The Pharmaceuticals Are Doctoring the Medicine

               The Pharmaceuticals Are Doctoring the Medicine

                     By Timothy Spearman

Four centuries ago, Francis Bacon invented modern empirical science, which depended on five-sense reasoning to prove a scientific proposition was valid. While this was necessary in order to invoke a certain scientific rigor in our pure sciences, it created a blind spot in scientific inquiry that has never really been resolved. It left no room for other modalities that could not be proven valid by five-sense empirical science. The benefits of yoga meditation could not be quantified and measured by scientific method. Yet its practitioners will maintain that they derive a great deal of scientific benefit from the practice. What the Indians call Prana and the Chinese call Qi – subtle energies found within the body whose flow can be manipulated by acupuncture and herbal medicine – cannot be confirmed by the empiricist who adheres to the pharmaceutical allopathic medical model. He will refer to these medical modalities as alternative medicine, when in fact it is his brand of medicine that is actually alternative, since it has only been in existence for just over a century, while acupuncture and herbal medicine are time-honoured traditions that have been practiced for millennia all over the world.

Allopathic or pharmaceutical medicine is regarded as a science by its adherants and practitioners, yet in many ways it is a pseudo-science. Medical experimentation is often shoddy and results are often engineered by doctors who have certain professional obligations to those dispensing the grant money. Results are often tailored to meet the demands of the end-user of the research and the findings are often shamefully disingenuous. Medical peer review is often influenced by fascist forces driven by eugenicists with a eugenics agenda like Bill Gates and the infamous Gates Foundation, which has been caught red-handed dispensing tainted vaccines, which the Indian government wishes to hold the genocidal Gates accountable for. In fact, Gates has long been in cohoots with the intelligence agencies controlled by the Vatican. Microsoft operating systems are notorious for their spyware capability. And Microsoft generated viruses like the conficker virus were meant to be part of a projection analysis to see how many hosts could be infected by biological agents which adhered to the same mathematical model in terms of infection vectors and contagion ratios.

George Soros is another major investor in the eugenics, depopulation and genocide program. In fact, he is responsible for funding the development of the very labs responsible for manufacturing disease agents like Ebola. George Soros, who funded the bioweapons lab in Africa where Ebola broke out and profits from destabilizing countries and wrecking their economies, is a murderous paedophile and satanist. He stands accused of conspiring to commit bio-terrorism, crimes against humanity, genocide and conspiracy to commit mass murder. It appears that Soros may have violated the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989.


According to the US-based Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), a bioterrorism attack is the deliberate release of viruses, bacteria, or other germ agents used to cause illness or death in people, animals, or plants. These agents are typically found in nature, but using recombinant technology can be made more resistant to current medicines and to be more transmissible and contagious.

That law defines a biological agent as:


” …any micro-organism, virus, infectious substance, or biological product that may be engineered as a result of biotechnology, or any naturally occurring or bioengineered component of any such microorganism, virus, infectious substance, or biological product, capable of causing death, disease, or other biological malfunction in a human, an animal, a plant, or another living organism; deterioration of food, water, equipment, supplies, or material of any kind…

In a stunning piece of propaganda in establishment newspaper The Telegraph it seems the British public are being prepared for a false flag Ebola outbreak at the Commonwealth Games starting in Glasgow on July 23. The Telegraph buried a key aspect of the Story – the evidence that a US bioweapons lab in Sierra Leone with links to the Soros and Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is likely the origin of the current Ebola outbreak. While The Telegraph buried facts about the existence of this hospital bioweapons research lab and also ignores information in the US Centers for Disease Control’s (CDC) Ebola fact sheet, which identifies hospitals as the place where an Ebola outbreak is most likely to occur, Washington Post reporter Terence McCoy has entered the realm of fairy tales by blaming the current Ebola outbreak on deforestation, another stunning example of pseudo-science. Even more stunning is blaming the Ebola virus on fruit bats, which is no less of a pseudo-scientific claim than blaming African green monkeys for the HIV/AIDS scourge.

Take this website as a for instance – The website freely admits that Professor Robert F. Garry is “currently managing the consortium of scientists who are developing modern diagnostics for several biodefense pathogens.”

Consortium member, Dr. James E. Robinson, is named as “a collaborating investigator in four large consortia projects funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.”

Consortium member, Dr. Pardis Sabeti, has received fellowships from the Rhodes Scholarship, the Soros Fellowship, L’Oreal For Women in Science Fellowship, according to the website.

Scientist Stephen Gire has links to the CDC and US military. Do you mean the U.S. military as in the CIA’s bioweapons program? Most probably. He “spent time at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention researching vector-borne infectious diseases. He then moved on to complete a Masters of Public Health at Columbia University and a three-year fellowship with the United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID). He has researched viruses such as West Nile, Dengue Fever, Monkeypox and Ebola, and he conducts on-site training in biological techniques to laboratory staff in the developing world.”

Given such credentialed eugenicists having myriad conflicts of interests, it is reasonable to ask for an investigation into whether this particular US bioweapons lab at the geographical epicentre of the current Ebola outbreak actually caused the Ebola outbreak.

In 2009, Baxter in Austria was caught contaminating 72 kilos of seasonal flu with the deadly bird flu virus in its biosecurity level 3 laboratory. It later emerged from documents posted on Wikileaks that Baxter was a US defense or military asset. As for Jane Burgermeister, the whistleblowing Austrian journalist responsible for the scoop as well as potentially saving the lives of thousands or even millions of people in Europe, she was nearly committed to a mental institution for taking on the medical mafia. And the brainwashed multitudes continue to make fun of conspiracy theorists, while heroes and heroines like Jane Burgermeister continue to save their undeserving bacon. In fact, documents as well as current mainstream media hype point to plans for false flag Ebola bioterrorism attacks in hospitals and clinics against US and UK citizens using occasions like the Commonwealth Games in Scotland to spread panic, but as usual the complacent public continues to be wooed by the bread and circuses, proving that we haven’t advanced one step since the Roman era and are as shallow as ever. The ultimate purpose of all this pseudo-science on Ebola is to implement martial law measures contained in epidemic and pandemic plans and so gain total control of the population at a time when the financial system is close to collapse.

Given that the pharmaceutical cartel is complicit in all this, one really needs to ask if it’s beneficial to rely on their so-called medicine. It doesn’t look like it to be fair and to be frank. In fact, the word ‘pharmacy’ is derived from the Greek pharmakon, which means ‘remedy’ and ‘poison’. How charming. The whole pharmaceutical medical paradigm is based on prescribing a poison to recommend a cure. And they have the audacity to call so-called “alternative” medicine practitioners snake oil salesmen, when Parlaselsis, the father of modern pharmaceutical medicine was an alchemist, who was experimenting with the same poisonous substances used in smelting – copper sulfide, zinc, lead, mercury, etc. – to remove impurities from the body.

As for the pseudo-science of AIDS treatment, it’s astounding how true it is that the blind are lead by the blind. There is no empirical evidence whatsoever that anyone is HIV-positive, since the virus is too microscopic to be detected so we are told. In fact, the test to verify if someone is HIV-postive tests for HIV-related antibodies, not the virus itself. However, there is no way of proving that the antibodies in question are HIV-related, when the virus is alleged to have an exceptionally high rate of mutation. If that is so, how can it be definitively shown that the virus is HIV-related when it could just as easily be there for some other pathogen as innocuous as the common cold? The cases of false positives are well documented. It has also been shown that the seven year period when AZT drug cocktails were the recommended treatment for HIV/AIDS patients was the peak period for AIDS-related deaths in Canada. AZT was a chemotherapy treatment that had been shelved back in the 70’s because it was found to be so reactive and dangerous that it was found to be unsafe. Yet when people were given the falsely grim prognosis of AIDS, they were willing to put up with the agonizing and harmful side effects of AZT under the false proviso that it would give them a fighting chance. It did no such thing. In fact, it is well known that chemotherapy weakens the immune system, and since this was such a reactive and dangerous brand of chemo, it literally destroyed the immune system of the patients it was meant to treat. In other words, the patients died of MIDS (Medicine Induced Immune Deficiency Syndrome). Yet the deaths were listed on the medical charts as AIDS-related.    

Today they prescribe anti-retroviral medications, which like AZT drug cocktails, prescribed in the 80s, patients are advised to take, even though they have no observable signs of being sick, since they have not yet developed AIDS. Instead, they are told that the drugs will delay the onset of AIDS. How can they ever empirically verify that this is the case, when the patient will at some point develop the full blown AIDS symptoms? Where is the evidence that the prescription has actually done what it was prescribed to do? And this is empirical science? Please.

Medicine needs to be liberated from the yoke of the eugenicists. They have created a three-tier system of medicine on the planet. The first tier elite have access to homeopathic and naturopathic remedies that they know are more beneficial to health. Meanwhile, the servile masses in the so-called First World developed countries are issued harmful allopathic pharmaceutical medicines, which are meant to shorten or even end their lives. The vaccines certainly due that, and by Bill Gates own admission, are meant to do just that. He is quoted as saying, “The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s heading up to about nine billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that number by ten or fifteen percent.” This proves vaccines are not for keeping people alive, but for killing off as many as possible. Have you seen what’s in them? Visit the Center for Disease Control website and have a look. Whatever they’re supposed to prevent they give you. How can you ever prove they did or didn’t? All the pharmaceutical mafia has to say is that it didn’t work as effectively as they had hoped. Merck is in bed with the CIA’s bioweapons program and so is the Gates Foundation. Gates is a deep cover CIA operative. He is a genocidal monster worse than anything the AshkeNAZIs could cook up (pardon the pun). As for the Third World, they are relegated to the third tier of medicine, which isn’t medicine at all but poison. All the eugenicists’ poisons are tried out on the poor to see how successful they are at killing masses of humanity. If they work successfully, they try them out on the undesirable population segments in the so-called developed world, such as gays, who got the brunt of the Hepatitis B vaccine trials undertaken Stateside, which unleashed the scourge of HIV/AIDS on American homosexuals.

The world needs a new paradigm of medicine that embraces the metaphysician. What is meant by this term in this context? The word means “beyond the physic” so a metaphysician would be a physician of the human spirit and astral body. Healing must happen at both levels if it is to be effective: the physical and the spiritual. Children should be learning Tai Chi and Yoga in school and practicing it. They should be taught yoga meditation for peace of mind and clarity of perception. Would the narrow-minded so-called educators taught under their own limited worldview of western science even consider this? They might now that they are all dropping like flies from Ebola, AIDS and other diseases. Their arrogant dismissal of other medical paradigms may soon turn into a desperate appeal for help.

Gandhi: Illuminati Agent & Deception through Subterfuge

Gandhi: Illuminati Agent Deception through Subterfuge

By Timothy Spearman

The best person to bring on side in any political cause is a man of God or holy man. Nothing grants greater credibility to a cause than a man of God who swears by God to be a vessel of the truth and a proponent of righteousness. In the case of a Christian community, the mere sight of a collar, cross, ministerial garb and other accoutrements of the Christian leader inspire a certain reverence among his flock and a feeling of awe mixed with unease or even fear. The Satragraya movement would definitely have benefited from such an influential religious figure and certainly would have wished to recruit one to the cause. Reverend J.J. Doke, missionary and opportunistic converter of the multitudes would have jumped at the chance to serve a popular movement of the masses such as Satragraya. He would have equally wished to convert a figure like Mahatma Gandhi to his religion in order to initiate mass conversions under the leadership of a human rights proponent he would single-handedly portray as a saint in his own Gandhi biography. Gandhi never did convert to Christianity as Reverend Doke, the consummate religious opportunist, had hoped, but he did function, as Doke had wished, as a Christian paradigm of Doke’s own invention, a modern day saint who would give Christianity the hormone injection it required. In essence, Doke was a kind of Pygmalion who had fashioned a saint in his own image. Gandhi was an invention who would convince the Christian world that the miracle of Christ really had been possible. If the miracles of healing the lame and feeding the multitudes could be recapitulated in the form of a modern day miracle, people’s faith in Christ would be restored and the churches would be filled once more. Gandhi couldn’t walk on water, heal the lame and blind, or turn water into wine, but what the Satragraya movement would prove through the public relations campaign orchestrated by Doke is that he was capable of performing a modern day miracle: Defeating an imperialist power through passive resistance. The Satragraya movement would have with equal fervor wished to bring a man of God into its fold who would give its cause the legitimacy it sought, a man of the cloth whose reputation would precede him and with sufficient power to convince the masses that, his word being as good as gold, the movement for which he stood really was legitimate.

Doke’s letter to The Transvaal Leader on the “Immigrants Restriction Act” and “peace preservation permits” shows how politically savvy he actually is. The language he employs in his letter to the editor is calculating and manipulative. It is intended to elicit shame in the white rulers of South Africa by highlighting how reasonable the Asiatics and their demands really are. A certain degree of irony can be detected sufficient to inflict the appropriate sting. What in essence Doke implies in the letter is that the Asiatics are not protesting laws that violate their basic human rights, but only the practice of leaving the decision in the hands of officials subject to racial bias and questionable ethics. The letter implies that the Asiatics wish their cases to be referred to legitimate courts and that they be granted the right of appeal. The irony of course is that, if the Asiatics were actually to be given such entitlements, it would be tantamount to granting them the very human rights they see themselves as being denied. The strategy employed in Doke’s letter is admirably sophisticated, but not entirely genuine in import by being so:

The Asiatics claim simply the interpretation and protection of the Supreme Court. They do not resent the “Immigration Restriction Act”. They only claim that it be notinterpreted by any official, however exalted he may be, but by the recognized Court, and by that judgement they will stand.

They do not resent the rejection of Asiatics by Mr. Chamney, and their deportation, but but they claim that no official shall be made supreme. They ask for the right of appeal in such cases to the well-balanced judgement of a properly constituted tribunal.

(Rev. J.J. Doke’s Letter to “The Transvaal Leader”, July 4, 1908, p. 495, Appendix III in Vol. 8)

What the letter shows is that, while a man of the cloth, Doke is a political animal. His use of language is highly manipulative and far from genuine. Granted, the cause is just, but the language employed is conceived in the spirit of the ends justifying the means. He is not being entirely genuine. This in itself is no fault. The point we are making is that he is politically savvy and a master propagandist. He is also given to employing language in a manipulative and even coercive fashion. We present this as evidence that he is capable of being manipulative or even lying to get what he wants. From a means-ends standpoint this can be justified if the cause is just. This we do not dispute. We simply wish to show that there is no reason for believing that this man of the cloth is above lying. There is a tendency for scholars and the reading public to be persuaded that the good reverend’s biography of Gandhi is entirely genuine and aboveboard because it is written by a man of the cloth, but we intend to show that it is not written to be a genuine account at all, but rather as ‘an experiment with the truth’ to use Gandhi’s own language. Experimenting with the truth in essence is to experiment with a lie, since to employ disparate versions of the truth in order to witness their effect is tantamount to telling lies to observe their effect. Hitler’s maxim that the bigger the lie the more people will believe it is apropos in the case of Gandhi and that of Doke, the master manipulator.

There is another question to examine in relation to Doke’s Gandhi biography. Is it professional for a biographer to establish a friendship with his subject? Additionally, is it appropriate from the standpoint of professional ethics to associate oneself with the political movement of the biographical subject? Is it acceptable for a professional biographer to be part of the same political struggle as the biographical subject? Is there a conflict of interests in writing a biography on a subject with whom you are both a friend and a professional colleague? There are such instances of course, but is it ethical from a professional standpoint? One of the authors of this book knows of a case in which a chancellor of a Korean university commissioned a famous Indian diplomat and intimate acquaintance of his to write a biography on him. The Korean university chancellor it turns out was a political opportunist, who built a U.N. sponsored graduate institute of peace studies on land he had appropriated from local villagers, who ended up being displaced and in poverty at the price of his fame. Currying favor with the U.N. and American elite, he was maneuvering into position for a Nobel Peace Prize. If he wins, he will be in the good company of other corrupt laureates such as Henry Kissinger and Kim Dae Jung. Thankfully, the Indian diplomat eventually declined the offer to write a biography on the chancellor. He apparently regarded the biography as one too many conflicts of interest on the part of the chancellor.

Doke’s biography M.K. Gandhi: The Story of an Indian Patriot in South Africa is dated 1909, yet it can be established from the evidence of several letters written in the year 1908 that an intimate friendship and political alliance had been forged between Gandhi and Doke well in advance of the biography’s publication. The following letter by Gandhi to Rev. Doke dated Oct. 8, 1908 is a fine example:

Dear Mr. Doke,I received your note at Phoenix. The expected has happened. I think it is well. I

have arrived just in time. There were serious differences between two sections here. They are by no means over yet. You will say I have accepted the hospitality before the ‘settings’
were finished. I think it was better that I should do that than that the invitation should be rejected for the sake of the ‘settings’. After all I have done nothing. For six days I may carry on
correspondence. If you think I should answer any questions, you may write. I must now stop as I have
been called away to give digit impressions. Please excuse me to Olive for not writing. I am Yours sincerely,

(112. Letter to J.J. Doke, King Edward’s Hotel, Vokhurst,

Thursday, October 8, 1808, Vol. 9, p.193, 194)

What this letter reveals is that Gandhi has become a friend of the Doke family and is on intimate terms with husband and wife. It is also clear from the letter that Gandhi appeals to Doke for advice and counsel and that they are political colleagues. The fact that Gandhi invites Doke to write to him should he have any questions implies that the reverend has become so intimate an associate that Gandhi’s personal welfare has become a matter of greatest concern to his champion and defender. There is nothing cynical about the friendship and political alliance. What we question is the fact that such a relationship is a conflict of interest from the standpoint of a professional biographer. There is no way that the friendship and political alliance forged between the two men could fail to color the tone of the biography.

A letter from the same year reveals how close the relationship between the two men has become. Gandhi writes to Doke from the Court House. The letter is written in an attempt on Gandhi’s part to relieve his friend of any anxieties he might entertain on his account. The tone of the letter is most consoling:

Dear Mr. Doke, I am writing this from the Court House. I had hoped to be able to send you something before I was fixed up. But I I have been too busy otherwise. I thank you very much for your good wishes. My sole trust is in God. I am therefore quite cheerful.

(121. Letter to J.J. Doke, Volksrust, Wednesday 14, 1908, Vol.9, p. 204, 205)

There is another letter from Doke that shows the great depth of Doke’s friendship and love for Gandhi. The letter is dates September 30, 1908 well before the publication date of the biography. There is no doubt that the friendship has moved well beyond acquaintance and mutual self-interest. A bond has been forged between the two men that is lifelong, so deeply felt on Doke’s part that he would willingly lay down his life for Gandhiji:


Your beautiful present of the Song

Celestial I appreciate very much.

In every respect it is one of the

Choicest treasures which I have –

dainty in appearance – fascinating

in its contents – and of great

value and a momento of a friendship

which I shall always regard with

gratitude. Yes, even if the darling

wish of your heart is fulfilled and

I get into prison for it.

(Rev. J.J. Doke’s Letter to Gandhiji,

11 Sutherland Ave., Johannesburg,

September 30, 1908, Appendix XII, Vol. 9, p.482)


Then we have Rev. J.J. Doke’s letter to the editor of the Rand Daily Mail, in which he protests the arrest of Gandhi. What is clear from the letter is that he has received regular updates from Gandhi on the treatment he has received at the hands of the authorities. This means that no one member of the Satragraya is more concerned with the personal well being of Mahatma Gandhi than Rev. Doke. He has taken it upon himself to be his champion and defender. His good name and standing in the community as a reverend of untarnished respectability would make his letter to the editor both credible and morally persuasive. It is likely that both Gandhi and Doke would have recognized the political expediency of using the merits of a man of the cloth to influence public sentiment. There is no doubt from the tenor of the letter that it is intended to make the citizens raise up in moral outrage:


Yesterday it was necessary that he should

Appear in some case in the Magistrate’s

Court. I understand he was brought there

from the cells, dressed in civilian clothes,

but handcuffed!

Of course, there may be amongst us

those who will be glad to hear that

indignities are being heaped on this great

Indian leader; but I venture to hope that

The great majority of our colonies will

Feel ashamed and angry that a man of

the character and position of Mr.

Gandhi should be needlessly insulted in

this way.

(Marched in Handcuffs, Rev. J.J. Doke’s Letter to “Rand Daily Mail”

Johannesburg, March 11, 1909, Vol.9, p.489)


What emerges from the letter is the fact that Doke has risen to the stature of being Gandhi champion. No matter how politically and socially compromised he might be in the corrupt white establishment of South Africa, he is prepared to put his life and reputation on the line in defense of Gandhi. No higher level of commitment could be shown by one human being to another not in defense of their mutual cause than that shown by Doke to Gandhi and Satragraya.

How did they meet? How did they come to know each other? And under what compunction were they brought together? Was there a fraternity to which they both belonged that preceded Satragraya and the European Committee of which they were both active members? What force drew Doke from New Zealand to South Africa and to seize the hand of his confederate? There is an answer to this and the evidence for it rests with a speech Gandhi gave at a Masonic Hall of all places in Johannesburg. The description of the gathering given below reveals a great deal about the organizations to which Gandhi and Doke were mutually affiliated:


The Masonic Hall, Jepper Street,

Johannesburg, was the scene of a

brilliant mixed gathering of Europeans,

Chinese and Indians on the night of the

18th instant in honour of the British

Indian community. Mr. Hoskin was in

the chair. Mr. Doke was on his right

and Mrs. Doke on his left. Mr. Cachalia

occupied a seat to the right of Mr. Doke.

Mr. Quinn and his Chinese friends were

also present.


The first thing to observe about the preceding description of the banquet is that it was held in a Masonic Lodge and that Mr. Hosken, the leader of the European Committee to which both Gandhi and Doke belong, is the Grand Master of the Masonic Lodge on Jepper Street in Johannesburg where the banquet is being held. We know this because of what is stated in the above passage, that, “Mr. Hosken was in the chair.” This means that he is in the chair where the Worshipful Master or Grand Master of the Masonic Lodge presides. This means that he is a 33rd Degree Freemason and the supreme head of this particular Temple. The fact that Gandhi and Doke are present and that Gandhi is giving a speech in honour of Rev. Doke in a Masonic Lodge hosted by the Grand Master of the Lodge and leader of the European Committee, Mr. Hosken, is strong evidence supporting Gandhi’s and Doke’s Freemason affiliations. The fact that Mr. Hosken is both the Grand Master of the Temple and the leader of the European Committee of which all three are members suggest that the links between the three men go beyond the European Committee to another overriding organization, the very organization in whose Temple the current banquet it is being hosted, namely Freemasonry. We would go even further and suggest that the European Committee is a subcommittee set up by Freemasonry for vested political reasons and toward a defined political goal. The description of the content of Gandhi’s speech given below establishes the Masonic affiliations of all three men beyond doubt:


Speaking of Mr. Doke’s Asiatic work, it

is not possible to refrain from speaking

in praise of the work of the European

Committee of which the chairman (Mr.

Hosken) was the president. Mr. Gandhi

frankly confessed that passive

resistance might have broken down

without the magnificent support

rendered by the European Committee.

(Speech at Banquet to Rev. J.J. Doke,

Indian Opinion, 26-2-1910 and 5-3-1910, Vol. 10, p.420)


What the preceding passage reveals is what it doesn’t reveal, namely, the text of Gandhi’s speech. We only have a description of the speech made at the so-called banquet. While some might object that just because all three men are attending a meeting held in a Masonic Lodge in no way proves that they are Masons, the fact that this is an official meeting and Gandhi’s speech is not available because the meeting is official and secret proves that all three men are Masons. Again, some might argue that just because the meeting is held in a Masonic Temple does not mean that everyone present is a Mason, including possibly some of the Chinese delegates present, the fact that this is an official Masonic meeting is proven by the fact that the text of Gandhi’s speech is not available. We only have the minutes pertaining to the alleged content of Gandhi’s speech. This means that Gandhi’s speech and its contents are secret. Let’s not forget that Freemasonry in its modern form is based on the 33 Degree organizational model founded by Sir Francis Bacon, the founder of her Majesty’s Secret Service, and that like the intelligence organization that was formed under his leadership, Freemasonry is a secret society that is highly secretive. (Francis Bacon’s Personal Life Story) Strong affiliations remain between the world’s intelligence communities and Freemasonry to this day. According to a source formerly in U.S. Naval Intelligence, most of the higher-ranking officers in the American intelligence community are higher degree initiates of Freemasonry. What does this say about Gandhi’s real status? Is he a spy and intelligence asset of the British government assigned to be instrumental in the partitioning of India and Pakistan and that his Freemason affiliations would help him to sell out his own people? We think this very likely and shall endeavor to prove it. What has been shown if not proven beyond a reasonable doubt is that both Gandhi and Doke are Freemasons and that they are attending an official Lodge meeting in which the Lodge members are hosting a farewell dinner for one of their own members, J.J. Doke.

Proving that Gandhi is a Freemason is no easy task considering that the organization has endeavored to suppress the fact with religious zeal, just as it succeeded in suppressing the true authorship of the Shakespeare plays for 400 years. It is provable however. We have Gandhi to thank for revealing the fact in his own words, his own dairy in fact. The overwhelming majority of scholars have a tendency to take everything literally especially from a man whose word is considered as good as gold. The fact is however that much of what Gandhi wrote is in Masonic code. Much of it is to be taken figuratively rather than literally. The following passage is taken from Gandhi’s dairy at a time just before he leaves for London to sit the Bar. What Gandhi is describing here would be interpreted by most scholars as a literal account of a series of accidents that befell him while journeying from place to place. This would not be a correct interpretation. What Gandhi is in fact describing in coded language, which can only be understood by higher degree initiates of Freemasonry or by researchers of Freemasonry, is his initiation to the Third Degree of Freemasonry:


Amidst thoughts, I came unconsciously in

contact with a carriage. I received some

injury. Yet I did not take the help of

anybody in walking. I think I was quite

dizzy. Then we entered the house of

Maghjibhai. There I again came in contact

with a stone unknowingly and received

injury. I was quite senseless. From that

time I did not know what took place, and

after that, I am told by them, I fell flat on

the ground after some steps. I was not

myself for 5 minutes. They considered

I was dead. But fortunately for myself

the ground on which I fell was quite

smooth. I came to my senses at last and

all of them were quite joyful. The mother

was sent for. She was very sorry for me,

and this caused my delay though I told

them that I was quite well. But none

would allow me to go, though I

afterwards came to know that my bold

and dearest mother would have to go.

But she feared the calumny of other


(London Diary, London November 12, 1888, Vol.1, p.4, 5)


What Gandhi is recounting in this diary entry is for Masonic eyes only. Only a fellow Mason or a researcher in the field would be able to interpret the Masonic allusions and there is no doubt that the preceding passage is written in Masonic code. What Gandhi is describing is his own initiation to the Third Degree of Freemasonry. While some might argue that it is a literal description of an accident that befell him while traveling in India, a careful reading of the passage would make such conjecture absurd. Some might even argue that Masonic initiation in the place described would be impossible since no Masonic Temple could be found in such a location, but this is to impute that Gandhi is being as literal about the location as he is about the account itself. The diary entry was made on November 12, 1888 in London, which is revealing in itself. Had the event occurred in India, why would he not have made the diary entry at the time of the event, which had allegedly occurred in India?

First, Gandhi tells us, ‘I came unconsciously in contact with a carriage’. When the first mishap occurred, we are told that he ‘unconsciously’ received a blow to the head. We know he sustained an injury to the head because he says, ‘I think I was quite dizzy’. He would have been unconscious of the event were he blindfolded, which candidates for the Third Degree notoriously are. Then, he tells us that they entered the ‘house of Maghjibhai’, where he sustained another injury to the head, ‘There I again came in contact with a stone unknowingly and received injury.’ This time he uses the word ‘unknowingly’. To this point, he has sustained at least two blows to the head, this time ‘unknowingly’. Were he blindfolded it certainly would be ‘unknowingly’. He would not know what hit him so to speak. He certainly would appear not to be aware of the fact that a stone maul had struck him in the forehead, which would in fact be the case if he were a candidate for the Third Degree.

What is the Third Degree? Many will be familiar with the phrase, ‘They gave him the Third Degree’. Masons initiated to the Third Degree know its significance. It is a ritual death conceived in part to warn the candidate never to betray the Order. Any candidate who betrays the order is given the Third Degree, which in Masonic language means that he is subjected to a ritualized form of torture and assassination. Masons who betray the oath taken in the Third Degree to safeguard the secrets of Freemasonry and not reveal any of its arcane beliefs and practices will be given the Third Degree in fact and not in ritual. The Third Degree has a long history. It is ultimately based on a ritual reenactment of the murder of Hiram Abif, the alleged architect of King Solomon’s Temple. According to the legend, Hiram Abif was confronted by three ruffians in the Temple. The three ruffians are known in Masonic lore as the three Juwes. The three Jewes are Jubelo, Jubela and Jubelum, the alleged assassins of Hiram Abif. According to the story, upon completing his prayers, Hiram Abif prepared to leave the Temple when he was confronted by the three Juwes. The first of the assailants demanded that Hiram reveal the secrets of the Master Mason, but the Master refused. This set into motion such jealous rage in the three aspirants that their anger turned violent with deadly consequences. The story of what occurred is here recorded by researchers with Masonic affiliations:


His devotions being ended, he prepared to retire

by the south gate, where he was accosted by

the first of these ruffians, who, for want of a

better weapon, had armed himself with a plumb

rule, and in a threatening manner demanded of

our Master…the genuine secrets of (Grand

Geometrician), warning him that death would be

the consequence of his refusal; but true to his

obligation he replied that those secrets were

known to but three in the world and that without

the consent of the other two, he neither could,

nor would divulge them…

This answer not proving satisfactory, the

Ruffian aimed a violent blow at out Master’s

forehead, but startled by the firmness of his

demeanour, it only glanced down the right

temple. Yet with sufficient force to cause him

to reel and sink to the ground on his left knee.

Recovering himself from this situation, he

rushed to the west gate where he stood

opposed by the second ruffian, to whom he

replied as before, yet with undiminished

firmness when the ruffian, who was armed

with a level struck a violent blow on the left

temple which brought him to the ground on

his right knee.

Finding all chances of escape in both

these quarters cut off, our Master staggered,

faint and bleeding, to the east gate where

the third ruffian was posted and who, on

receiving a similar reply to his insolent

demand…struck him a violent blow full in

the center of the forehead with a heavy

stone maul, which laid him lifeless at his


(The Hiram Key, p.175)


It is clear from the preceding passage that Hiram Abif was given three blows to the head, the first to either temple and the third and fatal deathblow to the forehead with a stone maul. To review the passage from Gandhi’s diary entry, he states that it was inside the ‘house of Meghjihai’ that he received a blow from a stone, ‘There I again came in contact with a stone unknowingly and received injury’. We are certain the reader will agree that to receive a blow from a stone inside the ‘house of Meghjibhai’ is a rather unusual place to suffer from such a mishap, unless of course you are a Freemason undergoing the third in a succession of ritual blows in the Third Degree of initiation inside a Masonic Temple. Nor would it be so unheard of if the stone were in fact a stone maul used to administer the ritualistic fatal blow to the forehead in ritual of the Third Degree. Following the blow received from the stone (or stone maul), Gandhi stumbles and falls ‘flat on the ground’ we are told. We are then informed that he was unconscious for five minutes. ‘I was not myself for 5 minutes,’ he informs us, adding, ‘They considered I was dead.’ Since the candidate for the Third Degree is undergoing his own ritual death, it would be natural for his brethren to regard him as symbolically dead at this point in the ritual. Then Gandhi informs us that he escapes serious injury because of the smoothness of the floor, ‘But fortunately for myself the ground on which I fell was quite smooth.’ Indeed, the floor would have been quite smooth had he fallen on solid masonry, which the floor of a Masonic Temple would most assuredly be. Then he informs us that his brethren were overjoyed when he regained his senses, ‘I came to my senses at last and all of them were quite joyful.’ The relevance of this is that the Third Degree ceremony culminates with the Worshipful Master removing the blindfold so the candidate of the Third Degree can gaze upon his own burial shroud containing the skull and crossbones. He would then be raised from the dead in a raising ceremony at which point his fellow Masons who raise a cheer of rejoicing. Following this, Gandhi informs us that, ‘The mother was sent for.’ It is no accident that he uses the definite article ‘The’ before ‘mother’. Why would he not say, ‘My mother was sent for’? This is because the language is intended to be ambiguous. To the uninitiated, ‘mother’ is an allusion to his mother. Thus, it is his mother who is being sent for. To the initiated, ‘The mother’ refers not to Gandhi’s own mother, but to ‘The Widow’ of which all Masons claim to be the sons. According to Masonic lore, Hiram Abif was the Widow’s son. Many Masons even refer to themselves as ‘the Widow’s sons’ or ‘the sons of the widow’. Gandhi informs us that, ‘she was very sorry for me’, as of course the widow would most assuredly be for her martyred son. He then informs us, ‘But none would allow me to go, though I afterwards came to know that my bold and dearest mother would have allowed me to go.’ This is in fact all Masonic code for the Widow wishing to set her son, Hiram Abif, at liberty, since ‘liberty, fraternity and equality’ are said to be the motto Masons swear by. The passage ends with Gandhi telling us of his mother entertaining fears on account of her son: ‘But she feared the calumny of other people,’ which the Widow most assuredly done having a portent of what awaited her martyr son.



Is there any evidence that Lord Ampthill had any connection with the European Committee? Well, as the president of the South African British Indian Committee, he would have most certainly had dealings the European Committee, of which Mr. Hosken was the head, since the record attests to his dealings with another European Committee member, namely Gandhi. In one letter, Gandhi actually appeals to Lord Ampthill to meet with the South African politicians, which suggests that at some point the esteemed member of the House of Lords, probably came into contact with several prominent political figures in South Africa:


At the same time, I respectfully venture

to think that, if somehow or other you

could come in personal contact with the

South African politicians, it will be

useful for future action in connection

with the Imperial work that you, as

President of the South Africa British

Indian Committee, are engaged in.

(Letter to Lord Ampthill #247,

London July 21, 1909, CWMG, Vol. 9, p.431)


Is there any evidence that Lord Ampthill knew or had ever met Doke, though he denies it? Considering that Doke was so strong a supporter of Gandhi’s, a committed proponent of Satragraya, the editor of Gandhi’s own newspaper the Indian Opinion, and an activist for the Indian cause in the Transvaal, it stands to reason that Doke would be connected with the delegation accompanying Gandhi to London to present a deposition before Parliament on the question of Indian immigration to the Transvaal. As the President of the South African British Indian Committee, Lord Ampthill had taken personal charge of the deposition opposing the Act of 1907, a Bill that enforced strict restrictions on Indian immigration to the Transvaal. In the following letter, Gandhi thanks Lord Ampthill for his continued support for the Indian cause to which he has made his own to use Gandhi’s own phraseology:


I am extremely obliged to Your Lordship

for the very great trouble you are

taking over the Indian cause in the

Transvaal which you have made your own.

