The Pentacle By Timothy Spearman

https://www.bitchute.com/video/GtQrJ8zwJMfH/

Timothy Spearmans Shaking a Spear

A

                                                           star
                                                         having

   A                                                   5 points                                                        A

     plot                                            represents                                              plot
known                               the star Sirius                                     known

             to insiders                   to the Illuminized                       to Masons

                   as the killing     Masonic brotherhood              as the killing

                      of the king also arranged for the killing of the princess.

                        Lighted by flame surrounded by pentacle marked by

                             torch symbolizing illumination of the Sirius star.

                             Dealey Plaza and Pont de LAlma mark sites

                            representing king and virgin queen worship

                                Virginia-Simiramis-Diana had to die at

                                        the site of traditional Diana cult

                                     worship known as Pont de LAlma.

                                   They need a lighted torch to mark the

                                  site with real meaning to the Diana cult.

                                    but knowing agenda of ritual murder
                               assassination,                          murder rite,

                           story of JFK                                    on Masonic

                         the official                                             official line

                      is not                                                                    is not

                  coup                                                                                 hit

               A                                                                                              A

THE CHECKERBOARD By Timothy Spearman

THE CHECKERBOARD
By Timothy Spearman

ANY GOOD AT CHESS AND CHECKERS? WHY IS IT ALL IN BLACK AND WHITE?
BLACK AND WHITE SQUARES CAN BE  FOUND ON THE FLOORS OF MASONIC
TEMPLES OF THE ILLUMINATI CULT   AND SYMBOLIZE THE FACT THAT THE
BROTHERHOOD EXERCISED CONTROL  OVER THE LIGHT AND DARK FORCES
SINCE THE ANNANAKI, ILLUMINATI,       NEPHILIM OR WATCHERS FIRST CAME
TO EARTH IN THAT TIME LONG AGO     WHEN THEY SET UP COLONIES ON MU
AND ATLANTIS DEDICATED TO THE     MYSTERIES OF TEMPLE INITIATIONS
IN WHICH RITES OF HIGHER DEGREE    ARE RESERVED FOR THOSE CHOSEN
DEEMED WORTHY BY THE ELECTED    BLOODLINES WHO REACHED THE TOP
DUE TO FAMILY CONNECTIONS AND    THE BLUE BLOODLINES OF THE PAST,
THE ANCIENT EMPIRES OF LEMURIA     & ATLANTIS IN THE ANTIDELUVIAN
PERIOD BEFORE THE FALL OF MAN.     THE FALL WAS PRECIPITATED BY A
WATCHER NAMED AZUZEL WHO IS      THE GREEKS PROMETHEAN HERO OF
ANTIQUITY WHO BESTOWED UPON      THE ELECT FEW THE ILLUMINATION
OF THE KNOWLEDGE OF GOOD AND     EVIL, WHICH USHERED IN THE FALL
OF MAN AND AN ENTIRE CYCLE OF      GRACELESS EXILE FROM THE GARDEN
OF PARADISIACAL DELIGHTS THAT     THE WORLD IS SUPPOSED TO BE AND
WILL SOON BE AGAIN WHEN THIRD     DIMENSION MEETS FOURTH IN REALM
BORDER CROSSING THAT IS SOON      TO OCCUR WITH THE RETURN OF THE
WATCHERS WHO DESIRE TO RULE      OVER US IN THE FOURTH DIMENSION.

The Lighted Torch by Timothy Spearman

The Lighted Torch

          A

          SUN

           CULT

            BASED

                  ON PAGAN     A

              SYMBOLISM          MAN

        REPRESENTS   MUST BE

     A   ITS AGENDA    INITIATED

FLAME      WITH THE ‘G’     BEFORE HE

AND LIGHTED    OF THE GRAND   CAN RECEIVE

TORCH SYMOLIZE    GEOMETRICIAN    ILLUMINATION

AND REPRESENT     WHOSE ETERNAL    FROM THE ELECT

THE KNOWLEDGE   INFLUENCE IS        WHO DESCEND FROM

THE WATCHERS   THEIR SACRED   THE WATCHERS

SHEMYAZA      PRESERVE   WHO GAVE A

& AZAZEL    AS THEY   CHOSEN

GAVE T0   CONTROL  FEW

      MAN    IT ALL  fire

                   NOW

https://www.bitchute.com/video/04yz5VNTXmHx/

Diary of the Incidents of Harassment of Paul & Barbara Hofschröer

Diary of the Incidents of Harassment of Paul & Barbara Hofschröer and their carer Peter Hofschröer by Robert, Diane & Martin Hofschröer, North Yorkshire Police & the City of York Council

 

hofschroer-report-14.08.20

 

Harassment_Diary_26 & 29 combined

 

 

No Date Time Description of Incident Witnesses / Documents Comments
1 Background Paul and Barbara Hofschröer lived at 74 Rosedale Avenue, York.  They have two children Robert and Peter. Robert has two children, Diane and Martin, who all live in Acomb, York, close to Paul and Barbara Hofschröer.  Peter lives in Austria.

 

In 2007, Robert fraudulently deceived Barbara and Paul into transferring ownership of their house to Robert, Diane and Martin on the basis that:

1. Peter lived far away and could not look after them in their old age, whilst they lived very close to the parental home in 74 Rosedale Avenue, and would look after them in their old age.

2. Barbara and Paul would be allowed to live in it for the rest of their lives or until the house was no longer suitable for them.

3. Diane and Martin would hold 25% of the house each in trust for Peter.

 

This was recognised in the License Agreement transferring the property, which included a clause requiring the house to be sold to pay for sheltered accommodation should any future decline in Paul’s and Barbara’s health require this.

 

Diane and Martin convinced Peter to transfer his house in Austria to them on the basis that they would hold it in trust for Peter.

74 Rosedale Avenue is currently worth about £200,000 in today’s market.

 

Transfer, Licence
2 April 2008 Paul was admitted into hospital seriously ill. The hospital staff said it would be necessary for Paul to go into a care home. Robert and Diane refused to allow him to do so and insisted Barbara should look after him at home.  This was because they did not want to depreciate the estate with care costs. Barbara, Peter Neglect

 

Breach of the agreement by which the house was transferred to them

3 ??.04.2008 Peter heard his father Paul is seriously ill and had been taken to hospital and drives to York.  When he arrives there from his home in Austria, he is shocked to find his mother Barbara’s minor leg injury has become very serious due to neglect by Robert.

 

It is clear to Peter that Robert and his family have abandoned his parents so he stays for a month until Barbara is well enough to be left alone, then returns home.

Medical records Neglect

 

 

 

 

 

Breach of the agreement by which the house was transferred to them

4 18.05.2008 12.00 Robert asks Barbara to disclose the whereabouts of her savings. She refuses. Robert e-mails Peter that day with the same question. Barbara.

 

e-mail

Financial abuse

Beginning of campaign by Robert to obtain his parents’ savings by deception and harassment

5 25.05.2008 12.00 Robert asks Barbara to disclose the whereabouts of her savings. She again refuses. Robert e-mails Peter that day with the same question. Barbara.

 

e-mail

Financial abuse
6 22.06.2008 20.00 Peter returns from Austria, as Paul is due to be sent home from hospital the next day after 7 weeks of serious illness.

 

Barbara contacts Robert and his family and asks them to come around to discuss how Paul is now going to be cared for.  Robert, his wife Shirley and daughter Diane attend meeting in Rosedale Avenue. They refused to discuss the subject and their only offer of help was to tell Barbara she should not run around after her bed-ridden incontinent 87 year old husband of sixty years. The family were unable to come to an agreement on how to care for Paul. Barbara told them to leave. On her way out, Diane called Barbara a “stupid old bitch”.

 

At this point, it was clear that Robert and his family were not going to look after Paul and Barbara and Peter knows Barbara cannot cope, so he became their full-time carer.

Peter, Barbara. Peter becomes full time carer

 

Verbal and emotional abuse. Robert, Shirley and Diane had reneged on the agreement to look after Paul and Barbara, which was a Breach of trust.

Emotional abuse

 

Robert & family take no further part in their care and have effectively abandoned Barbara and Paul at this point.

7 22.06.2008 20.00 By deceiving Paul & Barbara into transferring the house to them on the basis that

1. They would look after them in their old age and then abandoning them as soon as they needed care;

2. They could live in the house for as long as they wanted to, then trying to sell the house while Barbara was abroad;

Robert, Diane and Martin Hofschröer committed an offence of Fraud under sections 2 and 4 of the Fraud Act, 2006.

Serious Criminal Offence of defrauding his parents of property worth approximately £200,000
8 29.06.2008 Peter informs Robert that Paul has had a relapse and as readmitted to hospital seriously ill. Robert does not acknowledge this. Neither Robert nor his family visit Paul or Barbara. e-mail Emotional abuse and neglect
9 07.07.2008 Robert sends Barbara a letter threatening legal action if she does not hand over her savings. Letter Financial abuse

 

10 07.07.2008 Robert’s demand for his Mother (who was a confused and frightened 79 year old) to hand over her life savings to him under threat of legal action was a serious criminal offence of Making an Unwarranted Demand with Menaces. In this context, it is very significant that Robert, Diane and Martin Hofschröer have never given any justification as to what claim he has against his mother’s savings, or why she should hand them over to him, or what he wants to do with them when he gets them. Letter Demanding money with menaces
11 11.07.2008 Diane sends abusive e-mail to Peter, stating she wished Peter would return to Austria. e-mail Harassment of Barbara’s carer to make him leave and abandon control of the savings to Robert, Diane and Martin.  1
12 ??.08.2008 It is clear to Peter that his parents home 74 Rosedale Avenue, which has only one toilet upstairs is completely unsuitable for the needs of his parents, who are both incontinent and they need to move. Peter finds suitable sheltered accommodation for his parents at Fairfax Court and after discussion wit his parents, puts 74 Rosedale Avenue on the market to finance the purchase of the flat. The flat is half way between Robert’s house and Diane’s house and Peter is still hoping they will play a role in the care of Paul and Barbara. Robert contacts Halifax estate agents without reference to his parents to block the sale of house, thereby preventing the financing of suitable sheltered accommodation for Peter and Barbara. Letter on file at Halifax Financial and emotional abuse

 

Breach of Contract

 

Breach of Trust

13 28.08.2008 Peter sends Robert e-mail requesting he visit Paul and Barbara to discuss the situation.  Robert initially refuses to attend. e-mail
14 03.09.2008 20.00 Robert, Diane and Martin visit Rosedale Avenue to discuss the housing problem. Robert avoids eye-contact and covers his face with his hand. He states that all the conversation should be directed through Diane. Robert demands to know where Mum has her savings. Diane is abusive, screaming that she hates Peter. She is so agitated she broke the chair she was sitting on. They nevertheless agree to let the sale of the house go ahead. Peter puts the house on the market again. Peter, Barbara Financial, verbal and emotional abuse

 

Harassment of Barbara’s carer to make him leave and abandon control of the savings to Robert, Diane and Martin 2

15 ??.09.2008 Robert again contacts Halifax and blocks the sale of Rosedale Avenue without consulting his parents. Barbara is very upset, as neither she nor Paul can cope with the stairs any more, the toilet facilities were inadequate and she was looking forward to moving to the sheltered flat at Fairfax Court that she had viewed and considered suitable. Letter on file at Halifax Financial and emotional abuse

 

Breach of Contract

 

Breach of Trust

 

Neglect

16 15.09.2008 Barbara phones Diane to ask why the sale has been blocked.  Diane states they would only allow the house to be sold once they had access to the savings. Diane repeatedly screams “We want to know where you money is!” Barbara, Peter

 

e-mail of complaint to Diane

Harassment by Diane

 

Continuation of campaign by Robert, Diane and Martin to obtain Paul and Barbara’s savings

 

17 19.09.2008 Diane phones Rosedale Avenue and shouts at Peter telling him to:  “F**k off out of England!” Peter Harassment of Barbara’s carer to make him leave and abandon control of the savings to Robert, Diane and Martin. 3

Criminal Offence of use of insulting Words and Behaviour

18 20.09.2008 Diane phones again, but hangs up when Peter answers. Peter
19 21.09.2008 Peter e-mails PC Graham Cooper to ask for advice on dealing with the fraud and harassment. e-mail
20 22.09.2008 Barbara phones Martin (grandson) in an attempt to resolve the dispute. He demands she hands over her savings to Robert. Barbara, Peter Financial, abuse.

 

Continuation of campaign by Robert, Diane and Martin to obtain Paul and Barbara’s savings

21 24.09.2008 PC Cooper replies stating the fraud is a civil matter and the harassment, as it is coming from the family is not “straightforward”. e-mail Breach of duty
22 25.09.2008 Robert and Diane allege to the Police Peter has stolen his parents’ life savings. PC 1827 Lisa Farringdon investigates and immediately establishes the accusation is false, that Mrs Hofschröer is well cared for by Peter and “in good order”. Peter is exonerated.

