into the Pacific because I knew they were doing this; I knew they were playing with these storms out in the Pacific off the west coast of the United States. And I get up to an altitude of about 40,000 some feet, about 45,000 feet, and was able to view and capture the satellite manipulation of a storm system as they took it from Oregon and dragged it down towards California. So this was the first direct measurement
confirmation that they were manipulating these storms with satellites. And I‘m not going to talk specifically about the details of that on the air for a very good reason…The orbits of these satellites can be changed using electro- magnetic propulsion systems that are on the satellites. And that‘s another technology that I was familiar with back in the very early 80‘s, as far as maneuvering satellites into position around the Earth. So the storm that went into Brazil, for example, a year and a half ago…Brazil had never seen hurricanes before. That storm was manipulated and dragged into Brazil…The root source of energy for a hurricane is not warm water—and I dispel that myth conclusively in my weather book showing hurricanes on Mars, where there is no water at all. We have hurricanes that have gone all the way up to Alaska; we‘ve had hurricanes that have developed off the west coast of Washington State; we‘ve had hurricanes in the North Atlantic.
McCanney‘s remarks have to be qualified here. He is not saying that HAARP does not exist and he is not saying that it isn‘t an integral part of the U.S. military‘s weapons arsenal. He is simply saying that it cannot be used to steer a hurricane and has proven ineffectual in this regard. It is for precisely this reason that he worked on the development of a more viable technology for steering hurricanes.
Like it or not, the world‘s climate can be manipulated as part of a new generation of so-called ―non-lethal weapons‖. According to Michel Chossudovsky, Professor of Economics at the University of Ottawa, both the Americans and Russians have the capability to manipulate the world‘s climate. This corroborates McCanney‘s claim that he shared the technology with the governments of both countries. Where Chossudovsky disagrees is that, unlike McCanney, he does not
underestimate the power of HAARP. He says that it is being developed as part of the ―Star Wars‖ Strategic Defense Initiative. Under the joint management of the US Air Force and US Navy, the HAARP base is located in Gokoma, Alaska and is operated by the Air Force Research laboratory‘s Space Vehicles Directorate. He contends that scientific evidence supports the fact that HAARP is now fully operational and can be used as a weapon of mass destruction capable of triggering floods, droughts, hurricanes and earthquakes. Renowned scientist Rosalie Bertell has confirmed that U.S. scientists are working on weather systems as a weapon of war. She claims that the capability exists to enhance storms and divert vapor in the Earth‘s atmosphere to trigger floods and droughts. (Michel Chossudovsky,
―Washington‘s New World Order Weapons Have the Ability to Trigger Climate Change,‖ Jan. 4, 2002, http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CH0201A.html) Given that several hurricanes of recent date, including Ivan, Katrina, and Wilma began life as insignificant storms only to be later upgraded to hurricanes shows a common pattern. Could it be that these hurricanes are being pumped up like balloons through the manipulation of the ionosphere by means of laser technology?
Chossudovsky examines some of the unusual weather patterns observed in recent days. Hurricanes Alex, Ivan, Frances, Charley and Jeanne all occurring in sequence over a short period of time, unprecedented in hurricane history in the Caribbean. The island of Grenada is devastated with two-thirds of the island‘s 100,000 inhabitants left homeless. In Haiti, tens of thousands are left homeless, while the Dominican Republic, Jamaica, Cuba and the Bahamas have also been devastated by anomalous storms. (Michel Chossudovsky,
―The Ultimate Weapon of Mass Destruction: ‗Owning the Weather‘ for Military Use,‖ Sept. 27, 2004, http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CH0409F.html) What goes on here? There is a distinct pattern of largely black populations being targeted here. The same goes for New Orleans. Is Mother Nature racist? How is it that the rich white neighborhoods of the French Quarter were spared the hurricane‘s wrath, while the poor black neighborhoods of the lower Ninth Ward reaped the whirlwind?
According to Chossudovski, HAARP has been operational since the early 1990s. Its system of antennas at Gakona, Alaska are based on a patent held by Advanced Power Technologies Inc., a daughter company of Atlantic Ritchfield Corporation (ARCO). The Inospheric Research Instrument (IRI) was installed in 1992 by a subsidiary of British Aerospace Systems. The antennas are said to beam into the ionosphere by means of wireless high frequency transmitters. ARCO sold its Advanced Power Technologies division to E-Systems in 1994, a highly secretive high tech military contractor with links to the CIA. E-Systems specializes in developing electronic warfare equipment, as well as navigation and reconnaissance machinery. It is one of the biggest military contractors in the world.
$800 million of E-Systems annual sales consist of black budget operations so secret that not even Congress knows how the money is being spent. In 1995, E-Systems was bought out by Raytheon, the fourth largest U.S. military contractor, making Raytheon the largest electronics defense company in the world. Raytheon is involved in other projects involving a military application of the weather, including the activities of its subsidiary in Antarctica, Raytheon Polar Services. Under the Bush administration, British Aerospace Systems became the main partner in the HAARP antenna facility. The multimillion dollar contract was issued by The Office of Naval Research to BAES in 2003, through the US subsidiary BAE Advanced Systems Technologies Inc. The contract was effective some two months prior to the Anglo-American invasion of Iraq. In April
2003, BAE Systems Advanced Technologies subcontracted the production and installation of the antennas to Phazar Corp, a company specializing in the development of advanced wireless antennas for military use. At the same time, BAE Systems had outsourced the production and installation of the high-frequency radio transmitters for the HAARP antenna facility to a Jersey based defense electronics firm called DRS Technologies Inc. Given the solid evidence of defense contractors investing so much in the HAARP antenna facility in Gakona, the evidence points to a full scale military operation involving an Anglo-American military alliance to advance the New World Order agenda with unfathomable global implications. (Michel
Chossudovski, ―The Ultimate Weapon of Mass Destruction: ‗Owning the Weather‘ for Military Use,‖ Sept, 27, 2004, www.globalresearch.ca)
Is there evidence the technology has been used? The evidence is only circumstantial at this point. The evidence though circumstantial points to a number of unusual climatic changes in countries belonging to the so-called ―axis of evil‖ or otherwise posing a military threat to the United States. Iraq, Iran and Syria all experienced devastating droughts in 1999. Afghanistan was hit by four successive years of drought just prior to the US-led invasion in
2001, softening it up significantly and making it ripe for invasion rather as a military phalanx might do. Cuba and North Korea have both experienced a repeated pattern of droughts followed by floods. Weather patterns in North Korea since the mid-1990s have been marked by a series of droughts followed by floods. We will concentrate our analysis on North Korea because author Timothy Watson has lived in neighboring South Korea for the past 11 years and has been a direct witness to the weather conditions on the peninsula during the relevant period. Recurring droughts and flooding often in the same year have hit North Korea, but not strangely South Korea. North Korean and US estimates on the number of deaths resulting from famine differ—North Korea puts the figure at 220,000, while the US estimates 2 million—but regardless of the exact number it is clearly a climactic catastrophe of biblical proportions in a population hovering around 18 million. The first major flooding to hit North Korea came in 1995. Flooding accompanied by drought hit hard in 1999. The water shortages were so serious it resulted in the destruction of that year‘s crop. In June of 2001, there was another devastating drought with rainfall amounting to only 10% of normal levels, which served to undermine agricultural crops. A few months later in October, another round of flooding occurred putting a further davit in the rice harvest. Kangwon province was hit the hardest. The normal amount of rainfall for October there should have been 20 mm, but the heavens unleashed 400 mm of rainfall in only 12 hours, just to give people an idea of the extent of the catastrophe. It was the worst flooding recorded since record keeping began in 1910. (Ibid) Having
lived in South Korea for 11 years from 1995 to 2006, author Timothy Watson was always struck during that period that the fortunes of the North were so opposed to those of the South. Given the ideological divide that exists between the developed capitalist world and the communist world, the dramatically reduced standard of living in the North could not possibly be a coincidence. Portrayed as a reclusive hermit kingdom, the North has been diplomatically, ideologically, and economically isolated. It may also be the case that it has also been shunned by the weather. If the US does own the weather, it should be self-evident that they are not going to share it with their enemies. North Korea may have been literally left out in the rain and the sun for that matter.