(Letter to Lord Ampthill #260, London,

July 29, 1909, Vol.9, p.447)


Gandhi then informs Lord Ampthill that he has prepared a deputation letter to place before parliament, but that he will appeal to the Lord’s judgment before sending it:


I am enclosing statement in proof from

because, in anticipation of Your

Lordship’s approval, it was sent to

the printer’s yesterday, but it will

not be published or submitted without

consultation with Your Lordship.



Then, in response to Lord Ampthill’s concerns that Gandhi’s movement of “passive resistance” might have ties with radical organizations in India, Gandhi flatly denies any such affiliation, referring to Rev. Doke for vindication:


The test of passive resistance is

self-suffering and not infliction

of suffering on others. We have,

therefore, not only never received

a single farthing from “the party

of sedition” in India or else-where,

but even if there was any offer, we

should, if we were true to our

principles, decline to receive it.

We have hitherto made it a point

not to approach the Indian public

in India for financial assistance.

The accounts of the British Indian

Association are open to the world.

A statement of income expenditure

is published from time to time and

is advertised in Indian Opinion.

Mr. Doke, Mr. Philips, and the

Other notable men who are working

in the Transvaal for us, know this

fact most intimately…

(Ibid. p.448, 449, Vol. 9)


In Lord Ampthill’s foreword to Doke’s biography, he denied having any connection to Doke, claiming not to know him personally. One wonders how this is possible if Gandhi is seeking vindication through the good reverend’s character. Why would Gandhi even refer to Rev. Doke unless he was known to Lord Ampthill personally and sufficiently for him to act as a meaningful character witness on Gandhi’s behalf? It is interesting to note that the preceding letter to Lord Ampthill is dated July 29, 1909, exactly 11 days before Gandhi would send another letter to the esteemed Lord asking him to write the foreword for the Doke biography. Gandhi’s letter of request appears below:


Dear Lord Ampthill,

I have now received the somewhat

delayed proof of the Rev. Mr. Doke’s

book, which I am very anxious to see

published as early as possible. I

might mention in passing that I have

received a number of subscriptions

in advance.

I know you are very busy and I have

hesitated to burden you further

with the writing of the introduction,

which you were good enough to promise,

if the proof should meet with your

approval. Nevertheless you will I

hope, find time – as I am sure you

have the desire – to give this matter

your very kind attention.

I am forwarding the proof under

separate cover.

(Letter to Lord Ampthill # 9,

London, August 9, 1909, p.15, Vol. 10)


Later, Gandhi would refer to Doke yet again, this time in a letter following the preceding one requesting a foreword from Lord Ampthill. The letter is dated October, 14, 1909, some two months after the preceding letter. Here, Gandhi mentions Rev. Doke so casually one must question Lord Ampthill’s claim not to know the reverend:


Mr. Doke, in a letter to me, says

that passive resisters have never

been so strong as they were when

his letter left South Africa.

(Letter to Lord Ampthill # 109,

London, Oct. 14, 1909, p.106, Vol.10)


It is undeniable that the reference to Doke is of so casual a description that one is forced to recognize the open familiarity Gandhi has in alluding to their mutual acquaintance. Doke cannot, as Lord Ampthill alleges, be unknown to him.


Indeed, the tale just keeps getting taller. Not only do the letters Gandhi exchanges with Lord Ampthill catch the esteemed Lord out in a lie, but they entrap Gandhi in one of his own. We will now explore this as it is central to the question of Gandhi’s truthfulness and reliability as a witness offering sworn testimony. When questioned about his connections with radical groups in India, Gandhi defends himself against such charges in several letters to Lord Ampthill. In one such letter dated August 4th, 1909, just five days before he would write to Lord Ampthill requesting that he write a foreword for the Doke biography, Gandhi is obviously anxious to win vindication and for good reason. The concluding part of the letter reads as follows:


I am fully aware of the allegation

that we are acting in co-operation

with the extremist party in India.

I however give Your Lordship the

emphatic assurance that the charge

is totally without foundation.

Indian passive resistance in the

Transvaal had its rise in that

Colony and has been continued

absolutely independent of anything

that is being said or done in

India; indeed, sometimes, even in

defiance of what has been said or

written to the contrary in India

or elsewhere. Our movement is

absolutely unconnected with any

ex(tremist movement in India). I

do not know the extremists

per(sonally)… is the Moslem League

and some time Secretary in London

of the Pan-Islamic Society, and

this correspondence has been carried

on with a view to interesting Indian

opinion in our matter and arousing

public sympathy.

(Letter to Lord Ampthill # 256

London, August 4, 1909, p.457, 458, Vol.9)


Gandhi equivocates on the issue. He claims not to know any extremists personally and then indicates at the end of the letter that he has some acquaintance with an individual affiliated with the Moslem League and the Pan-Islamic Society, but justifies his correspondence with this individual by claiming to desire to gain intelligence on Indian opinion concerning his cause and also with a view to arousing public sympathy. Now if that isn’t double talk, we would like someone to advise us on what is.


Gandhi’s double talk doesn’t end there, since we have an actual letter he personally wrote to the London Branch of the Indian Moslem League. Gandhi cannot escape the charge of being guilty of double talk on this question. He states unequivocally that he and his organization have no association with any radical organizations operating in India or outside and yet the following letter proves that correspondence does take place between his organization and one of those deemed radical and violent, namely, the Indian Moslem League. Gandhi’s letter to the London branch of this organization reads as follows:


Dear Sir,

The Transvaal deputation have received

The following cablegram from Johannesburg:


Meeting held yesterday enthusiastic,

determined continue, resolutions

congratulating released, reaffirming

complete confidence delegates, efforts

greatly appreciated, afresh pledging

their support, protesting Vernon’s

statement which until Government

repudiates Asiatics interpret disclosure

Government policy. Request imprisoned

Mohammedans special meal Ramzan refused.


I draw your particular attention to the

last paragraph of the cablegram, which

shows that the Transvaal Government have

deeply hurt the religious susceptibilities

of British Indian Mohammedans who have

settled in the Transvaal, who have felt

called upon, on religious and conscientious

grounds, to disregard what is known as the

Asiatic Act and to suffer imprisonment for

their so doing.

That under the British flag, which is

supposed to respect all religions,

Mohammedan passive resisters should be

prevented from performing a religious

observance of the highest importance is a

very serious matter. I hope that the

League will take prompt action.

I may point out that last year, at

Volkhurst, facilities were given to

passive resisters during the month of

Ramzan. (Draft Letter to London Branch

Of Indian Moslem League # 72, p.100, 101, Vol.10)


The duplicitous nature of this letter could not be more obvious. The tone of the letter is clearly inflammatory and specifically designed to provoke and instigate. Gandhi’s manipulative reference to human and religious rights violations of Mohammedans by the Transvaal Government is calculated to provoke a violent response. Not only does he mention the imprisonment of Mohammedans, but the denial of their rights to religious practice and diet. Gandhi adds, “I hope that the League will take prompt action.” To instigate conflict and incite a radical organization to prompt and decisive action is none other than to call for and incite violence. And this is the true face behind the mask of divinity. This is the quintessential Gandhi, the two-faced Gandhi, the duplicitous double talker. While posturing outwardly as a pacifist with no appetite for blood whatsoever, he was covertly acting as a man of war and instigator of terrorism. Col. G.B. Singh’s book, Gandhi: Behind the Mask of Divinity has already implicated Gandhi in a bloody suppression of African Zulus. A shrewd investigator might also ask why photos of Gandhi in his British colonel uniform have not been as easy to come by as those depicting the Hindu saint in a loincloth.


Now, if Gandhi did have Freemason affiliations as we allege, this would explain his duplicitous Orwellian doublespeak and double talk. The Masons have always employed such tactics. It is their modus operandi to present a good outward façade, while concealing the shady and criminal underworld activities of the world’s largest and most powerful crime syndicate. This is what is symbolized by the black and white squares found on the floors of every Masonic Temple and on the police caps of so many of the world’s police forces. It symbolizes the fact that the Masons control both sides, the light and the dark forces, that they supply arm to both sides in wars, play both sides of the fence, and engage in black operations as their basic modus operandi.


Before going underground and changing their name, the modern day Freemasons were known as the Knights Templar. An early Templar family known as the House of Guise and Lorraine had a unique Coat-of-Arms consisting of a “double cross”. This Coat-of-Arms came to be associated with their modus operandi, which consisted of betraying or double-crossing both sides in wars by covertly arming both sides. Supplying gold and arms to one king to which they pretended to be loyal, they would simultaneously turn around and arm his opponent. Duplicity and double-dealing came to be so closely associated with this family that the “double cross” came to mean betray, cheat, or deceive someone. (David Icke, And the Truth Shall Set You Free) As a probable heir by succession to crooks in a criminal organization of longstanding, Gandhi was probably well trained in the arts of deception, duplicity and intrigue, and pulled it off with masterful precision.


While denying any affiliation to radical organizations in several letters to Lord Ampthill, Gandhi later confesses to having limited contact with the Moslem League, but employs more double talk in an effort at self-justification.


Opposed as I am to violence in any

shade or form, I have endeavoured

specially to come into contact with

the so-called extremists who may be

described as the party of violence.

This I have done in order if

possible to convince them of the

error of their ways. I have noticed

that some of the members of this

party are earnest spirits,

possessing a high degree of morality,

great intellectual ability and lofty

self-sacrifice. They wield an

undoubted influence on the young

Indians here. They are certainly

unsparing in their efforts to impress

upon the latter their convictions.

One of them came to me with a view to

convince me that I was wrong in my

methods and that nothing but the use

of violence, covert or open or both,

was likely to bring about redress of

the wrongs they consider they suffer.

(Letter to Lord Ampthill,

London Oct. 30, 1909, p.201, Vol.10)


We quote the passage in full in order to give it fair and objective reading. We have no intention of misleading anyone. Notice the diplomatic tone of the letter entirely lacking in the letter to the London Branch of the Moslem League. Gandhi ends by referring to “the wrongs they consider they suffer,” ‘they’ being the Moslems. While diplomatically alluding to such wrongs as a matter of perspective in the letter to Lord Ampthill, Gandhi is unequivocal and rather highhanded in condemning such behavior in the letter to the Moslem League. Gandhi is highly skilled at playing both sides of the fence. In this letter, he endeavors to convince Ampthill that there are high-minded members of this Moslem terrorist organization, individuals with which he can both converse and reason with. This begs the question of course, since he claims to be incommunicado with any such organizations yet appears to know those in the command structure of at least one terrorist organization well enough to describe their characters and thinking.


Suffice to say that Gandhi and Ampthill are not putting all their cards on the table. Suffice to say both men have something hidden up their sleeves. Lord Ampthill appears to wish to conceal his association with Rev. Doke, while Gandhi appears to want to conceal his associations with radical pro-independence terrorist organizations in India. Why all the secrecy? Why all the doubletalk, duplicity and lies? Well, In Gandhi’s case, it is essential that Gandhi conceal his affiliations to terrorist organizations back home if he is to win Lord Ampthill over to the cause. The tone of his letters to Lord Ampthill seem somehow obsequious and overly deferential. The fact that Gandhi cuts off all correspondence with Ampthill after getting what he wants only highlights the insincere nature of the correspondence.


Probably the most influential figure of the pro-independence drive in the post-colonial period is M.K. Gandhi, more famously referred to as the Mahatma. In the 1890’s, the young Gandhi set off to London to study law. His London Diary recorded the events of this time in his life, but despite the painstaking efforts of scholars to preserve his writings for posterity, all but 20 pages of The London Diary went missing. The surviving pages describe Gandhi’s initiation to the Third Degree of Freemasonry. It is apparently his Freemason diary. It in all probability describes his initiation through the several degrees of the organization. Why has the volume been suppressed? Is it to conceal Gandhi’s Freemason affiliations? Gandhi is a far more complex figure than anyone seems to have imagined. The recent book Gandhi Under Cross-examination exposes the fact that Gandhi lied about the racial train and coach incident, where he was purportedly thrown off a train at Pietermaritzburg Station. The Editor-in-Chief of Gandhi’s own Indian Opinion newspaper, Rev. J.J. Doke, wrote the biography, opportunistically turning Gandhi into a martyred saint for political motivations. By comparing the four biographical and autobiographical accounts of the incident, the authors of Gandhi Under Cross-examination discover the fraud Gandhi committed on the world’s citizens. Under cross-examination, Gandhi is exposed as a fraudster, who has lied about his past in order to exploit the politics of victimization to gain political advantage. This is an effective counterpoint to the later real-life trail of Gandhi’s assassin, Natharam Godse. In the 1890’s in South Africa, Gandhi addressed a body of fellow Indians in a town hall in Johannesburg. He raises a motion for a permanent Indian militia in South Africa. He proposes forming a volunteer ambulance corps of Indian stretcher-bearers to convince the British that they are loyal followers of the British Empire, in order to gain the permission of His Majesty’s government to found a permanent India militia. Gandhi becomes a sergeant major in the British Army. His ambulance team joins the British in their effort to suppress a “Kaffir” uprising in South Africa. Gandhi acts as a recruitment officer for the British Army in the Boar War, WWI and WWII and as an apologist for the British Empire in his Indian Opinion newspaper. We also know that Gandhi had secret meetings with arms dealers and a Muslim terrorist organization known as the Muslim League. Two attempts on the life of Gandhi are made in close succession. Assassins are dispatched from Lincoln’s Inn in London, one of the Inns of Court and law schools for the elite. The first murder attempt fails, but the second succeeds. Gandhi is assassinated and Natharam Godse is arrested in the square before hordes of onlookers. He surrenders, compliantly raising his hands over his head in surrender and hands his weapon over to the authorities. Gopal Godse, brother of Gandhi assassin, Natharam Godse, wrote a book called May It Please Your Honour based on the courtroom testimony of his brother, which the world never got to hear. Natharam Godse conducted his own defence in the hope that he might present his true motivations to the world. He conducted his own defence, but the Congress Party of India ensured that not a word of Godse’s testimony was published in any of the Indian newspapers. The police steal the notebooks out of the reporters’ hands and destroy them on the spot, issuing a stern warning not to print a single word of Godse’s testimony in any of the national newspapers. Godse’s courtroom testimony brought tears to the eyes of the packed gallery. Sobs conveying the deep emotion of those present could be heard throughout the court according to the testimony offered by Natharam Godse’s brother. Godse testified that Gandhi was in regular correspondence with known terrorists, including the head of the Muslim League, a terrorist organization responsible for slaughtering thousands of innocent civilians, especially in Calcutta. He also alleges that Gandhi conspired with the Amir of Afghanistan to front an invasion of India in order to found a Muslim caliphate, but the plot was somehow thwarted before it could be realized. Gandhi welcomed the Ali Brothers as he would his own brothers. He welcomed them and their planned invasion. He welcomed the Amir of Afghanistan and his army. He welcomed the establishment of a permanent Caliphate in India. He believed it would make India a more orderly society, disciplined while enforcing high standards of morality, along with stability and peace. This is the same reason Gandhi promoted Hindustani as the lingua franca of India. This is the tongue that would bind both Hindus and Muslims together. Hindustani is Urdu under a different name. Godse understood that this was subterfuge. It was communalism of the worst kind. It amounted to the Islamizing of India. He accused Gandhi of lacking the courage to call for the adoption of Urdu as the national language, hence the subterfuge of smuggling Urdu in under another name. To bolster up a language in the school curriculum and grant a bastard tongue a pedigree is insanity of the highest order. Forcing a foreign tongue upon a great nation like India was seen as treasonous to Godse and one of the prime motivations for the assassination. Mr. Shastri, Mr. C.Y. Chintamani, the editor of Allahabad and even the Mahatma’s lifelong friend, the late C.F. Andrews, confirmed that Gandhi’s speeches and writings added up to an open invitation to the Amir of Afghanistan to invade India. It was de facto high treason. Is there another word for a leader plotting to have his country invaded by an alien power? The only explanation is that he had formed a secret pact with Shiekh Abdullah. Under his orders, the administrative power of Kashmir would be placed in the hands of Muslims. For this reason and this reason alone, Gandhi consented to armed resistance by the Indian forces to the Pakistani raiders of Kashmir. It was a coup d’etat and in the process he had signed Kashmir away. The motherland was destined to lose half its territory. It was the most monstrous act of treason in the history of the world, yet the perpetrator continues to be celebrated around the world as a martyr and saint. Instead of fasting to stem the tide of the Pakistani invasion or practicing Satyagraya in the face of an armed Muslim invasion, Gandhi instead fasted because a handful of Muslims did not feel safe in Delhi. All of his fasts were orchestrated to coerce Hindus, but never once did he show the courage to stand up to the more aggressive Muslim population. He persistently embraced a policy of appeasement. His collusion with Muslim forces knew no bounds. How else could he have allied himself to the Ali brothers and their treasonous plot to bring ruin to India through the invasion of the Amir of Afghanistan? In 1919, the Government of India Act was overshadowed by the Jallianwalla Bagh Tragedy. Though the incident happened long ago, it is fresh in the minds of the people who lost loved ones and have hearts enough to know what it must feel like to lose a loved one. Hundreds of men, women and children were shot dead that day at the orders of General Dyer for the mere crime of holding a peaceful demonstration against the Rowlatt Act. Sir Michael O’Dwyer became notorious for his callous and unscrupulous reprisals against anyone who denounced or opposed the Rowlatt Act. The apologists have lost the argument in excusing these acts as those of misguided fanatics in breach of the proper chain of command. This man was a ‘Sir’, a knight and a peer of the realm. This means that he and his policies had the endorsement of the British establishment and the blessing of the King. Twenty years later he would pay for his crimes, when he was shot dead in London by Udham Singh. While terrorism can never be condoned or endorsed, it is necessary to recognize that the actions of the Chafekar brothers of Maharashtra, Shamji Krishna Verma, Lala Hardayal, Virendranath Chatapadhyaya, Rash Behari Bose, Babu Arvind Ghosh, Khudiram Bose, Ulhaskar Datta, Madalal Dhingra, Kanhere, Bhagat Singh, Rajguru, Sukhdeo, and Chadrashekhar Azad were all done in response to government-sponsored terrorism under the yoke of foreign occupation. There is a subtle distinction to be made between pro-independence freedom-fighters and “terrorists”. Bhagat Singh successfully disrupted the proceedings of the Legislative Assembly in the 1929 bombing incident. Does this make him a “terrorist” or a pro-independence freedom fighter? The Hindu-Muslim unity Gandhi claimed to covet so strongly was now a fleeting mirage. If Godse’s defence were on public record, everyone would know the truth. If the press had not been muzzled, the word would be out. Instead, the treasonous Congress Party suppressed the truth and prevented the face behind the mask of divinity from being revealed. Perhaps most notably, he accuses Gandhi of leaving his own Hindu population to be helplessly slaughtered in the streets by the Muslim League, the infamous terrorist organization without recourse to a militia or the dispatch of a civil defence unit. Any sane and competent leader would call for the impeachment of a government that allowed such outrages as the slaughter of innocent women and children to go on under its own nose. But what did Gandhi do according to Godse? He went to Calcutta not to oppose the violence and speak out against it, but to enter into a strange contractual friendship with the author of these massacres. He even went so far as to defend Premier Suhrawardy’s government and the Muslim League, a notoriously brutal terrorist organization. During the three-day massacre, when both person and property were being violated in the most brutal fashion, Gandhi did and said nothing. Is it non-violence to let innocent civilians be put to the sword, sliced up under the blade and thrown to the dogs for meat? Passivism is not the answer clearly. Maintaining a balance of power and assuring the peace through a system of checks and balances and an armed militia in the hands of all defensible populations is the best was to secure the peace. Leaving people defenceless through an enforced policy of non-violence leaves them vulnerable paradoxically to the very violence one seeks to avoid. Innocent men, women and children were cut down in the streets of Calcutta because there was not even the presence of an armed guard to offer a defence against armed terrorists, let alone a proper response to their violent outrages. Godse also cited speeches in which Gandhi absurdly encouraged Hindu refugees to return to Pakistan during the pro-Muslim independence drive and face their fates, even if it meant being cut down by their Muslim brothers. He even made absurd references to Hindu scripture to justify this logical fallacy. Godse also implicated Gandhi in the partitioning of India and Pakistan, another act of high treason according to Godse. Amazingly, Godse further argued that Gandhi’s Satragraya campaign of non-violent resistance to British rule only succeeded in forestalling independence by forty years by taking all the steam out of the militant movement to create home rule. The Rowlatt Report went on at great length about the strength of the independence movement. The revolutionaries had gained the upper hand and the British knew it. From 1906 to 1918, one Brit after another, along with several Indian collaborators, met their untimely ends at the hands of revolutionary nationalists. The British were shaking in their boots. It was practically murder by numbers. They were being picked off one by one by the pro-independence revolutionaries the British called “terrorists”. Ever the consummate hypocrite, from 1920 onwards, Gandhi put his foot down on the use of force, crushing any armed resistance with his non-violence stance, even though he had carried on an active campaign of recruiting soldiers for Britain in the First World War and before that during the Boar War in South Africa. Gandhi’s non-violence movement died a death only a few weeks after the start of the ‘Quit India’ campaign. Gandhi’s position was rejected outrightly by members of the Congress Party. Nowhere was non-violence preached or practiced. Virtually everyone was committed to “do or die”. No one wanted to follow Gandhi’s methods and sit in jail. On the contrary, they wished to avoid jail at all costs. Rather than stewing in jail, they were committed to action, inflicting the maximum harm to British rule by cutting communications, committing arson, looting and other acts of violence, assassinations not excluded. Government administration was brought to a standstill. They set fire to police stations and postal offices, while communications were disrupted with firebombs and other forms of sabotage. In north Bihar and other locales, nearly 900 railway stations were burnt to the ground or destroyed. At the very moment the smell of freedom could be detected in the air, Gandhi was calling for non-violence, when only a few short years before he had advocated violence as a recruitment officer for the British Army. This begs the question: Whose side was he really on? Godse noted how Hindu women and children were offered no defence in the face of their Muslin terrorist foes. It was the heroic fight put up by Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj that checked and destroyed Muslim tyranny in India. It was absolutely correct and just, according to Godse, for Shivaji to kill Afzul Khan, since the latter had already broken the Vedic sanction against attacking the innocent and unarmed. Conversion by the sword is irreligious and unHindu. Condemning Shivaji, Rana Pretap and Guru Govind as deluded and misguided patriots was extremely presumptuous of Gandhi. Each of these heroes was unrelenting in his defence of the country, protecting the people against the atrocities and outrages of alien invaders, and prizing the motherland free from the foreign yoke. Under thirty years of dictatorship by the Mahatma, what does he have to show us, asked Godse, but the desecration of temples and our women’s bodies, forced conversions at the hand of a sword, and even the rape of the own motherland, one third of the nation stripped away to become a permanent neighbour, black sheep and exiled family member, ever on our doorstep as a watchful enemy? For Godse, Gandhi was a dwarf before the likes of Shivaji, Rana Pretap, and Guru Govind. His condemnation of these illustrious heroes was presumptuous at best. These were the martyrs whose blood formed the mortar that built the temple of independence. In truth, Gandhi’s policy of ahimsa was an abject failure from the word go. The more the Mahatma condemned the use of violence in the nation’s battle for independence, the more popular it became. This fact became abundantly clear in the Karachi Session of Congress in March 1931. From 1921-22, Gandhi became the ideologue of the Congress and it was under his leadership that the first Non-Cooperation movement was launched. When Gandhi abruptly ended the movement, the revolutionaries became disillusioned with the creed of non-violence espoused by him. During 1924-25 Gandhi became involved in an extended polemical argument on the use of violence. The brunt of Gandhi’s arguments lay in what he called the ineffectiveness of violence, the added expenditure it cost the government to curb it and the insane pressure of anger and ill-will that started it in the first place. In fact so opposed was he to the revolutionaries that when the Viceroy Lord Irwin missed a narrow escape on his life, Gandhi wrote an article called the “Cult of the Bomb” where he thanked god for the Viceroy’s escape and condemned his bete noire, the revolutionaries. In 1925 Sachindanand Sanyal sent an open letter to Gandhi in which he said,

…(the) Non-Violent non-cooperation movement failed not because there was (a) sporadic outburst of suppressed feelings here and there but because the movement was lacking in a worthy ideal. The ideal that you preached was not in keeping with Indian culture and traditions. It savoured of imitation. Your philosophy of non-violence… was a philosophy arising out of despair.

By 1929 the revolutionary movement in India had developed and in December of that year, Bhagwati Charan and Chandra Shekhar Azad wrote an article defending the Delhi Bomb Case revolutionaries from Gandhi’s scathing criticism, in which they argued,

The revolutionaries believe that the deliverance of their country will come through revolution… (This) revolution will not only express itself in the form of an armed conflict between the foreign government and its supporters and the people, it will also usher in a new social order. The revolution will ring the death knell of Capitalism and class distinctions and privileges. It will bring joy and prosperity to the starving millions who are seething under the terrible yoke of both foreign and Indian exploitation.

In 1931 in a note to the party, the great pro-independence revolutionary, Bhagat Singh, wrote about Gandhism as the dominant ideology in the Congress, which is unable to take a stand against the British and instead wants to become a partner in power… (the Congress) is working as a centrist party and has always been so. It is embarrassed to face reality. The leaders who run it are those people whose interests are associated with the party… If revolutionary blood does not succeed in giving it a new lease of life… it will be necessary to save it (the party) from its allies. Interestingly although Gandhi insisted on the acceptance of non-violence dogmatically, younger members were not so averse or critical of the revolutionaries. Subhas Bose and Jawaharlal Nehru were the two prominent Congressmen who supported the revolutionaries. Chandra Shekhar Azad used to receive money regularly from Motilal Nehru. Money to the revolutionaries was also supplied by Puroshattamdas Tandon and Shiv Prasad Gupta. Even leaders like Maulana Shaukat Ali and Krishna Kant Malviya supplied revolvers to Sanyal. “The non-violence of the Mahatma was by-passed by the Congressmen and they were not found wanting in their moral, financial and other support to the revolutionaries,” say Irfan Habib and S.K. Mittal. That there was public sympathy for the revolutionaries and support from within the Congress must have been known to Gandhi. It may well have been a fact that Gandhi, sensing a threat to his leadership, became increasingly bitter towards the revolutionaries and when he could have negotiated a release for some of them he chose not to. And what is it to keep perceived “dissidents” who pose a threat to one’s leadership, but the very definition of dictatorship? And still today at a time when we consider ourselves so enlightened, we continue to fall for the propa-gandhi that the Mahatma was the ultimate democrat. We should make a distinction here between a “pro-independence freedom fighter” and a “terrorist”. If one is trying to liberate one’s country and its people from the yoke of a brutal foreign occupation, and is targeting the military and top political brass of the foreign occupier, how does that make one a “terrorist” in any reasonable sense of the word?



Probing Doke-Gandhi Connection




A few words on the background of Reverend Doke are helpful. Based upon what is reported in the popular Gandhian literature, he was born at Chudleigh, South Devon in England on November 5, 1861, about eight years before Gandhi. With little early education to his credit he became a pastor at the age of seventeen and three years later he moved to Capetown in South Africa. With some more foreign travels as a missionary, he returned to South Africa in 1903 and in 1907 a pastoral opening brought him to Johannesburg.1, 2, 3 The ongoing Satyagraha campaigns brought the two personalities closer together, their relationship strengthened by Gandhi’s convalescence in the Doke family home.


The best person to bring on side in any political cause is a man of God or holy man. Nothing grants greater credibility to a cause than a man of God who swears by God to be a vessel of the truth and a proponent of righteousness. In the case of the Christian community, the mere sight of a collar, cross, ministerial garb and other accoutrements of the Christian leader inspire a certain reverence among his flock and a feeling of awe mixed with unease or even fear. The Satyagraha movement would definitely have benefited from such an influential religious figure and certainly would have wished to recruit one to the cause. Reverend J. J. Doke, missionary and opportunistic converter of the multitudes, would have jumped at the chance to serve a popular movement of the masses such as Satyagraha. He would have equally wished to convert a figure like Mahatma Gandhi to his religion in order to initiate mass conversions under the leadership of a human rights proponent he would single-handedly turn into a saint in his own Gandhi biography. Gandhi never did convert to Christianity as Reverend Doke, the consummate religious opportunist, had hoped, but he did function, as Doke had wished, as a Christian paradigm of Doke’s own invention, a modern day saint who would give Christianity the hormone injection it required. In essence, Doke was a kind of Pygmalion who had fashioned a saint in his own image. Gandhi was an invention who would convince the Christian world that the miracle of Christ really had been possible. If the miracles of healing the lame and feeding the multitudes could be recapitulated in the form of a modern day miracle, people’s faith in Christ would be restored and the churches would be filled once more. Gandhi couldn’t walk on water, heal the lame and blind, or turn water into wine, but what the Satyagraha movement would prove through the public relations campaign orchestrated by Doke is that he was capable of performing a modern day miracle: Defeating an imperialist power through passive resistance. The Satyagraha movement would have with equal fervor wished to bring a man of God into its fold who would give its cause the legitimacy it sought, a man of the cloth whose reputation would precede him and with sufficient power to convince the masses that, his word being as good as gold, the movement for which he stood really was legitimate.


Doke’s letter to The Transvaal Leader on the “Immigrants Restriction Act” and “peace preservation permits” shows how politically savvy he actually is. The language he employs in his letter to the editor is calculating and manipulative. It is intended to elicit shame in the white rulers of South Africa by highlighting how reasonable the Asiatics and their demands really are. A certain degree of irony can be detected sufficient to inflict the appropriate sting. What in essence Doke implies in the letter is that the Asiatics are not protesting laws that violate their basic human rights, but only the practice of leaving the decision in the hands of officials subject to racial bias and questionable ethics. The letter implies that the Asiatics wish their cases to be referred to legitimate courts and that they be granted the right of appeal. The irony of course is that, if the Asiatics were actually to be given such entitlements, it would be tantamount to granting them the very human rights they see themselves as being denied. The strategy employed in Doke’s letter is admirably sophisticated, but not entirely genuine in import by being so:


The Asiatics claim simply the interpretation and protection of the Supreme Court. They do not resent the “Immigration Restriction Act”. They only claim that it be not

interpreted by any official, however exalted he may be, but by the recognized Court, and by that judgement they will stand. They do not resent the rejection of Asiatics by Mr. Chamney, and their deportation, but but they claim that no official shall be made supreme. They ask for the right of appeal in such cases to the well-balanced judgement of a properly constituted tribunal.

(CWMG Vol. 8, Appendix III, p. 495, July 4, 1908)


What the letter shows is that, while a man of the cloth, Doke is a political animal. His use of language is highly manipulative and far from genuine. Granted, the cause is just, but the language employed is conceived in the spirit of the ends justifying the means. He is not being entirely genuine. This in itself is no fault. The point we are making is that he is politically savvy and a master propagandist. He is also given to employing language in a manipulative and even coercive fashion. We present this as evidence that he is capable of being manipulative or even lying to get what he wants. From a means-ends standpoint this can be justified if the cause is just. This we do not dispute. We simply wish to show that there is no reason for believing that this man of the cloth is above lying. There is a tendency for scholars and the reading public to be persuaded that the good reverend’s biography of Gandhi is entirely genuine and aboveboard because it is written by a man of the cloth, but we intend to show that it is not written to be a genuine account at all, but rather as “an experiment with the truth” to use Gandhi’s own language. Experimenting with the truth in essence is to experiment with a lie, since to employ disparate versions of the truth in order to witness their effect is tantamount to telling lies to observe their effect. Hitler’s maxim that the bigger the lie the more people will believe it is apropos in the case of Gandhi and that of Doke, the master manipulator.


There is another question to examine in relation to Doke’s biography of Gandhi. Is it professional for a biographer to establish a friendship with his subject? Additionally, is it appropriate from the standpoint of professional ethics to associate oneself with the political movement of the biographical subject? Is it acceptable for a professional biographer to be part of the same political struggle as the biographical subject? Is there a conflict of interests in writing a biography on a subject with whom you are both a friend and a professional colleague? There are such instances of course, but is it ethical from a professional standpoint?


Doke’s biography M. K. Gandhi: An Indian Patriot in South Africa is dated 1909, yet it can be established from the evidence of several letters written in the year 1908 that an intimate friendship and political alliance had been forged between Gandhi and Doke well in advance of the biography’s publication. The following letter by Gandhi to Rev. Doke dated October 8, 1908 is a fine example:


Dear Mr. Doke,

I received your note at Pheonix. The expected has happened. I think it is well. I have arrived just in time. There were serious differences between two sections here. They are by no means over yet. You will say I have accepted the hospitality before the ‘settings’ were finished. I think it was better that I should do that than that the invitation should be rejected for the sake of the ‘settings’. After all I have done nothing. For six days I may carry on correspondence. If you think I should answer any questions, you may write. I must now stop as I have

been called away to give digit impressions. Please excuse me to Olive for not writing.

(CWMG Vol. 9, # 112, pp. 193-94)


What this letter reveals is that Gandhi has become a friend of the Doke family and is on intimate terms with husband and wife. It is also clear from the letter that Gandhi appeals to Doke for advice and counsel and that they are political colleagues. The fact that Gandhi invites Doke to write to him should he have any questions implies that the reverend has become so intimate an associate that Gandhi’s personal welfare has become a matter of greatest concern to his champion and defender. There is nothing cynical about the friendship and political alliance. What we question is the fact that such a relationship is a conflict of interest from the standpoint of a professional biographer. There is no way that the friendship and political alliance forged between the two men could fail to color the tone of the biography.


A letter from the same year reveals how close the relationship between the two men had become. Gandhi writes to Doke from the Court House. The letter is written in an attempt on Gandhi’s part to relieve his friend of any anxieties he might entertain on his account. The tone of the letter is most consoling:


Dear Mr. Doke,

I am writing this from the Court House. I had hoped to be able to send you something before I was fixed up. But I have been too busy otherwise. I thank you very much for your good wishes. My sole trust is in God. I am therefore quite cheerful. (CWMG Vol. 9, # 121, pp. 204-05, October 14, 1908)


There is another letter from Doke that shows the great depth of Doke’s friendship and love for Gandhi. The letter is dated September 30, 1908 well before the publication date of the biography. There is no doubt that the friendship has moved well beyond acquaintance and mutual self-interest. A bond has been forged between the two men that is lifelong, so deeply felt on Doke’s part that he would willingly lay down his life for Gandhi:


Your beautiful present of the Song Celestial, I appreciate very much. In every respect it is one of the choicest treasures which I have–dainty in appearance–fascinating in its contents-–and of great value and a memento of a friendship which I shall always regard with gratitude. Yes, even if the darling wish of your heart is fulfilled and I get into prison for it.