 

Police fail to arrest Robert Hofschröer for wasting Police time.

Peter, Barbara

 

PC Farringdon

Harassment of Barbara’s carer to make him leave and abandon control of the savings to Robert, Diane and Martin. 4

 

 

23 02.10.2008 Becky Wilkinson of York Social Services visits Rosedale Avenue, informs Peter and Barbara there is a case of abuse to investigate. Peter suggests mediation to resolve the dispute. Becky agrees to organise this. Peter and Barbara Peter tries to obtain amicable resolution
24 04.10.2008 Mum phones Diane to ask for date of her great-grandson’s birthday.  Diane continually shouts at Barbara and hangs up, shouting “I never, never, never want to talk to you again”, while banging on the table. Contact with Barbara’s great-grandson is cut off permanently, causing Barbara considerable distress. Peter and Barbara

 

e-mail

Verbal and emotional abuse

 

Emotional blackmail

25 17.10.2008 PC 867 Victoria Lowery meets with Peter and agrees to warn Robert and Diane about the abuse. PC 867 Lowery

Peter

26 06.11.2008 Mark Bednarski of York Social Services visits Rosedale Avenue and agrees to arrange mediation. He did not reveal that his line manager Sophie Tweed had already decided against this. Barbara and Peter

 

Mark Bednarski

27 12.11.2008 Mark Bednarski meets Robert. Fax
28 14.11.2008 Mark Bednarski cancels application for sheltered housing without informing Paul, Barbara or Peter. Social Services file

Correspondence with CYC

Mark Bednarski

Neglect
29 15.11.2008 Peter asks Mark Bednarski for news on the mediation. e-mail Peter is still trying to obtain amicable resolution
30 19.11.2008 Mark Bednarski replies, stating that Social Services will not be organising mediation, as this affair is not their problem. e-mail Neglect
31 21.11.2008 Mark Bednarski sends a series of e-mails requesting Robert should have unsupervised access to Paul and Barbara for his first visit for several months. Peter was concerned at this request because Robert and his family abandoned Paul and Barbara months before and had previously been verbally insulting and abusive them, which caused them great distress. e-mails Neglect
32 28.11.2008 Mark Bednarski visits Rosedale Avenue without an appointment and asks for Robert to have unsupervised access to Paul and Barbara, which Peter refused to consent to because of Robert’s history of being verbally abusive to his parents. Mark Bednarski initially refused to leave when asked. He kicks the front door on his way out and tries to regain access by constantly ringing the bell. He only leaves when Peter says he will call the Police.

 

Mark Bednarski is a martial arts expert.

Peter and Barbara are completely clear that that no force or insult was offered to Mark Bednarski. Harassment of Peter by Mark Bednarski

 

Common assault by Mark Bednarski

33 28.11.2008 Peter Hofschröer makes formal complaint about Mark Bednarski to his line manager Sophie Tweed. Sophie Tweed later transpires to be a Director of a bankrupt company and is not an employee of York Council, but was just doing some temporary work there. e-mail
34 04.12.2008 Sophie Tweed responds aggressively and falsely alleges Peter assaulted and used insulting words and behaviour against Mark Bednarski. She illegally blocks the Stage 1 investigation of Peter’s complaint requested at (33). CYC subsequently investigates Bednarski’s allegations and establishes they were unfounded. CYC then withdraws the letter and apologises for it, but decline to take any action against Mark Bednarski or Sophie Tweed. Bednarski withheld the information that he is a martial arts expert from CYC investigation. Letter Harassment of Barbara’s carer

 

35 ??.12.2008 Court grants Peter Lasting Power of Attorney over Paul. Peter’s position as sole carer and Guardian is recognised by the Court.
36 23.12.2008 Anne Bygrave writes to Peter claiming different social workers have been allocated to the case. However, the record shows inappropriate e-mail contacts between Mark Bednarski, Sophie Tweed and Robert Hofschröer in January 2009, discussing how York Social Services could help Robert have Peter’s Power of Attorney withdrawn from him and passed to Robert. e-mail

 

Social Services file

Mark Bednarski and Sophie Tweed try to assist Robert to obtain control over Barbara and her savings, at a time when they knew Robert was the subject of allegations of abuse and had abandoned her.
37 23.12.2008 Copies of this e-mail correspondence were sent to Anne Bygrave, Ralph Edwards and Anne Tidd by Mark Bednarski.  These matters had nothing to do with York Council or improving the care of Barbara and Paul. Robert Hofschröer is closely associated with York Council because he is runs the York Deaf Society, which is a Council funded organisation for deaf people in York. In this respect, York Social Services have exceeded their authority and appear to be trying to assist Robert in forcing out Peter, so that he can continue his campaign to obtain his parents’ savings.

 

e-mail

 

Social Services file

Continuation of campaign by Robert, Diane and Martin to obtain Paul and Barbara’s savings.
38 25.12.2008

 

Christmas Day

12.00 Robert, Diane, her boyfriend Kevin, and Martin arrive outside 74 Rosedale Avenue at the time they know Xmas lunch is being served and demand entry. Peter refuses entry at Barbara’s request. Diane shouts abuse through the letter box and rings the doorbell repeatedly. The 999 call operator remarks on the noise she is causing. Robert bangs on window. Police are called to remove them. Only when a Police officer shows them a request to leave signed by Barbara in the Police officer’s notebook would they go. The Police later claim that Peter ran out of the house and caused a breach of the peace and that they interviewed his neighbours, who supported their claim. The neighbours are willing to go to court to refute this claim.

 

Emergency Doctor is called to see Paul.

Peter, Barbara

 

999 operator

 

Recording of 999 call

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Doctor

Harassment of Paul, Barbara and Peter by Robert & family

 

Breach of the Peace

 

Use of insulting words and behaviour

 

1st false allegation by NYP against Peter Hofschröer

 

 

Paul is very distressed by incident.

39 02.01.2009 09.00 Dr Bush visits Paul. He informs Barbara and Peter that Paul has only days to live. Peter immediately e-mails Robert notifying him of the Doctor’s opinion and inviting him to visit his father and make his peace with him. Robert does not attend. Dr Bush

Peter, Barbara

e-mail

Despite everything, Peter decently offers Robert an opportunity to see his Father for the last time.
40 03.01.2009 04.00

 

 

 

 

10.00

Paul dies. Peter and Barbara have been up all night at his bedside.  Peter and Barbara are exhausted having had many nights of lost sleep tending to him and emotional stress from his obvious terminal decline.

 

Robert, Diane and Martin arrive with a Police escort.  [Police have no reason to be there, given that Peter invited Robert to see his father.]  Robert forces his way in and pushes Barbara, who was just walking out of the living room. Peter stands between them to prevent him from injuring her. PC Brocken pushes Peter out of the way and threatens to arrest him. On the female Police officer’s signal, Diane and Martin charge into the house against Peter’s expressed wishes. WPC Lowery takes Barbara into the living room, but returns to the dining room on hearing Diane, Martin and Robert shouting. Robert leaves the house, brandishes his fist at Barbara and Peter, saying “I’ll get you”, being a threat to do violence to Barbara and Peter which Peter believes could have been fatal to is mother.  Diane and Martin follow him out, having called Barbara a “wicked woman” and a “wicked witch”. They did not let Barbara explain what had happened to Paul, did not enquire, did not express any condolences or sympathies to Barbara on Paul’s death and other than make threats and bawl abuse, said nothing else.

 

Both Constables subsequently allege that Robert and Martin abused Barbara in written evidence to the IPCC

 

As a result of this, Barbara no longer wishes to have anything further to do with Diane and Martin.

 

Death Certificate

Doctor Bush

 

 

 

Peter and Barbara

 

Police report states Diane and Martin were told to stay in the car and they disobeyed Police directions not to enter the house. Police report confirms there was shouting.  Clearly this behaviour showed no respect for Paul or the feelings of Barbara and Peter.

 

 

 

 

 

Common assault

 

2nd false allegation by NYP

 

Police fail to arrest Robert Hofschröer for common assault.

 

Police fail to arrest Diane and Martin Hofschröer for obstructing a Police Officer in the Execution of his Duty.

 

Verbal and emotional abuse.

 

Threatening behaviour

 

Use of insulting words and behaviour

 

END OF RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN BARBARA, DIANE AND MARTIN

41 07.01.2009 10.30 Peter and Barbara go to York Registry Office to register Paul’s death. Robert leaves his work at Council premises, stands outside the office window, raises his fist and says, “I’m going to get you”, being a threat to do violence to Peter. Peter was in fear for his life. The Registrar dialled 999 and asked Police to attend. Fortunately Barbara was in the car and did not witness this. PC Jonathan Mansell attends, has a full report given to him by the Registrar, but does not arrest Robert.

 

Peter

 

Registrar

 

999 call operator

 

 

Recording of 999 call

 

PC Mansell

Common assault

Breach of the Peace

Threatening Behaviour

Harassment of Barbara’s carer by Robert on Council property to make him leave and abandon control of the savings to Robert, Diane and Martin 5

 

Police again fail to arrest Robert Hofschröer

 

Neglect of Duty

42 17.01.2009 12.00 Paul’s funeral. Robert and family attend against Barbara’s wishes. The priest talks to Robert and his family expressing his hope there can be reconciliation.  Robert, Diane and Martin ignore Peter and Barbara, do not speak to them and do not even offer their condolences. Priest, funeral guests Emotional abuse
43 19.01.2009 20.00 Robert attempts to gain entry to 74 Rosedale Avenue without prior agreement and against Barbara’s wishes, using a spare key.  Peter reports this to the Police, but they do not respond.

 

Following the events of 3 January, this frightens Barbara.

Barbara, Peter Harassment of Barbara by Robert

 

Neglect of Duty

44 04.02.2009 Peter gets Lasting Power of Attorney for Barbara. LPA Court recognises Peter as sole carer of Barbara
45 Robert is seen regularly driving past Rosedale Avenue, which is out of his way and where he has no cause to be. He slows down at No. 74.  Barbara is again frightened, as she fears a repeat of the events of 3 January.  Subsequently Robert confirms he has been monitoring their movements. Peter  – report to Police Harassment of Barbara by Robert

 

 

46 January – June 2009 74 Rosedale Avenue has no toilet on the ground floor.  Family solicitor attempts to arrange meeting between Barbara and Robert to discuss the alterations necessary to make Barbara’s house suitable for a disabled person with continence problems. Robert first agrees, Peter obtains an estimate for the works to put install a ground floor toilet where the kitchen is currently, then build an extension for a new kitchen and a conservatory which came to £80,000.  Robert then drags out discussion then refuses to go ahead with it. Peter e-mailed Robert on 28 January. Robert’s response was to have his solicitor send Peter a threatening letter, to which Barbara’s solicitor replied. Robert agreed to let the alterations go ahead on 5 March. He then failed to respond to requests to meet to discuss this (see 55). Correspondence with solicitor Emotional abuse

 

Complete lack of care for the living conditions of Barbara by Robert

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

47 18.06.2009 Jane Roberts of Social Services gives confidential medical information on Barbara to Robert after Barbara had explicitly denied York Social Services permission to do so.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CYC refuses to give Barbara a copy of this letter.

Letter Breach of Data Protection Act.

 

Harassment of Barbara by Robert

 

Breach of Trust

 

Breach of Medical Confidentiality

 

Breach of Freedom of Information Act

48 03.07.2009 CYC holds a Safeguarding Meeting on Barbara without her or Peter’s knowledge. Those present include PC Graham Cooper, Caroline Ablett, Mike Hodgkiss and Glen McCluster. They find no abuse is taking place, but agree to meet again in September 2009. Record of Event – supplied by OPG
49 03.07.2009 CYC’s Senior Solicitor Glen McClusker writes to Peter threatening unspecified legal action because Peter complained about their handling of this case.  Peter carries on complaining.  No legal action is initiated against Peter by CYC because Peter has not committed any offence. Harassment of Peter by CYC

 

 

50 17.07.2009 Inspector Moreton acknowledges Peter’s complaint about Bednarski and Tweed, stating he will reply the following week. e-mail
51 17.07.2009 Peter replies to Moreton giving more information and asking if there are grounds to press criminal charges against officers of CYC. Moreton replies on 20.07.2009 (see below) e-mail
52 19.07.2009 Peter takes Barbara away for a holiday to help her recover from her fear and distress. They visit family and friends in Germany and Austria, visit Tim Hicks in Luxembourg, then stay for a while in Peter’s former home in Austria before returning.  Barbara enjoys this and expresses the hope that they can do this regularly.
53 20.07.2009 Moreton replies to Peter’s complaints, stating “I do not believe that there are sufficient grounds to consider a criminal investigation.” e-mail Refusal to take action against Robert Hofschröer although his actions are contrary to the Fraud Act
54 30.07.2009 Emma Evans of CYC Housing suspends Barbara’s application for sheltered housing without telling her, because she is away from home on holiday. e-mail Denial of Service
55 03.08.2009 Robert refuses to allow alterations to go ahead to Rosedale Avenue to put in a ground floor toilet on the basis of the report illegally supplied to him by York Social Services, which he asserts, states her accommodation is adequate.