To return to McCanney‘s radio program, he now proceeds to debunk the popular myth that hurricanes are produced in warm water and that the power for hurricanes is derived from atmospheric conditions present over warm water areas. This background is both necessary and useful in terms of understanding what he calls Weather Modification 101, since it is the ionosphere that is the source of energy and it is here that the weather manipulation is concentrated. What he is unequivocal about is the fact that the US space program is steering hurricanes by beaming lasers through the hurricane‘s eye.
The root source of energy for a hurricane is not warm water—and I dispel that myth conclusively in my weather book showing hurricanes on Mars, where there is no water at all. We have hurricanes that have gone all the way up to Alaska; we‘ve had hurricanes that have developed off the west coast of Washington State; we‘ve had hurricanes in the North Atlantic…The energy for storms comes from the ionosphere, and what happens is that as the cloud systems develop, there‘s a breakdown of the electrical situation above the clouds. The current begins to flow to the cloud tops, and as this
happens, it develops the eye of the storm. The eye of the storm is actually an electrical current sheet that‘s moving upwards and that spirals upwards because of the carioles force that causes, for example, the water in your bathtub to spin as it goes down. And that spinning sensation in your bathtub drain is just the opposite effect of a hurricane…What happens is that as the wind rushes in around the base of the hurricane and is drawn up the central column by the electric field, all the way up to the ionosphere, as that air mass moves over the water, it evaporates water and drives it up into the cloud tops, as this spills out the top of the eye. And that‘s why there‘s a slight cooling of the water as the hurricane passes, but the cooling of the water is not the source of energy for the hurricane…the amount of energy in a hurricane far exceeds the heat loss from the water under the hurricane. So the simple conservation of energy, this warm water theory of hurricane development is absolutely patently false. So that now that you understand what causes a hurricane, as that eye develops, there‘s an electrical current that moves the ionic air current that moves across the ocean comes up the column, the central eye of the hurricane, and the biggest part of the electrical current is the electron current coming down the eye of the hurricane. Now, if you take a laser and you shine it down, and enhance, ionize the path between the ionosphere and that storm, then you start to be able to increase the energy in that storm. If you bring your
satellite beam off to the edge of the eye, you now start to drag that hurricane around like you put a ring inside somebody‘s nose and you can drag it around, just like we saw with Hurricane Jean last year in the fall and the other hurricane that they could manipulate. Hurricane Katrina they manipulated…However, the lucky part – I shouldn‘t say lucky—the fortunate thing with New Orleans has always had that vast swamp and shallow water down at the delta of the river. And that‘s why the hurricanes would always come in and always fizzle before they got to New Orleans. Now, New Orleans survived this hurricane quite well. It‘s the levee, so the term being used ‗the Katrina disaster‘ – Katrina did not cause a disaster in New Orleans. Believe me, it was the levees that blew a day later that caused the damage in New Orleans. So let‘s put the damage right where it belongs on FEMA and the people who blew the dykes down in New Orleans.
What is essential to note here is that the levee breach occurred one day after the hurricane reached landfall. In addition, as McCanney rightly points out, New Orleans has always had a huge acreage of wetlands acting as a storm and sea swell buffer. The Hurricane Katrina Disaster, as he rightly points out, is a misnomer. The actual name that should go down into posterity in the history books is FEMA‘s Controlled Demolition of New Orleans Levee.
McCanney then debunks the claims of those who fail to know what they‘re talking about that it was the Russians that are manipulating the weather. Since it was McCanney who gave the technology to the Russian and American governments in the first place, he presumably has a vested interest in knowing what they are
actually doing with it. He also has the technology and expertise to be able to track their weather-control activities, which he claims he had done by taking an airplane up to 45,000 feet, where he was able to view and capture the use of satellite lasers to steer and manipulate a storm. He is also obviously able to track these storms as a trained meteorologist by computer and did so in the case of Katrina, which is how he was able to identify the anomalous nature of her path in the first place. What he is unequivocal about is the fact that it is not the Russians. To impute a Made in Russia label to Hurricane Ivan and Katrina simply because these storms have Russian names is to commit the worst of racial slurs on a nation based on a simpleton‘s reasoning. Are the Russians in charge of naming these weather systems? It would be patently absurd to put a Made in Russia label on a tactical weather storm. And would they announce their intentions if they were planning on using weather manipulation as a weapon of war? Putting a Russian sounding name in the two man-made hurricanes, Ivan and Katrina, is a cynical attempt to seed the notion that ―the Russians did it‖ in the public mind. (Sherman H. Sholnick,
―Overthrow of the American Republic – Part 80 Hurricane Katrina – Who Benefits?‖ Sept. 7, 2005, www.rense.com/Datapages/sholnickdatapage.html) McCanney begins by asking two very pertinent questions.