(CWMG Vol. 9, Appendix XII, p. 482, September 30, 1908)


Then we have Rev. J. J. Doke’s letter to the editor of the Rand Daily Mail, in which he protests the arrest of Gandhi. What is clear from the letter is that he has received regular updates from Gandhi on the treatment he has received at the hands of the authorities. This means that no one member of the Satyagraha is more concerned with the personal well being of Mahatma Gandhi than Rev. Doke. He has taken it upon himself to be his champion and defender. His good name and standing in the community as a reverend of untarnished respectability would make his letter to the editor both credible and morally persuasive. It is likely that both Gandhi and Doke would have recognized the political expediency of using the merits of a man of the cloth to influence public sentiment. There is no doubt from the tenor of the letter that it is intended to make the citizens rise up in moral outrage:


Yesterday it was necessary that he should appear in some case in the Magistrate’s Court. I understand he was brought there from the cells, dressed in civilian clothes, but handcuffed! Of course, there may be amongst us those who will be glad to hear that indignities are being heaped on this great Indian leader; but I venture to hope that the great majority of our colonies will feel ashamed and angry that a man of the character and position of Mr. Gandhi should be needlessly insulted in this way.

(CWMG Vol. 9, p. 489, March 11, 1909)


What emerges from the letter is the fact that Doke has risen to the stature of being Gandhi’s champion. No matter how politically and socially compromised he might be in the corrupt white establishment of South Africa, he is prepared to put his life and reputation on the line in defense of Gandhi. No higher level of commitment could be shown by one human being to another in defense of their mutual cause than that shown by Doke to Gandhi and Satyagraha.


How did they meet? How did they come to know each other? And under what compunction were they brought together? While we have addressed these questions based upon what has been reported, more importantly we need to ask: Was there a fraternity to which they both belonged that preceded Satyagraha and the European Committee of which they were both active members? What force drew Doke from New Zealand to South Africa and to seize the hand of his confederate? There is an answer to this and the evidence for it rests with a speech Gandhi gave at a Masonic Hall of all places in Johannesburg. The description of the gathering given below reveals a great deal about the organizations to which Gandhi and Doke were mutually affiliated:


The Masonic Hall, Jepper Street, Johannesburg, was the scene of a brilliant mixed gathering of Europeans,

Chinese and Indians on the night of the 18th instant in honour of the British Indian community. Mr. Hoskin was in

the chair. Mr. Doke was on his right and Mrs. Doke on his left. Mr. Cachalia occupied a seat to the right of Mr. Doke.

Mr. Quinn and his Chinese friends were also present.

(CWMG Vol. 10, # 249, p. 420)


The first thing to observe about the preceding description of the banquet is that it was held in a Masonic Lodge and that Mr. Hosken, the leader of the European Committee to which both Gandhi and Doke belong, is the Grand Master of the Masonic Lodge on Jepper Street in Johannesburg where the banquet is being held. We know this because of what is stated in the above passage, that, “Mr. Hosken was in the chair.” This means that he is in the chair where the Worshipful Master or Grand Master of the Masonic Lodge presides. This means that he is a 33rd Degree Freemason and the supreme head of this particular Temple. The fact that Gandhi and Doke are present and that Gandhi is giving a speech in honour of Rev. Doke in a Masonic Lodge hosted by the Grand Master of the Lodge and leader of the European Committee, Mr. Hosken, is strong evidence supporting Gandhi’s and Doke’s Freemason affiliations. The fact that Mr. Hosken is both the Grand Master of the Temple and the leader of the European Committee of which all three are members suggest that the links between the three men go beyond the European Committee to another overriding organization, the very organization in whose Temple the current banquet it is being hosted, namely Freemasonry. We would go even further and suggest that the European Committee is a subcommittee set up by Freemasonry for vested political reasons and toward a defined political goal. The description of the content of Gandhi’s speech given below establishes the Masonic affiliations of all three men beyond doubt:


Speaking of Mr. Doke’s Asiatic work, it is not possible to refrain from speaking in praise of the work of the European

Committee of which the chairman (Mr. Hoskin) was the president. Mr. Gandhi frankly confessed that passive resistance might have broken down without the magnificent support rendered by the European Committee.

(CWMG Vol. 10, # 249, p. 420)


What the preceding passage reveals is what it doesn’t reveal, namely, the text of Gandhi’s speech. We only have a description of the speech made at the so-called banquet. While some might object that just because all three men are attending a meeting held in a Masonic Lodge in no way proves that they are Masons, the fact that this is an official meeting and Gandhi’s speech is not available because the meeting is official and secret proves that all three men are Masons. Again, some might argue that just because the meeting is held in a Masonic Temple does not mean that everyone present is a Mason, including possibly some of the Chinese delegates present, the fact that this is an official Masonic meeting is proven by the fact that the text of Gandhi’s speech is not available. We only have the minutes pertaining to the alleged content of Gandhi’s speech. This means that Gandhi’s speech and its contents are secret. Let’s not forget that Freemasonry in its modern form is based on the 33 Degree organizational model and is a highly secretive secret society. What has been shown, if not proven beyond a reasonable doubt, is that both Gandhi and Doke are Freemasons and that they are attending an official Lodge meeting in which the Lodge members are hosting a farewell dinner for one of their own members, Rev. J. J. Doke.


Gandhi’s obituaries to the late Rev. J. J. Doke in 1913 reveal a great deal about the reverend’s motives for writing the biography. Gandhi’s own words imply that the primary aim of the biography was not to glorify the Indian leader, but to promote the cause of Satyagraha, Indian home rule, and independence from the yoke of British imperial rule. Gandhi’s first obituary to the late Rev. Doke reveals the book’s true raison d’etre:


He wrote an Indian patriot in South Africa-–a popular history of the story of Indian passive resistance. Lord

Ampthill wrote a very flattering introduction to it. To Mr. Doke it was purely a labour of love. He believed in the Indian cause and the book was one of the many ways in which he helped it.

(CWMG Vol. 13, # 166, p. 258)


The express purpose for Doke writing the Gandhi biography, as Gandhi himself admits, was to promote the cause of passive resistance first and foremost. Why would Gandhi misquote the title of the book? Moreover “M. K. Gandhi: An Indian Patriot in South Africa” is really a biographical sketch of Gandhi and the issue of Indian passive resistance is only subservient to the greater issue of Gandhi himself. Gandhi states unequivocally that, rather than a simple biography, Doke’s book was written as “a popular history of the story of Indian passive resistance” to use Gandhi’s own words. Gandhi, the leader of the movement, was just a means to an end, a rallying cry, a means of mustering a throng of supporters toward a common cause. By turning Gandhi into a martyr figure, by fictionalizing his early life by depicting him as a martyred saint who had miraculously risen from defeat after being beaten down by his oppressors would give the cause the locus and impetus it required to get off the ground, to take wing, and to fly if not soar. What is also evident from Gandhi’s first memoir and obituary to the late reverend is that he is on such intimate terms with Doke that he knows his personal and family history nearly as well as his own, i.e.:


The late Rev. Doke had very little schooling, owing to delicate health. At the age of 16 he lost his mother.

At the age of 17, on the resignation of his father from the pastorate, he became pastor. At the age of 20 he came to South Africa, where he was in Cape Town for a short time….

(CWMG Vol. 13, # 166, p. 260)


What is revealing about the preceding memorial account is the fact that the writer of the first major biography on Gandhi was on such intimate terms with the subject of the biography as to have been a confidante, best friend, and virtual family member. In addition to being a friend of intimate acquaintance, colleague and brother-in-arms, he was a strong supporter of the same political struggle. This intimacy of association violates the professional ethics of the biographer who is supposed to maintain a certain objectivity and professional distance from his subject. For a biographer, any historian of personages, to be too close to the subject he is memorializing is bound to distort the figure and color the portrait.


To add to this memoir, we have the second of Gandhi’s obituaries to the late reverend also written for the Indian Opinion. Gandhi’s second obituary in honor of Doke demonstrates beyond doubt that Doke was a proponent of Gandhi’s cause of passive resistance and had been so practically upon arrival to South Africa:


When Mr. Doke came to the cause, he threw himself into it heart and soul and never relaxed his efforts on our behalf.

It was usual with Mr. Doke to gain complete mastery over the subject he handled. He, therefore, became one of

best informed men on the subject in South Africa. He loved passive resisters as they were his own congregation. The

poorest Indian had free access to this pious Englishman. His pen and his eloquence were continually used by him

during the troublous times through which the community has passed. He missed no opportunity of visiting passive resistance prisoners in gaol. And at a critical period in the history of the community and this journal, he

magnanimously and at no small inconvenience to himself, took charge of the editorial department, and those

who came in contact with him during that period know how cautious, how painstaking, how gentle and how

forebearing he was.

(CWMG Vol.13, # 167, p. 262, August 23, 1913)


Not only is Doke an active proponent of Gandhi’s cause of passive resistance. He is deeply committed to it as an adherent. From the standpoint of a professional biographer, his Gandhian biography would be regarded as little more than a propaganda and public relations exercise rather than a genuine biography. As Gandhi says of the reverend, “He loved passive resisters as they were his own congregation.” His mission then was to champion the cause of his congregation. One wonders whether his sermons were geared toward liberating their immortal souls or their minds and bodies from the material bondage to which they were subject. Gandhi adds of the good reverend that, “His pen and his eloquence were continually used by him during the troublous times through which the community passed.” There is no equivocation here. Gandhi states explicitly that the pen and the eloquence of the good reverend “were continually used by him,” that is continually, unremittingly used by “him” i.e. Gandhi. Gandhi leaves us in no doubt that he has used the reverend as a propaganda agent in promotion of the cause, “continually” implying from the beginning and without interruption. Gandhi then informs us his colleague took charge of the editorial department, which suggests that Doke was in complete charge of the P.R. machine behind the Satyagraha movement as the Editor-in-Chief of the Indian Opinion, controlling what got printed and by whom. The fact that he functioned as Editor-in-Chief of the Indian Opinion only makes the conflict of interest in writing the Gandhian biography that much more self-evident. How can an advocate of the cause and an editor of the propaganda vehicle of the movement, the Indian Opinion, be expected to write an uncolored, unbiased and objective biography of the leader of the movement?


Should any doubts remain about the level of commitment demonstrated by Reverend Doke to the cause, Gandhi tells us unreservedly in his final tribute to Rev. Doke written for the very newspaper the reverend himself headed that he had been committed to the Indian cause practically from the day he arrived:


In 1907, when preparations for the Satyagraha campaign were in full swing, Mr. Doke had recently come to the

Transvaal from New Zealand. He began taking a keen interest in the Indian problem from the very day he arrived,

and continued to help till he died. With the exception of one or two, no other Englishman, and hardly any Indian,

had such (a) clear grasp of our problem as Mr. Doke.

(CWMG Vol. 13, # 168, pp. 263-64, translated from Gujarati)


Doke’s loyalty to the cause was as unrelenting as his faithfulness to its leader. As Gandhi himself states, Satyagraha became his raison d’etre from the day he arrived until the time of his death. There is no doubt then that the 1909 biography of Gandhi is colored by an emotional investment on the part of the biographer to the subject and the cause to which both subject and biographer are committed. The biography by Doke is neither scholarly not professional but is colored by the biographer’s own biases and commitment to the cause. It does not maintain any of the professional detachment, distance, dispassionate objectivity that a bona fide biography is required to maintain. Should there be any question then about the authenticity of Doke’s account of the racial train incidents in South Africa, let us remind ourselves of the purpose of the biography. The purpose of the biography as Doke explicitly stated to Gandhi was to promote Gandhi as the martyr figure and hero of the Indian passive resistance movement.


There is another suspicious circumstance concerning Doke’s biography of Gandhi. The foreword is written by Lord Ampthill. In the foreword, Lord Ampthill takes care to distance himself from the author. He even goes so far as to deny even knowing him:


The writer of this book is not known to me personally, but there is a bond of sympathy between him and me in the

sentiments which we share in regard to the cause of which he is so courageous and devoted an advocate.

(CWMG Vol. 10, Appendix 1, p. 485, August 26, 1909)

(Also check chapter “introduction” in the book, M. K. Gandhi: An Indian Patriot in South Africa).


Why does this passage from Lord Amptill’s foreword peek our curiosity? Why does it raise our doubts? We invite the reader to employ our methodology and scrutinize the passage for himself before reviewing our analysis. A perceptive reader will have his own suspicions aroused after rereading the preceding passage carefully. The first suspicious element is that Lord Ampthill begins the foreword with a denial of any firsthand acquaintance with the author, “The writer of this book is not known to me personally….” Why deny knowing someone, especially at the outset, unless you desire to distance yourself from having any association with the person in question. While some might argue that this is probably because Lord Ampthill did not want to be politically compromised by association with Satyagraha or the movement for home rule, his own words show this not to be the case, for he adds, “…but there is a bond of sympathy between him and me in the sentiments which we share in regard to the cause….” It is self-evident that Lord Ampthill feels no need to distance himself from the cause. So why distance himself from the personage of Rev. Doke? It is rather odd that he should seek to do so, since the reverend is obviously respected, of good standing in the community and wears a collar. Is Lord Ampthill being genuine in his claim not to know the reverend “personally” as he puts it? This is hardly likely, since his own words in reference to Doke’s character give him away, “…the cause of which he is so courageous and devoted an advocate.” How is Lord Ampthill able to vouch so strongly for the character and commitment of a man he has never met? Why deny knowing someone unless you wish to disassociate yourself from the individual in question for some reason? Were Lord Ampthill to have a clandestine association with Doke, Gandhi and others, there might be a very good reason to deny his having any association with the good reverend. Were he a fellow Freemason or a member of the European Committee or in some way more intimately tied to the political struggle to which both Gandhi and Doke are committed, there might be a very good reason for denying any association with the good reverend. Based on a cable sent by Gandhi to Lord Ampthill on December 24, 1913, there is evidence that such an intimate political association would have and actually did exist. The cable from Gandhi reads, “Hosken issued public appeal supporting our letter.” (Cable to Lord Ampthill, Durban, Dec. 24, 1913, Colonial Office Records: 551/52, Vol.13, p. 439) Hosken, our reader will recall, was presiding as the Worshipful Master at the farewell dinner for Rev. Doke held at the Masonic Lodge meeting in Johannesburg. Hosken was also the head of the European Committee. The fact that Gandhi mentions Hosken in the cable without any honorific title before his name suggests that he is a well known member of the old boy’s network and an intimate associate of them both. This suggests either that Lord Ampthill was an active member of the same Masonic Lodge or intimately associated with its members and some of those associated with the European Committee. In short, it is highly doubtful that Doke would not have been known to Ampthill personally. So why deny knowing Doke? Were there a clandestine association and accompanying agenda between Ampthill and Doke or even Ampthill, Doke and Gandhi, there would be a very good reason for concealing their connection. Were the connection to be exposed as the conflict of interest it most probably was, it would do serious damage not only to the reputations of all three men, but to the possible hidden agenda to which they were all secretly committed. Gandhi’s connection to Freemasonry must be investigated and carefully evaluated knowing fully that his literature is scant on these matters.4












  1. James D. Hunt.  Gandhi and the Nonconformists: Encounters in South Africa. New Delhi: Promilla & Co. Publishers, 1986, pages 98-123.


  1. Sushila Nayar. Mahatma Gandhi: Satyagraha at Work (Vol. 4). Ahmedabad, India: Navajivan Publishing House, 1989, pages 468-74.


  1. CWMG Vol. 13, # 166, pp. 258-62.


  1. Proving that Gandhi is associated with Freemason is no easy task considering that the organization has endeavored to suppress the fact with religious zeal. We have Gandhi to thank for revealing the fact in his own words, his own dairy in fact. The overwhelming majority of scholars have a tendency to take everything literally, especially from a man whose word they take to be as good as gold, this notwithstanding the fact that he openly admits to being experimental with the truth. The fact is however that much of what Gandhi wrote is in Masonic code. Much of it is to be taken figuratively rather than literally. The following passage is taken from Gandhi’s “London Dairy” dated November 12, 1888, at a time just before he leaves for London. What Gandhi is describing here would be interpreted by most scholars as a literal account of a series of accidents that befell him while journeying from place to place. This would not be a correct interpretation. What Gandhi is in fact describing in coded language, which can only be understood by higher degree initiates of Freemasonry or by researchers of Freemasonry, is his initiation to the Third Degree of Freemasonry:


Amidst thoughts, I came unconsciously in contact with a carriage. I received some injury. Yet I did not take the help of anybody in walking. I think I was quite dizzy. Then we entered the house of Maghjibhai. There I again came in contact with a stone unknowingly and received injury. I was quite senseless. From that time I did not know what took place, and after that, I am told by them, I fell flat on the ground after some steps. I was not myself for 5 minutes. They considered I was dead. But fortunately for myself the ground on which I fell was quite smooth. I came to my senses at last and all of them were quite joyful. The mother was sent for. She was very sorry for me, and this caused my delay though I told them that I was quite well. But none would allow me to go, though I afterwards came to know that my bold and dearest mother would have allowed me to go. But she feared the calumny of other people…

(CWMG Vol.1, # 4, pp. 4-5) [London Diary must be evaluated carefully. The editors of CWMG confess that this diary was of about 120 pages. Accordingly, Gandhi handed over this diary to Chhaganlal Gandhi, his cousin, in South Africa, who too was going to London in 1909. Only 20 pages of this diary are available in the CWMG. The rest are unaccounted for.]


The preceding passage has been interpreted naively as a plain account of a mishap occurring during a coach journey. What Gandhi is in fact describing is his initiation to the Third Degree of Freemasonry. The Third Degree of Freemasonry has a long history. It is based on the Masonic legend of the murder of Hiram Abif, the alleged architect of King Solomon’s Temple. According to the story, Hiram Abif was confronted by three ruffians in the Temple known as the three Juwes, by name Jubilo, Jubila and Jubilum. Their ostensible aim was to acquire the occult secrets of the Craft from Hiram Abif, the Master Mason. When he refused to reveal the secrets, the three ruffians blocked the three exits of the Temple. Hiram Abif made three alleged attempts to escape, but was attacked by one of the ruffians at each exit point of the Temple, being struck in the temples and forehead with architectural devices employed as weapons by each of his assailants. The account of what took place during the legendary murder is given below:


His devotions being ended, he prepared to retire by the south gate, where he was

accosted by the first of these ruffians, who, for want of a better weapon, had armed

himself with a plumb rule, and in a threatening manner demanded of our

Master…the genuine secrets of the

(Grand Geometrician), warning him that death would be the consequence of his

refusal; but true to his obligation he

replied that those secrets were known to but three in the world and that without the

consent of the other two, he neither could, nor would divulge them… But as for

himself, he would rather suffer death than betray the sacred trust reposed in him.

This answer not proving satisfactory, the ruffian aimed a violent blow at our

Master’s forehead, but startled by the firmness of his demeanor, it only glanced

down his right temple. Yet with sufficient force to cause him to reel and sink to the

ground on his left knee. Recovering himself from this situation, he rushed to the west

gate where he stood opposed by the second ruffian, to whom he replied as before,

yet with undiminished firmness when the ruffian, who was armed with a level struck

a violent blow on his left temple which brought him to the ground on his right knee.

Finding all chances of escape in Both quarters cut off, our Master staggered, faint

and bleeding, to the east gate where the third ruffian was posted and who, on

receiving a similar reply to his insolent demand – for our Master remained true to his

obligation even in his most trying moment – struck him a violent blow full in the

center of the forehead with a heavy stone maul, which laid him lifeless at his feet.

(Christopher Knight and Robert Lomas, The Hiram Key, London: Arrow Books. Ltd., 1977, p. 175)


This then in essence is what the Third Degree of Freemasonry is based upon. The Third Degree is thus a ritual reenactment of the assassination of the Masonic hero, Hiram Abif. Gandhi’s diary account of what took place that day in Rajkot (in India) is written in Masonic code. The two blows he describes receiving were in fact blows to the head, which rendered him senseless. Regarding the first blow, he states, “I came unconsciously in contact with a carriage.” He certainly would be unconscious of such a fate if he were blindfolded, which of course all initiates to the Third Degree of Freemasonry are. After the first blow, we are told that he entered the “house of Maghjibhai.” It is in this house that he tells us, “There I again came in contact with a stone unknowingly and received injury.” Again, he uses the word ‘unknowingly’ quite inexplicably unless we decode the Masonic language and the intended allusions made. He would quite naturally ‘unknowingly’ come in contact with the stone maul or hammer that administered the ritual deathblow inside the temple if he were blindfolded, and he is clearly inside a building structure he describes as the “house of Maghjibhai.” He then tells us that he was out for the space of five minutes and that “they” thought he was dead. The “they” he is referring to are his fellow Masons, who would regard him as dead after receiving the ritual blow to the head, a reenactment of the final fatal blow that killed Hiram Abif in the Temple. But Gandhi tells us that he did not sustain injury because he landed on a smooth surface, “But fortunately for myself the ground on which I fell was quite smooth.” So he would have done if he landed on the smooth surface of solid Masonry, which of course is the case with all Masonic Temples. He then tells us that he came to, “I came to my senses at last and all of them were quite joyful.” The Third Degree of Freemasonry concludes with the Worshipful Master leading the candidate to his burial shroud to behold the skull and crossbones, thereby confronting his own death ritually. Following the ceremony, the initiate rises to receive cheers and rejoicing from his fellow Masons. This accounts for the joy experienced by Gandhi’s brethren on the occasion. We are then informed that, “The mother was sent for.” An interesting and unmistakable meaning is here implied. He does not say “My mother was sent for.” He clearly states, “The mother was sent for.” While some might argue that this is an easy mistake for a non-native speaker of English to make, we have to remember that Gandhi was a master of the English language and was not given to making mistakes with articles such as “the.” “The mother” is a pointed reference to Hiram Abif’s mother, who Masons refer to as “The Widow.” Hiram Abif is in fact referred to as “the widow’s son” in Freemasonry. And Masons themselves often refer to themselves as “the sons of the widow.” Gandhi then tells us that she, the Widow, was quite sorry for him and that she “feared the calumny of other people.”

To explain the import of “the widow’s son” and its significance to Freemasonry, we must turn to the Bible for a scriptural reference to Hiram Abif, who was the son of the widow of Naphtali. References to Hiram Abif occur in two passages from the Holy Scriptures. In the first, he is called the widow’s son, of the tribe of Naphtali, and in the other, he is called the son of a woman of the daughters of Dan. However, in both scriptures, we are told that his father was a man from Tyre. In other words, Hiram Abif’s mother was of the daughters of the city of Dan, in the tribe of Naphtali, and is referred to as the widow of Naphtali, as her husband was a Naphtalite and only a man of Tyre by habitation. (Robert Macoy, A Dictionary of Freemasonry, NY: Gramercy Books, 1989, p.696) Hiram Abif was the chief architect of the king of Tyre, and was dispatched by his king to serve in the construction of King Solomon’s Temple. In Hiram Abif, Speculative and Craft Freemasonry are reunited. He was an alleged master in all forms of architecture and design, ranging from architecture, statuary, founder to designer. Masonic and non-Masonic researchers alike believe that the Freemason legend of Hiram Abif is a cover story or cipher story alluding to some other personage from history, some say he is a cipher for Jacques de Molay, the martyred Grand Master of the Templars, or a cipher for a personage or divinity from ancient Egyptian legend and mythology.


We believe that Gandhi while openly confessing to being Hindu, he is also a Mason, or closely associated with it. There is no mistaking the arcane import of the diary entry. The fact that he is describing an incident that allegedly took place in India in a diary entry made in London on November 12, 1888 reveals a great deal. The Indian setting is a cover for an initiation that took place in London’s Temple Bar contemporaneously with the diary entry and not the record of a biographical event from some years earlier as is implied. Higher Degree initiates of Freemasonry would not be fooled by the references, while uninitiated scholars and researchers would naively overlook the hidden import of the diary entry.


Gandhi’s autobiography has another strange facet. Astonishingly, he claims in the introduction that his intention is not to write a real autobiography. Rather, he speaks rather amazingly about his experiments with truth. There is no other way of taking these words than to see his autobiography as an acknowledged fiction. To admit to his reader that he is not attempting to write a real autobiography, but merely experimenting with the truth is tantamount to confessing that his autobiography orients itself toward truth rather as Dostoyevsky’s and Dicken’s novels do. In short, it is a work of fiction and cannot be seen otherwise because of his own words on the subject. One wonders how such a startling admission could have been overlooked by the previous generation of scholars. But then it is our observation that scholarship itself should come under the microscope of skeptical inquiry, since the scholarly community has found itself in error on a whole plethora of subjects over the centuries. Just to offer some early examples, Columbus had to discover the New World to promote his new paradigm; Copernicus withheld his discoveries for thirty years before daring to propose his heretical heliocentric solar system to the monastic pedants of his day. Luckily, he managed to escape the purifying rituals of the Inquisition’s torturers by dying. Copernicus was then forced to recant for reiterating the theory; Bruno was burnt to a cinder for reiterating the already reiterated; Galileo was martyred for being the patron saint of an already accepted truth; Descartes was mercilessly persecuted by the monastic scholars of Holland only to narrowly escape trial by fire; As for Shakespeare, the scholarly community has embarrassingly overlooked the obvious: That Will Shaksper from Stratford-upon-Avon is a mere front man or mask for the true author, a ruse orchestrated by Francis Bacon’s secret fraternities not least of which was Freemasonry. The famous Droeshout engraving appearing on the Frontispiece of the First Folio of 1623 makes it plain that the face appearing on the Frontispiece is merely a mask. Then there are Ben Jonson’s words accompanying the portrait engraving: “This shadow is renowned Shakespeare’s? the soul of th’age? The applause? delight? the wonder of the stage….” (Charlton Ogburn Jr., The Mysterious William Shakespeare: The Myth and the Reality, McClean, Virginia: EPM Publications, Inc., 1984. p.237) Why all the question marks unless he is questioning the authenticity of the artist’s portrait? Then there is the incredible likeness between the subjects appearing in the Marcus Gheeraedts portrait of Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford, and the John Taylor portrait of William Shakespeare that four hundred years of scholarship has somehow overlooked. In fact, it was not until Dr. Timothy Watson spotted the likenesses in February of 2003 that one of the most important discoveries ever made pertaining to the Shakespeare mystery came to light.

In the last century Percey Bysshe Shelley was expelled from Oxford for merely suggesting that there might not be a Creator in a paper distributed among the faculty called “The Necessity of Atheism”. And just to catalogue some of the things the scholarly community has gotten wrong in the 20th century, they found themselves in gross error over the psychoanalytic theories proposed by Freud. Geographers and geophysicists could not have been more in error concerning continental shift and earth plate tectonics, a discovery they attempted to suppress for over fifty years through their notoriously criminal conduct. And since one of the authors of this book has personally experienced such criminal conduct at the hands of a university in the U.K., he has something of an axe to grind with the corrupt academic establishment that is in cahoots with the corrupt political and legal establishments, each of which vaccinates the others to enhance their immunity against censure and criticism.

Later in the century, social scientists found themselves committing a litany of errors in the realm of geopolitics, misjudging the situation in Vietnam, East Timor, Central and South America, the Balkans, and a host of other places that came under the gun of Uncle Sam, NATO or the UN’s so-called peacekeeping forces. In addition, they were largely in error about Cuba, the Bay of Pigs, the JFK coup d’etat, and more recently September 11 and the war on terrorism. Given the appalling record of oversight and the skill they exhibit at missing the obvious, it amazes us that anyone should be amazed by the attenuated vision, myopia and ignorance of the tunnel-visioned pedants that stake their claim over the archives only to collect more dust from neglect and redundancy than the books we see them pouring over.

So what is Gandhi playing at? Does he take us for fools? Is there any reason why he shouldn’t? It seems fair in hindsight for him not to expect much inquisitiveness from the scholarly community. There is certainly no reason for him to have had higher expectations. The history of scholarship marked would have confirmed in his mind that he had nothing to fear from posterity. Their ineptitude and incompetence would leave him unscathed and unmolested. Prior to the release of Col. G.B. Singh’s much acclaimed Gandhi: Behind the Mask of Divinity, there was barely an attempt to penetrate the façade. In fact, people took the mask for the real McCoy. In fact, the word ‘persona’, referring to the mask worn by actors upon the stage, is the same as that worn by the consummate actor Mahatma Gandhi, the mask people take for his true face. When are scholars going to wake up to what many in India already know, that it was all a ruse, a charade, theatrical revels and of Academy Awards standards? Gandhi himself tells us in the introduction:


[It] is not my purpose to attempt a real

autobiography. I simply want to tell the

story of my numerous experiments with

truth…But I should certainly like to

narrate my experiments in the spiritual

field which are known only to myself, and

from which I have derived such power as

I possess for working in the political



So there, we have it. He is admitting unequivocally that he is not even attempting a real autobiography, but merely experimenting with the truth, which means that he is free to opportunistically play with the facts in whatever form he chooses in order to produce whatever effect he likes. If anyone has a different interpretation of his words, we invite him to suggest one. The facts could not be plainer. Gandhi admits that he is not giving a factual account of events. In fact, he is not even attempting to do so. By his own admission, he is experimenting with the truth, which at best means that he is not telling the truth and at worst lying. But since he is on record in the introduction admitting that he is making no attempt at a real autobiography but merely experimenting with the truth, we cannot call him a liar since he is an admitted liar. An admitted lair has the virtue of being honest about his lies. Of course we are being facetious and have our tongues firmly implanted in our cheeks, but irony is unavoidable on this point. It is simply laughable that the provocative introduction to a work with an even more provocative title could have been overlooked for so long. An Autobiography or The Story of My Experiments With Truth is a title selected by a man who is having a good joke at the world’s expense. He has chosen the title confident in the knowledge that only a few initiates who are in on the scheme know his true face and have seen behind the mask. And he is equally confident that the rest of the world is so in the dark that they cannot see the face behind the mask even though he has taken the trouble to tell everyone that he is wearing one. The Story of My Experiments With Truth is a provocative title that makes it clear to anyone with eyes that he is not revealing his true self in a ‘real autobiography’, but is employing a mask, a façade, a persona in a self-confessed attempt at political opportunism.

On page 158, it is clear that it is the Solomon Commission that manages to obtain a release for Gandhi from jail. The Solomon Commission is a rather strange name for an organization designed by Indians to protect Indians. Look for a Theosophical Society and Masonic connection here. King Solomon and Solomon’s Temple are central to Freemasonry and figure in much of its mythology and esoteric teachings. There is no doubt that the Solomon Commission is a Mason front organization. Also note your own quote on page 194 “Under the auspices of the Johannesburg Theosophical Lodge, Gandhi delivered sermons at the Masonic Temple on Hinduism.”


Gandhi: The Illuminati’s Duplicitous Double Agent 


Shakespeare and Tribal History of Anglo-American Empire

Shakespeare and Tribal History of Anglo-American Empire

By Timothy Watson, Ph.D.

The Tribe of Dan was the Tribe of Judges. It is a known prophecy that the Tribe of Dan will one day judge the Tribe of Judah. The two tribes have been in historical contention. Jacob warned his sons, “Dan shall judge his people, as one of the tribes of Israel. Dan shall be a serpent by the way, an adder in the path that bites the horse heels, so that his rider shall fall backward. I have waited for your salvation, O Lord.” Genesis 49:16-18.

What has this got to do with Shakespeare and English history? Maybe everything. Let’s begin with the Bard’s true pedigree.

Edward de Vere, the Earl of Oxford, is the real Shakespeare. He and Francis Bacon, Viscount of St. Albans, were both illegitimate sons of the Queen farmed out to different families.

Paul Streutz argued convincingly in Oxford: Son of Queen Elizabeth I that Queen Elizabeth was raped by her stepfather, Thomas Seymour, and gave birth to illegitimate son Edward in 1550.

The Queen met Francis Bacon’s father, Robert Dudley, the Earl of Leicester, when they were both confined to the Tower during her sister Queen Mary’s brief reign, as Alfred Dodd asserted in Francis Bacon’s Personal Life Story.

The half brothers co-founded the secret propaganda ministry Fra Rosi Cross also known as the Honourable Order of the Knights of the Helmet.

Upon initiation, members kissed Pallas Athena’s helmet of invisibility and became known as “the invisibles”. They then wrote under pen names or anonymously.

The research and writing team recruited from Oxford and Cambridge University was seventy strong and were known as both the Wild Goose Club and the Team of Good Pens.

Francis Bacon, Edward de Vere and Bacon’s brother by adoption, Anthony, founded Her Majesty’s Secret Service.

They used the illiterate actor Will Shakspere as the “False-staff” or “False-spear” front man, thus Falstaff.

William Shake-speare was hyphenated on the first folio of Sonnet poems because the poet’s pen name was derived from the goddess of Greek drama, Pallas Athena, the Spear-shaker. She shook her spear at the twin serpents of ignorance and vice, driving them off by educating the masses.

The concealed princes were of the line of the Rose. Obviously, the balcony speech refers to the fact that, though the author cannot bear the name of the rose, he still smells as sweet because he carries the Tudor royal bloodline, whose family symbol is the Red Rose.

What’s in a name? that which we call a rose
By any other name would smell as sweet;
So Romeo would, were he not Romeo call’d,
Retain that dear perfection which he owes
Without that title.

Francis Bacon was the Grand Master of the Rosicrucian Society and the Freemasons. The rosy cross of the Rosicrucians and the red rose of the Tudors holds family connections. Most likely the serpent rouge or red bloodline is the “issue”, pardon the Elizabethan pun.

The War of the Roses, representing a conflict between the Red Rose of the House of York and the White Rose of the House of Lancaster, was a feud between rival bloodlines. The Tribe of Judah is represented by the Lion and the Tribe of Dan by the Unicorn in the British Royal Coat-of-Arms.

tribal 1



Unicorn chained and in bondage by Lion oppressor

In Romeo and Juliet, Queen Elizabeth I is referred to as Roseline, referring to the line of the rose. Romeo was having an affair with Roseline before he met Juliet. Shockingly, there is evidence Elizabeth I and her concealed prince son, the 17th Earl of Oxford, were not only lovers, but Henry Wriothesley, the 3rd Earl of Southampton, appears to be their son.

The film “Anonymous” by Roland Emmerich addresses this theme. While irreverent, the argument finds scholarly precedent in Shakespeare’s Lost Kingdom: The True History of Shakespeare and Elizabeth, by Charles Beauclerk.

This is shocking to us, but not so to the ancient royal bloodline families, who secretly practice inbreeding to this day just as their bloodline did in Egypt when the Great Royal Daughter, the first born daughter of the pharaoh, married the first born son.

This explains why Oxford dedicated the narrative poems Venus and Adonis (1593) and The Rape of Lucrece (1594) to Southampton. The content of Shakespeare’s Sonnets also points to Wriothesley being the Earl of Oxford’s son.

This accounts for why King James confined both the Earl of Oxford and his son Wriothesley to the Tower of London the moment he assumed the throne.

King James then faked the Earl’s death, staging several of his plays at a sham funeral in 1604. Oxford was then exiled to the Isle of Mersey off the coast of Colchester in Essex County. It is a known penal island surrounded by a toxic bog. There is no way off the island.

The rivalry between the two English royal houses is between the Tribe of Dan and the Tribe of Judah.

The royal line of Ireland has the Haplotype R1B1 genetic. The Irish king line has the Cohen Haplotype, the genetic line of the Jewish priesthood, the Cohenim. The Tribe of Dan (Tuatha Dé Danann) is known to have gone to Ireland. Jesus was of the Tribe of Dan. His uncle was Joseph of Arimathea. “Arimathea” is a royal Danite title.