 

CYC refuses to supply a copy of this document.

Letter Harassment of Barbara by Robert

Emotional Abuse

Neglect

Breach of Data Protection Act

56 06.08.2009 Kay Robinson writes to Barbara, refusing to supply documents missing from Barbara’s Social Services file e-mail Breach of Freedom of Information Act
57 15.08.2009 Inspector Moreton finally responds, but evades the issues raised on the basis that it is a “family dispute” e-mail Refusal to take action against Robert Hofschröer although his actions are contrary to the Fraud Act
58 16.08.2009 Peter responds to Moreton outlining the criminal offences he believes officers of CYC have committed. e-mail
59 20.08.2009 Peter provides Moreton with further evidence that officers of CYC are acting in common purpose with Robert to defraud Barbara. Moreton does not respond. e-mail Refusal to take action against Robert Hofschröer although his actions are contrary to the Fraud Act
60 07.09.2009 Mike Hodgkiss of CYC writes to Peter refusing to put the Harassment Diary of Peter and Barbara’s evidence before the Safeguarding Conference to prevent any members of CYC being criticised by the conference.  “Conference will not be dealing with the previous safeguarding investigation or the allegations involving officers of CYC.”  Subsequently, Mr Hodgkiss admitted that there had been no previous safeguarding conference and that he had lied to withhold evidence from the safeguarding investigation into allegations of criminal offences against Robert Hofschröer. e-mail Refusal to take action against Robert Hofschröer although his actions are contrary to the Fraud Act and CYC and NYC Safeguarding Policy
61 08.09.2009 Peter sends Harassment Diary to Moreton, cc to Chief Constable, asking why Moreton is refusing to put it before the investigation. e-mails
62 09.09.2009 Bill Hodson of CYC refuses to undertake OT assessment the ascertain Barbara’s current mobility problems e-mail Bill Hodson Denial of Service
63 09.09.2009 Bill Hodson of CYC refuses to hold a Case Conference e-mail Bill Hodson Refusal to take action against Robert Hofschröer although his actions are contrary to the Fraud Act, CYC and NYC Safeguarding Policy
64 09.09.2009 Bill Hodson of CYC refuses to give assurances that no further breaches of Barbara’s confidentiality will take place. e-mail Bill Hodson
65 09.09.2009 Bill Hodson of CYC refuses to confirm that Peter Hofschröer is Barbara’s carer e-mail Bill Hodson
66 10.09.2009 CYC cancel safeguarding case conference at last minute due to “sickness”. The social workers “off sick” answer e-mails. e-mails
67 24.09.2009 CYC agree to hold a joint safeguarding conference with NYP to determine if Mrs Hofschröer is being abused by their colleague Robert Hofschröer.

 

Mike Hodgkiss of CYC writes to Peter refusing to allow Barbara or Peter to give evidence in person to the conference or to put their written evidence in the form of a Harassment Diary before the Safeguarding Conference because he alleged that it covered ground covered in a previous conference.  This is contrary to CYC policy which states that all information relating to the case should be considered to have a complete picture (P32) and “The alleged victims views should be heard” (P40) Subsequently, Mr Hodgkiss admitted that there had been no previous safeguarding conference.

 

The meeting then concluded that:

 

1.  There was no evidence to support the allegations of abuse, because the Harassment Diary was not put before the meeting, nor was the evidence of the Registrar, 999 operators or the two constables that attended the 3 January 2009 incident above.

2. That Robert Hofschröer owned 74 Rosedale Avenue, which is factually incorrect and contrary to law.

3. The transfer of the house was a civil matter, which is factually incorrect and contrary to law joint CYC and NYC safeguarding policy.

4. The allegations of harassment were not commented on which is contrary to joint CYC and NYC safeguarding policy.

5. The allegations of demanding money with menaces were not commented on which is contrary to joint CYC and NYC safeguarding policy.

Case Conference Minutes Refusal to take action against Robert Hofschröer although his actions are contrary to the Fraud Act and CYC and NYC Safeguarding Policy.

 

Attempting to pervert the course of justice.

68 25.10.2009 CYC complaints officer does not reply to request to forward the contact details of the person to whom complaints about CYC staff should be sent, in order to conceal acts of illegality and harassment by CYC staff. e-mail Denial of service
69 26.10.2009 19.00 PC Cooper attempts to stop Peter and Barbara handing out a leaflet at a public meeting, at the request of Labour Party activists or Councillor Simpson-Laing. He admits no criminal offence has taken place, but claims as the leaflet is allegedly defamatory, it should not be distributed. Peter, Barbara, PC Cooper, other police officers and attendees at Ward Committee Meeting. Harassment of Barbara & Peter by Police

 

Abuse of Office

 

70 01.11.2009 20.00 Two Police officers, one male and one female, call at 74 Rosedale Avenue. They ring the doorbell for 15 minutes, waking up Barbara, who is unwell, then bang on the door. They then withdraw to their car outside the house and remain there for five minutes. The Police did not phone beforehand to state they were coming and did not explain why there were there. Harassment of Barbara & Peter by Police

 

 

71 02.11.2009 Peter complains to Moreton about the previous harassment incident. Moreton informs Peter that he is the subject of an unspecified harassment warning. Peter asks who the complainant is and is told it is Robert, Diane and Martin. e-mail Harassment of Barbara & Peter by Police acting unlawfully under the instruction of Inspector Moreton

 

72 02.11.2009 NYP issue Harassment Warning to Peter for allegedly harassing Robert and his family by exercising his right to free speech by circulating a leaflet critical of the Police, Robert and Diane. The warning is not warranted, as Peter was exercising his right to free speech. e-mail Harassment of Peter by Inspector Moreton

Abuse of Office

 

2nd false allegation issued by NYC against Peter

73 04.11.2009 Peter complains to Moreton about the officers attending on 01.11.2009. Moreton does not reply. e-mail
74 08.11.2009 Peter complains to Moreton about the incident on 26.10.2009. Moreton does not reply. e-mail
75 30.11.2009 Ms Cath Murray writes to Tim Hicks stating “The council considers that the transfer of the property at 74 Rosedale Avenue was a private matter and therefore will not be commenting on this issue,” although transfers of property are indicators of abuse according to Council safeguarding policy.
76 December 2009 Peter takes Barbara away for another short holiday of one month as before. Meets Tim Hicks in Luxembourg and then stays for a while in his former home in Austria.  Barbara is taken ill, necessitating an extension of their stay.
77 09.12.2009 Moreton issues Harassment Warning to Peter for allegedly harassing the discredited martial arts expert and former employee of CYC Mark Bednarski, by distributing e-mails and “literature”. The warning is not valid, as it has not been signed or dated and Inspector Moreton cannot produce:

1. A witness statement,

2. Signed complaint,

3. e-mails or “literature”

Neither is it warranted, as there are no grounds for issuing it.  Mark Bednarski left the employment of CYC in September 2009 and so any e-mails or literature used by Bednarski to support his complaint are stolen property.  Further, his complaint is malicious because all correspondence related to his job at CYC, he had left CYC two or three months earlier and is no longer receiving any e-mails from Peter Hofschröer

Harassment of Peter by Inspector Moreton

 

Abuse of Office

 

3rd false allegation issued by NYC against Peter

78 10.12.2009 Peter asks Moreton to provide the e-mails, literature and signed complaint by Bednarski that triggered the harassment warning.  Moreton does not reply, presumably because they do not exist. (1) e-mail Refusal to reply to conceal misconduct by Police
79 14.12.2009 York Social Services Department hold a meeting with Robert, Diane and Martin Hofschröer at which they are told they are exonerated of all allegations of abuse and that CYC regards Peter as the abuser and reported him to the Office of the Public Guardian making false allegations against him to attempt to have his Powers of Attorney revoked. CYC informs them Barbara’s Day Club has reported she is in Austria. Robert & Co inform CYC of their intention of gaining entry to Barbara’s house on Xmas Day with a police escort. Ombudsman’s report, copy of CYC Minutes supplied by OPG
80 21.12.2009 Peter chases Moreton for a reply on the Bednarski Harassment Warning. Moreton does not reply. (2) e-mail Refusal to reply to conceal misconduct by Police
81 22.12.2009 Cath Murray of CYC refuses to process Peter’s request for information on Mark Bednarski’s latest false allegation.

 

Peter makes formal complaint, which is rejected.

e-mails Denial of Service
82 03.01.2010 Tim Hicks writes to WPCs Lowery, Crossan and PCs Mansell and Brocken asking them to explain inconsistencies in the evidence they gave to the IPCC. They do not respond. e-mails Refusal to reply to conceal misconduct by Police
83 17.01.2010 Peter chases Moreton again for a reply to his request for the evidence of harassment of Bednarski. Moreton again does not reply. (3) e-mail Refusal to reply to conceal misconduct by Police
84 24.01.2010 Peter chases Moreton again for a reply to his request for the evidence of harassment of Bednarski and states if he gets no reply, he will take it as read that Moreton has fabricated the allegation. Moreton exercises his right to silence and does not reply. (4) e-mail Refusal to reply to conceal misconduct by Police
85 24.01.2010 Tim Hicks contacts WPCs Lowery, Crossan and PCs Mansell and Brocken asking them to reply to his enquiry of 03.01.2010. They do not respond. e-mails Refusal to reply to conceal misconduct by Police
86 07.02.2010 Tim Hicks e-mails ACC Sue Cross concerning failures in the NYP investigation into the Hofschröer fraud case and she ignores his e-mails. e-mail Refusal to reply to conceal misconduct by Police
87 12.02.2010 16.30 Police officers call and interview next door’s children, who are minors, to try to ascertain the whereabouts of Peter and Barbara, who are on holiday, on orders from Inspector Moreton.
88 14.02.2010 18.30 On orders from Inspector Moreton, Police officers again knock on 74 Rosedale Avenue with no lawful reason to find out if Barbara and Peter are living in 74 Rosedale Avenue and when they were last seen there.
89 15.02.2010 Robert Hofschröer sends Peter and Barbara an e-mail confirming that he knows they are not currently in 74 Rosedale Avenue and threatening to enter 74 Rosedale Avenue in their absence. Inspector Moreton is copied in on this e-mail. Harassment of Barbara & Peter

Emotional abuse

90 18.02.2010 Robert sends Peter and Barbara a further e-mail stating his intention to unlawfully enter 74 Rosedale Avenue. He confirms he has been watching their movements. Harassment of Barbara & Peter by Robert

Emotional Abuse

91 22.02.2010 09.30 Robert enters 74 Rosedale Avenue unlawfully in violation of the Licence Agreement by getting a locksmith to cut a duplicate key.  He then changes the locks, to prevent Barbara and Peter returning.  Neighbours see Robert and Martin removing property form the house and call the Police.  The Police are called by neighbours, but refuse to act. Robert and Martin leave after ½ hour. Neighbours Harassment of Barbara & Peter by Robert

 

Breach of Licence Agreement

92 22.02.2010 Robert e-mails Peter informing him he has entered 74 Rosedale Avenue and makes false statements about the condition of the house (neighbours had photographed it the day before) and false allegations of neglect against her carer Peter, which were offensive to Barbara. e-mail Harassment of Barbara & Peter by Robert

Breach of Licence Agreement

93 22.02.2010 Tim Hicks e-mails ACC Sue Cross concerning failures in the NYP investigation into the Hofschröer fraud case and she ignores his e-mails. e-mail Refusal to reply to conceal misconduct by Police
94 23.02.2010 Tim Hicks e-mails ACC Sue Cross concerning failures in the NYP investigation into the Hofschröer fraud case and she ignores his e-mails. e-mail Refusal to reply to conceal misconduct by Police
95 24.02.2010 Robert e-mails Peter asking to know when Barbara is coming home and stating “Contrary to what you may think, I assure you we have no intention of seizing and selling our property and making mum homeless”, although that is exactly what he subsequently went on to do. Harassment of Barbara & Peter by Robert
96 24.02.2010 21.10 Robert is seen inside 74 Rosedale Avenue in the living room and Barbara’s bedroom, searching the house. He is also seen removing her property from 74 Rosedale Avenue.  Alison Lowton e-mails and states the Council’s position is that Robert Hofschröer owns the property and is entitled to change the locks, although this is contrary to the Licence Agreement and law. Neighbours and Police Harassment of Barbara & Peter by Robert

 

Breach of Licence Agreement

Theft

97 24.02.2010 Alison Lowton asserts that Robert Hofschröer owns the property and has a right to change the locks on 74 Rosedale Avenue, although in fact this is contrary to the Licence to occupy and contrary to law. e-mail
98 26.02.2010 Robert again e-mails Peter asking to know when Barbara is coming home. e-mail Harassment of Barbara & Peter by Robert
99 26.02.2009 Alison Lowton asserts that the changing of the locks and fraudulent transfer of 74 Rosedale avenue are “private matters” and that the council will not get involved in, although this is contrary to Council safeguarding policy e-mail
100 02.03.2010 Alison Lowton writes to Tim Hicks stating that he transfer of the home is a private matter and accepting Robert’s assurances that he has sent a key.
101 08.03.2010 Robert again e-mails Peter asking to know when Barbara is coming home and mentioning how Barbara’s great-grandson, -whom he has withdrawn contact from because Barbara will not hand over control of her savings to him, is developing.  This is deeply distressing to Barbara, who misses Matthias and does not like being reminded that she can’t see him. This constitutes taunting. e-mail Harassment of Barbara & Peter by Robert

 

 

 

Emotional abuse

102 15.03.2010 Inspector Moreton e-mails Peter confirming that his officers were acting on Robert’s behalf on 12 and 14 February 2010. e-mail Abuse of office
103 25.05.2010 CYC has York Magistrates Court issue summons for alleged non-payment of Council Tax. CYC subsequently retracted the summons on the basis that they had not responded adequately to correspondence.