Who is doing the weather manipulation? Who is controlling these satellites? It has been suggested by people who don‘t know what they‘re talking about that Russia is causing this. Patently false. Russia, back in the 90‘s, offered to give, just like I did, the weather manipulation technology to the United States. How did I know that? Cause I worked with the Russian scientists. How did the Russian scientists figure it out? They were translating my science papers into Russian, and teaching them in the universities. They were atmospheric
scientists. Dr. Demetrov and his group of atmospheric scientists had already known and translated my papers back in the mid- and early 90‘s. That‘s how they discovered this. And they developed the technology for weather manipulation, and they were giving it to the United States for free so they could prevent the damaging storms. Because understand, Russia doesn‘t have hurricanes. The United States is one of the most hurricane and tornado prone areas on the planet. That‘s because we‘re west of the Atlantic Ocean. And the other place that is prone to these kinds of devastating storms is the South Pacific, specifically all the way from Japan down into Micronesia to Australia, and sometimes New Zealand, although that‘s pretty far south.
So if the Russians aren‘t doing it and al-Qaeda‘s not doing it and none of America‘s traditional enemies are behind it, who are the perpetrators? Like a policeman who knows his beat and knows the bad cops operating in the underworld, McCanney is able to identify the culprits because he is a government insider and a weather expert who has worked in the field of weather manipulation. He therefore knows the government organ with the know-how, capability and payload and is not shy about naming it, along with a list of accomplices.
Who could be doing that? None other than our own space command. Clearly, it is being done by the scientific payloads, the satellites that had been launched by the United States. Who is doing this? Well, understand that you don‘t own the federal government, that the people who run the government, the
Bush‘s, the Clinton‘s, are jut the representatives of the World Bank, which is a front organization for the large groups of people that manipulate and manage the world politics, economics, etc. And it is well known in CIA circles, etc. that they cannot bring down the United States until, or they cannot get the New World Order in place until they bring down the United States. It‘s well on its way folks. And there are a lot of people expecting the second wave, some kind of terrorist biochem or possibly nuclear attack on another major American city. Our president, George W., signed an Executive Order Saturday night before Katrina hit, made landfall, giving total authority to FEMA. Now, if this were the case and people were in control, why would they not be there with supplies, etc. Well, you have to understand that FEMA was not set up, the Federal Emergency Management Agency is a misnomer. Well, in a sense, they were not designed to help people; they were designed to contain people, to install martial law, to prevent people from leaving areas, and that‘s what they did, that‘s exactly what they did. And any of the guard that was down there were under the direction of FEMA. So when people are saying, ―Why didn‘t you bring water and supplies?‖ well, FEMA was never designed to bring in water and supplies and food and tents, etc. Their job is to displace the public. And very clearly the job of FEMA in this situation was to clear out the city of New Orleans. When the hurricane didn‘t do it, they blew the levees. And now
imagine the amount of coordination it would take to do this. Anybody that doubts that the levees were not blown, look at the pattern, how they were evenly place around the entire city, to blow, to allow the water to flow into the city, so that it could not possibly be pumped out. One breach, the city could have handled it. The pumps would have handled it. They could have dealt with it, but you look at the breaches, they didn‘t just—a three hundred yard long breach – didn‘t just happen a little bit and then a little bit later; it blew at one time. And there‘s a lot of corroborating research going on in this area right now, and I‘ve seen it. There‘s no question about it. Who did it? FEMA. There‘s no question about it. And they‘re demolition experts…
Is there any corroboration in the mainstream media for McCanney‘s claims that the New Orleans flood was caused by a controlled demolition of the levee? It happens that there is. In fact, there is a whole trunk load of articles from the mainstream press to support his contention. In a Washington Post article titled ―U.S. Censoring Katrina Coverage, Groups Say,‖ by Deborah Zabarenko, it is clear that FEMA was behaving like a government agency in China in the wake of the levee disaster. Reporters and photographers were not aloud to accompany FEMA officials in the operation to recover bodies. FEMA claimed this was motivated by a desire to protect the dignity of the dead. One e-mail communiqué explained the situation, quoting a FEMA spokesperson who said, ―The recovery of victims is being treated with dignity and utmost respect and we have requested that no photographs of the deceased be made by the media.‖ Rebecca Daugherty of the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press expressed her complete perplexity and bewilderment at the actions of FEMA in a statement also quoted in the article:
The notion that…that they would even spend the time to be concerned about whether the reporting effort is up to its standards of taste is simply mind-boggling. You cannot report on the disaster and give the public a realistic idea of how horrible it is if you don‘t see that there are bodies as well.‖
(Deborah Zabarenko, ―U.S. Censoring Katrina Coverage, Groups Say‖ Sept 8 2005, http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article…)
Tom Rosenstiel, director of the Project for Excellence in Journalism, is cynical about FEMA‘s claim, stating, ―This is about managing images and not public taste or human dignity.‖ It is in effect an attempt at PR damage control by both FEMA and the U.S. government. Rosenstiel also noted that the government was inclined to protect the psychosocial virginity of the American people, steering the public away from images of carnage. He acknowledges that American media is the most sanitized in the world, and are less likely to show graphic images of carnage than any other television news media in the world. He wonders why American news outlets go into hurricane and earthquake ravaged parts of the world and show the aftermath in graphic detail, while refusing to do so closer to home, which raises the issue of ―international equity‖ in news reporting. ―How is the world going to look at us if we go into their part of the world and we do not allow ourselves to look at such images when they‘re right in our own midst?‖ asked a spokesperson for the American PEN Center. (Deborah Zabarenko, ―U.S. Censoring Katrina Coverage, Groups Say‖ Sept 8
In another article posted at www.rense.com titled ―Citizen Flotilla Turned Back,‖ Jason Robideaux, an attorney from Lafayette Louisiana, wrote of how a group of some one thousand citizens with
500 or so boats left the Acadia mall in Lafayette on September 7, 2005 heading for New Orleans with a police escort from the Jefferson Parish
Sheriff‘s Department. The citizen flotilla was organized by Louisiana State Senator, Gautreaux from Vermillion Parish. The State Police waved the flotilla of trucks and boats through the barricades at LaPlace and the entourage headed for New Orleans till they were stopped cold by agents of the Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries. A DWF agent inspected the boats and told nearly half of the citizens that their boats were too large because the water level had dropped during the night. The citizens told the agent that the local and national media had reported that the water level had risen during the night. The citizens were told that no boat over 16 feet in length would be allowed through. When the citizens asked that they be permitted to go to hospitals to rescue patients and medical staff, the DWF agent turned a deaf ear to their demands and told them to turn around and head home, this despite the fact that CNN had reported that there were over one thousand trapped people in Charity Hospital in New Orleans. (Jason Robdeaux, ―Citizen Flotilla Turned back By Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries‖ Sept. 7, 2005, http//www.rense.com/general67/cit.htm) If this is not corroboration enough, there is the article posted at FEMA‘s own website to substantiate the claims that the response to the hurricane was entirely managed or rather mismanaged by Federal authorities and that local chapters and citizens groups were allowed no jurisdiction in the area under the pretext that it would hamper fire-rescue efforts and throw the rescue operations into chaos.