In the Holy Land, the Danites hail from the Danite mountain stronghold known as Mount Hermon. Mount Hermon is in the Golan Heights. It is the traditional site of the Danite settlement, where they undertook Druidic practices as Druids.

The Tribe of Dan are not Jews apparently, but Celtic and Jesus is a Celt and the bloodline has been traced to a common ancestor in the Caucus Mountain region 9,500 B.C.

Jesus and his uncle traveled to England and Ireland. Jesus’ uncle Joseph had tin mines in Cornwall. Joseph established the birthplace of Freemasonry in England at St. Albans in 63 A.D.

The oldest king line of Ulster, Ireland is the McNea family. They descend from Egyptian and Danite royal lines. They later migrated to the county of Westmoreland in Scotland. Scotland is really Scota-land, named after Pharaoh Akhenaten’s daughter Scota.

The McNea family changed their name to Nevill when they settled in Westmoreland, Scotland. They later moved to England. The king lines of both the House of York and the House of Lancaster took assiduous pains to marry Nevills or related families like the Poles.

Many of the true claimants to the throne on both the Lancastrian and York sides were hunted down and killed by Tudor King Henry VIII, since they had a greater claim to the throne since his own line had been tainted through the marriage of his ancestor Edward IV to commoner Elizabeth Woodville.

Elizabeth, the daughter of Edward IV and Elizabeth Woodville, married Henry VII and gave birth to future King Henry VIII. Henry VII murdered rivals to the throne, killing Edward V and Richard Duke of York after 1485, as well as Edward Earl of Warwick.

Henry the VIII continued his father’s work by murdering Sir Richard Pole, Edmund de la Pole, Henry Pole B. Montague, since the Poles all shared a family connection to the Nevills, having married into the true royal line.

Sir Geoffrey Pole escaped assassination by fleeing into exile, while John de la Pole, Earl of Lincoln, heir presumptive of Henry VII was killed in battle as was Richard de la Pole, whether by design or accident cannot be firmly established.

Henry Pole was imprisoned in the Tower of London by Henry VIII, while Arthur Pole and Henry Pole suffered the same fate under Elizabeth I.

Sir Edward Nevill was also executed by Henry VIII, while Lady Jane Grey, the Nine Days Queen, was executed by Henry VIII’s daughter Mary I in 1553, who also executed Thomas Stafford, son of Henry Stafford, a baron who had also married a Pole.

“Hamlet” is autobiographical and is a declaration that the royal court would return to the Stuart line of King James the VI of Scotland. Mary Queen of Scots and James VI are represented by Old Fortinbras and Young Fortinbras in the play.

Queen Elizabeth had murdered Robert Dudley’s wife to pave his way to the throne as her royal consort. Her son Lord Oxford forced them to confront their royal murder re-enacted on the stage.

Oxford made it clear in “Hamlet” that a curse had befallen his family and that succession would go to the Stuart Line of Scotland. He set the play in Denmark to disguise the references to the royal court of England.

The rival bloodlines are represented by the red and white rose. The Tudor family holds the red rose pedigree of the York line, while the House of Lancaster embodies the rival white.

There is no arguing the point that the Kennedy clan in America has been the target of a vindictive plot to prevent them from entering public life. Since they are direct descendants of the true royal line of Ireland and by extension Egypt, the symbolism of the ritual of the “Killing of the King” cited by researcher James Shelby Downward begins to make sense.

The fact that an Egyptian obelisk with lighted torch at the top marked the location of JFK’s assassination in Dealey Plaza and that an aerial view of Dealey Plaza resembles a pyramid with a missing capstone, the Egyptian symbolism appears more potent in hindsight. The pharaonic king line that was the true claimant to the American throne chair had to be removed by the Illuminati.


tribal 2


Dealey Plaza obelisk marking location of JFK’s assassination 

tribal 4a


Also, “Lincoln” means “Line of Cohen”. That means Lincolnshire in England is where the Line of Cohen settled. He descends from the priesthood of the Cohenim. He was a prophet and very spiritual and shamanistic. Naturally, the Illuminati sought to take him out.

Interestingly, Lincoln was shot when the Moon was on the Ascendant at 9° of Sagittarius at 10:15 pm April 14th, 1865 and died the next morning when the Sun was on the Ascendant at 25° of Capricorn at 7:22 am on the April 15th, 1865.

tribal 5a tribal 6 a




This suggests he was a sacrifice of the Sun god Osiris and Moon goddess Isis, making him Horus, the son of the Sun god.

Alan Pinkerton was Honest Abe’s personal bodyguard. He founded Pinkertons, which supplies security for the U.S. Secret Service to this day. Interestingly, the logo for the Pinkerton Security company is the All-Seeing Eye of Horus, the Illuminati logo.

This suggests the fox is guarding the henhouse. It’s probably a safe bet that the Illuminati control security for prime ministers and presidents around the world. Any leader who steps out of line gets whacked by his own security detail.

Timothy Watson is the author of Must I Remember published, a true story about an Afghani refugee family.

Visit Tim’s website

or drop him a line at .




Obama bin Osama Cause Osama bin Lyin’

Obama bin Osama Cause Osama bin Lyin’
By Timothy Spearman
Cognitive dissonance being what it is the average TV viewer has no idea how brainwashed they really are. The fact that the authorities chose the word TV “program” as a synonym for TV “show” and no one noticed the implications of the word “program” or TV “programming” highlights how deep the psychological programming and mind control actually go. The public is even brainwashed to not recognize they are brainwashed by Orwellian double-speak like “TV program”, which places the mind in psychological denial mode by dismissing the notion that TV viewing has anything to do with programming the mind. “It’s just a word for heaven’s sake,” the TV viewer will argue. “TV program is just another word for TV show.”
No one seemed to notice when Michael Jackson turned from black to white. No one paid the slightest attention when Britney Spears went from good girl to bad. No one paid any heed to Hannah Montana going from nice girl to naughty girl Miley Cirus. How deep does the programming go? I guess we will have to ask the Monarch slaves and Montalk test subjects who have been through the CIA’s MK-Ultra program, stars and superstars who like Katy Perry, have not just gone to the dark side, but actually admit they sold their souls to the Devil.
It is rather amazing that one of the major global terrorists modeled after George Orwell’s “Goldstein”, the character featured in 1984 as the international terrorist the Ministry of Peace would have us all focus our hate, bears a striking resemblance to role played by Osama Bin Laden in the international media.
Amazingly, Osama bin Laden’s personal handler is Zbigniew Brzezinzki, the man who personally credits himself with creating the Mujihadeen, the Taliban and Al-Qaeda with 3.5 billion in CIA funding, ostensibly with the aim of toppling the Soviet Empire by bankrupting it through an interminable war on terror. Exactly the same M.O. is now being deployed on the United States with the aim of bankrupting it the last great superpower, before ushering in the New World Order of the Antichrist worldwide.

obama 1










obama 2













Notice the clean right temple on the forehead. In later photos, we see the scar and the mark. Is this a micro-chipped Manchurian Candidate president? What is remarkable is that Zbigniew Brzezinzki is the personal handler of Obama too. There is even a video clip on youtube showing Obama turning to Mr. Brzezinzki to thank him for his years of mentorship. In this same interview we see an interview with Brzezinzki, in which Brzezinzki denies a relationship of Obama prior to September of 2007, claiming to have met him only in the summer. Yet Obama refers to his years of mentorship in more than one speech. What is being hidden about their relationship and why? (
You will also notice a long scar along the jaw bone that wasn’t there when Osama was younger. Is this the result of plastic surgery?


obama 3








You will also notice a long scar along the jaw bone that wasn’t there when Osama was younger. Is this the result of plastic surgery? Notice how the Maxillary lateral incisor in Obama’s million dollar smile is tucked behind the maxillary central incisors. Then take a look at Osama’s incisors and once again we are left in little doubt that we are dealing with doppelganger biometric ID. Obama’s teeth exhibit the same trait in the upper photo. For clarity the maxillary lateral incisors are in red. The central are in the middle of these as shown.

obama 4






George Freund, “The Ears Have It,”

No wonder people are mixing up Obama and Osama as they make repeated Freudian slips. Does the Freudian slip betray a deeper knowledge of facts beneath the programming, brainwashing and psychological denial? This is the nature of cognitive dissonance. Like the word TV “program” being used as a synonym for TV “show”, the public is being programmed not to see the word “program” for what it is – “programming”. Thus, they are inclined to dismiss the notion that they are being systematically brainwashed and programmed because the word is used in a different nuance so they fail to see the true implications of the TV programming. This is like Jacque Derrida’s difference, in which he explains that just by changing the ‘e’ in difference to a ‘a’, it becomes a non-word and a non-concept, which ‘deconstructs’ the programming and leaves the subject utterly deprogrammed outside language, reason and sense. This is the very essence of cognitive dissonance.
As a Shakespeare scholar, I am reminded of the similarities in the names “Will Shakespere” and “William Shakespeare”. “Will Shakspere” was the name of the front man who pretended to be the author and took credit for the plays, while “William Shakespeare” was the pen name adopted by the concealed royal princes Francis Bacon and Edward de Vere, the 17th Earl of Oxford, who were the Queen’s bastard children and named their author after Pallas Athena, the goddess of Greek drama, who dispelled the serpents of ignorance and vice by educating the masses through drama, and was thus known as the Spear-shaker, Hasti-vibrans in Latin. The same cognitive dissonance exists in the similarity between the two names “Will Shakspere” and “William Shakespeare” that exists between the names Obama and Osama.
Timothy Spearman, “Shaking a Spear at Ignorance,”


obama 12

Now we’re getting somewhere. Biometric ID doesn’t lie. That’s why security and the banking industry are moving into biometric ID. The Japanese banks were the first to introduce cardless ATMs, but now the government of British Columbia has implemented them. It won’t be long before the technology goes global. Now if we examine Obama’s and Osama’s biometric IDs,  featuring their respective palm characteristics, we can see we have a pretty remarkable match. If this is verifiably true, then we have clear evidence the president is not only a chameleon but a “karma chameleon” to use an old Boy George coinage, since he is able to play both sides of the fence, pretending to be good on the Stars and Stripes side, while being downright evil as the CIA agent code named Tim Osmond, who is playing the international terrorist.
(“Is Obama Really Osama bin Laden,”

As you all know, Donald Trump made a big deal about Obama’s birth certificate. Then the White House released the birth certificate in response to Trump’s protests.
There are a number of anomalies with the birth certificate that require scrutiny and attention. First of all, the birth certificate that the White House released lists Obama’s birth as August 4, 1961. It also lists Barack Hussein Obama as his father. No big deal, right? At the time of Obama’s birth, it also shows that his father was twenty-five, and that Obama’s father was born in Kenya, East Africa. This wouldn’t seem like anything of concern, except for the fact that Kenya did not even exist until 1963, two whole years after Obama’s birth, and twenty-seven years after his father’s birth. How could Obama’s father have been born in a country that did not yet exist? Up and until Kenya was formed in 1963, it was known as the “British East Africa Protectorate”.
The other discrepancy concerns the hospital that Obama was born in. On the birth certificate released by the White House, the listed place of birth is “Kapi’olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital”. This cannot be, because the hospital(s) in question in 1961 were called “KauiKeolani Children’s Hospital” and “Kapi’olani Maternity Home”, respectively. The name did not change to Kapi’olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital until 1978, when these two hospitals merged. How can this particular name of the hospital be on a birth certificate dated 1961 if this name had not yet been applied to it until 1978?
George Freund, “The Trouble with Fake ID,”
If that isn’t enough deception for you, consider the so-called raid in Abbattobad, Pakistan, where the US Navy Seals supposedly took out Osama bin Laden. The raid never took place, as Nobel Laureate Seymour Hersh has correctly claimed. The entire operation is a fraud from start to finish, and all the US Navy Seals who were purportedly involved in the raid were later killed in a helicopter crash. I have eyewitness testimony from Pakistanis who used to live in the area and they said there is no way Osama bin Laden lived there. They claim it was a CIA safe house and not a hideout for the world’s most notorious terrorist.
It may be the most brilliant psy-op in history for Obama to have eliminated his own alter ego, Dr. Jekyll taking out Mr. Hyde in apparent raid that never even took place. Now in the minds of most lamestream media viewers, Osama is officially dead and there’s no way he can ever be identified now with the man in the White House. The public mind through TV programming has been brainwashed to accept that Osama is dead. Not only has Osama-Obama benefitted from the mid-term benefits of a major military victory in the so-called “war on terror”, but he has taken out his own alter ego at the same time, so that people are unlikely to see the link between the two men, including the fact that they shared the same handler, Zbigniew Brzezinzki.


obama 13


President Barack Obama, Vice President Joe Biden and Secretary of State Hilary Clinton, along with members of the national security team, receive an update on the mission against Osama bin Laden in the Situation Room of the White House.
The head of the CIA admitted yesterday that there was no live video footage of the raid on Osama bin Laden’s compound as further doubts emerged about the US version of events. The live footage is a lie and the staged nature of the above photo should be obvious for anyone with eyes to see with that it is a patent hoax.
Leon Panetta, director of the CIA, revealed there was a twenty-five minute blackout during which the live feed from cameras mounted on the helmets of the US Special Forces was cut off. Therefore, the contention that the raid was streamed live is simply physically impossible. No doubt Panetta made this announcement as a deliberate effort to embarrass the president and the White House. If anyone thought Watergate was a scandal, this makes Nixon look like a babe in the woods.
A photograph released by the White House appeared to show the president and his aides in the situation room watching the action as it unfolded. In fact, they had little knowledge of what was happening in the compound. The intense look of Obama seems artificial, forced and fake in hindsight. As for the hand-to-mouth look of shock and awe on the face of Hillary Clinton, all one can say is ‘Yeah right’. Feminine delicacy in a ruthless warmonger and CIA deep cover covert operative? Are you kidding me?
In an interview with PBS, Mr. Panetta said: “Once those teams went into the compound I can tell you that there was a time period of almost twenty or twenty-five minutes where we really didn’t know just exactly what was going on. And there were some very tense moments as we were waiting for information.
“We had some observation of the approach there, but we did not have direct flow of information as to the actual conduct of the operation itself as they were going through the compound.”
Mr. Panetta also told the network that the US Navy Seals made the final decision to kill bin Laden rather than the president.
He said: “The authority here was to kill bin Laden. And obviously, under the rules of engagement, if he had in fact thrown up his hands, surrendered and didn’t appear to be representing any kind of threat, then they were to capture him. But they had full authority to kill him.
“To be frank, I don’t think he had a lot of time to say anything. It was a firefight going up that compound. And by the time they got to the third floor and found bin Laden, I think it – this was all split-second action on the part of the Seals.”
The president purportedly only knew of the mission’s success after the Navy Seals commander heard the word “Geronimo” on the radio, a code word from commandos reporting that they had killed bin Laden.
The absence of footage of the raid has led to conflicting reports about what happened in the compound. According to Pakistani authorities one of bin Laden’s daughters, who was present during the raid, claimed that her father was captured alive before he was killed.
There was also growing doubt about the US claims that Pakistan’s intelligence agencies were involved in the raid, another patently bogus claim, only one of the many Seymour Hersh is referring to, when he says that not one word of the White House’s account of the raid in Abbattobad is true.
Lieutenant General Asad Durrani, former head of the ISI, Pakistan’s intelligence service, said it was “inconceivable” that his government was unaware of the US raid on Osama bin Laden’s compound. He claimed his country was forced to deny any knowledge of the raid to avoid a domestic backlash. The ISI’s official line has been that bin Laden’s compound had “slipped off our radar” after it raided the building looking for him in 2003.

The agency claims it was unaware that bin Laden was hiding there. How could a domestic agency not know and a foreign agency know? It’s a ridiculous claim. The fact is that ISI was set up and trained by the CIA – whose covert ops really work for the Vatican (House of Cain) and are called “The Knights of the Holy See” – and work under their rubric and control.
Lieutenant General Durrani, however, said that the denial was a “political” manoeuvre by the intelligence services to avoid claims that they were working too closely with the US. This statement by the Lieutenant may be the only true statement in the entire pack of lies.
He said: “It is more likely that they did know [about the raid]. It is not conceivable that it was done without the involvement of Pakistani security forces at some stage. They were involved and they were told they were in position.
“The army chief was in his office, the cordons had been thrown around that particular place. The Pakistani helicopters were also in the air so that indicates that it was involved.
“[There are] political implications back home. If you say that you are involved there is a large, vocal faction of Pakistani society that will get very upset because we are carrying out repeatedly these operations with the Americans.”
“CIA admits that there is no live footage of the raid on Osma bin Laden’s compound,” posted originally by EU Times, May 5th, 2011,
Abbattobad Raid Is a Lie
Not one word of official account of raid that killed Bin Laden is true, was the recent claim made by award-winning journalist Seymour Hersh. The Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist says that raid which killed Osama Bin Laden in 2011 is ‘one big lie’, which of course it is from start to finish. He says the US media is running scared and is too timid to pick on Obama. Hersh, 76, says the solution is to shut down news networks like NBC and ABC as corrupt entities. He also suggested firing 90 per cent of mainstream editors.

obama 14

‘Not true’: Journalist Seymour Hersh says the raid that killed Osama Bin Laden in 2011 was all a fabrication

obama 15

The compound: The Pakistan home of the al Qaeda leader was in flames after it was attacked by Navy Seals
He said the Navy Seal raid that supposedly resulted in the death of the Al-Qaeda terror leader, Hersh said, ‘not one word of it is true’.
Hersh first gained worldwide recognition in 1969 for exposing the My Lai Massacre and its cover-up during the Vietnam War, for which he received the 1970 Pulitzer Prize for International Reporting. The problem as Hersh sees it is that the US media is allowing the Obama administration to get away with lying. ‘It’s pathetic. They are more than obsequious, they are afraid to pick on this guy [Obama].’ Meanwhile, the White House has refused to publicly release images of Bin Laden’s body, fuelling suspicion they are withholding information.

obama 16

Aftermath: Part of a damaged helicopter is seen lying near the compound after US Navy SEAL commandos supposedly killed bin Laden

obama 17

Destroyed: The purported grounds of the Bin Laden’s compound after the raid
Although the White House said the corpse was immediately ‘buried at sea’ within twenty-four hours of his death in line with Islamic tradition, it quickly emerged that this was not standard practice. Muslims bury their followers in the ground. A burial at sea is in violation of Muslim practice and would be forbidden. It has also been suggested that the White House has changed its story multiple times on several points, according to, a pattern we have seen before with the Oklahoma Bombing, 9/11, Sandy Hook, the Boston Marathon, etc. The later claim was made that they did not want Osama’s gravesite to turn into a holy shrine, being visited by faithful jihadists.
They initially claimed that pictures from the ‘situation room’ show Obama, Vice President Joe Biden, Hilary Clinton and the rest of the security team watching the raid live, when in fact there was a blackout on the feed. Neighbors close to the Pakistani compound in Abbottabad also said they had never seen Bin Laden in the area.

obama 18

Hersh claims the US media is too scared to challenge Obama
Hersh said the American press spends ‘so much more time carrying water for Obama than I ever thought they would’. In his opinion, the solution would be to shut down news networks like NBC and ABC and fire ninety per cent of mainstream editors and replace them with ‘real’ journalists who are not afraid to speak truth to power. ‘The republic’s in trouble, we lie about everything, lying has become the staple,’ he said.

(Marie-louise Olson,

Seymour Hersh has saved the day. This is the best news those in the conspiracy exposure culture have heard in years. He has exposed the mainstream media in America as an Orwellian Ministry of Peace propaganda mouthpiece of the White House. The CIA’s Operation Mockingbird, a CIA covert operation to infiltrate the corporate media to control the message, has received the ultimate mocking it deserves.

As for Osama being dead forget it. Fox News announced his death from kidney disease back in 2001, so we can clearly see how credible the corporate media is. Osama is in the White House. In the best psyops operation in history. Obama killed off his own alter ego, so that Dr. Jekyll could hide Mr. Hyde. Obama is Osama. I have been saying this for months. As usual no one listens to the messenger. They both had Zbigniew Kazimierz Brzezinski as their mentor (handler). What are the odds? Osama-Obama – Cognitive dissonance to create confusion in the public mind. Will Shakspere-William Shakespeare. It’s an old game. They’ve been at it for a long time. And the public, which they call the profane rabble of goyim are as dumb as pegs.

Charting the Course of the Antichrist

Charting the Course of the Antichrist

Timothy Spearman

There has been much written and discussed about Dec. 21, 2012. It is the winter solstice and hearkens back to the holidays of the pagan sun cults represented by the Babylonian trinity Nimrod, Simiramis and Tammuz and their Egyptian counterparts Osiris, Isis and Horus. After the Luciferians took over the Northern Kingdom of Egypt, following the influx of refugees from Land of Canaan known as the Hebiru or “Shepherd Kings,” the monotheistic religion of the Pharaoh Akhenaton came into being, which venerated the god of this world or Lucifer. The new religion and the older pagan cult then fused to produce the hybrid we know it as today and to which the elite Satanic cabal known as the Illuminati continue to subscribe. In light of this, December 21, 2012 – a date that will live in infamy because the world population has been brainwashed to welcome that date as one of great significance – is in fact a date with Lucifer.

December 21 let us remember is the date that the sun god dies and goes to a dark place for three days until he is raised by the moon goddess three days later in a necromancy ceremony conceived to raise her consort from the dead. Thus, the date itself symbolizes the resurrection of the sun god, who is actually Lucifer since the cult of the sun god and the cult of Lucifer were actually fused in Egypt at the time of the Middle Kingdom. What this suggests is the rebirth of Lucifer, who will assume the world throne at the resurrected Temple in Jerusalem on December 21, 2012.


charting 1

Astrological chart for December 21, 2012
To understanding the above chart for December 21, 2012, it is necessary to offer some background on the concept of sacred geometry and the occult significance of the geometric shapes found within this uniquely singular chart. The concentration of planetary rulerships in the first three houses and the last five houses of the chart creates a semi-circle of planetary influence that is immediately noticeable and discernible. This produces a matrix of lines based on trines, squares, and oppositions that produce obvious and significant geometric forms. The sacred geometry produced from these matrices is of such occult significance that it cannot be dismissed, especially in light of the date December 21, 2012, and what it actually commemorates. Present within the above chart is a perfected pyramid factoring in the Golden Mean or Pi ratio.
To offer some background to our study of sacred geometry, let us begin by going back to the dawn of civilization, where we see a figure emerging from the mist of history known as Enoch, first referred to in Genesis 5:24. Enoch is the basis for the Greek Hermes (Mercury to the Romans) and the Egyptian Thoth. The system is called Enochian magic. Hermes Trimegistus means “Thrice Greatest Hermes”. Hermes and Hermetic tradition is said to have created the zodiac. Hermetic tradition is also responsible for the craft of creating cities, which Hermes taught. “The Divine Pymander of Hermes Mercurius Trimegistus” introduced the concept of “As above So Below”. The Square and Compass is a disguised Hexagram Star and is symbolic of “As above So Below”. The reflecting pools in Washington D.C. symbolize this reflecting of what is above in what is below.
David Ovason argues in “The Secret Architecture of Our Nation’s Capital,” that the real secret of Washington lies in Federal Triangle. There is a right angle triangle surrounding the constellation Virgo reflected in the Washington street plan. This is significant since the plan to usher in the Antichrist beings in mid-September 2009 when a stellium of planets comprised of Mercury, the Sun, Saturn and the Moon all appear in the 10th House relating to the public, conveying a strong commitment in terms of governance over health. This health initiative will be used to weaken the resistance of the people and to make them more susceptible to the influence of the Antichrist when he emerges on the world stage in 2012 represented as a Savior figure and the instrument of our planetary salvation.
Let us not forget that the right angle triangle is the geometric representation of the Pythagorean theorem. The theorem states that the base of the right angle triangle squared and the perpendicular side of a right angle triangle squared are equal to the third side known as the hypotenuse. The Master Mason candidate of Freemasonry is asked to meditate on the 47th problem of Euclid, which is the 47th theorem of Pythagoras, which also states that the sum of the squared hypotenuse is equal to the sum the squares of the other two sides in a right angle triangle. In occult circles, the upright side symbolizes the male, the base symbolizes the female and the hypotenuse symbolized the Divine Child. (Riddle in Stone) The Divine Child translates as the son of the sun god Tammuz/Horus, the product of the union of the sun god and his consort the moon goddess, but because of the fusing of the old sun god cults with the newer Lucifer cult, Osiris = Lucifer and the Divine Child Horus = the Antichrist.

charting 2

a2 + b2 = c2


The White House, Washington Monument and the Capital Building all line up as a right angle triangle. The occultists intended for this street plan to draw on the spiritual energies of Virgo. Are the energies intended to bring forth the Divine Child? David Ovason refers to Pennsylvania Avenue as the spiritual center of Washington D.C. It is the hypotenuse of Federal Triangle. The Divine Child is supposed to be the New Age Messiah, the coming together of the cosmic masculine and feminine forces to produce a synergy, which the Masons believe will create the so-called “Perfected Man” who is in fact the Masonic Christ or Antichrist.
The Buchanan monument in Washington D.C. placed Buchanan, a Mason, between a male and female god and goddess as the hypotenuse, where the perfected man is supposed to be. Daniel Carter Beard founded the Boy Scouts of America. The Boy Scout Memorial on 15th Street, between East Street and Constitution Ave. show the Boy Scout as the Divine offspring of the male god and female goddess statues he stands between. (Riddles in Stone)


charting 3














The chart cast for the Mayan calendar date of Dec. 21 2012 above displays a perfected pyramid embodying the Golden Mean formed by Uranus, Jupiter, Saturn and Pluto at the base with an apex forming in Neptune. This pyramid, which perfects on December 21, 2012, heralds the arrival of the Antichrist on the world stage.

This will be commemorated in symbolic terms by the capping of the Great Pyramid of Egypt with its missing capstone, an event depicted on the reverse side of the American one dollar bill. This in turn commemorates the ascension of the Masonic Christ or Antichrist to the throne in Jerusalem, an event symbolically conferred by the date December 21, 2001, the chart above confirming this to be the case with the esoteric geometry it invokes.
In addition, a right angle triangle drawing on the energy of Virgo, which is surrounded by a right angle triangle, can also be found in the matrix of lines found in the chart drawing for December 1, 2012, heralding the arrival of the Masons’ “Perfected Man,” the Masonic Christ or Antichrist. In keeping with the occult belief “As above So Below,” a right angle triangle is formed in the chart of the heavens on December 21, 2012, the malefic planets Saturn and Pluto forming the male energy of the upright line, Jupiter and Saturn forming the feminine energy of the base, and Pluto and Jupiter forming the hypotenuse representing the Divine Child, which in this case is the Antichrist.
It turns out that the International Swine Flu Conference August 19-21 Washington D.C. is being held in a place of due ceremony for the occultists. If you reread my article, you will be shocked to discover that the same street in Washington D.C. that they are holding their little Antichrist Swine Flu party – how to take out the goyim by their own unclean habit of eating swine – is the very same street that happens to be the hypotenuse of Federal Triangle, namely Pennsylvania Ave. And let’s not forget, to the occultists, the hypotenuse of the right angle triangle represents the so-called “perfected man”, the Masonic Christ, the Antichrist. So the swine flu conference in Washington D.C. is a date with the Antichrist. Remember also that the “Sylvania” in Pennsylvania refers to a wooded area or grove of trees where witchcraft rites are held.

OK Bomb Far From Okay

OK Bomb Far from Okay
Timothy Spearman
The first thing to note about the chart is that there are two Squares in close aspect. The first Square is formed by Mars at 16° of Capricorn in the Third House, the Moon at 25° of Sagittarius in the Seventh House, and Venus at 26° of Pisces in the Tenth House.

This suggests an act of war through business activity that will affect the homeland through travel or a vehicle of travel affecting humanity and goodwill in the public domain. It also points to a homeland operation by a homeboy, a local. The other Square is formed by Mars at 16° of Capricorn, Jupiter at 14° of Sagittarius in the Seventh House, and Saturn at 20° of Pisces. This suggests an act of war through business activity as a result of travel from abroad that will have a destructive and debilitating effect.

The two Squares in close aspect suggest that there are two covert operations, one foreign and one domestic. They Squares also appear to be like arrowheads aimed at the DC (Descendant) Seventh House as though it were the outcome of the energy of the AC (Ascendant), which is under the rulership of Gemini. Since Gemini rules communications, the message being sent into the public domain is through an act of terror or war.

The basis of the message is that Uranian freedom is being undermined by Neptunian deception, symbolized by the conjunction of the two planets in the Eighth House, while humanity and goodwill are concurrently undermined in the public domain by violence and death, symbolized by the conjunction of Saturn and Venus in the Tenth House under the rulership of Pisces.

The AC (Ascendant) is at 9° of Gemini. The Sabian symbol for 9° of Gemini is “Aroused strikers around a factory”. Sabian symbols are based on archetypes invented by an astrology practitioner who meditated on the significance of each of the 360 degrees of the zodiac. Gemini rules communications and the message conveyed by the media was that Timothy McVeigh was a member of an anti-government militia group. “Aroused strikers around a factory” would represent the sentiments of such a group, a grassroots movement of blue collar activists who see their cause as a just one aimed at fighting those who hold a monopoly on power.

Jim Keith and other researchers later exposed the fact that Timothy McVeigh was working for the CIA and was a member of the Confederate Lodge of Freemasonry. These shadowy connections call into question the official line promoted by the mainstream media depicting him as being affiliated with an anti-government militia group. In hindsight, he appears to be more like an agent provocateur meant to infiltrate a militia group as part of a counterintelligence operation. 9° of Aquarius, which is one Sabian symbol over from the AC represents “A quiver filled with arrows”. This suggests a weapon or an arrow poised for deployment like a bomb set to explode based on a detonation timing device.

The DC (Descendant) is located at 8° of Sagittarius. The Sabian symbol for 8° of Sagittarius is “Deep within the depths of the earth, new elements are being formed”. Seismic readings taken at the time of the explosion noted that there were two major explosions occurring ten seconds apart. This behavior accords with that of a high tech device requiring military clearance known as a Simtex explosive device. The explosion was of such force that it caused a seismic disturbance large enough for the anomaly to be detected, resulting in a reaction deep within the earth causing “new elements to be formed,” as is the case with violent reactions like a seismic disturbance.

The Sabian symbol for Mars at 16° of Leo is “Brilliant sunshine just after a storm”. A storm is an apt description for a bomb explosion. The reference to “brilliant sunshine” is symbolic of the fiery bomb blast that would have filled the sky the morning of the bombing. The planet aspected at the 16° mark is the one associated with the god of war, showing that the storm is an act of war and the super-effulgent brilliance comparable to “brilliant sunshine” was the result of an act of aggression, a blitzkrieg, a lightning strike, an act of war.

Chiron at 20° of Virgo reveals the Sabian symbol depicting “A caravan of cars headed for Promised Land”. In the wake of the explosion, many motorists fled the downtown core in panic just as an escape crowd will flee the site of danger. The fact that Chiron is the heavenly body aspected here is significant because Chiron is a mythological figure who suffered injury and debilitating illness due to the infliction of a wound. A bomb inflicting a wound on the downtown core of Oklahoma at 9:02 am, when most people are starting work, would have induced a panic resulting in an exodus from the downtown core in a bid to escape the danger and get out of Dodge. Escaping extreme danger is comparable to an escape from bondage and deliverance to a Promised Land, so the related Sabian symbol seems apt in light of the events of that morning.

Moon Node at 5° of Scorpio reveals the Sabian symbol of “A massive rocky shore resists the pounding of the sea”. Scorpio represents death and renewal. The fact that the Moon Node is aspected here suggests a fleeting and transitory act of violence, not long-lasting.

The resultant damage was not as extensive as it might have been. The Alfred B. Murrah Building withstood the assault to some degree. Photographs of the wreckage left in the aftermath of the bomb show a damaged building with outer facade destroyed.

The evidence points to a blast originating from within the building, sending debris across the street, as opposed to an external blast being the cause of destruction as the mainstream media claimed. The local news services in Oklahoma reported that two undetonated bombs had been discovered by bomb squad officials inside the building. It is also known that the Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms Bureau had explosive materials deployed in its work stored in the Federal Building, which only added to the magnitude of the explosion. It is also worth noting that the ATF Bureau staff received prior warning of the blast insofar as they were told not to come into work that day. Despite the magnitude of the assault, much of the building remained intact.

Interesting also is that the degree point next to 5° of Scorpio at 6°, pointing to the Sabian symbol of “A gold rush tears men away from their native soil”. Was it the lure and promise of money as payment for a covert operation that lured Middle Eastern terrorists away from their native land? In light of the fact that Mercury is at 4° of Taurus in the Twelfth House, which represents the Sabian symbol of “The pot of gold at the end of the rainbow,” it would suggest that the covert ops walked away with their weight in gold in terms as reward and payment for pulling off the operation.

Witnesses who worked for a local property management company in Oklahoma said the company had hired a group of foreign refugees to do painting and construction work. This group had allegedly fled from Iraq to escape Saddam Hussein’s regime. An employee told the reporter that he saw these “refugees” cheering the Oklahoma terror attack and vowing to die in Saddam Hussein’s service. Was it the lure of money that enticed these poor Iraqi refugees to take part in a covert operation?
Pluto at 0° of Sagittarius has no associated Sabian symbol. Sagittarius rules travel and vehicular movement. The bomb responsible was said to be an ammonium nitrate bomb planted in a Ryder truck vehicle parked outside the building. The vehicle was not in motion, but stationary. The story is highly suspect, however, as there is no bomb crater in the street from the explosion. Dr. Frederic Whitehurst’s allegations against the FBI crime lab sparked a Justice Department investigation that found the lab had provided “inaccurate pro-prosecution testimony in major cases including Oklahoma City.” Retired Air Force General Benton K. Partin, an explosives expert, disputed the FBI’s theory that the damage to the Murrah Building was caused by a single truck bomb. His analyses were later endorsed by numerous physicists, physical chemists, and experts in structural mechanics as well as a series of live tests conducted at Eglin Air Force Base.