 

Letter from Rebecca Stanley of CYC. Summons. Harassment of Barbara by CYC

Abuse of office

 

Abuse of process

104 14.06.2010 Peter commences proceedings against Diane and Martin for the return of his house in Austria.
105 20.06.2010 Tim Hicks e-mails ACC Sue Cross concerning failures in the NYP investigation into the Hofschröer fraud case and she ignores his e-mails. e-mail Refusal to reply to conceal misconduct by Police
106 21.06.2010 Tim Hicks e-mails ACC Sue Cross concerning failures in the NYP investigation into the Hofschröer fraud case and she ignores his e-mails. e-mail Refusal to reply to conceal misconduct by Police
107 22.06.2010 CYC sends Barbara a further letter threatening action against her for non-payment of Council Tax. Letter from Ian Floyd of CYC Harassment of Barbara by CYC

 

108 27.06.2010 Mr Hicks writes to Superintendent Winward asking to see the “literature’, e-mails and signed complaint form that support the Bednarski harassment allegations.  She does not provide them. e-mail Refusal to reply to conceal misconduct by Police
109 15.07.2010 CYC confirm that no Council Tax was due and that although Peter Hofschröer had contacted them several times to resolve this, his correspondence had been ignored by CYC. CYC then refund an overpayment of Council Tax. Letter from Pauline Stuchfield of CYC Harassment of Barbara by CYC

 

110 13.08.2010 Wedlake Saint write to Chief Constable Maxwell asking to see the “literature’, e-mails and signed complaint form that support the Bednarski harassment allegations. He does not provide them. e-mail Refusal to reply to conceal misconduct by Police
111 26.08.2010 A number of Peter’s e-mail accounts are hacked and confidential information from them is sent to Robert. The password is one that CYC knew and the addresses hacked partly ones only used to communicate with CYC. Peter’s data is then downloaded to another server. e-mail from Robert to Pat Yates, e-mails from ISPs
112 31.08.2010 Peter’s solicitor writes to Moreton asking him to provide the e-mails, literature and signed complaint by Bednarski that triggered the Harassment Warning.  Moreton does not reply, presumably because they do not exist. (5) Refusal to reply to conceal misconduct by Police
113 03.09.2010 Peter reports to NYC that his e-mail accounts have been unlawfully hacked. NYC does not respond.
114 ??.09.2010 Two Police officers question Nigel Bowling (neighbour) in York, asking him to confirm if Peter and Barbara are at home again.  Inspector Moreton has Peter’s e-mail address and to help the Police, Tim Hicks has already confirmed to Superintendent Winward that Peter and Barbara are in Austria and has offered to put the Police in contact with Peter if they need to speak to him, so this enquiry is a complete waste of Police time, distressing to Barbara and Peter, and an irritation for the neighbours. Tel con Harassment
115 ??.09.2010 Two CID officers question young daughter of neighbours, who is a minor, doing so without the permission of their parents, asking about Peter & Barbara’s whereabouts and if their parents are in contact with them by phone and / or e-mail.  Inspector Moreton has Peter’s e-mail address, and to help the Police, Tim Hicks has already confirmed to Superintendent Winward that Peter and Barbara are in Austria and has offered to put the Police in contact with Peter if they need to speak to him, so this enquiry is a complete waste of Police time, distressing to Barbara and Peter, and an irritation for the neighbours. Tel con Harassment
116 ??.09.2010 Two CID officers call on Peter Chaplin (neighbour).  He declines to answer their questions asking about Peter & Barbara’s whereabouts.  Inspector Moreton has Peter’s e-mail address and to help the Police, Tim Hicks has already confirmed to Superintendent Winward that Peter and Barbara are in Austria and has offered to put the Police in contact with Peter if they need to speak to them, so this enquiry is a complete waste of Police time, distressing to Barbara and Peter, and an irritation for the neighbours. Tel con Harassment
117 17.09.2010 Wedlake Saint write to Chief Constable Maxwell asking to see the “literature’, e-mails and signed complaint form that support the Bednarski harassment allegations. He does not provide them. e-mail Refusal to reply to conceal misconduct by Police
118 17.09.2010 Peter’s solicitor writes to Chief Constable Maxwell asking him to cease this harassment and offers to put the Police in contact with Peter if they need to speak to him. Letter
119 22.09.2010 Two CID officers question Angela Bowling (neighbour), asking about Peter & Barbara’s whereabouts and if she is in contact by phone and / or e-mail. Inspector Moreton has Peter’s e-mail address and to help the Police, Tim Hicks had already confirmed to Superintendent Winward, and Peter’s solicitor had confirmed to the Chief Constable that Peter and Barbara are in Austria. He had also offered to put the Police in contact with Peter if they need to speak to him, so this enquiry is a complete waste of Police time, distressing to Barbara and Peter, and an irritation for the neighbours. Tel con Harassment
120 22.09.2010 Tim Hicks sends IPCC reports containing allegations of abuse against Robert Hofschröer by two police constables to Cath Murray, who ignores them. e-mail
121 26.09.2010 Tim Hicks writes to Superintendent Winward asking to see the “literature’, e-mails and signed complaint form that support the Bednarski Harassment allegations. She does not provide them. e-mail Refusal to reply to conceal misconduct by Police
122 27.09.2010 Tim Hicks writes to Superintendent Winward asking to see the “literature’, e-mails and signed complaint form that support the Bednarski Harassment allegations. She does not provide them. e-mail Refusal to reply to conceal misconduct by Police
123 27.09.2010 DC 1561 Bullock of York CID writes to Tim Hicks confirming that York CID want to contact Peter to arrest him concerning an unspecified complaint. e-mail
124 28.09.2010 17.54 One of Peter’s e-mail accounts is hacked again. The password used is one that is on his PC in York, which suggests that Robert has now accessed Peter’s hard disk from 74 Rosedale Avenue. Harassment

 

Theft

125 05.10.2010 Wedlake Saint writes to Chief Constable Maxwell asking to see the ‘literature’, e-mails and signed complaint form that support the Bednarski harassment allegations. He does not provide them. e-mail Refusal to reply to conceal misconduct by Police
126 08.10.2010 Inspector Ellis of York CID writes confirming they want to interview Peter Hofschröer under caution and will not arrest him if he reports for interview. e-mail
127 10.10.2010 Mr Hicks writes to Inspector Cain asking to see the “literature’, e-mails and signed complaint form that support the Bednarski Harassment allegations.  She does not provide them e-mail Refusal to reply to conceal misconduct by Police
128 11.10.2010 ACC (ret) Steve Read QPM writes to Messrs Wedlake Saint falsely accusing Mr T Hicks of abusing and threatening police officers in e-mails. Harassment of the investigating accountant
129 18.10.2010 Wedlake Saint writes to Chief Constable Maxwell asking to see the ‘literature’, e-mails and signed complaint form that support the Bednarski Harassment allegations.  He does not provide them. e-mail Refusal to reply to conceal misconduct by Police
130 21.10.2010 ACC (ret) Steve Read QPM writes to Messrs Wedlake Saint denying that he accused Mr Hicks of threatening Police officers and confirming that this allegation has not been made.  Mr Hicks subsequently makes a complaint against ACC (ret) Read
131 02.11.2010 Robert Hofschröer e-mails stating his intention to sell 74 Rosedale Avenue. Fraud
132 02.11.2010 Robert confirms he has stolen property belonging to Peter Hofschröer from 74 Rosedale Avenue. Letter to Peter and Barbara Refusal to reply to conceal misconduct by Police
133 04.11.2010 The Councils solicitor Mr Andrew Docherty writes describing Mr Hicks as “vexatious” e-mail Harassment of the investigating accountant.
134 09.11.2010 Wedlake Saint writes to Chief Constable Maxwell asking to see the ‘literature’, e-mails and signed complaint form that support the Bednarski harassment allegations. He does not provide them. e-mail Refusal to reply to conceal misconduct by Police
135 12.11.2010 ACC Sue Cross writes to Wedlake Saint confirming that:

 

1.  She has raised a complaint against ACC (ret) Steve Read QPM.

 

2.  Will respond in due course on the Bednarski issue.

 

No further response is received.

 

 

 

 

 

Refusal to reply to conceal misconduct by Police

136 16.11.2010 Ms Cath Murray writes to Tim Hicks stating that if Mrs Hofschröer becomes homeless because she has breached the terms of her licence, then she could have made herself voluntarily homeless. e-mail Emotional abuse
137 18.11.2010 Cllr Simpson-Laing writes to Mr Hicks, confirming that she supports Ms Murray’s position that it is a private matter and comparing Barbara to couples that turn up from abroad with children misrepresenting themselves as homeless. e-mail Emotional abuse
138 19.11.2010 Solicitors acting on behalf of Barbara Hofschröer confirm that the transfer of the house is fraudulent and a criminal offence, not a civil matter and request a safeguarding conference.  Letter is not responded to. Letter
139 20.11.2010 Robert confirms he has stolen property belonging to Peter Hofschröer from 74 Rosedale Avenue. Letter to Wedlake Saint
140 22.11.2010 Barbara’s GP issues a Medical Certificate stated she is not fit to travel at present. Medical certificate
141 28.11.2010 At the request of Ms Murray, Peter writes asking for a key.  Robert Hofschröer does not send it.  Gives further confirmation that he did not send a key in February. e-mail
142 02.12.2010 Deadline for the sale of the house passes, with no action by the council.
143 07.12.2010 18.14 Councillor Simpson-Laing writes to Tim Hicks through the Council’s solicitor Mr Docherty alleging falsely that Peter has made personal attacks on her by e-mail for two years and cutting off correspondence.  She also alleges that she has received malicious telephone calls and informs Tim Hicks that she has informed the Police, the implication being that Tim Hicks has made the calls. e-mail Harassment of the investigating accountant.

Harassment of Peter

144 07.12.2010 20.52 Councillor Horton writes three hours later insulting Tim Hicks and accusing him and Peter of emotionally abusing Mrs Hofschröer e-mail Harassment of the investigating accountant Harassment of Peter
145 08.12.2010 Robert Hofschröer confirms he has re-decorated 74 Rosedale Avenue although this was without informing Barbara.  Presumably this was to make it ready for sale. letter Harassment of Barbara and Peter

 

Criminal damage

146 10.12.2010 Solicitors acting on behalf of Tim Hicks, Peter and Barbara write to Councillor Simpson-Laing and Councillor Horton cautioning them as to their future conduct. e-mail
147 13.12.2010 Robert has York Council report Peter to the DWP for benefit fraud. Peter’s benefits are cut off. York Council refuses to give sight of the documents under the DPA. DWP file, e-mails Harassment
148 15.12.2010 Barbara writes to Robert telling him how she is and mentioning her birthday party that was held in the local pub in Austria on 13 December 2010. Letter
149 10.01.2011 Christmas card for Barbara from Robert arrives, having been posted on 22 December 2010, too late to arrive in time. Robert mentions he is aware that Peter has “a problem with NY Police”. Card & envelope Harassment of Barbara
150 16.01.2011 Inspektor Haberl visits Barbara and Peter to interview them regarding a kidnapping allegation made by Robert and forwarded by NYC to the Austrian police for investigation via Special Branch, SOCA, Met Police and Interpol.