First Responders Urged Not To Respond To Hurricane Impact
Areas Unless Dispatched By State, Local Authorities
Release Date: August 29, 2005
WASHINGTON D.C. — Michael D. Brown, Under Secretary of Homeland Security for Emergency Preparedness and Response and head of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), today urged all fire and emergency services departments not to respond to counties and states affected by Hurricane Katrina without being
requested and lawfully dispatched by state and local authorities under mutual aid agreements and the Emergency Management Assistance Compact.
―The response to Hurricane Katrina must be well coordinated between federal, state and local officials to most effectively protect life and property,‖ Brown said. ―We appreciate the willingness and generosity of our Nation‘s first responders to deploy during disasters. But such efforts must be coordinated so that fire-rescue efforts are the most effective possible.‖
The U.S. Fire Administration, part of FEMA, asks that fire and emergency services organizations remain in contact with their local and state emergency management agency officials for updates on requirements in the affected areas.
―It is critical that fire and emergency departments across the country remain in their jurisdictions until such time as the affected states request assistance,‖ said U.S. Fire Administrator R. David Paulison.
―State and local mutual aid agreements are in place as is the Emergency Management Assistance Compact and those mechanisms will be used to request and task resources needed in the affected areas.‖
Paulison said the National Incident Management System is being used during the response to Hurricane Katrina and that self-dispatching volunteer assistance could significantly complicate the response and recovery effort.
FEMA prepares the nation for all hazards and manages federal response and recovery efforts following any national incident. FEMA also initiates mitigation activities, trains first responders, works with state and local emergency managers, and manages the National Flood Insurance Program and the U.S. Fire Administration. FEMA became part of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security on March 1, 2003.
(First Responders Urged Not To Respond To Hurricane
Impact Areas Unless Dispatched By State, Local Authorities, August 29, 2005, http://www.fema.gov/newsrelease_print.fema?id=18470)
Claims by FEMA that outside help would hamper a federally coordinated fire-rescue effort is laughable in light of the well- documented story that firefighters were not dispatched to the affected areas. In response to Mayor Nagin‘s appeal for firefighters from other states to be dispatched to the area, firefighters were assembled from all over the country by FEMA. They thought they would be dispatched as emergency workers to the affected areas, but instead languished in a Sheraton Hotel conference room in Atlanta. In an effort to put a prophylactic on the whole out-of-state rescue operation, FEMA instead dispatched them across the Gulf Coast as PR officers for FEMA to disseminate fliers and a contact number for FEMA: 1-800-621-FEMA. FEMA spokeswoman Mary Hudak defended the federal agency‘s actions, issuing the cynical statement, ―The firefighters—or at least the fire chiefs who assigned them to come to Atlanta—knew what the assignment would be.‖ She then adds insult to injury by making the fire chiefs and firefighters look incompetent and stupid for failing to interpret a rather vague directive accurately. ―The initial call to action very specifically says we‘re looking for two-person fire teams to do community relations. So it there was a breakdown in communications it was very likely in their own departments,‖ Hudak was quoted as saying. FEMA‘s defense is no different from a crooked outfit that escapes legal accountability by carefully crafting and wording a contract so the client misreads and misinterprets the legal contract.
―Community relations‖ could mean a variety of things, including rescue and relief missions. There is nothing clear about the directive. The statement is entirely ambiguous and totally lacking in clarity. She is clearly insulting the intelligence of the fire departments and the citizens of the United States with this criminal act of legal and moral deflection. To add to the confusion and confirmed duplicity of FEMA, firefighters from around the country were told to bring backpacks, sleeping bags, first-aid kits and instant meals, and were told to prepare
for austere conditions. One fire chief from Texas wondered why the
1,400 firefighters lured to Atlanta under false pretenses by FEMA weren‘t being put to better use. (―Frustrated: Fire crews to hand out fliers for FEMA, By Lisa Rosetta, Salt Lake Tribune, Sept. 12, 2005, http://www.sltrib.com/portlet/article/html) This is at best government orchestrated criminal negligence causing death, and genocide at worst. For our money, we‘ll opt for genocide and call the murderous U.S. government agency‘s bluff.
The story was no different for out-of-state medical help. A North Carolina medical hospital, developed by the Office of Homeland Security in the wake of September 11, 2001, was sitting idle in a gravel lot 70 miles north of New Orleans because Louisiana officials refused to allow them to deploy to the flooded city. (―Katrina medical help held up by red tape: Doctors waiting to treat patients in tax- funded, state-of-the-art unit‖, CNN.com, Sept. 5, 2005) Homeland Security wouldn‘t let Red Cross food into the affected area either. FEMA would not permit the Red Cross to deliver food to the New Orleans convention center, where many of the refugees were given temporary shelter. ―The Homeland Security Department has requested and continues to request that the American Red Cross not come back into New Orleans,‖ Retina Hosler, spokeswoman for the Red Cross is quoted as saying. ―Right now access is controlled by the National Guard and local authorities.‖ (Ann Rodgers, ―Homeland Security won‘t let Red Cross deliver food,‖ Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, Sunday, September 3, 2005, http://www.post- gazette.com/pg/05246/565143.stm)
Toward the end of his broadcast, McCanney issues a statement that is not only shocking in its implications, but indicative of the fact that the United States has revisited the Nazi era. What he is alleging in no uncertain terms is the fact that FEMA, with premeditation and intent, was engaged in deliberate sabotage and obstruction of relief operations, failing to do its duty not through incompetence, but as part of a premeditated genocidal mandate.
Understand the tens of thousands of people
it took to coordinate, jamming radio signals in New Orleans, cutting phone lines, blowing up levees, keeping people out, keeping people in. The amount of effort FEMA went to was extensive. Believe me, they were there in full force, but they weren‘t there to feed the public or give them water. They were there to kill as many people as possible. Now remember the headlines. The mayor of New Orleans was saying that what they really needed was food and supplies and water for the people and to go get the people out of their houses that were drowning. The result was that nothing happened. The purpose of the headlines that I saw were to emphasize the
‗looting‘—it said ―City of Chaos‖—all of the headlines were designed to give the impression it was just a war zone in there. And that‘s why they kept the supplies out. They said, ―There was nothing farther from the truth…in fact, the situation would never have deteriorated to that if people had food and water because New Orleans is a very nice place to be and live. But if you take food and water away from people, and they‘re drowning in their houses, all of a sudden, yes, you‘re going to have a war zone…There was some looting, but mainly what I saw was people going into stores to get the supplies that they needed…
Are there any eyewitness accounts to support the view held by McCanney and many in the media that FEMA as well as state and federal authorities were in any way hampering, disrupting or stalling rescue operations? It happens that there are plenty of eyewitness
reports, but for the sake of brevity, we will focus on one. It is a report given by Paramedics Larry Bradshaw and Lorrie Beth Slonsky.