Subsequent research exposed the fact that the amount of ammonium nitrate needed to inflict the required level of damage would have to be one ton’s worth of fertilizer bomb material. This meant that the Ryder truck vehicle would have been too small to house such a bomb. The FBI consequently changed its story twice, increasing the size of the vehicle each time till it eventually turned into a moving van. The Sabian symbol for 1° of Sagittarius depicts “Retired veterans gather to reawaken old memories”. The first obvious conclusion is that this symbol alludes to Timothy McVeigh and his accomplice Terry Nichols, since they were both ex-military. Their participation in a covert operation would have been right up their street and would have seemed like old times. But given that the operation also involved covert operatives posing as bomb squad officials, who entered the facility the morning of the bombing ostensibly to participate in an anti-terrorist bomb drill, the symbolic allusion is quite suggestive. Were they retired army veterans as well? Was the intention to deploy decommissioned ex-military as covert operatives who would be hard to trace? Many witnesses testified that they saw several bomb squad officials entering the Federal Building that morning. Jim Keith and others exposed the fact that a bomb drill had taken place early that morning and that people had been evacuated from the building during the drill.
One of the suspects who fit the John Doe 2 profile was Jose Padilla. It was either during or after serving ten months in the Broward County Jail that the man raised as a Roman Catholic converted to radical Islam with his fiancé, Cherie Maria Stultz. Following Padilla’s release, he and fiancé Stultz worked at a Taco Bell restaurant in Davie, near Fort Lauderdale, close to about twenty Islamic centers or mosques. Padilla disappeared after two years, and the couple later divorced. By 1998, Padilla had moved to Egypt. This explains the Sabian symbol for Jupiter at 14° of Sagittarius, which is “The pyramids and the Sphinx”. There is no greater cultural symbol of Egypt than the Giza pyramids, so the reference to this archetype in the Oklahoma Bombing chart seems a clear reference to Padilla’s activities in Egypt prior to the Oklahoma Bombing. His goal in going to Egypt was ostensibly to further explore Muslim teachings and traditions. He stayed about two years, aligning himself with illegal underground extremist mosques while there.

The Sabian symbol for the Moon at 25° of Sagittarius is “A chubby boy on a hobby horse”. The Moon rules the home and homeland and Padilla is a homeboy. Born in Brooklyn NY, he moved to Chicago at age five. All the sketches of him show him to be a heavyset and puffy-cheeked man with jowls. As for him having a “hobby horse”, that would have to be his penchant for crime. As a teenager, he was a member of a street gang. He spent time in a juvenile detention center in 1985 for an armed robbery that left one victim dead of stab wounds. Later, armed with a baseball bat, Padilla and his accomplice held up three men. One man fled, but the two thieves gave chase, and Padilla’s accomplice stabbed him in the stomach. As a juvenile, Padilla was convicted of aggravated battery, armed robbery and attempted armed robbery and was incarcerated in Illinois from November 1985 to May 1988. After serving time for murder and assault, Padilla moved to Florida, where he got into trouble again.

This time he was charged with aggravated assault with intent to commit a felony and discharging a firearm from a vehicle. Despite his already lengthy criminal record, he was sentenced to a year’s probation. In 1992, one year after his probation ended, Padilla was convicted in Florida of aggravated assault with a firearm. While serving time in the Broward County Jail, Padilla was accused of battery on a jail officer and resisting without violence in January 1992. He settled the charges with guilty pleas after spending ten months behind bars. All of these light sentences for felony charges indicate he had a guardian angel within the criminal justice system.

Probably his CIA or CIA connections through an affiliate subcontracted intelligence cell like al-Qaeda made him immune to the true rigors of the corrections system, so that he invariably received a slap on the wrist as opposed to a punishment matching the charge.

The next Sabian symbol over from 25° of Sagittarius is 26° of Sagittarius, which depicts “A flag-bearer in a battle”. Given the sideline role he performed, he is more of a flag-bearer than a participant, cheering team members more directly involved from the benches. In many ways, he seems to have been more of a decoy whose function it was to lead investigators away from the true trail and those more directly involved in the operation.

Uranus at 0° of Aquarius suggests that the Uranian-Aquarian energy of freedom is doubly aspected, but Uranus at 0° suggests that the Aquarian-Uranian freedom energy is being held in restraint. Certainly if the operation to implicate the anti-government militia movement by employing McVeigh and Nichols as patsies is true, then the bombing of the federal building did much to restrain the impulse of liberty.

The fact that it also helped the gun-banning initiative and provided inducement for the founding of the security state would have only hampered the Uranian freedom factor even more. Another interesting aspect is the nearby Sabian symbol of 1° of Aquarius, which is “An old adobe mission”. Given the Hispanic roots of Padilla, this could be an important marker in the chart as well, alluding to the ethnic connections of one of the more significant covert operatives employed in the mission.  2° of Aquarius may be another telling marker if we can stretch the chart references that far, since it points to the Sabian symbol of “An unexpected thunderstorm”. A bomb detonation is comparable to a sudden storm as previously mentioned.

The evidence that the Oklahoma City Bombing involved a larger conspiracy, employing several accomplices or covert operatives with Middle Eastern connections is compelling. And the trail begins with a mysterious FBI All Points Bulletin. In the week following the bombing in Oklahoma City, a reporter at a television station received a tip about some suspicious activity and began an investigation of a local property management company.

The reporter had been told by several former employees of the management company that they had seen a pickup truck at the office, a truck that matched the description in the FBI APB. The reporter discovered that the owner of the property, a Palestinian expatriate, pled guilty in 1991 to several counts of insurance fraud and served eight months in a federal prison. Court papers indicated that the FBI had investigated the suspect for alleged connections to the Palestine Liberation Organization. Former employees told the investigator that, six months prior to the bombing, the owner of the property management company hired the foreign refugees to do some work.

This group had allegedly fled from Iraq to escape Saddam Hussein’s regime. An employee told the reporter that he saw these “refugees” cheering the Oklahoma terror attack and vowing to die in Saddam’s service. The reporter used surveillance equipment to photograph these foreign refugees, and focused on one man who seemed to match the last FBI profile sketch and description of John Doe No. 2. The reporter later interviewed witnesses who said they saw McVeigh in the company of a foreign-looking man in the days and hours before the bombing. Witnesses also said they saw several of the refugees moving large barrels around in the back of an old white truck. The barrels, they alleged, emanated a strong smell of diesel fuel, one of the key ingredients used in the Oklahoma City bomb. Who was this man, the one who resembled John Doe No. 2? His name was Al-Hussaini Hussain who later filed a defamation lawsuit in Oklahoma County District Court against the television station and the reporter, charging that the news station had falsely accused him of being John Doe No. 2. The lawsuit was later dropped since the station had never directly targeted him as John Doe No. 2. However, Al-Hussaini Hussain is just one of many who were mentioned as a possible John Doe No. 2. Some would suggest that Hussain was given up as a target to deflect attention from the real John Doe No. 2. This is a typical M.O. employed in military intelligence operations, in which a lookalike double is employed to confuse investigators either to set someone up as a patsy or to lead investigators off the scent of a key agent.
These Middle Eastern covert operatives may be what the Sabian symbol for Neptune at 25° of Capricorn signifies: “An oriental rug dealer in a store filled with precious ornamental rugs”. Neptune rules deception and illusion, which points to a duplicitous plot involving “oriental” businessmen, who under the lure of money have agreed to take part in a covert operation to bomb an American federal building. Perhaps one or more of them were employed as rug dealers in their former homeland. Perhaps that’s what gave them the expertise needed to do the decorative renovation work for the property management company.

Despite attempts by the Clinton-Reno Justice Department to enforce the official line that the Oklahoma bombing was a purely domestic terrorist act, Oliver Revell, former FBI Assistant Director in Charge of Investigation and Counterterrorism, was quoted in news accounts as saying, “I think it’s most likely a Middle East terrorist. I think the modus operandi is similar. They have used this approach.” According to court documents filed in the McVeigh trial, an FBI communiqué on the day of the bombing suggested the attack may have been in retaliation for the prosecution of the bombers in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing attempt. The communiqué was clear: “We are currently inclined to suspect the Islamic Jihad as the likely group.” Terrorist expert Neil C. Livingstone stated in The Globe on May 16, 1995 that, “There is a remarkable similarity between the methods used by Islamic terrorists in the bombing of the Marine barracks in Beirut, the attack on the World Trade Center, and the bombing in Oklahoma. The truckload of explosives is almost a signature or calling card, and it is the weapon of choice among these groups.” Livingstone, the author of several books on terrorism, continued: “Very typically, these terrorists have found home-grown radicals to use as dupes in the actual bombings.

They have supplied the money and the technical expertise and highly skilled operatives to guide a project and then get out of town before they can be apprehended.” One investigator found direct ties linking suspects from the Oklahoma City bombing to an Islamic Jihad cell in Florida.

He believed the Florida cell was tied to the network of Osama bin Laden. Padilla’s whereabouts are unknown from 1994 to 1998. In all likelihood, he was still living somewhere in Florida and could have been involved with some of the Middle Eastern terrorist organizations that had possible ties to the Oklahoma City bombings. Additionally, according to a report from the Associated Press filed on Tuesday, June 11, 2002, Padilla was a protégé of a top lieutenant of Osama bin Laden, where he met other terrorists through his handler and conducted research on how to build a radioactive weapon. The Iraqi terrorists along with Padilla probably all had ties to Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda, but since Osama was a CIA agent code named Tim Osmond, it is possible to see the entire operation as a subcontracted al-Qaeda operation, which is essentially a branch of the CIA. Zbigniew Brzezinzky, National Security Advisor under President Jimmy Carter, publically boasted about the fact that the Taliban, al-Qaeda, and the CIA were created with 3.5 billion in CIA funding to create a security problem in Central Asia capable of toppling the former Soviet Union.

The fact that there are these unremitting links between foreign and domestic agents and agencies shows inside complicity and the fact that the CIA was subcontracting its covert operations to foreign agents and agencies to hide their hand in domestic as well as international false flag terror attacks. This suggests that the fox was guarding the hen house, which of course it was. The MC (Midheaven), which is an expression of public reputation and public influence, is an especially important factor in this chart considering that the MC is at 17° of Aquarius representing “A watchdog standing guard, protecting his master and his possessions”.

The fact that Saturn is in Pisces means that a malefic planet is aspected in Pisces, the zodiac sign ruling weakness, debility and ill health. The Sabian symbol for Saturn at 20° is “A large white dove bearing a message”. The presence of Saturn under the rulership of Pisces at the MC suggests that the effect of the bombing operation in the public sphere is to undermine the message of peace dispatched by the bird species traditionally associated with peace. In contradistinction, if the occult meaning of the dove is considered, then the dove is a symbol of Isis or Simaramis, which is a dark goddess like Kali, suggesting that the message being sent is of malevolent intent.

Venus in Pisces suggests that the energy of good will and humanity has been weakened in the 10th House. The Sabian symbol for 26° of Pisces is “A garage man testing a car’s battery with a hydrometer”. This suggests that the detonation device may have been rigged to the truck battery in the decoy operation designed to make the Murrah Building Bombing look like an “outside” job as opposed to an “inside” one, the meaning here being both literal and figurative.

The Sun at 29° of Aries shows that the Sun sign is in under the rulership of the god of war. The Sabian symbol for 29° of Aries is “The music of the spheres”. This suggests that the bombing was disruptive of harmony and ushered in an era of disharmony and chaos.  However, there is also the thought that, in keeping with the motto of these Machiavellian organizations ordo ab chao (order out of chaos), greater harmony has been induced for the controlling elite out of this act of chaos and warfare. In near aspect to 29° of Aries is 28°, whose Sabian symbol is “A large disappointed audience,” an apt description for the dismayed crowd of onlookers in Oklahoma who were surely horrified and disillusioned with their world in the aftermath of the bombing.

Mercury at 4° of Taurus suggests “A pot of gold at the end of the rainbow,” an apt allusion to the rewards and payouts received by the covert operatives who would take their money and run. In near aspect is 5° of Taurus, whose Sabian symbol is “A widow at an open grave”. The blown out shell of the building is itself analogous to an open grave, but then there are the grieving widows and other relatives who lost loved ones as a result of this terribly unnecessary tragedy. But then aren’t all tragedies unnecessary, for why else would we conceive of them so?

Sources: John Doe #2: Who Is He?
Jim Kieth, OK Bomb
David Icke, And the Truth Shall Set You Free
David Icke, Alice in Wonderland and the World Trade Center Disaster

The Psychopath: Who‘s Afraid of the Big Bad Wolf ?

The Psychopath: Who‘s Afraid of the Big Bad Wolf?

By Timothy Spearman

There are many facets to the psychopath. There are a number of causal factors, symptoms and behaviours. Examining some of the characteristics of psychopathic behaviour is a useful exercise. World literature is a good place to search for the psychological profile of the psychopath.

This is where Freud and Jung and so many others have found their Psychoanalytical models, in literature ancient and modern. World literature will be referred to in the course of this study as a means of gaining a deeper understanding of the psychopath and his criminal compunctions. This will help us identify the characteristic signs of the psychopathic personality in order to empower those trained to spot the signs and symptoms to protect themselves.

We have a societal practice of protecting children under the belief that they are innocent. The tendency of the family structure is for the older members of a family unit, whom we refer to as matriarchs and patriarchs, to shelter and protect children in order to protect their innocence. The skeletons are tucked away in the closet, where they can‘t be seen, hidden from view. The older the family member, the more privy they are likely to be to all the skeletons. They will then be forced to perform the forensics on the skeleton to discover the cause of this family mishap or tragedy. They will then make decisions on how to give the family skeleton a fit burial so it can rest in peace, in order to prevent it from haunting the younger family members. Psychological denial then sets in and the older family members will act as if nothing happened and carry on the charade of pretending that nothing untoward has even happened. In this way, they maintain the veneration of the younger members of the family, who continue to look up to them as role models and exemplars, since they are oblivious to their sins and mistakes.

This is how the  nuclear family and the national family behave. The nuclear family is merely a microcosm of the national family. They follow the same practices and adopt precisely the same behavioural norms and values.
But are the children really innocent? Are all children really born in a state of tabula rasa, in which the mind truly is a blank slate, innocent and unsullied, or is the writing already on the wall for some? Are some children born with an innate proclivity for rebellion and violence, both defiant and anti-social? Is there a natural compunction in some children to pursue the individual good at the expense of the common good? Are they simply unlawful and uncivil by nature, lacking any sense of social responsibility and the greater good of society we are meant to serve? Are some children born psychopaths? Is it hardwired into the genetics of some children that they will be naturally anti-social? Will they be afflicted with an innate tendency to lie, cheat, manipulate and commit acts of cruelty for which they feel no moral compunction or remorse?

If such children did exist, it would serve no good trying to appeal to their sense of fair play. It would be difficult to educate such children to be socially responsible due to lack of empathy. Strategies endorsed in child care and classroom settings such as ―time out‖, which involves brief periods of isolation such as sitting in a corner or on a ―naughty chair‖, would be unproductive. Children with innate psychopathic tendencies would feel no more feel the sting of censure or stigma than they would regret for how their actions might have impinged on or harmed others.
Psychologists are now coming to recognize that psychopathic children, described as callous- unemotional (CU), form a distinct sub-category of the mental disorder known as psychopathology. Most children exhibiting anti-social behaviour do so because of bad rearing, poor parenting or an abusive home. However CU children do not fit that categorization. They are not specifically products of bad parenting in the opinion of Professor Essi Viding fromUniversity College London.

Her study has isolated a genetic causal factor over and above environmental and behavioural psychology factors that was overlooked until now. Her group carried out twin studies, whose working hypothesis is that psychopathic traits in children are largely genetic, and seems to be confirmed by the results. ―For the group which has callous-unemotional traits, there‘s a strong genetic vulnerability,‖ said Prof Viding. ―This does not mean these children are born anti-social or are destined to become anti-social. But in the same way that some of us are more susceptible to heart disease, these children are people who are more vulnerable to environmental influences that trigger the anti-social outcome. In the case of other children with conduct problems, bad parenting appeared to be the more likely cause. The parents ineffective the parents were as role models and exemplars, the more anti-social these children were likely to turn out. The study indicated that this was not the case for children with  Psychopathic tendencies. Prof Viding, who will give a talk at the British Science Festival next week, said between twenty-five percent and fifty percent of children with behavioural problems fell into the CU category. That amounts to slightly less than 1% of all children.

She revealed how she applied her own test on her one-and-a-half-year-old daughter. Knowing that emotions are strongly contagious in most small children, Prof Viding pretended to cry profusely. ―I was very relieved when my daughter promptly burst into tears,‖ she said. ―I‘m not saying that a child who wouldn‘t start crying at that point is then diagnostic of being a psychopath, but I think that‘s one fairly crude way to see how your child reacts emotionally.‖ Usually parents become all too painfully aware of psychopathic tendencies in their children over a period of time, she said.
―The kinds of features that parents report are cruelty to animals, cruelty to younger siblings and lying and not having any remorse or concern about getting caught,‖ Prof Viding said. Oddly there is some evidence, albeit tentative, that psychopathic children respond to ―warm parenting‖. This might mean giving the children what they want in return for good behaviour.―We may need to appeal to their selfish motives,‖ said the professor. 1
The hypothesis that it may be possible to appeal to selfish motives in pre-pubescent psychopaths for further research, while provocative and interesting, does nothing to remedy the problem. It would only serve to encourage children with a genetic predisposition to psychopathic behaviour into greater anti-social behaviours. All this approach would do is encourage them to be more manipulative. Psychopaths already have the ‗trickster‘ personality. They already have a tendency to manipulate people by telling them what they want to hear. Rewarding them for complying with social norms and conventions through a reward system will only enhance their capacity to manipulate by teaching them to feign compliance in order to please through deceit. This would encourage a generation of Eddie Haskels of the Leave It to Beaver stripe to emerge to the detriment and harm of all concerned.
To clarify the term ‗trickster‘, it is word used in the field of anthropology to describe the psychopathic personality. This is a helpful term as it reveals a lot. The reasons for the psychopath‘s ‗trickster‘ nature are many, but one important causal factor seems to be an enlarged or damaged amygdala. The amygdala (corpus amygdaloideum) is a set of neurons located deep
1 ―Around one in 100 children in the UK could be a psychopath, research suggests,‖ The Telegraph, Aug 31, 2012,
within the medial temporal lobe of the brain. It has been shown to play a key role in the processing of emotions and forms part of the limbic system. This subcortical brain structure is linked to both fear response and pleasure. Its size is found to be connected with aggressive behaviour. It has been shown to shrink by more than thirty percent in castrated males. Conditions such as anxiety, autism, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, and phobias are believed to be linked to abnormal functioning of the amygdala, owing to damage, developmental problems, or
neurotransmitter imbalance. 2 Developmental problems can be linked to trauma related to abuse as the link to post-traumatic stress disorder would suggest.

The psychopath is handicapped in his ability to feel, so the only real hope he has of achieving any socialization is to emulate human emotions, since he is unable to produce any of his own naturally. Instead, he is forced to manufacture human emotion. The only way to do this is by studying human behaviour and mimicking, emulating or copying the behaviours of others. As an adept observer of human character, he will then study people in order to give them what they want. The psychopath might begin by questioning his prey with a series of open-ended questions to try to pin down a personality profile rather like the Big Bad Wolf sought to question Little Red Riding Hood, i.e. ―Where are you off to Little Red Riding Hood?‖ or ―What have you got in your picnic basket?‖ or ―How far is it to Grandma‘s house?‖ The questions, while seemingly innocent and well intentioned, are clearly designed to prize as much information out of the innocent and unassuming as possible for the manipulative of the psychopathic questioner. The Big Bad Wolf then uses this information to trap or set up the unwitting so they can be tricked or deceived.
To take the example further, the psychopath will then exploit the information given in order to locate Grandma‘s house. He will then gain entry into Grandma‘s home under some false pretext – an M.O. often used by saboteurs, criminals and terrorists – to win her over and gain her trust. He will then study her behaviour meticulously in order to mimic it, fooling others through the studied behaviours of kindness and empathy he is adept at copying.

When Little Red Riding Hood arrives, she is initially duped because the psychopath is a wolf in sheep‘s clothing. Disguised as Grandma – with the aspect, look, expression, voice, tone and appearance of grandma – the wolf appears to be the nurturing and loving relative he pretends to be, but it is just a cruel hoax. At first, Little Red Riding Hood is completely taken in, deceived into believing that she is in the presence of grandma. The innocent and unassuming, the naive if you like, are often taken in by the psychopath at first. At some later point the victim of deception may twig to something the psychopath trickster says or does and finally clue into the fact that they are being conned, but that may not occur at the time, but sometimes afterwards when it is too late. By the time they realize it they have already been cheated.
In part, Little Red Riding Hood is deceived by her own mind and senses into believing it is her grandma. This phenomenon is known as ―change blindness‖. What this means is that her senses are expecting this to be grandma, so her mind is tricking her into believing that it is Grandma and is not paying attention to the anomalies and differences that would otherwise reveal to her that this is not grandma but an imposter pretending to be grandma. The innocent that is nurtured in a caring and empathetic environment and home does not expect to be exploited, deceived, cheated or tricked by an adult, since they are in contact with respectable and decent adults ninety-nine percent of the time. Consequently, Little Red Riding Hood is not expecting to be conned and is initially blind to the change that has taken place in grandma.

2 Amygdala,
Little Red Riding Hood does not immediately twig to the fact she is in the presence of a trickster and deceiver. She is a victim of change blindness. It takes her some time before she recognizes the anomalies and inconsistencies displayed in Grandma‘s appearance that do not correspond with what she is so familiar. ―But Grandma, what big eyes you have,‖ she observes. To which the Big Bad Wolf responds with an irrelevancy to distract Little Red Riding Hood from the pertinent issue. He employs a logical fallacy called a red herring argument to avoid and evade the question and its implications: ―All the better to see you with, my dear.‖ He employs the same tactic to a series of questions in a subtle attempt at sidestepping the issue. ―But Grandma, what big ears you have,‖ observes the young girl. To which the Big Bad Wolf replies,―All the better to hear you with, my dear.‖ The irony is heavy laden in his remarks because it is his exaggerated senses resulting from the trauma he was exposed to in his childhood that makes the psychopath predator the Big Bad Wolf so keen of sense. His sympathetic nervous system was triggered into high alert in his infancy due to the abuse and trauma he was exposed to. Thus, he does have ―big eyes‖ and ―big ears‖. The psychopath also tends to compensate for his lack of emotion by laying it on a bit thick with feigned emotion.

Consequently, everything about the psychopath is exaggerated, but he employs trickery in the form of red herring arguments and
other irrelevancies to distract his unwitting prey from seeing through the manufactured persona and façade.
As with most depressive mental illnesses, the psychopath has a dual nature. On the one hand, at the conscious level, he seeks his own self-preservation. But at the subconscious level, he appears to seek his own self-destruction. The two competing drives culminate in a cat and mouse game in which he attempts to cover his tracks and evade capture, while at the same time delighting in leaving a calling card, common M.O. or clue behind in the hope that, at the subconscious level at least, he will be caught. Like Prince Hamlet, he is battling inwardly with two competing drives. Thus the conundrum: ―To be or not to be‖. His conscious seeks life, while his subconscious eggs him on toward his own destruction. He knows his family line is cursed,―The time is out of joint: O cursed spite,/That ever I was born to set it right!‖3 (Hamlet, Act I, v) He knows his family has brought the censure of heaven upon it and has fallen out of favour. He knows succession will go to the Norwegian King just as the true author, Edward de Vere, the Earl of Oxford, Queen Elizabeth I‘s royal changeling prince, knows the Tudor line is at an end. Hamlet is his autobiography. The play within the play is intended as a ―Mouse Trap‖ for Queen Elizabeth and her secret royal consort, Robert Dudley, the Earl of Leister. The courts of Europe know the Queen and Sir Robert murdered his wife Amy Robsart to pave his way to the throne.―I‘ll have grounds. More relative than this—the play‘s the thing. Wherein I‘ll catch the conscience of the King‖.4 English royal succession will go to the Scottish King, James VI of Scotland, just as Danish royal succession will go to the King of Norway, personified by Young Fortinbras.

Lord Oxford in the personage of Prince Hamlet debates whether to kill or not to kill, whether to be or not to be. Prince Hamlet wants to kill his uncle but finds excuses for not doing so, waiting till he is done his prayers instead of slaying him in the chapel. The Tudor family is a badly inbred royal line, with the characteristic signs of distemper found in the inbred. The family‘s homicide and suicide genes are switched on, King Henry VIII, Queen Mary, and Queen Elizabeth all exhibiting the same homicidal tendencies, slaughtering indiscriminately even their own family members. The play Hamlet, based on the English royal court of the Tudors, is a3 Hamlet Act I, v., ll.207-208.4 Ibid. Act II, ii, ll. 603-605. bloodbath, the entire accursed Hamlet royal line systematically poisoning and slaying each other into extinction, a re-enactment on the stage of the actual circumstances of the English psychopaths on the royal throne.

Similarly, Lord and Lady Macbeth put on an outward show of pretending to mourn King Duncan‘s passing, when it is they who have murdered him and usurped his throne. They feign grief and maintain the hypocritical outward display of mourning in the conscious world of daily social interaction. They pretend to care about their missing guest, Banquo, who fails to show up for the banquet. While the usurpers pretend to miss the guest who fails to show up for the feast, the subconscious betrays its guilt in the form of Banquo‘s ghost, who shows up fashionably late at the gathering or so it seems to the homicidal couples‘ subconscious.
While the Macbeths feign grief over the loss of their murdered kinsmen, they really have no friends or kin. They are incapable of love or any genuine emotion. They have an instrumental view of ―friends‖ and ―kin‖. There is no one on earth for whom they have the slightest genuine love. Everything is a ruse and charade, a fraud, façade and frontispiece. Lady Macbeth, a true psychopathic and the product of generations of aristocratic inbreeding, is so intent on raping life of whatever it has to give that she turns to the black arts and sorcery to conjure up the darkest spells in the service of her ambitions. Still, she cannot quell the guilt that remains deep within her psyche. Soon the pangs of conscience begin to gnaw their way through the outer layers of her hardened heart like a persistent mouse might gnaw through a castle‘s walls. Her somnambulism and haunted nights wandering the corridors of the castle are symptoms of the conscience lurking in the subconscious coming to the surface, seeking to absolve itself of the repression of the conscious mind. Lady Macbeth‘s somnambulant confessions speak volumes, ―Out, damned spot! out, I say!‖ 5
The truth eventually comes out because it must. The deed once done cannot be absolved by any known formula. The affliction of guilt is permanent, and no matter how many layers it is buried beneath the veils of psychological denial, it will surface nevertheless and the hand that quits the life and shortens the breath must wear the sickly sweet scent of blood till the end of time: ―Here‘s the smell of the blood still: all the perfumes of Arabia will not sweeten this little hand.‖ 6 Anyone who has ever known this depth of guilt will know how unquenchable and insatiable it is and how impossible to satisfy. It is an internal guilt best epitomized by the unquenchable thirst and unsatisfied hunger of Tantalus, who was forced to endure the torments of Hades forever for the sin of his royal house, the sin of devouring his own kin. Tantalus is unable to reach the fruit above his head or the water beneath his chin. This is a symbolic expression of the psychopath being unable to access the pleasure principle. A damaged amygdala may be to blame. The psychopath has limited access to the pleasure principle often because the amygdala is unable to regulate the proper emotional response to stimuli. It has been shown to play a key role in the processing of emotions. It may be a processing center or control centre of the emotional responses emerging from the limbic system. The subcortical brain structure has been linked to both fear response and pleasure. Its size is known to have a direct bearing on aggression. An enlarged amygdala can mean that the subject is prone to fits of temper and rages. It is known to shrink in size in the case of castrated males. This means that it has a direct connection to the pleasure principle. In certain cases, a damaged amygdala makes it difficult for the subject to feel and experience pleasure. Like a heroine abuser who must take higher and higher doses each time to gain access to the pleasure principle, so the psychopath must resort to 5 Macbeth, Act V, i, 35. 6 Macbeth, V, i, 50-52. greater and greater extremes of perversion to access the pleasure principle. As the lyrics penned by the consummate psychopaths of the music industry, the Rolling Stones convey, the psychopath ―Can‘t Get No Satisfaction‖.

Beneath the secrecy and discretion, the psychopath wants to be caught. There is a perverse motivation behind everything he does. There is a malignancy that drives him on. It is a malice and hardheartedness that springs from the callous disregard and cruelty to which he was subjected in early life. The empathy centre of the brain is switched off and he is motivated to prey upon others. He is the rebel without a cause, motivated in his acts of cruelty to target the innocent and blameless. He would sooner prey on the innocent because that is crueller.
It is precisely because Othello and Desdemona are so undeserving, for instance, that the actions of the psychopath Iago become more cruel and savage. There is a perverse satisfaction to be drawn from the fact that the virtuous can be destroyed without reason or justification. Still, the psychopath leaves clues behind because ultimately he wants to be caught, wants to be destroyed.
It is programmed into his genetics. Having bottlenecked its genetics through bad husbandry practices, the family line has reached its terminus. As with any production line, nature practices its own form of quality control. Just as a defective product is removed from the assembly line so as not to contaminate the product line, so nature will remove defective products from its product line so as to prevent the gene pool from becoming tainted. Once the genes are reduced to two Y- chromosomes, the suicide and homicide genes switch on. The genes have been programmed to remove the genetically inbred family from the product line. Quality control dictates that the defective product must be removed to prevent the gene pool from being contaminated.
The hellfire must be all-devouring, eventually consuming all the participants in the drama, everyone in the room, including Professor Plum, Miss Scarlett, Mrs. White, Mrs. Peacock and Mr. Green. If you were a player of the game of chess, you would understand. You desire to destroy your opponent, capture and kill the king, but at the same time, you are so enamoured with the cleverness of your moves that you desire to show them off. By doing so, you give the game away, the opponent finds a chink in your armour and you are knocked from your high horse, and your knight becomes his. Thus, the psychopath‘s genes are programmed so as to give the game away. He reveals his hand by leaving a calling card at the crime scene, a clue, a common M.O., some means of giving himself away.

Follow the clues and you will track the psychopath down. The trail of clues eventually leads right to his front door. You may notice when you get there that he doesn‘t run. He is perfectly happy to be taken into custody. He hasn‘t the least fear of being taken away even if it means the gallows. The truth is that he is motivated as much by the perverse desire to be caught as by the impulse to evade capture. He strives after his own destruction as though he had a death wish. The ultimate revenge upon the world and God is to destroy everything in Creation including himself and he will delight in it until the stake is driven through his heart and the very last nail driven
into his coffin.
We may be the voyeurs of this world, but we are only capable of being so within the three- dimensional prison compound of the five senses. We are subject to a control matrix that seeks to keep us locked within the jailhouse of the five senses, because the controlling elites are threatened by what might happen if we realized that, with strength found in greater numbers, freedom is ours to seize. The aim of the privileged elite is to dumb us down so they can continue to exploit us as their slaves. Some are house slaves and others work out in the fields, but slaves we are one way or another. If we dare to violate the narrow parameters of thinking within which they seek to confine us, we are the mental equivalent of a runaway slave. Instead of cutting off our foot, they amputate our frontal lobes, subject us to shock treatment or put us on a steady diet of psychotropic drugs that perform what is tantamount to being a chemical lobotomy.
The ―educators‖ pretend to wish to encourage us to see outside the box and appear to award little Johnny when he excels on the Stanford Binet Test, but don‘t be surprised if little Johnny is later co-opted by DARPA to work on weapons systems that kill people. Or perhaps Johnny will be mind-controlled so that he will do the bidding of his handlers, and when it‘s done, he will be told, like John Nash, that he‘s delusional and be placed on psychotropic drugs to help him recover. He will be the perfect ―monarch‖ butterfly, cocooned in a state of hypnosis and mind control so that, when he is released from the mental cocoon and chrysalis, he will emerge as a butterfly transformed, a completely altered human being and career psychopath.
Like Chinese philosopher Chuang Tzu, he may be a little confused and wonder if he is a butterfly dreaming he is a human being or a human being dreaming he is a butterfly, but he will still be useful. Utility is the key. It doesn‘t matter if you‘ve given your mind away, as long as you are giving it to the right people. Take JFK, for instance. They got a hold of his brain too. Trouble is they lost it.
Just be wary of little Johnny asking too many questions in class. If they find him too inquisitive or thinking too far outside the box, they‘re apt to treat him like a jack in the box and stuff him back inside. They might even misdiagnose him with attention deficit hyperactive disorder and push their pharmaceutical mafia medications on him. Your trusted family doctor might even take the role of drug pusher and have him wrongfully diagnosed and medicated. The docs don‘t think outside of the box, you see. They are matriculated in the same grade school fashion as the rest of us, forced to cram a bunch of useless ―facts‖ into their heads. The matriculation system merely measures their ability to memorize the information they have been spoon fed. They are not trained in critical thinking or problem-solving. They are brainwashed fools who digest the medical manuals and then regurgitate them like a cow with four stomachs
chewing on its cud, only in their case crud. They are incapable of lateral thinking. They are rewarded for high test scores because what the indoctrination system is testing them on is how programmable and brainwashable they are, not how clever, original and inventive they might be. Their powers of deduction are really quite elementary, my dear Watson. Their deductions are based on a kindergarten flowchart, in which they hear the patient‘s symptoms, make their diagnosis – very often a misdiagnosis – and then prescribe the recommended therapy, which is usually some form of drug regimen. The medical mafia drug pushers, who receive their funding from the pharmaceutical mafia, will insist they push the medications on their patients and produce the medical charts to show they have done so. Should they fail to push the recommended doses on the unsuspecting public, they will have their medical licenses revoked after five years. In addition, they get bonuses and other perks for pushing the drugs, increasing their yearly profit margins by a few thousand dollars, a small price to pay for the selling of their souls.

The doctors will insist that they are the experts and that they know what is best. They will make their diagnosis in Latin and give you the prognosis in Greek. They do this in order to insulate themselves against malpractice suits by talking gibberish and gobbledygook the patient is unlikely to understand. The naïve will venerate them as a smarter and higher species of life and may even deify them as gods, when the truth is not even the doctors themselves know what they are talking about.
The eyes can be one of nature‘s warnings. When a baby is born, the iris, or coloured part of the eye, is usually perfectly balanced in the middle of the eye between the eye lids. It touches the upper and lower lids, so that the white of the eye or sclera does not show above or below the iris. The sclera is visible only to the left and right of the iris in a neurologically healthy person. This indicates a balanced and healthy nervous system. The baby is alert and in generally sound health and of balanced temperament. This can be seen in the balanced aspect of their eyes.

When a person dies, the iris floats upward so that it partially disappears under the upper eyelid, and the white sclera shows prominently below the iris. In Oriental Medicine, we call such an appearance sanpaku, a Japanese word meaning ―three whites‖ showing. Three whites or sanpaku eyes with the sclera showing prominently below the iris is common among those who are ill or exhausted. It is most severe among those who are gravely ill and approaching death.
Three whites show that a person‘s nervous system is seriously imbalanced. Practitioners of Oriental Medicine would see such a person‘s mind, body, and spirit as being out of harmony with the larger forces of the cosmos. In the case of a person whose sclera shows prominently below the iris, such a person‘s intuition would be badly askew. His or her ability to assess people
and situations would be weak. Such people could be easily taken advantage of and would become easy prey to psychopaths.
Generally, there are two types of sanpaku eyes. The first is yin sanpaku, white showing below the iris, which is very common, especially among drug addicts. Here, the iris floats upward, revealing the sclera below. The second type is yang sanpaku, where the white shows prominently above the iris. In this case, the iris sinks downward toward the bottom eyelid. This reveals a dangerous or violent character. Charles Manson has extremely revealing yang sanpaku eyes.

psco 1
Manson, Charles

If the sclera shows prominently below the iris, the condition is yin. This indicates that the person is not imposing themselves upon others, but may instead find themselves vulnerable to others imposing themselves upon them. The danger of the condition is yin comes from outside, not from inside. A person with yin sanpaku eyes is likely to place himself or herself in dangerous or threatening situations unwittingly and may be in mortal peril.
The macrobiotic philosopher George Ohsawa wrote a book called You Are All Sanpaku and dedicated it to John Kennedy and Abraham Lincoln, among others. Ohsawa said they were all seriously sanpaku and thus suffered from impaired judgment that indicated poor health and premature death. All of the celebrities below died premature deaths. Some of them like Abraham Lincoln and Michael Jackson even had poor health and all of them had sanpaku yin eyes.