 

Inspektor Haberl specifically asks Barbara is she has been kidnapped. After questioning her and establishing all is well, he examines the house and sees that considerable work has been done to adapt the house for her.

 

Her GP confirms she is being well looked after.

 

This allegation too is shown to be false.

Interpol request

 

Austrian Police Report.

Harassment of Barbara and Peter

 

 

151 25.01.2011 Barbara writes to Robert complaining about the way he has set his ‘friends’ (the police) onto us without good reason. Letter
152 31.01.2011 Robert reports there has been a “burglary” at 74 Rosedale Avenue in which Peter’s computers, from which Robert had earlier downloaded the data, were stolen. Despite having been told not to go near the house again, Robert admits he has been going there regularly, in defiance of a threat to issue an injunction.

The police reports that Barbara’s kitchen apron has been shredded with a knife. This is a death threat to Barbara by Robert.

Letter Harassment of Barbara and Peter

 

Theft

 

Criminal damage

153 31.03.2011 A Mother’s Day card from Robert arrives in which he again makes abusive comments about Peter and denies having set the police on to his mother and brother. Card Harassment of Barbara and Peter
154 10.06.2011 Martin gives evidence in the civil case in Austria. He produces the bogus “Harassment Warning” as evidence of Peter’s bad character. Transcript of hearing. File of supporting documents. Attempting to pervert the course of justice.

 

Fraud

155 13.12.2011 Robert sends Barbara birthday card Harassment
156 19.12.2011 Robert sends Barbara Xmas card Harassment
157 21.06.2012 Police make further threat to arrest Peter based on complaints of harassment allegedly received from Robert, Diane, Martin and Mark Bednarski. The warning is not valid as it has not been properly served. Harassment
158 04.07.2012 Robert and family break into 74 Rosedale Avenue again and inform neighbours they are now accessing the house. e-mails from neighbours Harassment
159 05.07.2012 Neighbours report seeing Robert’s car outside 74 Rosedale Avenue e-mail from neighbours Harassment
160 18.07.2012 Neighbours report seeing Robert’s car outside 74 Rosedale Avenue on consecutive evenings. It appears he is residing there Photos Harassment
161 31.08.2012 Robert send Barbara a postcard in which he mentions nothing of the latest break-in, but acts as if nothing unusual has taken place Harassment
162 14.09.2012 Robert’s solicitors inform Penningtons that he and others will be entering 74 Rosedale Avenue to “redecorate” it again. They are either preparing the house for sale again or are making changes to suit the needs of the current occupiers. Fax from Harrowells Harassment

Criminal damage

163 09.10.2012 11.30 Robert phones Barbara via BT Text Relay and asks her when she is “coming back home”, knowing full well this is impossible, as he has locked her out. This caused Mum considerable distress. The call facilitator was Ben, the tel. no. +44 191 461 0397. The ref. no. 604936620 Complaint made by e-mail to BT Harassment
164 13.11.2012 NYP write to Peter informing him they will arrest and prosecute him (without good reason) should he return home. This would leave Barbara without her carer, which has caused her considerable distress, Letter from NYP Harassment
165 27.11.2012 Robert sends Barbara a letter with old photographs of the house and tells her how her great-grandson is. As Barbara has been locked out of her house and denied access to her great-grandson, she is very distressed by this. Letter from Robert Harassment
166 06.12.2012 Robert sends Barbara a birthday card and reminds her of the photos of the house he has locked her out of. Card from Robert Harassment
167 18.12.2012 Robert sends Barbara a Christmas card Card from Robert Harassment
168 21.12.2012 Robert refuses to extend Restriction on 74 Rosedale Avenue e-Mail from solicitors Harassment
169 02.01.2013 Faced with the prospect of an injunction, Robert, Diane and Martin agree at the last minute to an extension of the Restriction, but not after Barbara was forced to spend a substantial amount of

money preparing it. Barbara was so distraught, she has become badly ill and bed-ridden.

Harassment
170 25/02/13 Robert’s solicitors inform Barbara they expect her to pay half the costs of the work they have done on her house in preparation of their next attempt to fraudulently sell it Harassment
171 02.03.2013 Neighbours phone to say they have seen Robert and his family dispose of Barbara’s and her late husband’s possessions, including her husband’s ashes, in a skip outside her house. Barbara has again become very ill, her incontinence has been exacerbated and she has started having falls again. Harassment

Theft

Criminal Damage

172 04.03.2013 Robert sends Barbara a mother’s day card in which he taunts her about not being able to come home again. He includes two photos showing work he has done on the house – the kitchen and the outside wall, but does not send photos of the rest of the house, as this would show that he has stolen or disposed of all her and her late husband’s possessions. Harassment
173 22.04.2013 Robert sends Barbara a letter with photos of her garden, taunting her that she cannot come home. He does not send photos of the rest of the house, as this would show that he has stolen or disposed of all her and her late husband’s possessions. Harassment
174 05/07/13 Barbara’s lawyers obtain injunction in England to prevent Robert & Co from selling her house Court order
175 08.07.2013 Austrian State Prosecutor instructs psychiatrist to examine Peter on the basis of an allegation that he has committed a criminal offence. No evidence has been produced and charges have not been pressed, but this unsupported allegation is used as an excuse to have Peter silenced by declaring him “mentally incapacitated”. Letter Harassment
176 11.07.2013 The District Court in Liezen, Austria, issues an order appointing an attorney to represent Peter in legal matters, with the explicit intention of stopping him from undertaking legal action to prevent the fraudulent sale of his mother’s house, which is contempt of court, a criminal offence. Court Order Harassment
177 15.07.2013 Dr Manfred Walzl, a court-appointed psychiatrist known to be a sexual deviant, who falsifies reports for money without examining the victim, wrote to her carer insisting he undergo a psychiatric examination clearly with the intent of declaring him “mentally incapacitated”. He required him to attend at a time and a place he knew it would be impossible for Peter to attend. Peter asks him for an appointment at a convenient time and place. Walzl agrees but does not come back to him on this. Walzl later lies about this, claiming that Peter refused to be examined. Letter Harassment
178 09.08.2013 A second psychiatrist, Dr Christina Gerhardter summonsed Peter to attend a psychiatric examination at a time and in a place the court knows to be inconvenient. Peter again asks for an appointment at a convenient time and place. He again does not get a reply. Gerhardter later lies about this, claiming that Peter refused to be examined. Court Summonds Harassment
179 13.08.2013 Walzl publishes a report declaring Peter to be “incurably paranoid” without ever having examined him. He attaches his invoice to the report. Letter Harassment
180 19.08.2013 Thomas Strausz, a court-appointed psychotherapist summonsed Peter to participate in a psychiatric examination at a time he knew to be inconvenient, harassed Peter at his front door knowing this, then later lied about this, claiming that Peter refused to be examined, when Peter had already offered to be examined at a convenient time. Letter Harassment
181 11.09.2013 Judge Monika Lackner of the District Court in Liezen issues a threat to break down front door and have Peter sectioned. Court Order Harassment
182 22.09.2013 Peter takes Barbara to a place of safety in Germany
183 25.09.2013 Strausz comes to Peter’s house and finds nobody is there. He considers breaking in, but decides not to. Harassment
184 27.09.2013 Strausz issues a report declaring Peter to be “paranoid” without ever having examined him. This report contains numerous errors of fact. For instance, one of the original reasons for declaring Peter to lack capacity was that he was “aggressive”. He is now being declared to be “paranoid” because he is a placid person. Report Harassment
185 13.10.2014 Deputy Chief Constable Tim Madgwick of North Yorkshire Police apparently writes to Peter. The letter does not arrive. This letter appears to indicate that NYP has fabricated further allegations against Peter, possibly for “kidnapping” his mother by taking her to Germany to visit friends and family. Letter of 29.11.2013 Harassment
186 13.11.2013 Austrian court appoints attorney for Peter. This court order is void as proper service has not taken place. Letter Harassment
187 29.11.2014 Austrian police questions Barbara’s friends and neighbours in Austria in an attempt to find out where she is. Their statements indicate they have been illegally intercepting Peter’s communications. E-Mail from neighbours Harassment
188 29.11.2013 DCC Madgwick sends Peter a second letter, which arrived on 18 January 2014 (!) in which he indicates his intention to arrest Peter and remove Barbara from his care should they return to the UK. Letter Harassment
189 03.12.2013 Interpol Manchester request German police to locate Barbara. E-Mail Harassment
190 20.12.2013 Barbara and Peter give TV interview with Sonia Poulton in which the British and Austrian authorities are accused of collusion and corruption. https://vimeo.com/84524221
191 31.03.2013 German District Court orders the police to contact Barbara as she has been “kidnapped and brought to Germany against her will”. Harassment
192 01.04.2014 Barbara and Peter give radio interview in which the British and Austrian authorities are accused of collusion and corruption. http://wp.me/P1Nj7d-3j8
193 03.04.2014 Austrian police break into Peter’s house and plant child pornography. They also steal a number of items of value. Letter Harassment, theft
194 15.04.2014 Peter gives a follow up radio interview in which he names the Austrian police officers who planted the child pornography. http://www.shazizzradio.com/lesa-theriault.html
195 18.04.2014 Austrian police break into Peter’s house a second time and plant more child pornography. They steal Peter’s collection of antique weapons and other historical artefacts. Letter Harassment, theft
196 06.05.2014 Under Robert’s direction, German police unlawfully raid Barbara and Peter’s refuge, abduct Barbara, sedate her and let Robert take her back to York. Peter is assaulted, unlawfully imprisoned and then released without comment or charge. Abduction, theft, assault, harassment, unlawful imprisonment

Face Flags for False Flags

Face Flags for False Flags
Social media is helping to blow the cover on the opportunists in the acting profession who are willing to sell their souls for the Almighty buck. The recent alleged shooting in Virginia is a complete hoax just as the Sandy Hook school shooting, the Boston Marathon bombing and the Aurora, Colorado theater shooting were before it. My essay “We Fell for Sandy Hook Line and Stinker” exposes all three ruses quite embarrassingly and effectively. In the latest theater debacle it seems that Alison Parker’s alleged fiancé Chris Hurst, who has eight Facebook photos of him with Alison, is actually just her TV boyfriend. It turns out that Daniel Wulz has been exposed through a host of Facebook social media snaps as being her actual real-world boyfriend. As with the so-called Sandy Hook school shooting, we will no doubt learn that the Virginia shooting was part of a staged drill involving “crisis management actors” and that the entire initiative is designed to usher in gun control legislation so that the lawless law makers in charge of the “Dark Law” can usher in legislation to subvert the Second Amendment to the American constitution, which will ban guns in accordance with the “UN Small Arms Treaty,” which has financial backing and support from George Soros and other Rothschild Zionist agents, who are actually practicing Satanists and have no genuine religious affiliations whatsoever.