We were repeatedly told that all sorts of resources including the National Guard and scores of buses were pouring in to the City. The buses and the other resources must have been invisible because none of us had seen them.
We decided we had to save ourselves. So we pooled our money and came up with
$25,000 to have ten buses come and take us out of the City. Those who did not have the requisite $45.00 for a ticket were subsidized by those who did have extra money. We waited for 48 hours for the buses, spending the last 12 hours standing outside, sharing the limited water, food, and clothes we had. We created a priority boarding area for the sick, elderly and new born babies. We waited late into the night for the “imminent” arrival of the buses.
The buses never arrived. We later learned that the minute the arrived to the City limits, they were commandeered by the military.
By day 4 our hotels had run out of fuel and water. Sanitation was dangerously abysmal. As the desperation and despair increased, street crime as well as water levels began to rise. The hotels turned us out and locked their doors, telling us that the “officials” told us to report to the convention center to wait for more buses. As we entered the center of the
City, we finally encountered the National Guard. The Guards told us we would not be allowed into the Superdome as the City’s primary shelter had descended into a humanitarian and health hellhole. The guards further told us that the City’s only other shelter, the Convention Center, was also descending into chaos and squalor and that the police
were not allowing anyone else in. Quite naturally, we asked, “If we can’t go to the only
2 shelters in the City, what was our alternative?” The guards told us that that was our problem, and no they did not have extra water to give to us. This would be the start of our numerous encounters with callous and hostile “law enforcement”.
We walked to the police command center at Harrah’s on Canal Street and were told the same thing, that we were on our own, and no they did not have water to give us. We now numbered several hundred. We held a mass meeting to decide a course of action. We agreed to camp outside the police command post. We would be plainly visible to the media and would constitute a highly visible embarrassment to the City officials. The
police told us that we could not stay. Regardless, we began to settle in and set up camp. In short order, the police commander came across the street to address our group. He told us he had a solution: we should walk
to the Pontchartrain Expressway and cross the greater New Orleans Bridge where the police had buses lined up to take us out of the City. The crowed cheered and began to move. We
called everyone back and explained to the commander that there had been lots of misinformation and wrong information and was he sure that there were buses waiting for us. The commander turned to the crowd and stated emphatically, “I swear to you that the buses are there.”
We organized ourselves and the 200 of us set off for the bridge with great excitement and hope. As we marched pasted the convention center, many locals saw our determined and optimistic group and asked where we were headed. We told them about the great news. Families immediately grabbed their few belongings and quickly our numbers doubled and then doubled again. Babies in strollers now joined us, people using crutches, elderly clasping walkers and others people in wheelchairs. We marched the 2-3 miles to the
freeway and up the steep incline to the Bridge. It now began to pour down rain, but it did not dampen our enthusiasm.
As we approached the bridge, armed Gretna sheriffs formed a line across the foot of the bridge. Before we were close enough to speak, they began firing their weapons over our
heads. This sent the crowd fleeing in various directions. As the crowd scattered and dissipated, a few of us inched forward and managed to engage some of the sheriffs in conversation. We told them of our conversation with the police commander and of the commander’s assurances. The sheriffs informed us there were no buses waiting. The commander had lied to us to get us to move.
We questioned why we couldn’t cross the bridge anyway, especially as there was little traffic on the 6-lane highway. They responded that the West Bank was not going to become New Orleans and there would be no Superdomes in their City. These were code words for if you are poor and black, you are not crossing the Mississippi River and you were not getting out of New Orleans.
Our small group retreated back down Highway 90 to seek shelter from the rain under an overpass. We debated our options and in the end decided to build an encampment in the middle of the Ponchartrain Expressway on the center divide, between the O’Keefe and Tchoupitoulas exits. We reasoned we would be visible to everyone, we would have some security being on an elevated freeway and we could wait and watch for the arrival of the yet to be seen buses.
All day long, we saw other families, individuals and groups make the same trip up the incline in an attempt to cross the bridge, only to be turned away. Some chased away with gunfire, others simply told no, others to
be verbally berated and humiliated. Thousands of New Orleaners were prevented and prohibited from self-evacuating the City on foot. Meanwhile, the only two City shelters sank further into squalor and disrepair. The only way across the bridge was by vehicle.
We saw workers stealing trucks, buses, moving vans, semi-trucks and any car that could be hotwired. All were packed with
people trying to escape the misery New
Orleans had become.
Our little encampment began to blossom. Someone stole a water delivery truck and brought it up to us. Let’s hear it for looting! A mile or so down the freeway, an army truck lost a couple of pallets of C-rations on a tight turn. We ferried the food back to our camp in shopping carts. Now secure with the two necessities, food and water; cooperation, community, and creativity flowered. We organized a clean up and hung garbage bags from the rebar poles. We made beds from wood pallets and cardboard. We designated a storm drain as the bathroom and the kids built an elaborate enclosure for privacy out of plastic, broken umbrellas, and other scraps. We even organized a food recycling system where individuals could swap out parts of C- rations (applesauce for babies and candies for kids!).
This was a process we saw repeatedly in the aftermath of Katrina. When individuals had to fight to find food or water, it meant looking out for yourself only. You had to do whatever it took to find water for your kids or food for your parents. When these basic needs were met, people began to look out for each other, working together and constructing a community.
If the relief organizations had saturated the City with food and water in the first 2 or 3 days, the desperation, the frustration and the ugliness would not have set in.
Flush with the necessities, we offered food and water to passing families and individuals. Many decided to stay and join us. Our encampment grew to 80 or 90 people.
From a woman with a battery powered radio
we learned that the media was talking about us. Up in full view on the freeway, every relief
and news organizations saw us on their way into the City. Officials were being asked what they were going to do about all those families living up on the freeway? The officials responded they were going to take care of us. Some of us got a sinking feeling. “Taking care of us” had an ominous tone to it.
Unfortunately, our sinking feeling (along with the sinking City) was correct. Just as dusk set in, a Gretna Sheriff showed up, jumped out of his patrol vehicle, aimed his gun at our faces, screaming, “Get off the fucking freeway”. A helicopter arrived and used the wind from its blades to blow away our flimsy structures. As we retreated, the sheriff loaded up his truck with our food and water.
Once again, at gunpoint, we were forced off the freeway. All the law enforcement agencies appeared threatened when we congregated or congealed into groups of 20 or more. In every congregation of “victims” they saw “mob” or “riot”. We felt safety in numbers. Our “we must stay together” was impossible because the agencies would force us into small atomized groups.