John F. Kennedy Robert F. Kennedy
psco 2

Abraham Lincoln

psco 0000

psco 6

Michael Jackson Heath Ledger

People exhibiting the yin sanpaku characteristic tend to be risk-takers and tend to place themselves in vulnerable situations where they do not exercising sound judgement. The people featured above accepted danger, but were unable to survive it. The condition known as Yin sanpaku, when the white shows prominently below the iris, can be the result of excessive intake of yin substances, such as sugar, refined grains, alcohol, and medical drugs.
If the white or sclera shows prominently above the iris, the condition is yang, and the danger among such persons comes from within. A person displaying the condition of eye known as yang sanpaku is likely to be extremely violent, filled with rage, and likely poses a threat to himself
and others. He may destroy himself, but may also take others with him.
Yang sanpaku, where the white shows markedly above the iris, can result from excessive intake of meat, salt, and hard cheeses, and from indulgence in violence. Yang sanpaku shows a character that is self-centered and bent on fulfilling its own ambition, something without regard for the cost.7
Psychopaths tend to be self-indulgent by nature. They often talk about what they ate that day or may speak often about cravings, i.e. needing a smoke, a coffee, or a snack. Their proclivity for indulgence tends to make them worse because their lifestyle choices in terms of rich foods and drink tend to enlarge the amygdala and affect the production of peptide connected with amygdale function called galanin.
Psychopaths are known to have eyes that lack empathy. If you have ever looked into a shark‘s eye you will have some idea what such an eye would look like. The iris is opaque and impenetrable to the gaze. The opaque aspect of the eye forbids the seer from looking into the subject‘s eyes. It is a cold stare and it is unwelcoming. It does not allow for an exchange of empathy and feeling. What is called the yang eye, when the whites of the eyes show more prominently above the iris, tends to show up more commonly in the psychopath, as is the case with Charles Manson. Perhaps a damaged amygdala may influence the position and aspect of the
eye, possibly directing the iris to sink down in the lower quadrant of the eye when the amygdala either shrinks or swells in size due to trauma, depression, and other emotional stimuli. With the aggressive subject with a swollen amygdala, the eyes might show white prominently above the iris with the iris directed downward in a look resembling hostility or disdain. The word
‗supercilious‘ refers to the act of looking down ―over the sills‖ of the eye. The eyes would assume in this case an arrogant, aggressive, predatory aspect under the influence of aggressive emotion. In the case of a swollen amygdala, the gaze of the eye, due to some causal factor, may be directed downward.
In the case of the psychopath, the subject has no empathy. The feelings have been switched off. This may be due to the damaged amygdala‘s inability to regulate and process the emotions properly. When the amygdala is swollen by stress, alcohol, medications, stimulant drugs or other causal factors, the subject may become aggressive and predatory, lacking all moral restraint,
compunction, remorse, regret and may appear to have no conscience whatsoever.
But what causes the amygdala to turn off the tap on the emotions? Has the subject experienced so much trauma or stress that the amygdala has turned off the empathy switch? The Golden Rule advises, ―Do unto others as you would have others do unto you.‖ Achieving this requires empathy. Where there are no feelings, there can be no ethics. Turn off the tap of human empathy and the emotions shut down. Such a person is incapable of human empathy,

7 ―Sanpaku Eyes: The Ill(uminati) Eyes,‖ from, posted at Red Ice Creations 09/09/2008,
feelings, compassion, mercy or any of the attendant emotions that would lead to a sense of moral restraint. Such a person would become a predator, an aggressive agent in search of prey.
Lifestyle and habits only make the situation worse. The ingesting of red meat and alcohol is known to affect the health of the amygdala. Drugs and alcohol are the worst offenders. Live on a diet of stimulants like amphetamines, methamphetamines, caffeine, or narcotics like heroin, opium, downers or barbiturates, or even alcohol and the amygdala becomes swollen and
impaired in function.
The rich get richer and the poor get poorer and for good reason. Psychopaths tend to form decadent habits. Wealth accrued through theft and impropriety leads to ingrained habits and lifestyle choices. Rich people eat rich food. A heavy diet of red meat, high cholesterol food, rich desserts, fine wines, champagnes, vintage whiskies, and cognac, or if you‘re American, Budweiser, and the amygdala in time will swell in size, leading to more aggressive behaviours.
Psychopaths are liminal, neither attached to the earth or sky, this place or that. They live in the borderlands, and are often lost at sea, marooned or exiled. Individuals that are trapped in liminal situations are not able to act rationally. They find themselves in a vulnerable state, unstable and without foundation, subject to the whims of troubled waters. The psychopath is discontented with staying put and is given to being a rolling stone that gathers no moss as he drifts from place to place unable to find stability or satisfaction. The pleasure principle remains unattainable no matter how much indulgent, hedonistic pleasure he seeks. Home and family are left behind and the future is uncertain. Perhaps wanderlust in rebellious youth can be traced to a dysfunctional amygdala. The stressful nature of the liminal crisis of leaving home and venturing off into the unknown prevent clear thinking and it is at this time of liminality that people are most vulnerable and open to being easy prey. Without stable foundations, which are broken down in times of liminality, the vulnerable look for guidance to the strong, leaving them more vulnerable than ever, since the strong are not always good. It is at such points that the rebellious youth might be drawn to the mentoring of a psychopath who coaches them into progressively worse degrees of psychopathic behaviour.
The psychopath could be described as the ―trickster‖, who entices and deceives by pretending to be empathetic and kind in an effort to hide, conceal, or compensate for what he does not have. The imitative aspect of human behaviour is an important aspect of liminality, and the trickster is a master of the trade of imitating and mimicking. They make perfect department store Santa Clauses, circus clowns, magicians, and kindergarten teachers. Imitation of human behaviour is closely tied to that of the trickster figure. The trickster is an archetype found in folktales and myths all over the world because it is one we are all familiar with and require education about if we are to avoid the pitfall of falling into their traps.
There is no better example of the trickster than the Big Bad Wolf. Confronting Little Red Riding Hood at the crossroads of two paths in the woods, Little Red Riding Hood is at her most vulnerable. She is at a liminal crossroads between home and Grandma‘s, a generation gap and gulf in between. She is on the borderlands of her past and future, visiting her Grandma in order to integrate with her past, but uncertain of the future. Seeing her vulnerability, and knowing she stands on the threshold in a state of liminality, the wolf takes full advantage of the situation. He
pays Grandma a visit, scrutinizing her speech patterns and manners, putting on airs and imitating her mannerisms and voice, and preparing himself for the grand deception as the quintessential pedophile and child abuser.
Tricksters are described as being marginal characters, outsiders who cannot be trusted. They are incapable of giving or sharing or of communal living of any kind. They are repulsive, if not
in appearance at least inside, largely due to their insatiable nature and the fact that they are never satisfied.
Having suffered possible neglect or abuse in their youth, they have a massive cavity in their hearts that can never be filled. They seek power and control to supplement for the helplessness and powerlessness they felt as children. Gaining control over one victim is gratuitous but is never enough. They may feel attracted to higher and more gratifying forms of control. They may graduate from terrorizing one victim to several, possibly even becoming serial killers. They may grow weary of terrorizing individuals. Their amygdala may be so badly damaged, access to the pleasure principle may be hampered or impeded. The trickster must resort to more extreme and deviant behaviour in order to access the pleasure principle. He can no longer feel the thrill from the old routine of terrorizing individuals. Like a heroin addict, he must obtain a stronger dose to access the pleasure principle. He now resorts to acts of terror that affect a larger group. It has
been noted, for instance, that bomb threat makers often have the same psychological profile as
the sex offender. Crime units at the scene of a bomb threat are instructed to look for a suspicious male lurking in the crowd. He may even have an erection. Due to the dysfunctional amygdala, they often experience sexual excitement from the bomb scare. A damaged amygdala may prompt the psychopath to resort to more deviant and radical hedonistic pursuits. When terrorizing individuals no longer suffices, he may turn to terrorizing a mass of people, turning to progressively higher forms of terror till he graduates from a psychopath to a sociopath.
Tricksters are known for their excessive eating, drinking, and sexual behavior, having no sense of shame. They are not taken seriously, given their affinity for jokes, storytelling, revels, singing and unrealistic fantasy. Their lifestyle and habits only lead to progressively worse behaviour. Excessive quantities of red meat, rich food and alcohol are known to adversely affect the amygdala, spawning aggressive behaviour. The psychopath becomes so profligate in his tastes and habits till he is beyond redemption.
History knows no greater example than Henry VIII of England. The Tudor king was a self- indulgent trickster and psychopath, who could deceive his way into the hearts of wenches low born and high with equal lack of discretion. His shameless exhibitions of throwing discarded animal bones and food remnants over his shoulder are famous the world over. His bawdy behaviour and tasteless jokes may have, like Yorick, ―put the table on a roar,‖ but when one considers the company he kept, it is hardly surprising they found the vulgarity such fit amusement.
So lacking in empathy was the trickster king, he actually insisted his five-year-old daughter Elizabeth attend her mother Anne Boleyn‘s public beheading. No sooner did his ex-wife have her head placed on the chopping block than it was made to roll, almost to the very foot of the impressionable young girl, who would grow up to be the trickster of the next generation, a
ruthless psychopath nearly as dangerous as her father and almost as unpredictable. Some scholars believe that she even ordered the execution of her own son, one of her concealed bastard
children, the Earl of Essex. The earl even carved the name ―Tudor‖ into his Tower of London cell as a clue to his true lineage. Psychopathology is a generational affair. The imitator passes on his skills by example to the impressionable child who imitates. The child then grows up to employ the same trickery on the next generation. It is called trauma-based mind control and
many mafia families practice it around the world. Do they understand the science of mind control or do they just imitate and follow by example?
In the context of liminality, the trickster is a very dangerous figure who can graduate from psychopath to fully-fledged sociopath. Lacking in self-worth and consumed by self-loathing, the
psychopath learns to imitate and mimic those of true substance and character. It is a begrudging form of flattery like Iago mimicking the good manners of Othello or Professor Moriarty imitating the good graces of Sherlock Holmes. In a liminal situation, where all boundary lines are blurred, imitative behavior escalates, and tricksters can be mistaken for charismatic leaders. In their desperate bid for guidance and leadership, individuals caught in liminal crises might turn to those who are merely tricksters, whom they confuse with Messianic figures or charismatic leaders capable of saving them. Liminal periods occur when entire societies get caught in a sea swell totally rudderless and without bearings. In the complete absence of a captain to guide the ship, or even a ship‘s steward, a so-called ―master of ceremonies‖, to use the language of the anthropologists, the ship of social destiny loses its nautical heading. The leadership figures that are supposed to lead the initiands out of the liminal phase give rise to tricksters who assume positions of power. The two ends of the equation tend to feed each other, the initiand‘s dependency on the trickster and the trickster‘s narcissistic disorder producing the need to be needed. The initiand‘s desperation level is palpably felt by the trickster who takes full advantage by pretending to provide for the initiand‘s needs when he is actually only using him.
When a trickster enters a position of leadership, liminality will not be restricted to a
temporary crisis, followed by a return to normality, but can be perpetuated endlessly. This can be explained by three important characteristics of the trickster: his homelessness, since he is by definition a drifter and rolling stone, lack of deeply felt human relations because his insecurity prevents him from forming any real attachments, and his complete lack of existential commitments sans raison d’être, sans a life purpose. These traits cause the trickster to have no interest in resolving the liminal crisis. He prefers to embrace the abyss and to run toward it like a lemming.
Like the Pied Piper, he will lead everyone else to the river to drown and will eventually take the plunge himself, because his raison d’être is to sow other‘s destruction and ruination. He does not seek the other shore beyond liminality, but embraces the liminal itself, having no wish to return to his beloved homeland from his odyssey, but preferring to remain marooned on the Isle of Circe, becoming perpetually beguiling and beguiled. He has no desire to seek a resolution to the crisis and to find his way home. Instead, he prefers to perpetuate the conditions of chaos that lead other people astray. If he can be the means of throwing his entire society into confusion, he will seize upon it in the hope of leading everyone like lemmings, blind leading the blind off the cliff into the river just like the Pied Piper, the ultimate trickster model and exemplar.
Finding himself, paradoxically, totally at home in liminality or homelessness, his real interest lies in perpetuating the opposite, i.e. unimaginable chaos. The trickster is also a mime. Imitation, whether in learning or in social activity, is only possible if we remain unaware that we are actually imitating. This is why the actor who is so immersed and absorbed in his character that he unselfconsciously forgets he is acting, pulling off the most remarkable and convincing performance of all. This is what makes the trickster and psychopath so convincing and appealing and why the Charles Mansons and Anton Leveys of this world manage to seduce so many.
Since the trickster is incapable of real learning and the pleasure of social interaction, he is more like a mime than an imitator – monkey see monkey do. Incapable of real creativity, he is forced to learn by rote only, memorizing patterns as opposed to genuinely learning the form. He appears to act like everyone else, but the act is just that, an act. It is neither real nor authentic, and in awkward moments, it becomes plain the imposter is just a trickster.
The anthropological term ―schismogenesis‖ can be used to describe situations of permanent
liminality. Through this concept, we can understand that societies can be stuck for long periods
of time in a state of stasis, where the previous unity was broken, but the schismatic event that caused the initiand to break from his past, continues to foment unrest and unimaginable violence. Entire cultures are capable of producing such schizoid personalities and the trickster is the one normally found to be behind the creation of such a culture. Some call it social engineering, but to engineer society requires an engineer. The social engineers are the psychopaths and sociopaths who receive their higher degrees from so-called esteemed institutions, when they are really under the control of secret societies and spy agencies, whether known or unbeknown to them. Let‘s
face it. The trickster is more effective when he works for other tricksters. This tends to explain why totalitarian trickster regimes tend to be top heavy with psychopaths and sociopaths. Birds of a feather not only flock together, but tend to nest and follow one another‘s migratory paths whenever they hook up.
The trickster is a master of magic shows and exploits others‘ liminal crises to his own advantage. The trickster is always an outsider on the outside looking in. One could say he massages the situation to his own advantage. The trickster has no emotional connection to others or their liminal crises, but he might look for a rational way of solving the crisis by turning things to his advantage as the ―master of ceremonies‖. It is precisely this confidence trick that allows
for the deception to propagate and like cell division replicate, the chaotic, horrific and repulsive trickster personality multiplying like mirrors reflected within mirrors ad infinitum.8
Once others become aware of the true nature of the trickster, it becomes a liminal crisis, since the character of the trickster can never be changed or subsumed. There is, in short, no solution to the problem of the trickster; he won‘t be reformed. It is equally impossible for the trickster to be punished, as punishment must lead to correction and moral improvement, but this is not possible for the psychopath. He has no empathy or feeling for the crimes committed, no guilt, no regret or remorse. It is, therefore, impossible for him to see the error of his ways. He can‘t see that what
he is done is wrong. He is blind to it. When punished, it is apt to have no effect. In fact, due to
the nature of a dysfunctional amygdala, he might actually derive a perverse sense of pleasure from the punishment. In some cases, the punishment may actually lead to a form of access the pleasure principle through some form of sadomasochistic pleasure. There is a documented case of a man on death row who actually revelled at the prospect of walking the green mile to the
electric chair. His name was Albert Fish, the oldest inmate ever to be put to death in the USA. He would abduct young children, chop them to bits and cook them, and then write letters to the parents with all the gory details. There is a non-fiction bio of him called ―Deranged‖. Witnesses report that it was all correctional guards could do to hold Fish back from the electric chair, so strong was the sexual exhilaration he felt at the prospect of being zapped by ―old sparky‖.
Filled with self-loathing, the psychopath despises humanity as a reflection of himself and seeks its destruction. Therefore, he is out to destroy himself and the world. Should the psychopath encounter someone truly good, endowed with a far nobler character, he will seek his or her destruction, just as Iago sought the destruction of Othello, Desdemona, and Cassio. To say Iago is a misanthrope would be an understatement. He despises the entire human condition. Lacking in empathy, he will no more feel sorry for himself than anyone else. Iago‘s words concerning Cassio speak volumes about his attitude toward himself and others, ―He hath a daily
beauty in his life/That makes me ugly.‖9 Thus Nietzsche‘s description of the ―sovereign man‖ is
in fact a description of his own psychopathic disposition: ―He who climbs the highest mountain

8 Liminality,
9 Othello Act V, i, ll. 20-21.
laughs at all tragic plays and tragic realities.‖10 The lack of empathy described is that of the narcissistic personality disorder, which Nietzsche would seem to share with the creature his literature is often credited with spawning, namely Adolf Hitler. The psychopath will revel in his own self-destruction and invite even more. Aristotle wrongly thought that we were all happiness- seekers. It‘s simply not true. There are some among us that would not be happy even if we were shown the way. Such individuals prefer to live in the brambles and thorns. Nietzsche was one such, his words betraying his true nature:

What is the greatest thing you can experience? It is the hour of the great contempt. The hour in which even your happiness grows loathsome to you, and your reason and your virtue also.
The hour when you say: ‗What good is my happiness? It is poverty and dirt and a miserable ease. But my happiness should justify existence itself!‘
The hour when you say: ‗What good is my reason? Does it long for knowledge as the lion for its food? It is poverty and dirt and a miserable ease!‘
The hour when you say: ‗What good is my virtue? It has not yet driven me mad! How tired I am of my good and my evil! It is all poverty and dirt and a miserable ease!‘
Have you ever spoken thus? Have you ever cried thus? Ah, that I had heard you crying thus!
Where is lightning to lick you with its tongue? Where is the madness, with which you should be cleansed?‖
(Thus Spoke Zarathustra)

By writing such a passage, Nietzsche might as well have pointed directly at the swastika, encouraging the Führer in his future excesses. Examples of tricksters of our time are Adolf Hitler, Benito Mussolini, Vladimir Lenin, and Joseph Stalin.
When trickster figures are mistaken for Messianic figures, people are drawn to them in the hope of finding salvation. They attract the unemployed and those desperate for work as Hitler did the Nazi Youth and Obama is now doing with the Obama Youth Brigade. Obama is even quoted as saying, ―We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we‘ve set. We‘ve got to have a civilian national security force that‘s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.‖11
For those in a liminal crisis, there is no such thing as normality. They seek balance on the
razor‘s edge. They walk a tightrope between ape and superman, as Nietzsche proposed. It is a dangerous crossing like a tightrope walker trying to traverse Niagara Falls. Such societies need
to maintain themselves in an interminable state of conflict, a perpetual state of war. They need to surround themselves with imagined enemies, which they convince their followers and adherents threaten to conquer and subsume them. This can happen at the petty political level or at the level of grand politics. At the level of the grand, they might refer to it as a cold war.
10 Friedrich Nietzsche, ―The Wanderer‖ in Thus Spake Zarathustra, Trans. Thomas Common. 1891.
11 ―Similarities between Obama and Hitler: A Factual Comparison,‖ at Now the End Begins, and-hitler-similarities.htm
Then there is the strange case of a pedophile that appeared in edition of The Atlantic magazine. He had tried to restrain himself, but the pleasure principle overcame his will. He tried to conceal his habits by using the cover of darkness to conceal his prowling and peeping Tom activities, but he was unable to quell his habits. His subtle sexual advances on his prepubescent stepdaughter became known to his wife, who became concerned and began investigating. At home, she began a proper search through his desk and closet storage spaces, as well as attic and basement storage areas. Her search led to the unearthing of a large volume of child pornography. She then reported him to the police. He was remanded in custody and charged with molesting his stepdaughter. He was also under investigation for suspected trafficking in child pornography and pedophilia. Amazingly, the surgeons found a quarter-size tumour lodged in his brain. The glioblastoma had emerged from the thalamus and impinged on the hypothalamus. This had imposed pressure on a third region of the brain known as the amygdala. The amygdala has a direct bearing on the regulation of emotions, especially fear and aggression, and has been linked to a host of pathological behaviours. A damaged amygdala is known to have severe emotional and social consequences. In fact, studies conducted on monkeys showed that a damaged amygdala led to an array of symptoms including lack of fear, blunted emotion and overreaction.
Let‘s start by examining a couple of case studies to see what we role the brain and its chemistry has in psychopathic behavioural disorders. The first case involves the tragic case of a
25-year-old former marine named Charles Whitman. For reasons not even he could understand, he carried a footlocker‘s worth of guns and ammunition to the top floor of the University of Texas Tower and opened fire indiscriminately and with a complete lack of empathy on innocent and unassuming bystanders whose only mistake was being in the wrong place at the wrong time. When he reached the top floor, he struck the receptionist with the butt of his rifle, killing her. He then turned his attention to two families coming up the stairs behind him, unloading a round into them at point-blank range. He then began firing indiscriminately from the tower at the people below. He shot a pregnant woman and then the boyfriend who came to attend to her. He then trained his rifle on pedestrians in the street and an ambulance driver who came to rescue them. The evening before Whitman had composed a suicide note, which read:

I don‘t really understand myself these days. I am supposed to be an average reasonable and intelligent young man. However, lately I can‘t recall when it started) I have been a victim of many unusual and irrational thoughts.12

What is even stranger than the tragic pointlessness of his shooting rampage, where he killed thirteen people and wounded thirty-two others, is the fact that Whitman, is the fact that he had murdered his wife and mother earlier that day sometime in the early morning hours, again without any motive or rational explanation, as he himself confesses in the same suicide note:

It was after much thought that I decided to kill my wife, Kathy, tonight … I love her dearly, and she has been as fine a wife to me as any man could ever hope to have. I
12 Paragraph from Charles Whitman‘s suicide note, quoted in David Eagleman, The Brain on Trail, The Atlantic, July/Aug, 2011.
cannot rationally pinpoint any specific reason for doing
this …13

As with Othello, there is no reason why Whitman should turn on his wife with violence, since, as with Desdemona, his wife seems to have given him no reason to complain or find fault.
The only explanation seems to be that some poisonous influence has been at work on his mind as is the case with Othello to cause him to develop irrational thoughts and fears even about those he both loves and trusts.
As a child, Whitman had scored 138 on the Stanford-Binet IQ test, placing him in the top
99 percentile. This only adds to the perplexity and tragedy associated with a killer who had such a promising start in life. In his suicide note, he requested that an autopsy be performed to see if something had altered in his brain chemistry to precipitate such a radical metamorphosis in his character and behaviour. As per his request, his body was taken to the morgue, where his brain was analyzed by forensic experts, who discovered a nickel-sized tumour called a glioblastoma beneath his thalamus, impinging on his hypothalymus and imposing pressure on a third region known as the amygdala. As was discussed at the beginning of the paper, the amygdala is involved in emotional regulation, especially fear and aggression. In the 1930s, researchers discovered that a damaged amygdale led monkeys to show a lack of fear, a blunting of emotions, and an inclination to overreact. Female monkeys suffering from amygdale damage neglected or physically abused their infants. It would be worth investigating whether women suffering post-partum depression have an issue with the amygdala. Perhaps the weight gain and diet an adverse affect on the amygdala, resulting in irrational impulses following the arrival of the child. Studies indicate that the amygdala becomes hyperactive when the human subject is shown threatening faces, are exposed to frightening situations, or fall subject to social phobias. Whitman‘s intuition that something was wrong with his brain chemistry was correct. Two important questions need to be asked. How did he know and what inhibited his drive to do something about it?
Such stories crop up from time to time as in the case of a forty-year-old man whose sexual preferences began to lean toward greater and greater perversity for no conceivable reason. For instance, the subject suddenly began to develop an obsessive interest in child pornography. He suddenly began exploring child porn-related websites and magazines. He also began soliciting prostitution at massage parlours, something he had never previously aspired to do. He testified later that he had tried to stop these tendencies and desires, but the ―pleasure principle overrode‖ his sense of restraint. He tried to hide these compulsions, but subtle sexual
advances toward his stepdaughter alarmed his wife, who soon discovered his child porn collection. He was removed from the house, found guilty of child molestation, and sentenced to rehabilitation instead of being sent to prison. But when he made inappropriate sexual advances toward the staff and other clients at the rehab centre, he was expelled and sent to prison.
At the prison, he began experiencing more severe headaches. The night before he was to report for sentencing, he couldn‘t endure the pain any longer and was taken to the emergency room. He was given a brain scan, which revealed a massive tumour in his orbitofrontal cortex. Neuro-surgeons removed the tumour and his sexual appetite returned to that of a healthy and normal male.

13 Ibid.
The year after his brain surgery the pedophiliac behaviour returned. The neuroradiologist discovered that a portion of the tumour had been missed in the surgery and had redeveloped. The subject was operated on again and the tumour was excised again, this time for good. Once the tumour was removed his behaviour went back to normal again.
What this story illustrates is the fact that when the frontal lobes are compromised, disinhibition sets in and startling behaviours can manifest. Disinhibition is experienced by patients with frontotemporal dementia, where frontal and temporal lobes degenerate. The loss of this essential brain tissue causes patients to lose the ability to control their hidden desires. They then act out of character by committing such acts as shoplifting audaciously right in front of security or store managers, flashing or streaking, running red lights or stop signs, breaking out in song at inappropriate times, eating from trash bins, or becoming physically aggressive or
sexually transgressive. Such patients often end up in court, where it is discovered that degenerative brain disease is to blame rather than immoral conduct strictly. Some 55 percent of frontotemporal-dementia patients are found to violate social norms.14
A study undertaken at Vanderbilt University has found that the brains of psychopaths appear to be wired to seek rewards at any cost. ―Psychopaths are often thought of as cold-blooded criminals who take what they want without thinking about consequences,‖ says Joshua Buckholtz, a grad student in the Department of Psychology. ―We found that a hyper-reactive dopamine reward system may be the foundation for some of the most problematic behaviours associated with psychopathy, such as violent crime, recidivism and substance abuse.‖
Previous studies on psychopathy focused on what these individuals lack – fear, empathy and interpersonal skills. The new research examines what they have in abundance – impulsivity, heightened attraction to rewards and risk taking. It is these strong negative impulses that are linked with the violent and criminal aspects of psychopathy.
―There has been a long tradition of research on psychopathy that has focused on the lack of sensitivity to punishment and a lack of fear, but those traits are not particularly good predictors of violence or criminal behavior,‖ says David Zald, associate professor of psychology and psychiatry and co-author of the study. ―Our data is suggesting that something might be happening on the other side of things. These individuals appear to have such a strong draw to reward – to the carrot – that it overwhelms the sense of risk or concern about the stick.‖
The researchers used positron emission tomography (PET) to analyze the link between dopamine levels in the neuron receptors and psychopathy, imaging the brain to measure dopamine release, in concert with a functional magnetic imaging (fMRI) to probe the brain‘s reward system.
―The really striking thing is with these two very different techniques we saw a very similar pattern – both were heightened in individuals with psychopathic traits,‖ says Zald.
Personality tests were conducted on test subjects to determine their psychopathic trait level. There is a whole spectrum of traits with violent criminals falling at the extreme end of the spectrum. However, a person considered normal can also have such traits, which include manipulativeness, egocentricity, aggression and risk-taking.
In the first portion of the experiment, the researchers gave the volunteers a dose of amphetamine, or speed, and then scanned their brains using PET to check the level of dopamine releases in response to the stimulant. Substance abuse has been shown in the past to be associated with dopamine response. Psychopathy is strongly associated with substance abuse.

14 David Eagleman, The Brain on Trail, The Atlantic, July/Aug, 2011.
―Our hypothesis was that psychopathic traits are also linked to dysfunction in dopamine reward circuitry,‖ Buckholtz said. ―Consistent with what we thought, we found people with high levels of psychopathic traits had almost four times the amount of dopamine released in response to amphetamine.‖15
This explains why fighter pilots in the American Air Force, who use amphetamines to maintain a high state of alertness while in flight, are shown to exhibit the traits of disinhibition, lack of guilt and moral compunction associated with the psychopath. This also explains why, when they return from their tour of duty to the United States, they end up experiencing post- traumatic stress disorder, because the chemical mask or shield provided by the amphetamines is removed and they are forced to confront the ghosts of their actions in combat at home. The ghosts don‘t go away because the chemical stimulant is no longer there.
This also accounts for the behaviour of the Japanese Kamikaze pilots who flew their zeros right into the battleships and carrier groups. It was not that they were endowed with heightened bravery because of some samurai-like code of gentlemanly honour. It was because of the effects of the powerful MDMA amphetamine drugs they were taking to facilitate their often long three- day missions across the Pacific Ocean. They were in the super-euphoric, manic super-capability phase of the drug when they committed these acts of turning themselves into suicide bombers. They were under a hallucinogenic haze of super-capability, a feeling of overriding superhuman invincibility. Even without the wings of the zeros they flew they would have believed they could fly. They would have believed in their own invincibility. They would have also been in a powerful state of disnihibition as well, in which they would not have been concerned with the outcome of their actions. The high of the speed they were on made the rush irresistible and the desire to do something exceptional, heroic and outstanding would have been irrepressible like someone in the manic phase of a bipolar disorder episode.
In the second part of the experiment, the research subjects were promised a monetary reward for completing a simple task. Their brains were scanned with fMRI while carrying out the task. The researchers found the dopamine reward area of the brain, the nucleus accumbens, much more active in those with high psychopathic traits than in other test subjects when the monetary reward was offered.
―It may be that because of these exaggerated dopamine responses, once they focus on the chance to get a reward, psychopaths are unable to alter their attention until they get what they‘re after,‖ Buckholtz said. Added Zald. ―It‘s not just that they don‘t appreciate the potential threat, but that the anticipation or motivation for reward overwhelms those concerns.‖16 (Ibid.)
This is a striking conclusion and may explain why we find psychopaths in disproportionately high numbers at the higher end of the socio-economic scale. It also explains why globalist bankers appear to exhibit a much higher proclivity for psychopathic tactics in preserving their wealth and power, and why they seem so intent on pursuing world domination and exacting
lockdown control over the global population through their globalist world government agenda and corralling the microchipped population into UN Agenda 21 megacities with depopulation targets being set at 90 percent by 2050 with a target population below 500,000,000 as the Georgia Guidestones suggest, the first commandment of the ten commandments engraved on the guidestones being, ―Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.

psco 8

‖1715 Vanderbilt University. ―Psychopaths‘ brains wired to seek rewards, no matter the consequences.‖ ScienceDaily, 15 Mar. 2010. Web. 10 Sep.