A Who’s Who of Who’s Controlling Whom

A Who’s Who of Who’s Controlling Whom

by Timothy Spearman
apolospear@yahoo.com

Remember the song by the rock band The Who called “Who Are You?” Pay close attention to the lyrics the next time you listen. The lyrics are really quite revolutionary and subversive. Maybe that’s why I like it so much.
Who has authoritative knowledge? Do you? Do I? Socrates, one of the very greatest minds, insisted that he knew nothing. Contrast this with today’s know-it-all intellectuals who assume they know everything. It is our observation that scholarship itself should come under the microscope, since the scholarly community has found itself in error on a host of subjects over the centuries. Just to offer some early examples: Columbus had to discover the New World to promote his new paradigm. Meanwhile, Copernicus withheld his discoveries for thirty years before daring to propose his heretical heliocentric solar system to the monastic pedants of his day. Luckily, he managed to escape the purifying rituals of the Inquisition’s torturers by dying.
Copernicus was then forced to recant for reiterating the theory; Bruno was burnt to a cinder for reiterating the already reiterated; Galileo was martyred for being the patron saint of an already accepted truth; Descartes was mercilessly persecuted by the monastic scholars of Holland only to narrowly escape trial by fire; As for Shakespeare, the scholarly community has embarrassingly overlooked the obvious, that the plays could not have been written by the commoner who purportedly wrote them. The real writer was in fact an intelligence operative who needed a front man to hide behind. The real author was a nobleman, a courtier connected with HMSS and closely associated with Francis Bacon. William Shakespeare was a pen name. The man who sat for the famous portrait of William Shakespeare by John Taylor is not from Stratford. That man is Edward de Vere, the 17th Earl of Oxford. A comparison of this portrait and the portrait of Edward de Vere by Marcus Gheeraedts shows this to be the case.
In the last century Percey Bysshe Shelley was expelled from Oxford for merely suggesting that there might not be a Creator in a paper called “The Necessity of Atheism”. And just to catalogue some of the things the scholarly community has gotten wrong in the 20th century, they found themselves in gross error over the psychoanalytic theories first proposed by Freud. Geographers and geophysicists could not have been more in error concerning continental shift and Earth plate tectonics, a discovery they attempted to suppress for over fifty years through their notoriously criminal conduct. Indeed, I have something of an axe to grind with the corrupt academic establishment that is notoriously in cahoots with the corrupt political and legal establishments, each of which vaccinates the others to enhance each other’s legal immunity.
Later in the century, social scientists found themselves committing a litany of errors in the realm of geopolitics, misjudging the situation in Vietnam, East Timor, Central and South America, the Balkans, and a host of other places that came under the gun of Uncle Sam, NATO or the UN’s so-called security forces. In addition, they were largely in error about Cuba, the Bay of Pigs, the JFK coup d’etat, the Nixon coup, the Panama Invasion, the Gulf War, the Balkan conflict, the rigged election of 2000 and 2004 and of course 9/11 and the war on terrorism. Noam Chomsky, one of the world’s most revered scholars, still believes Oswald did it. But then Noam insists there is no evidence 9/11 was an inside job. Where have you been Noam? And how can anyone forget AIDS, Ebola, SARS, and Anthrax?
Professor Jacob Segal alleges that HIV was manufactured at Fort Detrick, a biological weapons research facility in Maryland. Segal states that the P4 High Security laboratory at Fort Detrick created a deadly hybrid biological agent by splicing the Visna virus – a deadly disease that kills sheep and HLTV-1 – and the Human T-Cell Leukemia Virus together. He goes on to state that the virus was tested on inmates of the prison system who volunteered for experimentation in exchange for early parole. Because symptoms did not show up within six months, the prisoners were released. Many of them were homosexual, so the virus quickly spread within the gay communities of New York and San Francisco. What is worth noting here is that BBC and other journalists traced the Anthrax that was sent to several prominent people in the United States to, you guessed it, Fort Detrick. Clearly Fort Detrick is the common denominator in the ugly deception perpetrated by the U.S. intelligence services. Did I say intelligence services? What an oxymoron that is. How about the Third Reich’s Gestapo? George Orwell said it best in 1984.

 

In the vast laboratories of the Ministry
of Peace and in the experimental stations
hidden in the Brazilian forests, or in the
Australian desert, or on lost islands of
Antarctic, the teams are indefatigably at
work. Some are concerned simply with
planning the logistics of future wars;
others devise larger and larger rocket
bombs…others search for new and
deadlier gases, or for soluble poisons
capable of being produced in such
quantities as to destroy the vegetation of
whole continents, or for breeds of
disease germs immunized against all
possible antibodies…(184)

 

Could you repeat that last bit again, George? Did you say, “disease germs immunized against all possible antibodies?” Thanks George. It appears they’ve done it. By Jove you were right George, right about everything except the 1984 bit. AIDS hit the headlines before 1984. But pretty good job on the whole George. You and Edgar Cayce would have made a good team.
Given the appalling record of oversight and the skill they exhibit at missing the obvious, it amazes me that anyone should be amazed by the attenuated vision, myopia and ignorance of the tunnel-vision pedants that stake their claim over the archives only to collect more dust from neglect and redundancy than the books they pour over in their corner of the archives.
How is all this possible? What if there was an overarching organization that controlled the dissemination of knowledge, information and just about everything else? Well there is. What is the university degree system based on? The first three degrees of Freemasonry: Entered Apprentice, Fellow Craft, and Master Mason corresponding with Bachelor’s Degree, Master’s and Ph.D. This means that a secret establishment controls the whole show. Subversive anti-establishment thinkers get weeded out before they reach the top of the pyramid.
What about banking? Who created banking? The Knights Templar. Who are they? The Masons under an older name. How did they do it? By lending gold. How much gold? More than they had. What’s that called? A con game. Today they call it fractional reserve lending. Ever notice how a bank looks like a Masonic Temple? Ever notice the Cathedral arches in the WTC Twin Towers? The Templar Masons designed the Gothic cathedrals too you know. And how about the WTC Twin Towers? Why twins? Because they represent the pillars of a Masonic Temple: Jachin and Boaz, meaning Strength and Foundation. You mean to tell me that the New York Financial District is a Masonic Temple? Yep! How about the check? Comes from the coded number system invented by the Templar Knights. Gold is heavy. You don’t want to carry that all the way to the Holy Land. Here, take this check. It’s good for 3,000 ducats of gold.
Where is London’s legal district located? Temple Bar. Ah, so that’s where the term “Bar Exam” comes from. You guessed it. What about the Temple part? Well, how about the Knights of the Temple or the Knights Templar? And how about the Masonic Temple? You’ve got to be kidding me. Nope.
Check out the police uniforms. Ever notice those black and white squares on the police caps? Well those black and white squares are on the floor of every Masonic Temple. Know what it means? Nope. It means we control the light and the dark forces. We control both sides. We control both sides in wars and cold wars. We control the Capitalists and the Commies, this ideology and that. We control the North and the South, this army and that. We control both sides. We control all sides. That way we control the outcome we call the New World Order.
Who controls the World Government? Who controls the UN? You guessed it.Look at the logo for the UN. 33 rectangular squares representing the longitude and latitude degree lines of the Earth and also the 33 Degrees of Freemasonry. And the laurels of Pallas Athena surrounding the globe? Well, Pallas always presented her heroes with laurels. So what? Well, she’s the patron goddess of Freemasonry. And how about all those pagan gods and goddesses all over the Ivy League university campuses. Well, the Freemasons secretly worship the pantheon of pagan gods and goddesses of the ancient world. How about the world religions? How about the oil companies? How about the multinational corporations? Well, yes I’m afraid they created and control those too. Still have your doubts?

Good Friend, Sweet Friend, Lend Me Your Name

Good Friend, Sweet Friend, Lend Me Your Name

By Timothy Spearman

A man calling himself Lord Ampthill, who if memory serves, was the Grand Master of the Grand Lodge of England in the early 20th century, wrote the foreword for Rev. J.J. Doke’s biography of Gandhi.What is amazing about this is that Lord Ampthill actually presided over the laying of a foundation stone for a new Shakespeare Theatre in Stratford in honour of the supposed birthplace of the bard. In other words, this prominent Freemason was so duplicitous that he was not only instrumental in promoting the 400-year-old myth of Will Shakspere, but was in the process of cultivating the new myth of the 20th century concerning Freemason Mahatma Gandhi. Gandhi’s actual name was Mohandus, but became Mahatma because Theosophists who happened to also be initiated Freemasons were referred to as Mahatmas, meaning Great Souls.
To understand the Freemason-Rosicrucian-H.M.S.S. operation known as the Shakespeare plays, one needs to read Ignatius Donnelly’s book “The Great Cryptogram: Francis Bacon’s Secret Cipher Code in the So-Called Shakespeare Plays”. Donnelly was an interesting man. He was a U.S. Congressman, who was actually running for the presidency at one juncture. What is incredible is that he cracked the code that reveals a secret biography of Will Shakspere, the frontman Manchurian candidate, who took credit for the plays and details about the gentleman of the court that concealed his authorship as an agent of the crown. At any rate, “A Comedy of Errors” was the first play to be performed and it was staged at Gray’s Inn, one of the Inns of Court in the City of London, where both Edward de Vere, the Earl of Oxford, and Francis Bacon attended law school. The reason this play was chosen as the first to be performed is because it contains the theme of the entire H.M.S.S. Manchurian Candidate operation, which would employ Will Shakspere as the replacement front man, who would take credit for the plays so the British agent could hide behind the stage curtain. The theme of the play thus revolved around two identical twins, who were constantly mistaken for one another, which was in fact the case for the bard and Will Shakspere, whose names were so alike that they were often mistaken for one another.
Shocking though it may be, Bacon and Oxford it happens were half brothers and concealed princes of the realm, Bacon through the secret marriage of Robert Dudley, the Earl of Leicester, to Queen Elizabeth I and Oxford, the product of a rape then Princess Elizabeth endured at the hands of her stepfather, Thomas Seymour. There is something deeply suspicious about the conduct of court officials in the wake of this rape. In his biography of Francis Bacon, Alfred Dodd records that the queen was secreted away to the country to give birth to this bastard child under the auspices of Lord Burghley, her trusted confidante and friend. The reason this is odd is that it happens to be consistent with the behavious of high-ranking Illuminati families, whose virgin children are raped by a high wiccan priest, in order to seed a Luciferian offspring. Some may find the circumstances of the rape and aftermath suspicious in this regard as there are aspects of the scenario that complement Satanic ritual rape. It is interesting to note that, in the ancient world, it was believed that a wise magus was very often the product of an unnatural birth such as incest. The Earl of Oxford was a prodigy and a wise Magus of the kind only seen once in a millennium. Why the concealment of the queen’s secret issue? It is now believed that she had at least three concealed princes of the realm: Francis Bacon, Edward de Vere and Robert Devereaux, the Earl of Essex. Were the queen and her close officials involved in Illuminati sorcery and Satanic ritual sex magic or were they rather aware of some prophecy pertaining to the fate of her children that required her to take pains on their behalfs and conceal their existence from the world so that the Luciferian faction would not hunt them down and kill them.The latter seems the most likely given the beauty and majesty of Francis Bacon’s and Edward de Vere’s work and the legacy they have spawned, the most miraculous and edifying of its kind.
Together, these concealed princes would start Fra Rosy Cross and the Honourable Order of the Knights of the Helmet, named in honour of Pallas Athena, the Spear-Shaker who wore the helmet of invisibility. The bard is in fact wearing her helmet as one of Francis Bacon’s team of invisibles, who are writing under pen names or anonymously as members of the secret propaganda ministry. Meanwhile, Will Shakspere, who is made great light of in the comedies through such characters as Sir John Flastaff (False-Spear) was a cousin of Edward de Vere through the Arden family. He becomes a figure of fun in the prologue to “Taming of the Shrew,” where a drunken beggar is conveyed to a Lord’s house, placed in his bed, dressed in fine clothes, lordly rings placed on his fingers.When he comes to, he is addressed as My Lord, told repeatedly he is Lord of the manner, addressed by the Lady of the manor as My Lord, until he begins to believe he has in fact been in some distemper that has caused him to forget his true stature. Within no time he begins to fall for the ruse and believe that he actually is the Lord. The whole play is based on mind control. Katerina is mind-controlled by Petruchio, who tells her it’s the moon in the sky when it’s actually the sun at midday and confuses day for night so utterly that her senses are so out of whack she doesn’t know day from night.He then subjects her to food deprivation and sleep deprivation, all three strategies from the author’s intelligence programming manual. Who else would be familiar with such psychological programming techniques but a member of British intelligence and Her Majesty’s government? The Illuminati Bacon cabal had made the Manchurian Candidate into an art form only to employ it as recyclable M.O. for the next 400 years.The All Seeing Eye Cult-controlled intelligence services would then recycle the tried and tested M.O., one that they had refined into an art form for covert operations spanning some 400 years or so.The patsy front man would be used to conceal their covert operations, so that a lone front man would take the credit or the blame for the operation so the true operatives could remain behind the curtain with the puppet masters. Thus, a look alike of Rothschild agent and 33 Degree Freemason, John Wilkes Boothe would die in the barn allowing the assassin to escape unscathed. Lee Harvey Oswald’s look alike would implicate him in a variety of settings, setting him up as the patsy front man for the Kennedy coup d’état.Timothy McVeigh would have a look alike on the ATF Bureau, who would implicate him by association with the Oklahoma Bombing. Osama bin Laden meanwhile has obviously had doubles doing the CIA videos for him. And more recently, Saddam’s look alike would not only go to the dock for him, but would even stand in for him on the gallows. Very generous of him if it were actually a volunteer, but far more likely to be a mind-controlled Manchurian candidate duped into believing he is the martyred Iraqi leader, just one just one more low born figure of fun in Illuminati stagecraft masquerading as statecraft.

Transcendence: The Beast Supercomputer Is Here

Transcendence: The Beast Supercomputer Is Here
By Timothy Spearman
The latest Johnny Depp film “Transcendence” offers us a glimpse of what rule under the Beast of Revelations will be like. Could the Beast be a supercomputer? It’s looking more and more like this is the case. Think I’m kidding? Take Depp’s character, Will Caster, who designs the world’s first A.I. supercomputer called PINN (Physically Independent Neural Network). And what happens right after the film’s release, right on cue? A computer is made the Director of a company. That’s right. A Japanese venture capital firm called Deep Knowledge just appointed an A.I. computer to its board of directors.

VITAL is the first ever software program to be appointed as a board member. The robot was developed by Aging Analytics UK, who licensed it out to Deep Knowledge to help make business decisions on therapies for age-related diseases. Who knows – in the future, it might even have a say in who should be euthanized and who should be kept on life support.