In the pandemonium of having our camp raided and destroyed, we scattered once again. Reduced to a small group of 8 people, in the dark, we sought refuge in an abandoned
school bus, under the freeway on Cilo Street. We were hiding from possible criminal elements but equally and definitely, we were hiding from the police and sheriffs with their martial law, curfew and shoot-to-kill policies.
The next days, our group of 8 walked most of the day, made contact with New Orleans Fire Department and were eventually airlifted out by an urban search and rescue team. We were dropped off near the airport and managed to catch a ride with the National Guard. The two young guardsmen apologized for the limited response of the Louisiana guards. They explained that a large section of their unit was in Iraq and that meant they were shorthanded and were unable to complete all the tasks they were assigned.
This eyewitness testimony agrees in virtually every detail with the appraisal of the state and federal response to the Hurricane Katrina disaster given such large play in the media. What the witnesses
describe is an operation to keep the evacuees penned in with no chance of escape, as if the authorities had hoped there would be a die off in New Orleans where food and water could not get in and evacuees
could not get out. The resulting ‗looting‘ as it has been called was a last-resort, no-options scenario brought upon law abiding, decent people by state and federal authorities that refused to provide food, water and the basic necessities of life. Any human being anywhere in the world would have done the same. It is the natural response of human beings backed into a corner with no other recourse for survival. Yet, how did the mainstream largely CIA-controlled media respond to events in New Orleans? By depicting blacks as ‗looters‘ and whites as
people foraging for food. Kanye West‘s remarks on NBC‘s live concert fundraiser for victims of Hurricane Katrina could not have been more on the money: ―I hate the way they portray us in the media. You see a black family, it says, ―They‘re looting.‖ You see a white family, it says, ―They‘re looking for food.‖ (Lisa de Moraes, ―Kanye West‘s Torrnet of Criticism. Live on NBC,‖ Washington Post, Sept. 3,
2005, http://www.washington post.com/wp- dyn/content/article/2005/09/03/AR2005090900165_pf.html)
The testimony also agrees with McCanney‘s point that the country has no defense because the National Guard and most of the standing army are out of the country. The Department of Defense and Homeland Security are complete misnomers because there is no defense and no security being provided by the nation‘s own armed forces. This segment of McCanney‘s program describes a mutiny where soldiers from Louisiana stationed in Iraq were clamoring for the exits to help their loved ones back home.
Apparently, there was some mutiny in Iraq with soldiers from Louisiana who wanted to return home. And they brought a few hundred token guardsmen back, but the bulk of them remain in Iraq. So it‘s very clear that the guardsmen of the United States – and part of the purpose of the Iraq War was to get the defense of the United States to a minimum. I‘ve been told there are Mexican troops in New Orleans…So the international troop situation has already begun. The downfall from within the United States has already begun. The devastation that occurred due to this vast storm, and the aftermath, plus the blowing of the levees in New Orleans, clearly is the beginning of the downfall of the United States. A Trojan Horse has been planted in the United States. What we‘re expecting is another major event within the next weeks,
possibly in September, which would completely and utterly demolish the infrastructure of the United States. And cause complete chaos. And with the beginning of the infusion of foreign armies into this country and complete martial law and ordering of people, for example, into concentration camps, this is another issue that‘s not being talked about—that the people being drawn out of New Orleans by military and paramilitary forces are being maneuvered into the equivalent of concentration camps. We have one in Minnesota. I‘ve checked on it personally. And there‘s no way to contact any of those who are being held captive. The approximately 5,000 people are brought here. Families are being disbanded. This is ethnic cleansing. This is ethnic cleansing, and this should not be happening in the United States. There was plenty of homes and facilities set up to greet these people when they came to the metropolitan area of Minneapolis and St. Paul. But instead, they are being moved in bulk up to Camp Riley, which is obviously being set up. And we don‘t know how many foreign troops are being stored at these facilities. Another issue with New Orleans is that it will very likely be a staging area for central Unites States for foreign armies, and it‘s already occurring. So we have no army of our own in this country. The Department of Defense…is a misnomer. We don‘t have a Department of Defense. There is no defense in this country at all. All of our cities, all of our towns, all of our states, all of our provinces are completely defenseless. The
only defense—what the people can muster up themselves and which will be very much inadequate against a highly trained, well- armed foreign army.
What corroboration, if any is there for McCanney’s contention that ethnic cleansing is taking place and that civilians are being rerouted to concentration camps like Camp Casey? Plenty. A film called American Holocaust presents a particularly strong case for it. To begin with, the film exposes the fact that a Violent Crime Control Bill was passed in
1994 under section 40213 for the conversion of military bases into prison facilities. According to the producers of this program, a Department of the Army Memo that the various commanders were supposed to respond to, is a prepare and request memo for civilian prison camps to be built on these installations.
Amazingly, there is a Federal Transfer Center located at Will Rogers Airport just outside of Oklahoma City. They’re planning to use this as a major transport facility for civilians. The dedication stone at the airport has been installed by the Freemasons as seen from the Masonic Square and Compass clearly visible on the stone with the ‘G’
of the Freemasonic “Grand Geometrician,” they see as the architect of
the universe, inlaid. The foundation stone indicates that the airport has been commissioned by the New World Airport Commission. “New World” refers to the Freemason plan known as “New World Order” or “The Great Work of Ages” to found a world fascist dictatorship that will enslave and completely subjugate the world’s population through
a Trojan horse world government. The artwork commissioned at the airport is perverse and malevolent to the extreme and would be disturbing to any onlooker with a modicum of taste and decency. Nearly all the artwork on display commemorates death and genocide. One piece of art even features a child in a coffin wearing the so-called Star of David.
As hard as it may be to believe and even harder to accept, Mayfair Air Force Base in Sacramento has guard towers, censors, stadium lights and is slated to be another major detention facility.
More camps, 130 all told, are scattered around the United States. Most of them are located in the international biospheres, Camp Shelby MS., Fort Riley KS, Fort Drum NY, Camp McCoy WY, Indian Gap PA, Mather Air Force Base CA, Fort Benning GA, Fort Hacheun AR are just a few of the New World Order internment camps. One camp in Alaska is capable of holding 2 million people. The Civil Affairs Operations Manual calls for officials to get rid of this document. It is plan for the mass displacement of the civilian population for every city in America.
“Rex 84” is a FEMA and US military protocol to suspend the Constitution and implement martial law. The FEMA director was a cabinet minister when George Bush Sr. was the Vice President under Ronald Reagan. Oliver North was the national Security Council aid in charge of putting Rex 84 together. Rex 84 puts into play a scenario whereby the director of FEMA would take charge of the United States at any time the president declared martial law under a state of national emergency. The head of FEMA would then take charge of the
country’s infrastructure per Executive Order 12919 and suspend the
Constitution. During the Iran-Contra Inquiry, Oliver North is asked a rather uncomfortable question by Representative Jack Brooks. What took place during this session is absolutely chilling and is featured in the film American Holocaust.