16 Ibid.
17 ―The Message of the Georgia Guidestones,‖
Where the psychopath is concerned, studies are beginning to show that words speak louder than deeds or at least as loudly. Psychopaths are beginning to give themselves away by the words they use and by their manner of speech. It is akin to making an admission of guilt the way their words betray their deeds. They are incriminating themselves through word choice and communication pattern. Computerized text analysis shows that psychopathic killers make identifiable word choices seemingly beyond their conscious control when talking about their crimes.
This research could lead to new tools for diagnosis and treatment and greatly enhance the science of criminology and have great applications in criminal investigations and crime-solving. The words of psychopathic murderers betray their personalities, which are rooted primarily in selfishness, detachment from their crimes and emotional flatness, says Jeff Hancock, Cornell professor of computing and information science at the University of British Columbia.
Hancock and his colleagues analyzed the stories of 14 psychopathic killers held in Canadian prisons and compared them with 38 convicted murderers who were not diagnosed as psychopathic. Each subject was asked to describe his crime in detail. Their stories were taped, transcribed and subjected to computer analysis.
Psychopaths used more conjunctions like ―because,‖ ―since‖ or ―so that,‖ implying that the crime ―had to be done‖ to obtain a particular goal. This shows the Machiavellian tendency to think in a ―means-ends‖ goal-oriented teleology, in which any means are justified in achieving the desired end. They used twice as many words for physical needs, such as food, sex or money, while non-psychopaths displayed a word choice more associated with social needs, including family, religion and spirituality. Psychopaths showed a tendency to give away their own predatory nature through details of what they had to eat on the day of their crime. The extreme example of this is John George Haigh, who spoke of drinking his victims‘ blood.
The study also showed that psychopaths were more likely to use the past tense, suggesting a
detachment from their crimes, according to researchers. They tended to be less fluent in their speech, punctuating their speech with ―ums‖ and ―uhs‖. The exact reason for this is not clear, but the researchers speculate that the psychopath is trying harder to make a positive impression, needing to use more mental effort to frame the story.
―Previous work has looked at how psychopaths use language,‖ Hancock said. ―Our paper is the first to show that you can use automated tools to detect the distinct speech patterns of psychopaths.‖18
This can be valuable to clinical psychologists because it might be possible to engage in therapeutic approach based on using word choice to deprogram their Machiavellian thinking by invoking social thinking like family, religion and spirituality through the vocabulary choice therapists rely on.
Let us examine now turn to the narcissistic personality disorder. Our case study focuses on
UK serial killer John George Haigh. The three name appellation is granted to notorious psychopaths nearly as often as it is to great personalities. One can cite numerous examples, including John Wilkes Booth, John Hinkley Jr., and Luca Rocco Magnotta. What this suggests is that psychopaths contribute to our development as a race as much as the great inventors,
scientists and sages insofar as lessons are learned that are as instructive to our evolution and development as the more positive developments in our history. Lessons are learned, social understanding is gained and moral improvement is acquired. Maybe this is one of the reasons
18 Cornell University. ―Psychopathic killers: Computerized text analysis uncovers the word patterns of a predator.‖ ScienceDaily, 15 Oct. 2011. Web. 10 Sep. 2012.
they are remembered and in a perverse sense even honoured. One can see the notoriety attained by Haigh by the fact that he has earned his place in infamy and Madame Tussaud‘s Wax Museum. Given that he had a narcissistic disorder, he must have been gratified to earn his place in history. Strangely, instead of being punished, he appears to have been unduly rewarded and honoured by being accorded a place in history.
In 1949, London‘s Daily Mirror began a series of macabre stories about murder that began with the headline, ―Hunt for the Vampire‖. They did not name names, but it was obvious who they were focusing their attention on. The story that dominated the newsstands was catalyzed by a missing person‘s report from two weeks earlier, when a man and woman came to report one Olive Durand-Deacon missing to the Chelsea police. She had made an appointment to meet John George Haigh, the man who then reported her missing. She was scheduled to visit his place of business in Sussex, but according to him, had failed to show up.
He purportedly went to her friend, Constance Lane, to ask after her. He claimed that Mrs. Durand-Deacon had asked him to pick her up at the Army and Navy Surplus Store. He reported waiting for an hour, but that she had failed to appear. Mrs. Lane had noticed that Mrs. Durand- Deacon had not been at her usual seat at dinner or breakfast the following morning, and grew concerned. The chambermaid claimed the missing woman had been out all night and had not returned. After Haigh‘s account, Lane decided that she must report this incident to the police, since it was decidedly out of character. Olive was a woman of strict routine, so something seemed to be terribly amiss. Constance felt compelled to report it, so Haigh volunteered to drive her to the police station. Haigh‘s M.O. in this case of feigning concern and reporting one of his victims missing was obviously intended to make him appear innocent, respectable and
responsible. On a conscious level, the psychopath is driven by a self-preservation drive, in which he seeks to cover his tracks and to divert attention away from himself.19
On the other hand, they seem to delight in playing cat and mouse games with police
investigative units and to lead them a dance. They revel in using a common M.O. and delight in leaving calling cards at the crime scene, which tend to lead in their general direction. This is the other competing drive found in the psychopath‘s subconscious, which is programmed by their damaged genetics to remove them from the gene pool. It is nature‘s quality control mechanism, much like that employed in a factory to remove the defective products from the product line so that it doesn‘t taint the reputation of the product. Similarly, nature programs defective genes to press the kill switch, in which the suicide and the homicide gene are switched on with the aim of removing the tainted product from the human product line known as the gene pool. This is nature‘s quality control mechanism.
Tricksters or psychopaths like Haigh are the product of gene damage, possibly from bad husbandry practices, which tend to show up in future generations. They may well have bottlenecked genetics from too much inter-family inbreeding and seem to know intuitively that nature has invoked quality control and has decided to remove them from the human gene pool. It seems to be programmed into their genes. As the film Seven suggests, the psychopath often targets those who appear morally deficient like themselves. It is as if their damaged DNA is tuned to recognize other people with genetically compromised DNA. In the film Seven, each victim of the killer became a target because he deemed them guilty of one of the seven sins. The psychopath seems to recognize those with damaged genetics like himself and they become his

19 Katherine Ramsland, ―John George Haigh, Evolution of a Serial Killer,‖ at Crime Library: Crime Minds and Methods,
targets. The Jack the Ripper slayings targeted prostitutes, presumably because the killer objected to their kind, perhaps because he detected some defect in their genetics resembling his own.
And so it was with the badly inbred Haigh. It was not long before his psychopathic nature began to intrude upon his conscious attempts to escape accountability. It was as if his undoing was programmed into his genetics, his subconscious being the conduit for giving the game away. On the one hand, he was charming and self-possessed, but on the other hand, his subconscious was seeking his undoing and showing his hand. While vain with strong narcissistic tendencies, his subconscious was filled with such self-loathing that it sought his exposure and undoing.
The manager of the hotel where the missing woman stayed, for example, described Haigh as an unsavoury character and gave police a record of his debts at the hotel. The police thought Haigh had been rather too slick in his responses. He seemed rather conspicuous as a middle-aged man among all those wealthy older women, so they performed a criminal background check. Within an hour, Scotland Yard reported that according to the Criminal Records Office, Haigh
had been arrested several times for petty crime and had done jail time on three separate occasions. He immediately became a prime suspect in the homicide investigation.
Haigh appeared to be helpful on the surface. Debonair and handsome, his polished manner, obvious cleanliness, and stylish dress made a good impression on reporters. He answered all questions with apparent concern for the missing woman. Some people noticed that he wore gloves. It was soon revealed that Haigh was a compulsive hand-washer who always wore gloves, summer or winter. He detested dirt.
Even as Haigh gave interviews to reporters at the hotel, stressing his hope that Mrs. Durand- Deacon would be found safe and sound, the West Sussex constables were checking out his place of business, Hurstlea Products in Crawley. Haigh claimed to be the director of Hurstlea Products, but this was a patent lie. In fact, from this company he had rented a two-story storefront with a brick façade for what he called ―experimental work‖. He had told the managing director of
Hurstlea Products that he was doing ―a conversion job‖. Conversion work was a normal
industrial practice for breaking down materials in strong acid.
The police forced their way into the building to examine the contents of the room. They found tools, trays, wires, red cellophane paper and a wad of cotton near a bench. Three carboys stood in a row, packed in straw. Nearby lay a new stirrup-pump with a part removed, and a rubber apron stained by chemicals hung on the door. They also came across a pair of rubber boots and rubber gloves, as well as a gas mask inside an army bag.
The police team also found an attaché case that bore the initials, J. G. H. They found papers prelated to one Archibald Henderson, Rose Henderson, and three people named McSwan. The search also turned up a marriage certificate, several passports, identity cards, and driver‘s licenses. In addition, they found a .38 Enfield revolver and eight rounds of ammunition. There was even evidence the revolver had been fired recently. They then found a cleaner‘s receipt for a coat and traced the coat back to one belonging to Mrs. Durand-Deacon.
A man named Mr. Bull of Horsham then came forward to report that jewellery was pawned at his shop the day after the woman was reported missing. Police collected the jewellery and had it identified by a relative as belonging to Mrs. Durand-Deacon. The person who had sold it signed the ledger as ―J. McLean‖ at ―32 St. George‘s Drive, S.W‖. The jeweller‘s assistant matched Haigh with ―McLean‖. On previous visits, he had pawned jewellery under the name John George Haigh. When police asked him to come down to the police station, he most convivially said,
―Certainly. I will do anything to help you, as you know.‖
Haigh was too intelligent to have made so apparent an oversight consciously. To have deliberately gone to so much trouble to conceal his identity through the use of an assortment of aliases, only to give the game away by returning to the same shop in which he had pawned goods under his own name to pawn more under an alias seems absurd. And of course it is until one recognizes that his subconscious was in contention with his conscious mind. While his conscious mind seemed intent on evading detection and capture, his subconscious was programmed by his genetic kill switch or suicide gene to give the game away. This phenomenon among psychopaths fosters a cat and mouse game, in which they leave clues behind of so cryptic a nature that it requires clever sleuthing ability to connect the dots. What is overlooked, however, is the fact that the sleuth has to share the same proclivities as the psychopath in order to be on his trail. The detective recognizes his own hidden criminal nature in the psychopath and seeks his own
undoing through the capture of his own kind. Thus sleuth, psychopath and victim are all eliminating their own kind, systematically hunting each other down because the kill switch has been activated within their bottle-necked genetics and they are systematically removing each other from the human gene pool. Irrational though their behaviour may seem it is obvious why such individuals were the Darwin Award recipients of their day.
The human equation is a math formula that only works when the right husbandry practices are followed. The Tree of Life Etz haChayim (ץע םייחה) or Jacob‘s ladder is the breeding model and
it should be implemented worldwide so that the right people breed. To violate the human equation through bad husbandry practices is what forces nature to engage in quality control, removing the defective product from the product line so that it does not taint the gene pool.
Haigh had a detached air when he was brought into the Chelsea police station probably as a result of his dissociative identity disorder. He smoked, read a newspaper, and fell asleep as casually as if he were on a Sunday picnic. For some time, police revealed nothing about what they wanted from him. It took almost three hours for them to prepare for the interrogation,
sufficient time for him to adopt a scheme.
Haigh lied about his visits to Horsham. He presumptuously thought the police were stumped without a corpus delecti, so he talked freely. But he soon realized the police had something on him from their line of questioning. He initially stated that the coat belonged to a Mrs. Henderson, but later admitted it belonged to Mrs. Durand-Deacon. The detectives asked how he had come by her property and what he knew of her disappearance. He invented a story about blackmail, which soon fell apart at the seams. Under interrogation, he asked what the chances were of anyone
being released from Broadmoor, a psychiatric facility for the criminally insane. This betrayed his strategy of passing himself off as insane.
Haigh then showed his hand, still believing himself to be immune to prosecution. ―If I told
you the truth,‖ he said, ―you would not believe me; it sounds too fantastic for belief.‖ Apparently believing he would be sent to Broadmoor, he said, ―I will tell you about it. Mrs. Durand-Deacon no longer exists. She has disappeared completely and no trace of her can ever be found again. I have destroyed her completely. You will find the sludge, which remains at Leopold Road. Every trace has gone.‖ He then presumptuously added, ―How can you prove murder without a body?‖ This admission of guilt seemed inexplicable at first, but his intentions soon became transparent.
While in prison years before, Haigh had discussed this point of law with fellow prisoners. He had convinced himself that if there is no corpse, which is what he understood the term corpus delicti to mean, there can be no conviction. In fact, he had talked about this legal issue so often he had acquired the nickname, ―Ol‘ Corpus Delicti‖. He was convinced the police had to have a corpse to prosecute someone for murder. While in prison, he experimented on mice to see how
well their bodies dissolved. He also claimed that preying on older wealthy women was a more effective way of procuring money. Haigh never considered the weight of circumstantial evidence against him. He had already offered a confession, which was one very significant nail in his coffin. They only needed corroborating evidence.
Haigh was kept in custody, charged with the murder of Mrs. Durand-Deacon, and remanded
to Lewes prison. He showed no hint of remorse or fear about what was going to happen to him, a clear indication that he was in a state of complete disinhibition with no moral compunction whatsoever. In fact, he was as unconcerned with his own fate as he would be for anyone else‘s,
so devoid of feeling was he. One cannot help concluding that there was something seriously wrong with his brain chemistry. Chances were his amygdala function was badly askew amygdala and the galanin producition reduced to a trickle. His claim that he drank his victims‘ blood became the subject of debate. Was he mad or just faking it? Most of the examining physicians dismissed his claims as fantasy.
Haigh was born in Yorkshire. The family later moved to Outwood, where Haigh spent the next twenty-four years of his life. Haigh was from a strangely abusive home, with overbearing
parents. His early life was rather monastic, without the typical joys of childhood. His parents belonged to a religious sect known as the Peculiar People and they truly were. He was told Bible stories and forbidden from participating in sports or any kind of entertainment. He had no objection, since he had an aversion to dirt. His father incessantly warned him to take care not to
―grieve the Lord‖. He was told the world was evil and the family needed to guard against it. Haigh‘s father even built a tall fence and garden to self-righteously distance the family from their profane and unclean neighbours. From his upbringing, Haigh was being set up to be something
of a Raskolnikov, with the instilled belief that he was morally superior and could legitimately eliminate others from society due to their inherent moral inferiority.
John Haigh, Sr. had a bluish mark on his forehead, which he said was the Devil‘s brand. He had been marked because he had sinned and warned his son to avoid his fate in order to avoid receiving the Mark of Cain.
Haigh‘s mother was not marked because, as Haigh perceived her, she was an angel, and
Haigh came to see mother figures in that light. He found it remarkable that he had been born to a sinner and an angel. Here we see the development of a very unhealthy Oedipus complex,
pointing to a histrionic personality disorder. Those afflicted with such a disorder are known to be attention-seekers, in part due to a dysfunctional relationship with one parent. However they also have an imbalanced psyche where the anima and the animus are out of kilter. Haigh anxiously avoided anything that might leave the Mark of Cain on him and expose him as a sinner. He vigilantly examined others‘ faces, and often stayed awake at night wondering if the mark had materialized on his face as it had his father‘s.
Like father like son, since both seemed intuitively aware of some defect in their natures. As a boy, Haigh had written a prophetic paper in which he described his own irredeemable nature:
―We may well learn the lesson that one fall, even though it be met by perfect grace and full restoration, does not cure a natural disposition…‖ He seemed to know himself well even as a child. The mark of some genetic defect in his nature was apparent to Haigh even at a young age. He knew he was cursed, irredeemable and without hope even as a boy. This is often the case with psychopaths. Their damaged genetics, the result of generations of inbreeding, make them aware
of their own defective nature. The universe invokes its own form of quality control by programming their genetics to flip the homicide-suicide gene on. This happens whenever the genetic line becomes bottlenecked down to two Y-chromosomes and reaches a genetic dead end.
It all comes down to bad husbandry practices.
As a boy, Haigh had displayed a strong sensitivity to others, especially animals. He kept dogs and rabbits as substitutes for the friends he could not have. He sometimes gave his own food to neighbouring dogs. He claimed that he could not countenance the suffering of others, and later insisted that none of his victims had suffered.
Haigh was a victim of child abuse. He rarely misbehaved, but when he did, his mother struck the back of his hand with the bristles of a hairbrush. He later said that this treatment drew blood, which occasioned his craving for blood. Many believe he concocted this story to cultivate the image of insanity, but other vampiric individuals have reported similar incidents from their childhood.
Although he attended school, Haigh shunned contact with other children. He remained solitary throughout his childhood. He also became a pathological liar, a symptom of psychopathology. To avoid distressing his parents, he developed the habit of inventing what he knew they wanted to hear, another trait of psychopaths, who lack empathy but are able to feign it by learning to give people what they want to hear.
From age ten to sixteen, he began to participate in things that he had been taught were sinful. He developed the skill of leading a double life. He felt like he was getting away with something, and a psychiatrist would later determine that this had been the turning point for his fragile psychology and what allowed him to graduate from psychopath to sociopath. Haigh had also described how he would meditate on the image of the bleeding Christ from portraits in the Cathedral, claiming that this had inspired his bloodlust.
Haigh had a penchant for getting in trouble and soon found himself back in prison for petty crime. While in prison, Haigh vowed this would be the last time. He decided to go after rich
older women. He convinced himself that was where the big money was. He also mastered the use of sulphuric acid in the prison‘s tin shop. He experimented on mice, supplied to him by other prisoners, and made an extended study of the effects of acid on animal tissue. He discovered how
easy it was to dispose of a body with acid.
At a pub in Kensington, he chanced upon an old friend named McSwan. McSwan was happy to see him and took Haigh to see his parents. Having no idea what lay ahead, the family appeared delighted by the reunion. They told Haigh of their recent investments in property, which
provided a steady income. Haigh was already hatching a plan, as soon as he and McSwan were back in full swing.
One day, McSwan wrote a postcard for Haigh to young Barbara Stephens in Crawley, after which he was never seen again. In Haigh‘s diary, police found a cross etched in red crayon under the entry for September 9, the day likely chosen for McSwan‘s murder. Haigh claimed that he
had a sudden need for blood, so he had hit McSwan over the head with a blunt instrument and then slit his throat. He left the corpse there overnight to die while deciding how to dispose of it.

psco 9
Haigh returned to the basement two days later to see how the dissolution of the body was progressing. He looked into the drum to see a blackish porridge-like substance, smeared with red streaks. It smelled awful. Using a wooden rod, he stirred the acid stew to see if McSwan was
fully dissolved. It was more congealed than he had expected, but sufficiently liquid to pour down a large manhole drain, which is exactly what he did. To Haigh‘s chagrin, there were still lumps
of something at the bottom of the drum. He had to dig them out with a stick and force them down the drain. With mission accomplished, Haigh experienced a sense of euphoria. He had murdered someone and no one would ever be able to pin it on him. No one would ever find a body, no corpus delicti.
Haigh went to McSwan‘s parents and told them that their son had taken flight to avoid the draft. Since they already knew of his plans to skip town to avoid military service, it seemed plausible to them. Haigh even sent fake postcards to the McSwans from Scotland. He then made plans to acquire the rest of the McSwan‘s estate.
He then went on to murder both of the elder McSwans. Of course they too were seen to have disappeared. Haigh told the landlady they had emigrated to America. He had all of their mail forwarded to him, including McSwan‘s pension. He then disposed of all their property. He claimed he had to kill them both because the father‘s corpse did not produce enough blood to satisfy him. However, his control over their property and investments shows he had quite another motive. Under the alias William Donald McSwan, he forged the young man‘s signature on a Power of Attorney. He then forged a deed on a property owned by McSwan‘s mother and proceeded to appropriate it under another alias. He sold the properties for 1720 pounds. He also obtained securities, and from the sale of the estate gained more than 6,000 pounds. He was apparently so good at covering his tracks that their disappearance was never reported to police and was not even discovered until Haigh made his confession in 1949.
Within two years of McSwan murders, Haigh had spent all the money, so he looked around
for another target. He spotted an ad for a house on the market, which introduced him to Dr. Archibald Henderson and his wife, Rose Henderson. Haigh offered more for the house than they were asking, but could not come up with the money. Of course it was just a ruse. He had no intention of buying it. He was just looking for an angle. He continued to see the Hendersons and to develop a friendship based on their common passion for music. He encouraged them to talk about themselves and learned all that he could about their properties. He played the piano for them and performed many acts of kindness. Their association lasted five months, showing just how patient Haigh could be.
He resolved to drive Dr. Henderson to Crawley and shot him in the head with the man‘s own revolver. He left Henderson in the storeroom while he went to get a gas mask, which he had
taken from Henderson‘s place. He then returned to Mrs. Henderson, told her that her husband was ill, and drove her to her doom. She was vexed by the interruption and did not want to accompany him to the storehouse, but Haigh coerced her into doing so. She begrudgingly agreed to follow him into the building. Haigh then shot her as well and left both bodies there overnight. He claimed later to have drained them both of blood. He dissolved them in the acid baths just as he had done with the McSwans. Henderson‘s foot was still intact, but Haigh dumped the sludge along with the foot in one corner of the junk-filled yard, neglecting to properly dispose of the evidence. Apparently he felt immune to capture.
The following morning, the night porter at the hotel where the Henderson‘s were staying was asked to take their dog, an Irish setter, out for a walk. Haigh then went to the hotel, paid the bill, showed a letter of authority from Dr. Henderson, and left with their possessions. He sold the items but kept their dog with him in his hotel. He also acquired and sold the Henderson‘s house. Rather shockingly, he sold Barbara Stephens some of Mrs. Henderson‘s clothing. He even sold Mrs. Durand-Deacon, whom Haigh had met at the hotel, a handbag. He earned 8,000 pounds for his trouble. He even wrote to the Henderson‘s intimates, copying Rose‘s handwriting for a full fifteen pages to satisfy her sceptical brother, Arnold Burlin, who wanted to go to the police. Haigh told the brother that the Hendersons had decided to emigrate to South Africa. Burlin was worried, but seemed stumped over how to handle the affair. When he insisted again on going to the police, Haigh dissuaded him by claiming Archie would get into trouble for performing an illegal abortion. Burlin was sceptical, but was gradually convinced.
Haigh‘s romantic interest, Barbara Stephens, visited him in prison, expecting to find a disconsolate, falsely accused man. Instead, she saw a man who seemed to be revelling in the attention and who admitted to everything. When it occurred to her that he had killed all these people while they were together, she asked him why he had not killed her. He seemed genuinely horrified by the suggestion. He assured her that such an idea had never entered his mind. What disturbed her was that he had confessed his love for her the same week he had killed Mac. They had discussed marriage while he had plotted one of his killings, even selling Miss Stephens the deceased woman‘s dress. Barbara could not comprehend how she could have known so little about her intended. Despite her reticence, she wrote him letters throughout his prison term and visited him once a week. For his fortieth birthday, she sent him a good luck charm. She soon came to realize, however, that he would have killed her as well had it become necessary.
Justice was done when a member of the forensic‘s team detected something unusual, about the size of a cherry in the acid sludge. It turned out to be a gall bladder stone that had survived the acid. Also embedded in the sludge were some specimens of human bone, one of them from a left foot.
Inside the building, bloodstains were found on the wall. The wall was then scraped for analysis. The inspector thought the spray was consistent with someone getting shot while bent over the bench. Tests indicated that the blood was human, but could not be specifically grouped. For three days, the sludge from one of the vats of sulphuric acid was carefully sifted. This led to the discovery of:

  1. 28 pounds of human body fat
  2. three faceted gallstones
  3. part of a left foot, not quite eroded
  4. eighteen fragments of human bone
  5. intact upper and lower dentures
  6. the handle of a red plastic bag
  7. a lipstick container

Four psychiatrists examined him for the defence. Not one could show Haigh was not responsible for his actions. They were convinced Haigh had a ―paranoid constitution,‖ the same mental disease as Hitler. Such a condition was deemed to be partly hereditary and partly environmental, particularly upbringing. It is a preliminary stage to the ―paranoid insanities‖. Haigh, it was thought, had been sheltered in a fanatical and paranoid religion and raised by a mother who encouraged Haigh to believe in the prophetic nature of dreams. He lived in fear of the wrath of God and he was not allowed to have friends. He saw the solitary schoolboy as a paranoiac in the making. A youth raised in such a place was bound to escape into fantasy.
Haigh had been raised in an orthodox Christian setting and had then been plunged into an extreme form of prodigality, which was considered a sin within his primary religion. He was paranoiac and developed an early penchant for secrecy and the living of a double life. He had developed a private mystic life, which allowed him an escape from the cruel world, a symptom of schizophrenic and paranoid conditions.
As it happens, Haigh had obtained a lot of research on mental illness. He knew about the behavioural patterns, traits, and habits of various disorders. The subject fascinated him. Haigh was the ultimate trickster. In the past, he had posed as professionals such as a lawyer, an engineer, and doctor, so it would be easy for him to feign any type of mental illness.
It took only fifteen minutes for the jury to reach the consensus that Haigh was guilty. The judge asked if he had anything to say for himself. He cocked his head and said, ―Nothing at all‖. He finished his life story for the newspaper, which had paid for his trial. He also wrote letters to Barbara Stephens and to his parents. His elderly parents did not come to see him before he died, but his mother sent greetings through a reporter. He insisted that he was not afraid of being
hanged, showing that he was completely lacking in human emotion, as little concerned with his own fate as with someone else‘s. He was executed at Wandsworth Prison on August 6th, 1949.
He bequeathed his clothing to Madame Tussaud‘s Chamber of Horrors, where a wax figure of him was made. He sent instructions that it must always be kept in perfect condition, the trousers creased, the hair parted, his shirt cuffs showing. Among other murderers cast in wax, Haigh received his place in history. The narcissistic paranoiac‘s immortality now assured he must have felt his destiny had been fulfilled.20
Aristocrats tend to recognize others of their kind. It is presumably also possible for those with aberrant genetics to be able to recognize each other as well. How else could it be possible for two people of such profoundly evil natures as serial killers Myra Hindley and Ian Bradey or Paul Bernardo and Karla Homolka to find each other for that matter? Even Canadian serial killer Luka Rocco Magnotta is rumoured to have had involvement with Karla Homolka and to have possibly
been involved with her sexually.
Evil natures seem to possess a sibyl-like capacity to recognize each other. But an equally valid question must be posed concerning their motive for choosing the victims they do. Is the serial killer engaged in a form of natural selection? Is nature removing from the gene pool what it chooses not to accept? Serial killers always display the M.O. of leaving a calling card. They can‘t resist. They always leave a clue behind, a signature to let investigators know it is not Avon calling. Subconsciously they want to be caught. They can‘t help themselves. They give
20 Katherine Ramsland, ―John George Haigh, Evolution of a Serial Killer,‖ at Crime Library: Crime Minds and Methods,
themselves away by leaving clues behind. On the one hand, the self-preservation instinct creates the desire not to be caught and to evade capture, while on the other hand their subconscious impels them to give the game away so they can be caught. Is the subconscious desire to be caught an expression of their internal kill switch, the suicide gene that wishes to remove the genetically damaged individual from the gene pool?
Let‘s examine the Magnotta case briefly. First, the case broke in 2012 on the bicentenary of the War of 1812. The case has all the hallmarks of an MK-Ultra operation. I have lived on skid row. Do you know how hard it is to think about your next move when you do not have enough bread in the cupboard for your next meal? It‘s debilitating to be poor. It robs you of your self- confidence and self-esteem. You feel paralyzed. Porn actor or not, as soon as the story broke his prospects dried up. How could he afford all this travel, fashion apparel, costume changes, makeup, hair dye and identity changes, air travel under fake names and fake passports without a support network behind him? And because he‘s so villainous in his escapades, his activities have justified the pushing forward of measures to control the net.
The distribution of the body parts are a telling precursor to the breakup of Canada and its imminent annexation into the North American Union. It is particularly telling when the murder case evolved in 2012, the bicentenary year of the War of 1812. It is as if the CIA have orchestrated this psychological operation as a signal that America‘s ambition to achieve
―Manifest Destiny‖ is about to be realized. The torso found in a dumpster in Montreal, represented the discarded refuse of a dismantled Canada, while the torso and head were found in Quebec. The fact that the torso and head turned up in Quebec may have been intended to send the message that the seat of government for the North American Union would be in a newly independent Quebec. Hands and feet sent to the Tory and Liberal headquarters implied that the political parties were soon to be lame duck political entities, redundant and soon to be obsolete.
The hands and feet were sent to private schools in B.C. — St. George‘s no less. The slaying of the dragon, as in the Chinese dragon, and the victim being Chinese are also significant. The dismemberment of the Chinese national was a ritual performed in advance of the collapse and dismemberment of China into separate kingdoms — a well known prophecy. And you can expect to see rampant cannibalism in China as it disintegrates and falls into famine conditions. Famine- stricken North Koreans already exchange infant children with their neighbours so they don‘t
have to eat their own infant child. Hamatsu (cannibalism) was even practiced here in Canada by Natives, one of the reasons the Residential Schools came into being, in order to re-educate the Indians (an unpopular fact no one wants to discuss).
The Magnotta case is black ops, psy ops and ritual. He has a network behind him. He has been supported with a supply of travel documents, papers, and IDs with different aliases. The whole thing is a setup and it smells. He‘s connected to Homolka by insinuation and insinuation only. That is enough for ritual purposes. That‘s all they need. He‘s a Scarborough boy like Bernardo. He adopts disguises and bleaches his hair like Bernardo. The Toronto cops fail to respond to tips with Magnotta as with Bernardo. He adopts different aliases just like Bernardo. He even resembles Bernardo.
The satanic intelligence cults killed several birds with one stone in the case of Magnotta.
They began with a dehumanization campaign, bringing us down a peg or two on the evolutionary ladder by encouraging the sick cult of cannibalism. For instance, Alex Jones talked about Bilderberg members eating roasted foetal corpses plated in gold leaf. He used his trademark bullhorn to disabuse Bilderberg attendees about it outside one of their recent conferences.
The previous month police in Thailand arrested a British citizen after six roasted foetal corpses were found in his luggage. The bodies were believed to be between two and seven months old, according to the Guardian. Some were plated in gold leaf, apparently for use in black magic rituals.

psco 10

Image source: Reuters

Outside the annual Bilderberg meeting in Virginia on Thursday, Alex Jones of Infowars accused attendees of shipping in roasted foetal tissue to eat. A video posted online captured Jones shouting into a bullhorn outside the meeting place, claiming Bilderberg members ―ship in
roasted babies wrapped in gold foil for them to eat.‖ This was not Swiftian humour of ―A Modest
Proposal stripe on the part of Jones. To make it perfectly clear he wasn‘t kidding, he added,
―Every week they catch them shipping little babies wrapped in gold foil for these guys to eat. They admit that‘s where it goes to. I‘m not making this up.‖ If that wasn‘t enough of a show stopper for Bilderberg meeting attendees, Jones issued more accusations with his bullhorn:―Alright this is just a person going to pick somebody up, they‘re probably bringing him some child to rape or something in the trunk — no I‘m not kidding, these people are sick.‖ Too further antagonize the Bilderberg attendees, he added, ―You think I‘m talking about babies wrapped in gold foil for them to eat — I‘m not, I‘m not joking about that.‖ Jones then turned on a cop caught sneering at him, dropping the gauntlet on him and daring him to pick up the glove:
―This officer‘s laughing at me — $10,000 they try to ship in roasted babies wrapped in gold foil
for them to eat, $10,000 right now. You will lose, you will lose the bet!‖21
To add to this satanic cannibal madness, Koreans and Chinese are eating elixir restoratives in tablet form made from dead human foetal tissue. The Korea Customs Service said it had found almost 17,500 of the capsules being smuggled into the country from China since August 2011. The powdered flesh, which officials said came from dead babies and foetuses, is reportedly thought to cure disease and boost stamina, but officials said the capsules were full of bacteria and were a major health risk. ―It was confirmed those capsules contain materials harmful to the human body, such as super bacteria. We need to take tougher measures to protect public health,‖
a customs official was quoted as saying by the Korea Times.
21 Madeleine Morgenstern, ―Alex Jones Believes Bilderberg Attendees Ship in Gold-Covered Roasted Babies to Eat,‖ June 2, 2012,
Inspections were to be conducted with greater rigour on shipments of drugs arriving from northeast China, the Yonhap news agency reported. The Dong-a Ilbo newspaper said capsules were being dyed or switched into boxes of other drugs to disguise them. Some capsules were found in travellers‘ luggage and some in the post, according to customs officials.
Allegations that human flesh capsules were being trafficked from northeast China into South Korea emerged last year in a South Korean television documentary. At the time China‘s Health Ministry said it was investigating the claims raised by the programme.
Ministry spokesman Deng Haihua, quoted at the time in China Daily, said China had ―strict management of disposal of infant and foetal remains as well as placentas.‖ The face-saving denials by Chinese officials are typical and should be granted no credibility. Psychological denial hidden beneath the veil of Confucian ideals of saving face amounts to nothing but hypocrisy and endemic corruption, both of which China has in abundance. ―Any practice that handles the remains as medical waste is strictly prohibited,‖ the newspaper quoted Haihua as saying.22
The madness of Hannibal the Cannibal hardly compares with the suspicious attack of a Florida man who went on a rampage on bath salts, a purported LCD derivative and ate a man‘s face off, leaving him with one eye — the All-Seeing Horus eye perhaps? Is this more MK-Ultra-style psychological operations and black operations on the part of satanic intelligence agencies like the CIA? Is this more MK-Ultra ritual disguised as psychedelic psychosis?
Armando Aguilar is the president of Miami‘s Fraternal Order of Police. Miami‘s Fraternal Order of Police? What? Is this an order of police composed of the Fraternal Order of Freemasons? It would make sense that a mainstream press agency like ABC would interview a Mason on the subject, perhaps to contain the truth about the story by blaming it on drug psychosis. He speculated that Eugene‘s bizarre, violent behaviour may have been the result of taking a relatively new kind of drug called ―bath salts‖. The Miami Police Department would not officially comment on whether ―bath salts‖ might be involved in the case, but did confirm that
Eugene will undergo an autopsy.
According to Jeffrey Scott, a spokesman for the Federal Drug Enforcement Agency, so-called bath salts are a mix of chemicals sold as a synthetic alternative to stimulants like LSD, PCP, cocaine, and methamphetamine. They can be snorted, smoked, or broken down and injected.
Ohio emergency room attending physician Dr. Howard Mell spoke on the effects of ―bath salts‖. His description of the lethal side effects of the drug resembles the condition known as
―excited delirium‖. ―They come in and they‘re either psychotic, comatose or in cardiac arrest,‖ says Mell. ―Their body essentially goes into overdrive — their temperature and heart rate go through the roof, their blood can become acidic and their body cooks.‖
According to Louisiana Poison Center director Mark Ryan, ―bath salts‖ is just one of the names used to describe an ever-rotating series of chemical combinations, often including a synthetic amphetamine known as MDPV, which have been sold in gas stations, convenience stores and over the internet.
Ryan and the DEA spokesperson, Scott, both revealed to Crimesider that the chemicals in these products are believed to be imported mainly from China. Ryan says that many of the bottles are marked ―not for human consumption‖, but they‘re often sold next to energy drinks. According to a 2011 report published in the Annals of Emergency Medicine, bath salts first appeared in Germany in 2007. In 2010, the American Association of Poison Control Centers

22 ―S Korea ‗to target powdered human flesh capsules‘,‖ BBC News, May 7, 2012,
received as many as 304 calls about reactions to the drugs, and by the next year, that number had ballooned to more than 6,100.
―Most of the calls were coming from hospitals,‖ says Ryan. ―Patients were coming in, acting bizarre and needing to be restrained and saying they did ‗bath salts‘ and the doctor has no idea what the stuff is. Coke and meth have been around a long time, we know how to treat that.‖ Ryan implied that ―bath salts‖ was of an entirely different order.
Bath salts have been linked to tragic crimes, including the 2010 death of 21-year-old Dickie Sanders, a Louisiana man who slashed his own throat after ingesting the drug, then shot himself to death after the wound had been stitched up. In Washington State, the Seattle Weekly reported that toxicology reports found bath salts in the system of U.S. Army medic David Stewart, who allegedly killed his five-year-old son, his wife (who also had the drug in her system), and himself in April 2011.
After bath salt use started ―exploding‖ in 2010, Ryan says he sent samples of the substance to
the crime lab in Shreveport, where he is based. Some samples had MDPV, but some had other substances that Ryan says have caused permanent damage in some patients, including renal failure and tremors. ―These folks truly have no idea what they‘re getting,‖ says Ryan.
According to the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL), as of May 14, 38 states have instituted bans on bath salts (which they term ―substituted cathinones‖), but many levy no penalty for violating the ban. And according to the NCSL, ―minor changes to the chemical make- up of these substances can create new but very similar drugs not covered in the law.‖ The NCSL reports that at least 40 states have also banned synthetic cannabinoids, which are sold as alternatives to marijuana, but don‘t actually contain cannabis.
And now the federal government is getting on board. In September 2011, the DEA
―emergency scheduled‖ bath salts as a schedule one narcotic. The U.S. Senate also voted 96-1 for a Food and Drug Administration bill that includes an amendment that would classify
synthetic marijuana and some of the chemicals used to make bath salts as schedule one narcotics. The House of Representatives still has to pass a vote on the legislation.23
What all this cannibalism-inducing behaviour does is prepare and acculturate the world for the rampant cannibalism likely to unfold on several continents as people are forced to resort to the practice to survive because of massive famines and food shortages. In short, it looks like
―long pig‖ is back in season. It certainly looks like the Satanist psychopaths that control the planet are setting up the world for what has been dubbed a ―zombie apocalypse‖.
In these End Times, it seems that the consequences of generations of bad husbandry practices have come to a head. It has even been proven by recent genetic studies that have shown that aging father‘s have defective sperm and may be responsible for autism and schizophrenia in offspring. The Down syndrome link to so-called ―change of life‖ babies has been long known, but the link to aging fathers has only recently been confirmed in studies.
Older men are more likely to father children who develop autism or schizophrenia, because of random mutations that become more numerous in fathers of advancing age, scientists reported in