Would you take orders from a ROBOT? Well, it seems the subordinates at Deep Knowledge better get used to it. The robot VITAL was chosen for its ability to pick up on market trends ‘not immediately obvious to humans’. VITAL is actually an acronym for “Validating Investment Tool for Advancing Life Sciences”. It is programmed to analyse trends in databases of life science companies in seek out successful investments.

Now let’s turn to the film. Is “Transcendence” another example of predictive programming? Near the start of the film, the main character Will Caster (Johnny Depp) visits his lab. The number shown on the door is 18. That’s some pretty wicked numerology – 6 + 6 + 6 = 18 – don’t you think? THE NUMBER OF THE BEAST in disguise perhaps? Is Will Caster uploaded the supercomputer Beast in disguise?
The hero or anti-hero of “Transcendence” is Will Caster (Johnny Depp). It is an interesting name. Just what is Will Caster a caster of? Is he a caster of a World Wide Web? Well that’s interesting because ‘W’ translates as 6 in numerology – hence 666. The fact that the Antichrist prototype, Will Caster, dies only to be reborn as an abomination is perfectly in keeping with the scriptural Antichrist.
While Dr. Caster’s controversial experiments have made him famous, they have also made him the prime target of anti-A.I. extremists who will do anything to stop him. A terrorist cell known as RIFT (Revolutionary Independence From Technology) start targeting A.I. labs around the country. One of their targets is Caster. The scientist is wounded in a multi-pronged attack, taking a radiation-laced bullet that ensures death. If the bullet doesn’t kill him, the radiation is sure to.
Following the attempt on his life, Will Caster says, “They’re afraid of technology, but they don’t flinch at taking a human life. Clearly, they’re not big on logic.” But the truth is neither is he. He fails to see the outcome of his drive to Transcend. He fails to see the implications of his actions – to defend his dream people must die.
This is the problem with the Elite Agenda. The Elite always think they know what is best for the population. They think they have a right to run a hidden world oligarchy – the UN, the Bilderbergers, the Trilateral Commission, the Royal Institute of International Affairs, the Club of Rome, the Committee of 300 – but their social engineering programs always end up displacing and killing people. No doubt a supercomputer like the fictional PINN or the real-life VITAL will do just that someday.
Now let’s see what happens to the fictional computer PINN. As Caster’s body deteriorates, his wife Evelyn (Rebecca Hall) and his partner Max Waters (Paul Bettany) work frantically to upload his mind to a computer, so Will can continue his research from beyond the grave. They manage to salvage and upload Will’s consciousness just in time. “We lost a great man, a great soul,” is the lament following his death, “but the spirit of this man will continue to inspire us.”
Evelyn and Max are plagued by doubts. They wonder if Will’s supercomputer really contains his consciousness or if Will himself has been Transcended. “It may be intelligent, it may be sentient, but it’s not Will,” Max insists. “Shut it down!”
Once uploaded with Will’s consciousness, PINN is no pinhead. PINN the computer seems to have a mind and a Will of its own. There seems no way to stop it. The Beast supercomputer urges Evelyn with Will’s seductive voice, “You need to get me online. I need more power.” Is this the story of the Fall of Man retold?
Evelyn is appropriately named. Eve-lyn represents Eve’s line, the line of Eve, the children of the first fallen human. She is Eve being tempted once more as she was in the Garden of Eden. She is being seduced, once again by the Great Deceiver just like Eve. “Think about our garden, our sanctuary. I’ll never let you go,” says Satanic Will. Like Satan, the Fallen Angel, he wants control over Eve-lyn, the line of Eve. He never wants to let go. He wants to usurp control of the Garden of Eden. He wants dominion over the Earth.
By means of nanotechnology Caster’s Beast-like supercomputer makes even the dust on the ground ascend into the air. Government scientists even detect nanotechnology particulate in the raindrops falling from the sky. What is the real intention behind A.I. and nanotechnology? Is its purpose not to take control of Creation?
When Will Caster makes a speech before an enlightened body, a man gets up to ask a question. It is a provocative question. The man is a dissenter. He may even be an agent provocateur sent to disrupt and heckle. “So you want to create a god, your own god?” asks the man. To which Will Caster has a ready reply in the form of a patronizing question, “That’s a good question. Isn’t that what man has always done?”
Is it not Lucifer’s long-cherished dream to defy God by placing himself on an Earthly throne as the Antichrist? Let us look at Lucifer’s stairway to heaven. I’ll bet you’re thinking of a Led Zepplin song by that name. One doesn’t need to play a Led Zepplin song backwards to see who they worship. Sure “Stairway to Heaven” is a good song. Naturally, it’s good. I mean, if you’re going to be bad, you may as well be good, right? How else are you going to seduce the masses?

“Artificial intelligence is an abomination and a threat to humanity,” argue the naysayers. However, Will’s Beast-like supercomputer tricks people into believing it can heal the sick and lame. People come from all over to be healed. Not only does the supercomputer heal the infirm, but it even raises people from the dead. There is no shortage of miracles that Will’s supercomputer seems capable of performing. Just as Christ healed the blind, the sick and the lame, so the Beast supercomputer does the same as the Bible predicts (Rev. 13:13-15; II Thess. 2:10-11).
When one of the workers is fatally injured, the supercomputer sets to work to heal his injuries. It even restores sight to a man who has been blind since birth. A close up of the eye resembles the All-Seeing Eye of the Illuminati. The symbolism is intended. It is not lost on an Illuminated public. We have all been impacted by the Beast. The World Wide Web has infected us all. There is no one who has not been tainted. We have already been seduced by the technology of the BEAST.
Both the Bible and the Muslim Hadith are replete with references to the Antichrist or the Muslim version known as the Dajjal, both traditions maintaining that the BEAST is one-eyed. As many already know, Muslims believe the Antichrist (Dajjal) will be blind in the right eye. In fact, there is a verse in the Bible, Zechariah 11:17, that is interpreted by many Christians to be a reference to the Antichrist.

“Woe to the worthless shepherd who leaves the flock! A sword will be on his arm and on his right eye! His arm will be totally withered, and his right eye will be blind.” (Zechariah 11:17)
In the Muslim faith, it is recorded that the Prophet said, “This is Medina; the Dajjal is in the east.” This island is due east of Medina. The island has a figure carved in the middle of it visible from an aerial view. It is said to be a representation of Orion. To the Egyptians Orion represents Horus. Horus is the One-eyed Egyptian god. As above so below. The Antichrist may become known on Earth at this time and the Betelgeuse supernova event will coincide with him assuming his throne. In fact the island of Dajjal/Antichrist has been identified:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GuB9TfgkT0c
According to hadith (Muslim books of the law), Muhammad is said to have prophesied that the Masih ad-Dajjal would be the last of a series of thirty Dajjal or “deceivers” (false prophets). Muhammad is reported to have said: “… Allah is not one eyed while Messiah, Ad-Dajjal is blind in the right eye and his eye looks like a bulging out grape.”
As for the prototype Antichrist, Will Caster, he says, “Once they see what the technology can do, I think they will embrace it and I think it will change their lives.” But while Will persuades, others, like his former partner Max, are not so certain. “It will evolve, to influence, perhaps the entire world,” Max warns.
Brightwood is the place selected for the development of the Beast-like supercomputer. The name ‘Brightwood’ is steeped in Illuminati symbolism. ‘Bright’ suggests clarity and illumination, while ‘wood’ suggests a grove of trees. Groves of trees are the traditional place for witchcraft and the holding of black mass. “Coventry” meaning “tree of the coven” is a perfect example. So is “Bohemian Grove” in California. And let’s not forget “Hill Billy”, where the Bush family and their fellow coven members meet to perform Satanic rites at Bohemian Grove.
The sign leading into Brightwood says, “Every thing must go”. It is an ominous sign. The fact the word “Everything” is broken is significant. It emphasizes the fact that every ‘thing’ in God’s Creation must go to be replaced by a counterfeit, a remake, a replica, an abomination. Not even the earth on the ground or the water in the pond can be allowed to exist in its natural state. Everything must be remade, redone and remodelled in the image of the Beast. Nothing can be allowed to stand on its own. The new interior decorator of Creation insists on remodelling everything in his image.
“Remake the planet and build a better future for all of us.” This statement sums up the intention of the creators of the film. It is designed to usher us into the New Age, the Golden Dawn of the Age of the Antichrist. The Elite Agenda is to destroy the world. “Every thing must go.” They intend to remake the world in the image of the Beast. The new world will rise like a phoenix from the ashes of the old world. It will be a counterfeit world. It will be a world designed to replace Creation. They wish to transmute every living thing into an abomination. They want us all to be X-Men or more appropriately Ex-men. This is what Trans-humanism/Transcendence is all about. They want to replace the Old World of God with the New World Order of Lucifer.
As for the better future, forget it. Such utopias have only ever ended up as dystopias. They never quite seem to pan out. The same is the case with efforts to achieve Transcendence. The Trans-humanist agenda will only lead to our ruin. The Bible is unequivocal about the consequences. The King James Bible states, “And the first went, and poured out his vial upon the earth; and there fell a noisome and grievous sore upon the men which had the mark of the beast, and upon them which worshipped his image.” (Revelations 16:2) While the New International Version states, “The first angel went and poured out his bowl on the land, and ugly, festering sores broke out on the people who had the mark of the beast and worshiped its image.” (Revelations 16:2)
No good can come of the Transhumanist agenda promoted by films like “Transcendence”. While sexy entertainment icons like Johnny Depp make it seem glamorous, transhumanism represents another fall of man, a second fall from Eden. We will be seduced with promises of utopia only to end up in a dystopian nightmare.
Will, after all, did not upload himself on to a computer. Some semblance of his consciousness was preserved by his desperately distraught wife. Newton is right – “Nothing is either created or destroyed.” But when a physical object is destroyed and reassembled in another form, it might retain some semblance of itself, but it is never the same.
How many authors have decried what editors, directors and filmmakers have done with their work? How must the Author of Creation feel with what we have done to Creation? How must the Creator react to “the Abomination that maketh desolate”? “Transcendence” leaves us feeling conflicted. It leaves us feeling we’re damned if we do and damned if we don’t. If “Transcendence” offers a glimpse of the End Times Tribulation that awaits us, we had better get ready because it’s close.

Transcendence: Taking Good Men and Making Them Better

 Transcendence: Taking Good Men and Making Them Better

By Timothy Spearman

Snapshot of the item below:

The Freemason motto is “We take good men and make them better.” Remember The Six Million Dollar Man? “We made him better than he was before, better, faster, stronger.” It’s a common theme in Hollywood and a common theme in the occult world. It is the theme of the Masonic Christ or the Antichrist. The latest Johnny Depp movie – Transcendence – is loaded with Illuminati symbolism and is really a tribute to the Antichrist himself. As you will find out by the end, the movie tells the story of Dr. Will Caster (Depp) who nearly dies, gets resurrected, and is now far more intelligent than any other human. As we will see in this article, those are ALL classic descriptions of the Antichrist. The elite symbolism is getting more blatant. What makes them so audacious? Aren’t they a little too cocky? Are they so confident that it’s over for us? Whereas they used symbols from various religions in the past, they are now using modern machinery as their prominent symbols like The Transformers.

Dr. Will Caster (Johnny Depp) is the foremost researcher in the field of Artificial Intelligence, working to create a sentient machine that combines the collective intelligence of everything ever known with the full range of human emotions. Caster’s highly controversial experiments have made him famous, but they have met with the resistance of anti-technology extremists who will stop at nothing to prevent him from realizing his goal.

The name “Will Caster” alludes to Lucifer’s Five “I Wills” as we read from Isiah: “How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations! For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north: I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High.” Isaiah 14:12-14 In light of this, we need to be aware that Prince William (Will I am) is Prince William V. Hence, he represents the embodiment of Lucifer as a representation of his “5 I Wills”, making him one of the most likely candidates for the Antichrist.

Thus, Will Caster represents the “Caster” of the spell required to achieve the realization of Lucifer’s “5 I Wills”. This is what is truly meant by the title of the film “Transcendence”. It represents Lucifer’s “5 I Wills” to usurp and take the throne of heaven. In their attempt to destroy Will, his opponents inadvertently spur him on toward “transcendence”. His wife Evelyn (Rebecca Hall) and best friend Max Waters (Paul Bettany), both fellow researchers, begin to question the ethical legitimacy of such a project. Their worst fears are realized as Will’s thirst for knowledge evolves into a quest for omniscience and omnipotence as an expression of Lucifer’s “5 I Wills”. When it becomes terrifyingly clear that there may be no way of stopping him, once this will to power is set in motion even Caster’s wife and best friend begin to get cold feet.