Brooks: Col. North, in your work at the NSC, were you not assigned at one time to work on plans for the continuity of government in the event of a major disaster.
Defense Attorney: Mr. Chairman…
Chairman: I believe that question touches upon a highly sensitive and classified area, so may I request that you not touch upon that, sir.
Brooks: I was particularly concerned, Mr. Chairman, because I read in Miami papers and several others that there had been a plan developed by that same agency, a contingency plan in the event of emergency that would suspend the American Constitution, and I was deeply concerned
about it, and I wondered if that was the area in which he had worked.
(At this point, North shot nearly everyone in the chambers a dangerous look, as he was on the spot and like a cornered fox, was issuing something analogous to the Masonic distress code a Mason might issue to fellow Masons when in trouble.)
Chairman: May I most respectfully ask that that matter not be touched upon at this stage. If we wish to get into this, I’m sure arrangement can be made for Executive Session. (American Holocaust, The Prophecy Club)
The standby provisions and statutory provisions are already in place. Under the pretext of a terrorist threat or a national emergency, Americans could be arrested and held in detention for an undefined length of time. FEMA was given full jurisdiction in New Orleans in the case of the Katrina Disaster. If the disaster were of a magnitude that affected the infrastructure of the entire country as in the case of a pandemic or the threat of pandemic, martial law could and very likely would be implemented handing jurisdiction of the entire country‘s infrastructure over to FEMA.
Having identified the suspects, McCanney proceeds to show motive and opportunity. For him, it is clear that Halliburton is the greatest beneficiary and who is on the board of Halliburton, but Vice- President Dick Chenney. Since Halliburton has been awarded the contract for reconstruction of the city, it stands to benefit from reconstruction contracts, real estate ventures, investment portfolios, insurance schemes and limitless other financial benefits. This is an extreme case of conflict of interests and would be criminal under any normal circumstance where there was rule of law, but under a dictatorial regime that has thrown out the constitutional baby with the bathwater under the pretext of defending the nation against foreign enemies through an unpatriotic act named in true Orwellian fashion the Patriot Act, we have a fete accompli.
A guy named Tom Kennedy, being
interviewed by Dan Rather, after 9-11, Tom Kennedy states, ―For the record, FEMA arrived in New York on Monday night, Sept.
10 to get ready to go into action on Sept.
11.‖ The words of Tom Kennedy, agent of FEMA…This is another case…was given a directive prior to the disaster to go in and take care of business…FEMA was given jurisdiction before it was even known there was going to be a disaster there. Now, the
‗why‘ of this. New Orleans is the largest port in the country; it handles 25% of the shipping of the United States. And it is essential…including the grain being shipped this year. Believe me, you cannot take the grain shipment of the United States and somehow quickly and easily move it somewhere else. It‘s going to drive up the world food prices. It‘s going to – of course it‘s already driving up oil prices here. It is literally devastating the United States. I understand today, I learned that Halliburton has already received the contract to rebuild naval facilities down there, on bid contracts, to start to rebuild the infrastructure of New Orleans. Now isn‘t that interesting, because under the new ‗eminent domain law‘ that the Supreme Court has upheld, all of the poor people that have been pushed out of New Orleans have no right to their property because a higher buck entity, someone with more dollars, can come in and basically confiscate that…
McCanney‘s take on the reconstruction project received full support from investigative journalist Sherman H. Sholnick, who describes the
treacherous plan to rob poor New Orleans citizens of their homes succinctly.
The plan for treachery is simple. Residents of New Orleans fled for their life. They obviously did not take along in a plastic bag the deed for their property. So now out-of-town and out-of- work, they do not have the funds to pay their property tax nor do they have their property identification code and number. Sixty percent
of the population of New Orleans have been blacks, many impoverished, together with a sizeable number of poor whites, so it will be simple for land swindlers like Halliburton and their gang of pirates to grab lots of land from the descendants of slaves or white indentured servants, bulldoze away the hurricane wrecked houses, and build hotels and other structures…
(Sherman H. Sholnick, ―Overthrow of the American Republic – part
80 of Hurricane Katrina – Who benefits?‖
Has Halliburton really been awarded the contract to undertake reconstruction work in New Orleans? According to the Washington Post, Halliburton has definitely been given the green light. Halliburton has also been courting the $500 million Navy contract to perform emergency repairs at Gulf Coast naval and marine facilities damaged by Hurricane Katrina. A subsidiary of Halliburton, Kellogg, Brown and Root Services Inc., won a competitive bid contract in July 2004 to undertake debris removal and other emergency work in the case of natural disasters like Hurricane Katrina. The company was involved in the cleanup operation after Hurricane Andrew in Florida. KBR has been under scrutiny for receiving a five-year, no-bid contract to restore Iraqi oil fields shortly before war broke out in 2003. Halliburton says it
was paid $10.7 billion for Iraq-related government work during 2003 and 2004. In August of 2005, two Democrats in Congress asked Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld to investigate the demotion a senior civilian Army official named Bunnatine H. Greenhouse for publicly criticizing the awarding of the no-bid contract. Vice President Cheney was the director of Halliburton from 1995 to 2000. Democrats have rightly cited the conflict of interests here and have determined that the firm has received preferential treatment because of that relationship. (Lolita C. Baldor, ―Halliburton Subsidiary Taps Contract For Repairs,‖ Washington Post, Sept. 5, 2005, http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp- dyn/content/article/2005/09/04/AR200509041193_pf.html)
McCanney then raises the issue that is of central importance in all this discussion – the death toll. What is the true figure? How many people have really died in this disaster? The government figure was kept conveniently low, especially in the initial stages, but what is the true count? McCanney puts the figure at 150,000. We may never know the actual number.