23 Julia Dahl, ―Bath salts, drug alleged ‗face-chewer‘ Rudy Eugene may have been on, plague police and doctors,‖ CBS News, May 30, 2012, police-and-doctors/.
the first study of its kind. The age of mothers had no bearing on risks related to these disorders, the study found.
Experts said that the findings were no reason to reject late fatherhood, though it might have some bearing on reproductive decisions. The overall risk to a man in his forties or older is in the range of two percent. But the study, published online in the journal Nature, provides support for the argument that escalating rates of autism diagnoses in recent decades may be attributable in part to the statistical spike in older fathers, which could account for as many as twenty to thirty percent of cases.
The findings also call into question the longstanding assumption that the mother‘s age is the most important causal factor in a child having developmental problems. The risk of chromosomal abnormalities, like Down syndrome, increases for older mothers, but when it comes to an array of psychiatric problems, the greatest genetic risks originate in the sperm, not the egg, the study found. An analysis published in April found that this risk was higher in men
aged thirty-five than twenty-five and crept up with age. The new report quantifies that risk, calculating how much it increases each year.
The research team found that the average child born to a twenty-year-old father had twenty- five random mutations that could be traced to the father‘s sperm. The number increased steadily by two mutations a year, reaching sixty-five mutations in the children of forty-year-old men. The average number of mutations coming from the mother‘s side was fifteen, no matter her age, the study found.
The study was led by the Icelandic firm Decode Genetics, who analyzed genetic material taken from blood samples of seventy-eight parent-child trios, focusing on families in which parents showed no signs of a mental disorder but who gave birth to children with autism or schizophrenia. This approach allows scientists to isolate mutations in the genes of the child that were not present in the parents.
Most people have many of these so-called de novo mutations, which occur near the time of conception, and most of them prove to be harmless. But studies suggest that there are several such changes that can sharply increase the risk for autism and possibly schizophrenia. The more
de novo mutations a child has, the greater the risk of them developing one of these rare, disabling conditions. Dr. Stefansson said it made sense that de novo mutations would play a significant
role in brain disorders. At least fifty percent of active genes play a role in neural development, so that random glitches have a strong chance of affecting the brain.
In the end, these kinds of mutations may account for twenty to thirty percent of cases of autism, and perhaps schizophrenia. The remainder is probably a result of genetic predisposition and environmental factors.
Dr. Stefansson and other experts said that an increase in the average age of fathers had most likely led to more cases of autism. Though a significant finding, this study by itself hardly
explains the overall increase in diagnoses, at least in the United States. The birthrate of fathers age 40 and older has increased by more than 30 percent since 1980, according to government figures, but the diagnosis rate for autism has jumped tenfold, to one in eighty-eight eight-year- olds. It is not clear whether the rate of schizophrenia diagnosis has increased in the same timeframe.
Alexey S. Kondrashov of the University of Michigan has made an interesting proposal for ensuring more responsible husbandry practices in families. In an editorial accompanying the
study, he recommended ―collecting the sperm of young adult men and cold-storing it for later use
could be a wise individual decision.‖24
In the 1930s, the pioneering geneticist J. B. S. Haldane noticed a peculiar inheritance pattern in families with long histories of haemophilia. The faulty mutation responsible for the blood- clotting disorder tended to arise on the X chromosomes that fathers passed to their daughters. The fault was with dad and not with the mitochondrial DNA of mom. Haldane hypothesized that children inherit more mutations from their fathers than their mothers, although he acknowledged it was unlikely ―this could be proved or disproved for many years to come‖.
The time when this can be proved has arrived. Whole-genome sequencing of dozens of Icelandic families has just provided the evidence to prove Haldane‘s hypothesis. Moreover, a study published in Nature finds that the age at which a father sires children determines how many mutations those offspring inherit. Starting families in their thirties, forties and beyond increases the likelihood of men siring children that will go on to develop autism, schizophrenia and other diseases often linked to new mutations. ―The older we are as fathers, the more likely we will pass on our mutations,‖ says lead author Kári Stefánsson, chief executive of deCODE Genetics in Reykjavik. ―The more mutations we pass on, the more likely that one of them is going to be deleterious.‖
The recent study has also confirmed that Haldane was correct about why fathers pass on more mutations. Sperm is continually being generated by dividing precursor cells, which acquire new mutations with each division. By contrast, women are born with their lifelong complement of
egg cells.25
In essence, it is all about bad husbandry practices. Take the family‘s garden plot. If you don‘t plant the seed at the right time in the spring, the seed won‘t germinate properly. The soil has to
be found sufficiently damp and moist. If the seed is planted too early or too late, it won‘t produce a crop. The garden will go to seed and there will be no harvest. And so it is the case with the planting of the seed in the woman‘s womb. The woman‘s field must be furrowed at the right
time. If the seed is planted too early or too late, the sperm will be defective and the egg will not be fertilized properly. There will be chromosomal abnormalities in the DNA of the child forming in the womb and the child will be born defective and mentally ill, very likely developing one of the array of depressive mental illnesses already discussed.
The hemophilia causal factor Haldane identified is noteworthy from a husbandry aspect. The fact that Haldane ―noticed a peculiar inheritance pattern in families with long histories of haemophilia‖ is the clear giveaway. These families had ―long histories of haemophilia‖. The fact that these families had long histories suggests that they might have been too inbred. How else could a family have a long history? Is it possible that they were families of money and standing who could afford to pay for the study?
Genetic inbreeding may have been the cause of the damaged chromosomal structure on the
paternal side. It has already been noted that children tend to inherit their father‘s bad husbandry practices through the father‘s corrupted sperm. Could it be that generations of inbreeding have resulted in chromosomal damage resulting in hemophilia and other disorders?
As ruthless as it sounds nature seems to have invoked its own system of quality control by programming the genes to flip the kill switch in a badly inbred genetic line. Haemophiliacs are
24 Benedict Carey, ―Father‘s Age Is Linked to Risk of Autism and Schizophrenia,‖ New York Times, August 22, 2012,
25 Ewen Callaway, ―Fathers bequeath more mutations as they age: Genome study may explain links between paternal age and conditions such as autism,‖ August 22, 2012,
usually born in aristocratic bloodline families. This suggests that the disorder may be nature‘s way of invoking quality control. When a genetic line experiences chromosomal damage, nature seems to flip the kill switch as a quality control measure to ensure defective products are removed from the product line. In short, family lines that are too inbred are defective and the offspring of such families tend to be born with diseases like haemophilia. The defective chromosome is its own kill switch, nature‘s quality control mechanism for removing the defective product from the product line, in order to prevent the human gene pool from being tainted.
It is likely that psychologies like schizophrenia and psychopathy are products of the same bad husbandry practices. The suicide gene and the homicide gene get switched on in either case programming the subconscious of the badly bred individual to remove themselves from the product line known as the human gene pool through violence. In the case of the psychopath who is the product of bad husbandry practices, he may be born with the function of the amygdala already impeded. An enlarged amygdala is known to be contributing factor in the violent behaviour exhibited by the psychopath. Their subconscious is affected by the amygdala and they are possessed by drives that cause them to kill. The paranoid schizophrenic who hallucinates and hears voices in his head, inciting him to kill may be possessed by similar drives. The so-called subconscious drives and impulses toward self-slaughter or homicide may be due to the subtle programming of the genetics to remove defective products from the product line as a quality control measure built into nature. If nature is that cruel, it is up to man to make it less so by engaging in more responsible husbandry practices. The human is after all part of nature. We
must therefore share in the responsibility of making nature more humane. We are a reflection of the world. It is no crueler than we are. If we wish for nature to be kinder to the human, the human must be kinder to nature.
It could be argued that the family that engages in bad husbandry practices exacts a curse upon itself. To reiterate the proverb of Jesus, ―The sins of the fathers shall visit upon the sons until the third and the fourth generation.‖ The House of Atreus seems to be an example of such a cursed family line. Why cursed? Is it from generations of inbreeding? Had the family bottlenecked its genetics through intermarriage with close family relations? The problem of people marrying their cousins through arranged marriages is an endemic problem in Eastern Europe, East Africa and Asia. Historically, it was impossible to trust the neighbouring village. Resources were scarce and the competition for them so intense that one could not trust visitors or guests from the neighbouring communities. It was thought they were at best interlopers and at worst foreign
spies engaged in reconnaissance and subterfuge or sabotage. Anyone daring to introduce a newcomer did so at enormous personal risk. They had to be right about the good character of the foreigner, for if they were wrong and the community was harmed, he who played host to the foreigner would lose his head if he were lucky or be buried up to his head in an anthill if he were less so.
Not that anything much has changed in five millennia. Foreign spies are rife and agents are as plentiful as the birds of the forest in every country of the world. However, in these End Times, which some refer to as the Iron Age or Age of Kali, one cannot even trust one‘s neighbour. It is therefore thought in most countries that one can best safeguard one‘s interests by keeping it in
the family. It is thought mistakenly that one can trust and rely on one‘s own more than the foreigner and outsider. Misguided as this assumption is it is the governing prudence that decides on marriage. It is called a marriage of convenience, but the outcome usually leads to profound inconvenience, a family feud all encompassing in its scope and Hamletesque in its fallout.
Jesus said quite rightly, ―Whosoever shall seek to save his life shall lose it; and whosoever shall lose his life shall preserve it.‖ Luke 17:33 It is our very instinct of self-preservation that leads to our demise. The very effort to safeguard the good of the family, the city, the province
and the homeland – as the Confucian model would have it – leaves societies vulnerable to the sin of inbreeding. Our genetics became bottlenecked and our DNA is whittled down to one or two
Y-chromosomes at best. As with any Narcissus complex, our self-admiring xenophobia and the conviction that our way is best is the quickest way to assuring one‘s downfall and demise. As Nietzsche so aptly explained, our genealogy of morals sprung from the simple-minded precept that our insularity is best safeguarded when, ―We will despise all who are not as we are‖. This idolatry of the self led to an ever receding feedback loop until the genes bottleneck themselves into a corner. Mental illness and psychopathology set in because of chromosomal damage. The suicide gene switches on because nature realizes the ancestral line has reached a genetic dead
end. Not even a cul-de-sac is an option now. The inbred insularity of the community has boxed it
in. Once the DNA damage sets in, it could take three or four generations to undo the genetic knot. As Jesus so aptly put it, ―The sins of the father shall visit upon the sons until the third and the fourth generations.‖ That is actually quite a scientific statement, for it has been shown that, once genetic damage occurs usually as the result of some wrongful lifestyle choice or sin like drugs or alcohol abuse, incest or inbreeding, it takes at least three or four generations to undo the harm. It is encoded in your DNA and in your phylogenic race memory. Memories are long and one‘s DNA is not apt to forget.
Take as our reference the dysfunctional Marmaledov family from Dostoyevsky‘s novel Crime and Punishment. The fact that Mr. Marmaledov should return home jobless and without any money each time his wife found him a new position is perfectly explained by bad husbandry within the family. The Marmaledovs are quite simply the Russian equivalent of the American families depicted in the film Deliverance. The fact that their neighbours should stand at the door gawking as Mrs. Marmaladov grabs her husband by the scalp and raps his head off the floor for coming home drunk is equally explainable in terms of bad husbandry.
The need to placate one‘s own insecurities and inferiority complex by revelling in the misfortune of others helps to assuage one‘s worries, cathartically purging oneself of pity and
self-loathing. Thank goodness we have tragedy or better still the horror genre to relieve us of the guilt we harbour over the genetic disorders spawned from bad husbandry. Now in these End Times, when we have so bottlenecked our genetics that many of our tribes are at a genetic dead end and are following each other off a cliff like lemmings, blind leading the blind, it is abundantly clear why this is happening.
Psychopathology due to genetic inbreeding is a feedback loop of devolution and destruction. The more inbred the tribe becomes the more inbred it is likely to become. The DNA strands become so short they are incapable of lateral thinking. They become increasingly close-minded until the thought of breeding with another tribe, or even talking to a foreigner or even an outsider from another neighbourhood, let alone another country, becomes a mental and physical impossibility. The suicide gene is switched on and the self-annihilation of the race begins. Race
is an apropos word, a kind of pun, since the race is on for the tribe to extinguish itself. The more the race seeks its self-preservation the faster it hastens its demise. The case of North Korea could not make the point more abundantly clear. Their extreme xenophobia is the product of an insularity programmed into their genes. The ―Hermit Kingdom‖ of North Korea wears it as a badge of honour. Their genetics are so badly compromised by inbreeding that they exhibit a paranoia complex toward the whole world. They have an inferiority-superiority complex that
makes them more insular, xenophobic and paranoid. The explanation for their anti-social behaviour can be found in their inbred genetics. The homicide and suicide genes are switched on and the entire populous is systematically removing itself from the gene pool. In these End Times, the genetic wheat is separating itself from the genetic chaff.
And that is what is happening now around the world in these End Times. It is not as if we weren‘t warned, ―And the brother shall deliver up the brother to death, and the father the child: and the children shall rise up against their parents, and cause them to be put to death.‖ Matthew
10:21 Many of our communities are so inbred and our genetics so bottlenecked that nature has flipped on the kill switch. The suicide and homicide genes have been switched on and intertribal warfare is rife. Taliban and al-Qaeda operatives are blowing up their own inhabitants and setting their own villages ablaze. Whether or not they are under the hire of some foreign government is irrelevant. There has to be a precursor to one becoming a traitor and betraying one‘s own. There has to be a catalyst. The only explanation is that the empathy and conscience are dead within
those individuals who can act without conscience or compunction against their own. It is self- loathing to the extreme that causes one to become a misanthrope and despise one‘s own kind. Only psychopathology that is the product of inbreeding and the activation of the suicide gene could cause people to turn upon their own brethren in this way and blow them up. How else can you explain so-called honour killings, where a Muslim father in Pakistan or the UK kills his own daughter for not minding her place by failing to obey the patriarch of the household? Had it ever occurred to him that she just doesn‘t want to marry her cousin? It‘s called self-preservation. His opposition to her marriage to a foreigner will only ensure that the family becomes more inbred, leading to even more aberrant behaviour within the family whose homicide and suicide genes have been switched on from bad husbandry practices.
Perhaps the mother who has just given birth and kills her entire brood does so not strictly due to post-natal depression, but because her suicide gene is switched on. Indeed, the post-natal depression may be a symptom of the suicide gene‘s activation. Nature knows when there is a
genetic dead end. All it takes is for the kill switch to be thrown and the mechanics of nature takes care of the rest. It may be an unpleasant thought to consider, but the very fact that people don‘t want to go there may be a product of psychological denial associated with their own inbreeding. They prefer not to upset the apple cart and have the fruit of their loins rolling around on the floor. They prefer to keep the family skeletons in the closet so no one finds out how inbred they really are. When this habit becomes ingrained, it turns into a generational affair until there is no disclosure. The skeleton stays in the closet and they remain in denial. In America, they call him Uncle Sam. They tend to blame everything on Uncle Sam. He is an apt scapegoat. No one knows who he is and no one knows what he looks like. They have never seen him. He stays in the closet and it is very unlikely he will ever come out to reveal who he is.
The Ancient Greek dramatists were the greatest psychoanalysts of all time. It is small wonder
that Sigmund Freud referred so much in his work to classical drama to expound on the psychology of the human mind. The Oedipus and Elektra complexes, for example, are taken
from Sophocle‘s Oedipus Tyrannus and Aeschylus‘ Orestia, which explores the depths of human psychopathology to a Scorpionic degree. Aeschylus‘ sagely sword of psychoanalysis and clinical dissection goes deeper than any dramatist in history. The curse of the House of Atreus is an expression of the curse that attends all inbred families that fall under the influence of the blight
of mental illness. It begins with psychological denial toward the fact that one is the product of inbreeding and incest. This is the first of many family skeletons to be hidden away in the closet. This denial leads to more denials until inbreeding and incest become a generational affair, the
sins of the fathers remaining hidden from the sons until the third and the fourth generations. And by then it is too late. The family genetics become bottlenecked and the family line comes to a genetic dead end. Biblical in its scope, brother will turn upon brother, son against father, until the family house ends in slaughter.
To illustrate the point, let us be tantalized by a tale. It all begins with Tantalus, king of Sipylos, one of the sons of Zeus. Indeed, the Olympians were probably already inbred by the time Tantalus was thought of. And it is precisely this that led to his psychopathic behaviour. Having suffered child abuse early in life, he yearned for satisfaction but could never satisfy the pleasure principle. Indeed, none of his appetites could be satisfied and left him always yearning
for more. His afflictions of the mind led to his eternal punishment in Hades, since he could never extricate himself mentally from the state of depravity he was relegated to. Nothing could satisfy him and he was forever tantalized by his desire for more. Such is the nature of the psychopath. Relegated to a bottomless pit of depravity by the early depravations of life, he can never gain
access to the pleasure principle. Instead, he incessantly yearned for more. When gaining power and control over one person failed to satisfy, he turned his wanderlust on others. Given enough time, he would transform himself into a sociopath, seeking power and control of a larger group
or number by poisoning the city‘s water or food supply while standing by to watch the slaughter. At some point, the lust for power and control might impel one to invent the ultimate weapon of death and destruction like Oppenheimer who was quoting from the Bhagavad Gita when he said,
―Now, I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds.‖
The House of Atreus was under the curse of Tantalus, the forebear of Atreus, Agamemnon and Menelaus. Atreus was the father of Agamemnon and Menelaus. It was Tantalus, who would be relegated to eternal punishment in Hades, where he was forced into a permanent state of implacable want. The River Styx remained out of reach beneath his chin, while the fruit he longed for remained above his head and beyond reach. This was an allegory for the inaccessibility of the pleasure principle, which remained beyond his grasp as is the case for all psychopaths.
The sins of the father of the House of Atreus would visit upon the sons for more than just three or four generations. It would pass down the family line through successive generations. By the End Times, they would be at each other‘s throats and systematically taking each other out. Nature recognizes when a family line has reached a genetic dead end. The suicide and homicide gene switch on and the family members systematically exterminate each other.
The family saga continued with Tantalus giving birth to a son called Pelops, whom Poseidon, the god of the sea, was most fond. Pelops, meanwhile, sought the hand of Hippodameia, daughter of King Oenomaus, in marriage. Oenomaus set up a contest, a chariot race in which all rivals of the king were invited to compete against him for his daughter‘s hand. The suitor who lost the contest would lose his life. A number of men had died in such a contest before Pelops took up
the challenge. It was only natural that Pelops should wish to marry Hippodameia since he was a blood relative and was conditioned by his own inbred psychopathology to have a narcissistic sense of self-adulation and a xenophobic dislike of anyone who was not of his kin. Inbred as he was, Pelops was a born psychopath, completely without scruple or moral compunction. He was a career opportunist and would do anything, including selling his soul to Osiris, the god of the underworld, to get what he wanted. But since he was never satisfied and no amount of fulfilled desires could content or please him, he was at a loss as to how he could possibly please himself since he could never be contented and always yearned for more.
In keeping with his psychopathic nature, Pelops bribed the king‘s charioteer, Myrtilus, to disable the king‘s chariot. Not only did he disable Oenomaus‘ chariot, but the wheels actually came off, throwing the king from the vehicle to his death. Pelops then carried off Hippodameia as his bride. Pelops then turned on his co-conspirator, Myrtilus, doing away with him by casting him into the sea. Before drowning, Myrtilus cursed Pelops and his entire family line. It is this proclamation of Myrtilus that is thought to be the origin of the famous curse on the House of Atreus. However, it is the psychopathic proclivities of Pelops that are the true cause. The curse was in the genes and the human family remained accursed due to poor husbandry practices and bad breeding. The ill-bred family is like an untended garden and poorly cultivated ground invariably goes to seed. A bad crop and a bad apple is invariably the product. Scrape the bottom of the barrel and you‘ll find one. If you fail to extricate it and leave it to rot, it is apt to spoil the whole barrel. The consequence of bad husbandry practices is the End Times, a time when the genetic wheat must be separated from the genetic chaff.
At first, the curse does not seem to affect the family, but as with all genetically inherited features, mental illness within a family is not always immediately apparent. Pelops had a number of children, the most important of whom were his two sons, Atreus and Thyestes. Atreus married Aerope, doubtless a cousin or close relation who would further bottleneck the genetics down to two Y-chromosomes or even one. They in turn had two inbred sons named Agamemnon and Menelaus, while Thyestes had two sons and a daughter named Pelopia. The name says it all, Pelopia. She was literally a chip off the old block, closely related to her grandfather Pelops through her mother who was impregnated by him, thus the namesake.
Atreus and Thyestes then fell into a quarrel. This is thought to be at the instigation of the god Hermes, father of Myrtilus, the charioteer killed by Pelops, but in reality the quarrel was spawned by their inbred psychopathic natures. Quality control tends to remove its own defective products from the product line. The kill switch known as the suicide-homicide gene switches on and the defective seed is removed from the product line to prevent the gene pool from being tainted. The Atreus family members were the genetic equivalent of dead men walking and were intent on removing themselves from the gene pool. Had the Darwin Award been available in those days it is likely they would have been favoured recipients, due to their concerted effort to remove themselves from the gene pool.
What precipitated the feud was the fact that Thyestes had an affair with Atreus‘ wife, Aerope, and was banished from Argos by Atreus. But what really caused the rift was Thyestes‘ inbred psychopathology, which is precisely what attracted him to his brother‘s wife in the first place. One of the characteristic signs of inbreeding is a desire to inbreed more. Once again, the aberrations of nature are driven by their own impulses to remove themselves from the gene pool. Once the genes are reduced to two Y-chromosomes, they become further bottlenecked till they are reduced to one. It is at this point that the inbred become infertile and find themselves unable to produce any offspring at all. The inbred psychopathology devolves into a feedback loop in which the psychopath gives himself away in the hope that he will be caught, punished and killed, thus disqualifying him from the human race altogether. The M.O. of the psychopath is to leave some clue to his aberrant nature in everything he does, including breeding practices and strange sexual preferences, in the hope that he will be hunted down, caught and killed. This is due to the activation of the kill switch or suicide-homicide gene, which nature has switched on in an effort to extricate the defective product from the product line.
Shameless and totally without scruple, just one of the many symptoms of his inbred psychopathology, Thyestes petitioned to be allowed to return, and Atreus, appearing to desire a
reconciliation, agreed to allow Thyestes to come back and prepared a huge banquet in honour of their reunion. Since they both suffered from the same mental illness, it is probable that Atreus was as shameless and lacking in scruple as his brother, since the exiling of his brother was motivated more by a desire to keep up appearances of moral decency than a genuine moral outrage at his brother‘s undignified behaviour.
Appearances deceive, however, since the Prodigal brother had not really been forgiven at all. Atreus would eventually show his true colours. Like a dormant volcano that cannot long conceal its true nature, he would eventually erupt and explode, sending volcanic ash, lava and hot gas raining down upon enemies and innocents alike. Repressed desire eventually comes out in the form of bile, malice and ill will. Atreus requested that Thyestes send his sons ahead to assist in the preparation of the meal. Accordingly, the two sons were sent on ahead to help out in the kitchen.
At the banquet, Atreus provided a bountiful feast. Thyestes ate with relish, sampling the various dishes, which he was told consisted of various parts of the same animal. It was only at the end of the meal that he learned of the true nature of the evening‘s victuals. It was at this juncture that Thyestes learned that the dishes consisted of the flesh of his two slaughtered sons. This horrific event is the origin of the term Thyestean Banquet.
Overcome with horror, Thyestes cursed the House of Atreus and left Argos with his one remaining child, his daughter Pelopia. Since Pelopia was the product of inbreeding, it was only natural that she should breed with her grandfather Pelops. She was sure to fit right in despite the family feud and the estrangement of the brothers.
The psychopathic intrigues undertaken between the brothers only grew more rapacious. At one point, Thyestes actually took it upon himself to raise one of Atreus‘ sons, Pleisthenes by name. Of course no good could ever come from the actions of an inbred psychopath. No wholesome motive could possibly be found in such a seemingly selfless act as offering to raise
one‘s estranged brother‘s son. Thyestes‘ true intention was to program Pleisthenes to kill Atreus, in an attempt to usurp the crown from his brother and make himself king. Welcoming what Atreus thought to be his brother‘s son into his court, he actually killed Pleisthenes, not realizing he had been honoured with a visit from his long lost son. This latest tragic sin committed by the psychopathic brothers only exacerbated their quarrel.
Unbeknownst to Thyestes, he actually had one small infant son who survived the banquet, Aegisthus. Naturally, Aegisthus was the product of Thyestes‘ incestuous relationship with his daughter Pelopia. He eloped with her following the murder of the two older sons. Aegisthus was conceived by his psychopathic father to be the avenger of the infamous banquet, in which his father was served his eldest sons for the evening‘s repast.
This is the type of gore that descends upon a genetically inbred family caught in the middle of a family feud. Once the genes are reduced to two Y-chromosomes, there is no going back. Just as
the writing is on the wall, so it is written in the genes. The building blocks of the DNA, ACGT, get all out of whack. The letters get misplaced, misspelled and misaligned till entire strands of DNA go missing. The DNA became compromised and so began the fall of man. The grammar lexicon of the original word was lost, the mantra was forgotten, and the magic word of God that made all the puzzle pieces fit snugly into place got misplaced till everything fell apart at the seams. Bad husbandry practices set in and the field of woman went fallow or fell into neglect. Had we obeyed the strictures of the Vedas and the early books on human and animal husbandry we would have separated the castes and not rebelled against the well founded edicts of our forefathers, but we wouldn‘t listen and the End Times were the consequence. You reap what you
sow and what we have sown is the seeds of our own destruction. Were it not so, we would not be faced with the End Times. The genetic bottleneck has ensured most of our species has come to a dead end. The signpost is clear, the End Times the destination.
To resume the family sage, Agamemnon and Menelaus, the two sons of Atreus, married Clytaemnestra and Helen respectively, two twin sisters, though not identical. Clytaemnestra had a human father, whereas Helen was a daughter of Zeus. Helen was so famous for her beauty that a number of men sought her hand in marriage. The suitors all agreed that they would act to support the man she would eventually marry. It is claimed that Clytaemnestra was prone to fits of hysteria and would often imagine the worst. Given the incestuous inbreeding taking place within her class, her bottlenecked genetics would have led to damage setting in within chromosome 22, leaving her a basket case suffering from paranoid schizophrenia. Agamemnon and Clytaemnestra had three children, Iphigeneia, Orestes, and Electra.
When Helen, who was Menelaus‘ wife, ran off to Troy with Paris, Agamemnon and Menelaus
organized and led the Greek forces against the Trojans. The army assembled at Aulis, but the fleet could not sail because of contrary winds sent by Artemis. Agamemnon sacrificed his daughter Iphigeneia in order to placate Artemis. There is only one type of father who could sacrifice his own child to win the favour of a temperamental god, one that is the product of bad breeding, in short an inbred psychopath. Being possessed of like madness is the only explanation for what could have prompted Abraham to sacrifice his own son. Naturally, it was at the prompting of the devil himself that he would attempt to do so dastardly a deed. However, the modern psychiatrist might see it as the promptings of a schizophrenic delusion rather than a devil tempting fate. Fortunately, the light of clear reason seems to have dawned at the right moment and Abraham spared the sword. However, having suffered through the trauma of being placed on the altar beneath his father‘s sword, Isaac may have had one or two chips on his shoulder. The incestuously inbred often make such dramatic and ill-conceived leaps of aberrant logic, leaving their reasoning processes rather wanting. Agamemnon is no exception. His act of sacrificing Iphigeneia to placate a distempered god named Artemis is no less aberrant than the logic that guides a Muslim fundamentalist to undertake a so-called ―honour killing‖ that leaves him wholly and entirely dishonoured, and the good name of more sensible and less inbred adherents of the faith so damaged.
With Agamemnon and Menelaus off in Troy, Aegisthus, the son of Thyestes, returned to Argos, where he became the lover of Clytaemnestra, Agamemnon‘s wife. Yet one more example of the psychopathic inbred preferring to keep it in the family. The incestuous lovers would then send Orestes into exile, to live with an ally, Strophius in Phocis, while humiliating his sister, Electra, by treating her as a servant and marrying her off to a common farmer. When Agamemnon returned, the two conspirators successfully assassinated him and assumed the royal
throne of Argos. It is comforting to know that the people are ruled by such stable families we can look up to as role models and exemplars. It is even more comforting to realize that the same psychopathology that caused them to have their romantic incestuous trysts is the very same ill- reason that prompted them to mistreat their own family members by murdering them or sending them into exile. What a comfort to know that the same villainy and mistreatment befalling their families should be accorded to the national family in time, in keeping with the tradition of an inbred psychopath taking care of his own.
Orestes later returned from exile, and through the collaboration of his sister, Electra, would avenge the crimes committed against his father by killing Clytaemnestra and Aegisthus. In the play Electra, this act threw him in to so great a fit of distemper that he fell into a state of
temporary insanity. In truth, he was already deranged and was far from temporary, since his own inbred genetics led him to commit heinous acts of villainy. Orestes then underwent ritual purification by Apollo and sought refuge in the temple of Athena, the ancient world‘s answer to psychotherapy. He was then tried and acquitted.
It was this last action on the part of Orestes that is supposed to have put an end to the curse on the House of Atreus, but not so. Should anyone wish to relegate the House of Atrues story to myth, and in keeping with psychological denial, dismiss such legends as the products of the poet‘s overactive imagination, you might consider the story of King Astyages, the grandfather of Cyrus. History tells that he dreamed his grandson Cyrus would overthrow him, so he dispatched his henchman Harpagus to kill the child. Finding himself unable to raise his hand against a child, Harpagus handed the child over to a herdsmen instead. When the king later discovered that
Cyrus had escaped death, he took revenge on Harpagus. He invited him along to a feast, insisting he send his thirteen-year-old boy on ahead to help prepare the meal. Harpagus purportedly
gorged himself at the feast, relishing an occasion normally reserved for members of the noble caste. When the king asked his servant if he had enjoyed the meal, Harpagus confirmed that he had. Servants then placed a covered bowl in front of him, as if in offer of a fresh course. When Harpagus removed the cover, he discovered the head and limbs of his son. According to the historian Herodotus, Harpagus managed to maintain his composure. When asked by the king what beast‘s flesh he dined on, Harpagus replied that he knew very well and that whatever the king did was perfectly acceptable to him. Harpagus went on to engineer Cyrus‘s victory over his grandfather. It is remarkable how the more the psychopath tries to avoid his fate, the deeper he digs his grave. While the self-preservation drive impels the psychopath to save his life, the suicide and homicide genes ensure his demise. The self-preservation drive is hopelessly intertwined with the suicide gene, the cause of the psychopath‘s undoing. The story seems apocryphal, especially with its strong Oedipal undercurrents, but Cyrus actually did overthrow
his grandfather through the aid of Harpargus. Dispatched to repel Cyrus‘s army, Harpargus became a turncoat and joined the invading force as rightly he might. The story is most probably true, though perhaps slightly exaggerated, which only goes to highlight the barbarity of man‘s inhumanity to man, especially when aristocratic inbreeding leads to the emergence of the psychopathic personality. Power may corrupt, but when combined with inbred psychopathology, it corrupts absolutely.
To take the argument further, Roderick and his sister Lady Madeline were the last of the ancient race of Ushers. This was the end of the family line. Roderick Usher had been haunted by dark portents of the future, which had ushered forth the very fears he had entertained with the hurriedness of a racing clock. Roderick Usher and sister Lady Madeline had lived at the mercy of a malady of mind that had attended on all the members of the last generation of their race. The ancestral line known as the Ushers, the product of generations of inbreeding, had reached its
nexus and end point. Torn apart by the ravages of damaged genetics, they were a family afflicted, tearing into one another‘s beings with the rabid cruelty of the House of Atreus. The musical box would no longer sing its dirges anymore than the guitar of Roderick Usher. The musical box and the memories and photographs it contained were of no more relevance. If the music played and no one heard it, had it ever really played? Is there any phenomenological or epistemological evidence to suggest that the music is actually playing? Were any of its purported dirges actually real?
As with the relationship between Roderick and Madeline Usher may well have been incestuous, since Poe was no stranger to incestuous marriages himself, since he himself had
married his first cousin. Lady Madeline‘s catalepsy displays the signature of chromosome 22 damage, a hallmark of schizophrenia. She had catatonic schizophrenia, character of which prevented her in the last stages from showing any activity or signs of life. Roderick‘s own end appeared to have been hastened by that of his soul mate and twin. Sympathies of an unimaginable nature had always existed between them.
Lady Madeline had fallen into a cataleptic state and was mistakenly interred by her brother who thought her dead. It is a fitting ironic reversal for a tragedy Greek in its scope. Unfortunately, it would come to the same end. Lady Madeline would claw her way out of her tomb, bloody and bruised from the struggle against fate, only to throw herself in psychopathic rage upon her twin for wrongfully interring her. The twins would then die, the ruined House of Usher symbolic of the ruination of their race, the end of the family line known as the House of Usher.
This is the end that comes to all inbred ancestral lines, the Ushers calling on their funeral ushers. The inbred madness of Lady Madeline and Roderick Usher would be their undoing, their bottlenecked genetics from generations of inbreeding leading them down the narrow corridor of the House of Usher to their doom. Since Edgar Allen Poe, the author of ―The Fall of the House
of Usher,‖ had married his cousin, is it possible he know more about the perils of genetic inbreeding than he let on? Were Lady Madeline and Roderick Usher symbolic representation of Poe and his wife?
The ruined House of Usher was nothing but a metaphor for their doomed family line, the metaphoric collapse of the old mansion nothing but an allegory for the destruction of their inbred ancestral bloodline. In the end, brother would turn upon sister, wrongfully interring her before
her time, and sister would avenge the act in a homicidal rage. All this because the kill switch had been turned on, the homicide and suicide genes activated. Recognizing brother and sister as a genetic dead end, nature would intervene by a process of natural selection to remove them both
from the gene pool. It is tragic of course and inhumanly cruel, but the sins of the fathers will visit upon the sons for more than just three or four generations. It may take three or four thousand generations but the End Times will have its will in the end.



―Around one in 100 children in the UK could be a psychopath, research suggests,‖ The
Telegraph, Aug 31, 2012,

Benedict Carey, ―Father‘s Age Is Linked to Risk of Autism and Schizophrenia,‖ New York Times, August 22, 2012, risk-of-autism-and-schizophrenia.html?_r=0&pagewanted=print.

Ewen Callaway, ―Fathers bequeath more mutations as they age: Genome study may explain links between paternal age and conditions such as autism,‖ August 22, 2012,
Cornell University. ―Psychopathic killers: Computerized text analysis uncovers the word patterns
of a predator.‖ ScienceDaily, 15 Oct. 2011. Web. 10 Sep. 2012.

Dahl, Julia. ―Bath salts, drug alleged ‗face-chewer‘ Rudy Eugene may have been on, plague police and doctors,‖ CBS News, May 30, 2012,
57443712-504083/bath-salts-drug-alleged-face-chewer-rudy-eugene-may-have-been-on-plague- police-and-doctors/.

Eagleman, David. The Brain on Trail, The Atlantic, July/Aug, 2011. Liminality,
Madeleine Morgenstern, ―Alex Jones Believes Bilderberg Attendees Ship in Gold-Covered Roasted Babies to Eat,‖ June 2, 2012, bilderberg-attendees-ship-in-gold-covered-roasted-babies-to-eat/.

Nietzsche, Friedrich. ―The Wanderer‖ in Thus Spake Zarathustra, Trans. Thomas Common. 1891.

Ramsland, Katherine. ―John George Haigh, Evolution of a Serial Killer,‖ at Crime Library: Crime Minds and Methods,

―Sanpaku Eyes: The Ill(uminati) Eyes,‖ from, posted at Red Ice Creations

―Similarities between Obama and Hitler: A Factual Comparison,‖ at Now the End Begins,

―S Korea ‗to target powdered human flesh capsules‘,‖ BBC News, May 7, 2012,

―The Message of the Georgia Guidestones,‖

Vanderbilt University. ―Psychopaths‘ brains wired to seek rewards, no matter the consequences.‖
ScienceDaily, 15 Mar. 2010. Web. 10 Sep. 2012.