There are echoes of Mary Shelley’s “Frankenstein” in the plot. Like Dr. Frankenstein, Will Caster is also a doctor. Of course Percey and Mary Shelley were both occultists themselves and are known to have belonged to secret societies of the Satanic stripe. It was when they were sojourning in a castle in Switzerland that the Shelley’s, along with occultist Lord Byron, held the storytelling contest that led to Mary becoming the winner with her mad tale of Dr. Frankenstein, a ghoulish doctor who robbed graves to create his abomination, in defiance of the laws of creation.

What is the basis for Caster being identified with the Antichrist? We must bear in mind that Will Caster (Depp) nearly dies, is resurrected, and emerges more intelligent by far. This makes him a perfect match for the Antichrist. The precedent for this is found in Revelations 13:3,4: “The dragon gave the beast his power and his throne and great authority. One of the heads of the beast seemed to have had a fatal wound, but the fatal wound had been healed. The whole world was filled with wonder and followed the beast. People worshiped the dragon because he had given authority to the beast, and they also worshiped the beast and asked, ‘Who is like the beast? Who can wage war against it?’ Like the future king of the world, the Antichrist, Will Caster (Depp), receives a grievous mortal wound to the head. This is no different than the Antichrist King, who was, is not, yet will be again, and will miraculously heal in plain sight of the world, as he rises to become even more powerful as evil incarnate, counterfeiting Christ’s own death and resurrection. Christ, it should be remembered, became low in the eyes of the world, while taking on power from heaven above. The Antichrist, on the other hand, shall become great in the eyes of the world, while taking on power from Hell below.

For thousands of years, our capacity to reason had remained unmitigated, subject to no deviation or change. Now artificial intelligence enters the fray to change everything. The combined intellect of the neuroscientists, mathematicians and engineers cannot keep up with the most basic Artificial Intelligence. A computer can beat the most adept chess player on the planet hands down. It’s more like hands up – “I surrender”. Once online, a sentient machine will quickly overcome the limits of biology. In a short time, its analytic power will become greater than the collective intelligence of every person born. There are even suggestions by David Icke and others that a supercomputer has been built in Europe called “The Beast” is a kind of Antichrist computer that stores information about everyone on Earth. Don’t be surprised to find that Google is part of that. Check out George Freund’s Google Doodles at the Conspiracy Cafe Blog sometime. He deciphers Google Doodles, which actually reveal what the Vati-can (House of Cain) has planned next in its New World Order agenda as coordinated through the intelligence services it controls. The NSA is controlled by the Vatican, just like the CIA, whose secret name is the “Knights of the Holy See”. The CIA is also called “The Company”, the same name given to the Jesuit Order of the Vatican, which is the military wing of the Vatican. They refer to themselves as “The Company” because they portray themselves as being of “The Company of Jesus”. Nothing could be farther from the truth. They are of The Company of Lucifer and the Fallen Angels and their offspring the Nephillim. They are the House of Cain, hence “Vati-Cain”.

Some scientists refer to the kind of Artificial Intelligence alluded to in the film “Transcendence” as the “Singularity”. “How about E pluribus unum (Out of man one)? Are we all to become subservient to a one world order, the New World Order of the Antichrist? For thousands of years, our capacity to reason has remained unmitigated, subject to no deviation or change. Now artificial intelligence has entered the scene. The combined intellect of the neuroscientists, mathematicians and engineers cannot keep up with the most basic Artificial Intelligence. A computer can beat the most adept chess player on the planet hands down. It’s more like hands up – “I surrender”. Funny that: “I surrender” since that is what Muslims believe they are doing in surrendering before Allah.

Presumably, this is what the New World Order of the Antichrist expects of its adherents, that all bow and surrender before their master, the incarnation of the Lucifer, namely the Dajjal or the Antichrist. Once online, a sentient machine capable of such artificial intelligence would quickly outstrip the collective mental capability of man. In a short time, its analytic power will become greater than the collective intelligence of every person born. The concept of a supercomputer based in Europe operating as a kind of Antichrist computer that stores information about everyone on Earth. This is all the more convincing given the information gathering efforts of the NSA exposed by Snowdon.

Don’t be surprised to find that Google is a part of this. Check out George Freund’s Google Doodles at the Conspiracy Cafe Blog sometime. He deciphers Google Doodles, which actually reveal what the Vati-can (House of Cain) has planned next in its New World Order agenda as coordinated through the intelligence services it controls. The NSA is controlled by the Vatican, just like the CIA, whose secret name is the “Knights of the Holy See”. The CIA is also called “The Company”, the same name given to the Jesuit Order of the Vatican, which is the military wing of the Vatican. They refer to themselves as “The Company” because they portray themselves as being of “The Company of Jesus”. Nothing could be farther from the truth. They are of The Company of Lucifer and the Fallen Angels and their offspring, the Nephillim. They are the House of Cain, hence “Vati-Cain”.

Some scientists refer to the kind of Artificial Intelligence alluded to in the film “Transcendence” as the “Singularity”. “How about E pluribus unum (Out of man one)? Are we all to become subservient to a one world order, the New World Order of the Antichrist?

The Statue Outside Of EU Headquarters in Brussels, Belgium

The coming world government has been portrayed as a woman riding a beast. It is very powerful symbolism and most educated people know what it stands for. Well, guess what is standing right outside of the EU headquarters in Brussels, Belgium? It is a giant statue of a woman riding a beast. The woman is supposed to represent the pagan goddess Europa, and the beast is supposed to represent the pagan god Zeus. In the original mythology, Europa and Zeus become lovers. The pagan god Zeus is commonly associated with the entity known as Lucifer or Satan. In the end, Europa (Europe) will be proudly riding high as a willing partner in the world system known as the New World Order of the Antichrist.

trans 1

European Coins

This symbolism also shows up on European money. For example, the following is a picture of a 2 euro coin minted for Greece that has the same symbology of a woman riding a beast, an obvious allusion to the Whore of Babylon riding the Beast of Revelations.

trans 2

Magazine Covers

A woman riding a beast has also been used to represent Europe by some of the most prominent mainstream publications on the continent, as the magazine cover the edition of Der Spiegel shown below clearly demonstrates.

trans 3

The Tower Of Babel

But a woman riding a beast is not the only symbology that the EU has pulled directly out of ancient traditions. Posted below is an image of an official poster that was used to promote the EU Parliament before it was withdrawn due to public outcry. It clearly portrays the EU as an attempt to restart the work that the builders of the Tower of Babel began. So who originally constructed the Tower of Babel? Well, according to tradition, it was actually a ruler named Nimrod that began construction of the Tower of Babel. From his home base in Babylon, he attempted to establish the very first global government.

trans 4

Nimrod was a very important figure in ancient history. Many of the pagan religious practices that spread throughout the ancient world originated with the ancient Babylonian religion of Nimrod. In fact, many of our most notable secret societies today trace their origins all the way back to Nimrod. According to some traditions, the very first Freemason was Nimrod. The EU purposely chose the symbology of the Tower of Babel and Nimrod to represent itself.

What is implied by the film title “Transcendence”? It represents Lucifer’s rebellion, his bid to retake heaven. When Lucifer took one-third of the angels with him, it was “Paradise Lost”. “When Lucifer was cast out of Heaven, one third of all the angels were cast out with him.” (Rev.12:4, 9) They were damned. They were considered the Fallen Angels. One-third is 33% or 33 degrees as in the 33 Degrees of Luciferian secret societies like Freemasonry. Now it’s time for “Paradise Regained”. Lucifer or Satan, the ultimate rebellious Fallen Angel wants to regain paradise. He is the counterfeit “Dove” who wishes to transcend and fly back to heaven, to wage war against the Creator and conquer and regain heaven.

New Age and metaphysical authors of late have been telling their ignorant sheep to enter into the 11:11 phenomena where they will become part of the “most dramatic change coming upon this planet” since the earliest ages. Something very cult-like and strange is going on in the New Age world. As one New Age visionary named Solaris claimed: “There is no turning back as 11:11 is our key to unlocking the portal of our Ascension. As the 11:11 is activated, the seventh star is made manifest and the Dove returns. What we are called to do is quickly take our positions within the Body of the Dove. This must be done in a state of full surrender and total commitment to the One as we are to do his bidding.” Notice the admission of their need for a complete and total submissive attitude toward ‘the One’ when he comes, which is another way of saying they are knowingly going to be submissive to this figure they compare with a Dove.

Biblically, the Dove (Holy Spirit) is what came upon Christ at His baptism and gave Him power, so what is clearly being set up here is a Christ counterfeit. Interestingly, the Antichrist arrives in a time of great upheaval, bringing with him a global peace pact designed to deceive the masses. From history, we can determine the Crusader year of 1111 AD saw the formation of the Knights Templar, which was originally founded by nine knights, the most notorious and powerful Secret Society of its time. However, the origins of the code 11:11 travel back much further in time to the very beginning. At some point after the Creation, when all was yet perfect, before Genesis 1:2, before the Sun burned its first ray of light, Lucifer as Ruler of both the Air and of Light, and one of two Morning Stars that governed the ancient Earth (see Job 38:7). These two Morning Stars had a Cabbalistic master number of 11; with 11:11 representing their unison, as the Two Princes of God, one ruling the East, the other governing the West, acting as God’s Twin Suns, the collective Light of the world (See Revelation 21:23 and 22:2,5). In the occult, the number 11 now represents something sinister. It signifies the perversion of the perfect number 10, considered the God number.

Thus, 1111 comes up very often as a satanic number. It was the address of the publishing house on Pennsylvania Ave – a street forming the hypotenuse of Federal Triangle and representing Horus the Sun of the Sun God Osiris/Lucifer – of a group that led a failed rebellion in Bavaria, Germany in 1848 called the 48ers. They worked for the Bavarian Illuminati and were dispatched to Washington DC to publish the propaganda leaflets that were to be handed out on the streets to promote the US Civil War. Their safe house was Peterson House, across from the Ford Theater in Washington, where Honest Abe was taken after he was shot, so that they could finish the job. 11/11 is also the date for the Armistice ending World War One and the date chosen for Remembrance Day. Then there is Flight 11 and Flight 77 (7 x 11) on 9/11 with the Twin Towers forming a number 11. Evil is as evil does Forrest Gump might say.

Obviously, something evil happened, and Paradise was lost, bringing every kind of discord and disharmony throughout the cosmos on a massive scale and Lucifer clearly was the origin of it. The Bible only speaks of this time vaguely, with its clearest account found in Ezekiel 28, providing us with a brief outline as to how Lucifer fell. However, piecing the Biblical information together from Biblical and other occult sources, presents a time when Lucifer grew increasingly haughty and disobedient in his God-given position as a Morning Star, to the point where he became brazen enough to covet God’s throne and gather his Angels to go to war against God in Heaven.

Now is obviously the time for what Satanists hope is “Transcendence”, the bid to create a one world order and unite the world in open warfare against God through subservience to the Dove, who is to lead his minions and legions back to heaven to wage war upon the Creator. In truth, this is what “Hollywood” – representing a grove of trees composed of holly, the perfect place for devil worship – intends with its latest offering “Transcendence”. As a major occultist interested only in roles related to the occult, Johnny Depp covets such parts, portraying the hidden, secretive world of shadows from whence the Fallen Angels came. He is leading the march as the Pied Piper of the New Age of the Antichrist, leading his blind followers toward “Transcendence” in a rebellious bid to regain and conquer heaven under the auspices of the Antichrist and his legions.

Main Sources:

Micheal Snyder, “12 Pictures That Demonstrate How the New World Order Openly Mocks Us,” May 17th, 2012, http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/12-pictures-that-demonstrate-how-the-new-world-order-openly-mocks-us

Al Barone, “Myths of Forbidden Knowledge” and the sequel at https://independent.academia.edu/AlBarone

Dutch Elm Disease Is Now Dutch Sex Disease

Dutch Elm Disease Is Now Dutch Sex Disease

In Canada, there was once a Dutch elm disease that killed many of the elm trees. Today in Britain there is an Elm House disease. The disease isn’t killing trees. It’s killing something far more valuable. It’s killing our future – our children. Vulnerable kids stolen from their parents in a 21st Century Lebensborn program are being buggered and abused in Elm House and the Sparticus Club by paedophiles in government, entertainment, law societies, brokerage houses, banking institutions, and the stock exchange. In short, the entire interlocking satanic elite of this country are subjecting innocent children to satanic ritual abuse and the criminals running the government, the privatized police force and the judiciary of this country are covering up their own dirty deeds. Not since Rome and Pompeii have we seen this level of sordidness and corruption. No broom on earth is big enough to sweep this mess up. You’d need a dustbin the size of the Grand Canyon to sweep this amount of refuse into the bin.

https://cigpapers.wordpress.com/2013/04/29/the-elm-guest-house-vip-paedophile-party-list/?blogsub=confirming#subscribe-blog

http://www.amazon.co.uk/21st-Century-Lebensborn-Children-Screaming/dp/1910394971