Let‘s get to the death toll of New Orleans. My personal estimate is around 150,000 dead. There‘s no way that the number would be much smaller. This is astronomical…The government death toll is stated at 50…59 is the official death toll for Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans. Now remember, it was not Hurricane Katrina that did any severe damage. The death toll due to Katrina, probably less than 100. The death toll due to FEMA blowing the dykes, 150,000 at least…
We will probably never know the true figure for the Katrina dead. As with the tsunami disaster in the Asian Pacific, the body count remained extremely low in the beginning and then began climbing, but we have never been given a full tallying. We have had projections,
predictions, and estimates, but amazingly and inexplicably talk of numbers has gone out of circulation in the mainstream media. The Bush administration is obviously engaged in a PR damage control operation and wishes to keep the extent of its genocide and the level of its complicity in these events off the front page. It is for precisely this reason that FEMA has hired Kenyon International, a subsidiary of Service Corporation International, a scandal ridden Texas based company operated by a Bush crony, to set up a mobile morgue unit in Baton Rouge, Louisiana for the disposal of dead bodies. In other words, FEMA, with Louisiana governor Katherine Blanco taking charge of the negotiations, is subcontracting the body count for Hurricane Katrina, which many believe to be the worst disaster in US history, to a firm which has already faced legal action for discarding and desecrating human remains in Florida. The Menorah Garden cemetery chain, owned by SCI, desecrated vaults, removed hundreds of bodies from two cemeteries in Florida and dumped the gruesome remains in woods frequented by wild hogs. A backhoe was even used to crack open a vault to remove corpses and make room for more dead bodies. SCI paid $100 million dollars to settle a lawsuit filed by outraged family members of the deceased who alleged ―macabre mishandling, abuse and desecration of bodies‖ by Tri-State Crematorium in Georgia. The lawsuit accused SCI-owned funeral homes of sending bodies to an unlicensed crematorium, which instead of undergoing cremation, were shockingly piled up outdoors and stuffed in sheds in 2000. Some vaults designed to house only one body had 67 corpses stuffed inside. Kenyan bills itself as the biggest disaster management company in the world. It provided morgue support services for the tsunami disaster in Asia and for the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.
This is not the only scandal SCI has been involved in. It was involved in a previous debacle involving then Governor George W. Bush, who was accused of obstructing an investigation into SCI license violations. Robert Waltrip, chairman of SCI, is a longtime crony of George Bush Sr. and SCI‘s political action committee donated a handsome purse of $45,000 to Bush Jr.‘s 1994 gubernatorial campaign. The company also donated $100,000 to the construction of
George Bush Sr.‘s presidential library. ―It is appalling that the Bush administration – which has already badly bungled its response to Hurricane Katrina – would hire a company with a record of gross mismanagement of mortuary services,‖ Melanie Sloan, executive director of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics, is quoted as saying.
―I can only imagine that this decision was made because of President Bush‘s longtime friendship with the head of SCI, Robert Waltrip. Jennifer Crider, spokeswoman for House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, expressed concern over FEMA‘s choice of an SCI subsidiary and asked whether the choice was made on a no-bid basis. Democrats have called for the formation of an anti-fraud commission to investigate contracts awarded in the wake of Katrina. (Miriam Raftery,
―FEMA, La. Outsource Katrina body count to firm implicated in body-dumpingscandals,‖ http://www.rawstory.com.news/2005/FEMA_outsources_Katrina_bod y_count_to_firm_implicated_in_bodydumping_scan-0913.html)
The point of the above expose is to highlight the fact that we have a criminal organization, FEMA, connected to a criminal administration subcontracting the counting of the Katrina victims to a body disposal company itself implicated in criminal misconduct. The whole thing stinks to high heaven and points to a criminal murder conspiracy to hide the true body count in the wake of a FEMA-controlled demolition genocide attack on the African-American population of the southern United States.
What is the true motive for the genocide and population relocation in New Orleans? The motives are multifold. First, it will provide pretext for a military-controlled nationwide vaccination campaign resulting from the alleged disease exposure of refugees who will be said to have spread contagions and pathogens to other states. One of the Global Cleanse 2000-style initiatives to reduce the population by infecting people with STD through a forced vaccination campaign will then begin. Then, there is the fact that the United States has put in a request for massive offshore loans to pay for the reconstruction. In all likelihood, this will turn New Orleans into a playground for its rich foreign landlords. It will be the perfect New
World Order city and will very likely have special economic zone status rather like Hong Kong and become the perfect New World Order prototype city like Singapore. The poor undesirable class of New Orleans citizens will have been removed by the elitist and racist global elite and a new class of privilege will move in to appropriate the land and make off with the real estate trappings. McCanney concludes his radio broadcast by encapsulating it all quite nicely.
I‘m going to talk about the construction efforts that have already begun. And apparently these were already in place early in the devastation of this region. $50 billion. Can you imagine the United States? Apparently through the Bush administration, we are requesting $50 billion in foreign aid for reconstruction of the area hit by the storm. And they are saying this is due to the damage due to Katrina. Now understand, that this money will be going to rebuilding the infrastructure for the rich, for the people who are going to be back in there, and I suspect what will happen is that the reconstruction for workers will come out of the payments that they‘ll receive. There‘ll be some kind of loan structure set up, special loans given to people. And they will be put up in certain areas. My suspicion that, for New Orleans, this is going to become the new Shanghai, so to speak, an international cordoned off area, probably under IMF control. And we will have the equivalent of Singapore in the United States. Because of their asking for foreign money, don‘t you think the foreigners are going to want some money back? Out of this operation, once it gets going, the fifth largest port in the world,
New Orleans. So, you can already see the wheels turning. And who‘s going to build that port? I wonder if it would be Halliburton. You have to understand the overall background of who‘s running this. Clearly, the IMF, the United States is being treated like a Third World country and being driven down to the status of a Third World country. We are already there. The United States is Third World country status so to speak.
(Transcript of Jim McCanney‘s radio show, which can be downloaded
There‘s a rather nasty New World odor in all this. From National Planning Scenarios to the current New World Order headquarters – the United States – owning food, water, oil, and just about everything else, including the weather. We are losing our land and property. Eminent domain laws are being railroaded through the House without proper deliberation and debate and land transfers are taking place without the permission and approval of the disenfranchised citizens of the United States. How will it all end? Very badly – unless we do something about it and soon.
What is the solution to the Freemason-Illuminati plot to take control of the Earth and all of its resources, including the worker bees? The citizens off this world have to start fighting back. We have to seize back control of our resources and take back our birthright. No individual, state or organization should control the natural elements of this world. And no state, body, or organization has the right to control the people. Somehow, we have allowed non-elected representatives like George Bush – who has apparently stolen two elections without receiving the mandate of the people – to stay in office and to even be granted dictatorial powers under the pretext of an ever-present terrorist threat. Americans need to get their country back, restore its constitution and conduct a purge of its government at every level to root out the cancer that is Freemasonry, just as Italy
did in the recent P2 Freemasonry scandal that involved the Vatican and the government of Italy. The conspiracy orchestrated by Licio Gelli to topple the Italian government and replace it with a dictatorial regime sympathetic to the New World Order was only thwarted by the court system of Italy and it was this that rooted out the deadly canker and rescued the Italian Republic from an early death. We will investigate this affair in the next chapter. Suffice to say, America will have to address this matter in the courts and it is. The Grand Jury indictment case launched by Patrick Fitzgerald involving the Valerie Plame case and the White House leaks may be the key to saving the American Republic. We will see. For now, the fate of the United States and the world hangs in the balance.